Correlation between physician- and patient-directed disease assessments in ulcerative colitis patients from Saudi Arabia and Kuwait: Data from ICONIC.

Background: The aim of the observational, prospective study was to validate a novel, nonverbal assessment tool for perceived disease burden-Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self-Measure (PRISM)-in ulcerative colitis (UC) against established patient health questionnaires. The cumulative burden of patients recently diagnosed (<3 years) with UC was also evaluated. Methods: "ICONIC" - Understanding the impact of ulcerative colitis and its associated disease burden on patients - was a noninterventional, multicountry, multicenter study performed in a 2-year follow-up format in adult patients with recently diagnosed UC in 33 countries, regardless of disease severity or treatment. Data collection consisted of five visits, scheduled at approximately 6-month intervals. For the current analysis, patient data from Saudi Arabia and Kuwait were evaluated. The collected data comprised demographics, disease-related data, UC treatment, and healthcare resources, as well as physician- and patient-assessed quality-of-life and disease burden questionnaires. Correlations between selected questionnaire scores were performed using Spearman's rho. Results: Disease severity at baseline and throughout the study was slightly less favorable in this country analysis compared with the global study cohort. Disease burden was assessed by PRISM and improved within 24 months. Conclusions: The detected moderate correlation between PRISM and other assessment methods supports the validity of PRISM. Differences in perceptions of UC-related burden between physician and patient may reflect to some degree insufficient patient-physician communication.

Incidence of suboptimal response to tumor necrosis factor antagonist therapy in inflammatory bowel disease in newly industrialised countries: The EXPLORE study.

BACKGROUND: Incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing in newly industrialised countries (NICs); however, data on suboptimal response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents are limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess incidence and indicators of suboptimal response to first anti-TNF therapy in IBD patients in NICs. METHODS: A chart review was conducted in ten countries from Asia-Pacific (APAC), Latin America (LatAm), and Russia and the Middle East (RME) regions among patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD), initiating anti-TNF therapy in 2010-2015. The cumulative incidence of suboptimal response to anti-TNF therapy was assessed using the following indicators: dose escalation or discontinuation, augmentation with non-biologic therapy, IBD-related hospitalization, or surgery. RESULTS: The study included 1,674 patients (570 UC; 1,104 CD). At 24 months, 32.9% of UC (APAC: 45.1%; LatAm: 38.2%; RME: 23.8%) and 41.2% of CD patients (APAC: 54.1%; LatAm: 42.5%; RME: 29.5%) had experienced suboptimal response. The most frequent first indicator was non-biologic therapy augmentation in LatAm (41.7%), IBD-related hospitalization in RME (UC: 50.7%; CD:37.3%) and in APAC for CD (39.1%), and anti-TNF discontinuation in APAC for UC (38.3%). CONCLUSION: Suboptimal response to anti-TNF agents is common in IBD patients in NICs. Observed regional differences in the incidence and indicators may reflect local practice and anti-TNF restrictions in IBD management. NCT REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03090139.

A Saudi Gastroenterology association position statement on the use of tumor necrosis factor-alfa antagonists for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

The objective of this position statement from the Saudi Gastroenterology Association is to guide gastroenterologists on the use of tumor necrosis factor-alfa (TNF-α) antagonists for the treatment of the idiopathic inflammatory bowel diseases, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis. In this article, we summarize the relevant literature regarding the safety and efficacy of TNF-α antagonists, highlight relevant safety concerns specific to the environment in Saudi Arabia, and provide specific recommendations for the use of these agents.