Investigating physicians' views on non-formulary prescribing: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.

BACKGROUND: Well-designed and well-maintained drug formularies serve as a reliable resource to guide prescribing decisions; they are associated with improved medicine safety and increased efficiency, while also serving as a cost-effective tool to help manage and predict medicine expenditure. Multiple studies have investigated the inappropriate prescribing of non-formulary drugs (NFDs) with statistics indicating that up to 70% of NFD usage being inappropriate or not following the ascribed NFD policies. AIM: To explore physicians' views and influences on their prescribing of non-formulary drugs. METHOD: Data collection and analysis were underpinned using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted within Hamad Medical Corporation, the main provider of secondary and tertiary healthcare in Qatar, with physicians who had submitted a NFD request in the preceding 12 months. RESULTS: Three overarching themes were identified: providing evidence-based care for individual patients; influences of others; and formulary management issues. Subthemes were mapped to specific TDF domains: environmental context and resources; social influences; professional role and identity; beliefs about consequences; goals; intentions. CONCLUSION: The behavioral influences identified in this study can be mapped to behavior change strategies facilitating the development of an intervention to promote appropriate prescribing of NFDs with implications for medicine safety and healthcare efficiency.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ibuprofen Versus Indomethacin or Paracetamol for the Treatment of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Neonates.

This was a first-time evaluation that sought to analyze the cost-effectiveness of oral paracetamol and intravenous (IV) indomethacin as alternatives to ibuprofen for PDA in neonates. Decision-analytic, literature-based, economic simulation models were constructed, to follow up the use and consequences of oral/IV ibuprofen versus IV indomethacin, and oral/IV ibuprofen versus oral paracetamol, as first-line therapies for PDA closure. Model outcomes of interest were "success", defined as PDA closure with/without adverse events, or "failure" due to no response to the first course of treatment, death or premature discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events. Oral ibuprofen is dominant/cost-effective over IV indomethacin in 97.9% of simulated cases, but oral paracetamol was 75.2% dominant/cost-effective over oral ibuprofen. Against IV ibuprofen, IV indomethacin was 55.3% dominant/cost-effective, whereas oral paracetamol was dominant/cost-effective in 98.5% of the cases. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the study results. For PDA closure, while IV indomethacin was cost-effective against IV ibuprofen, oral paracetamol was cost-effective against both oral and IV ibuprofen.

A scoping review of theories used to investigate clinician adherence to clinical practice guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Routine utilization of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is an effective strategy to optimize patient care and reduce practice variation. Healthcare professionals' failure to adhere to CPGs introduces risks to both patients and the sustainability of healthcare systems. The integration of theory to investigate adherence provides greater insight into the often complex reasons for suboptimal behaviors. AIM: To determine the coverage of literature surrounding the use of theory in studies of CPG adherence, report the key findings and identify the knowledge gaps. METHOD: In April 2021, three bibliographic databases were searched for studies published since January 2010, adopting theory to investigate health professionals' adherence to CPGs. Two reviewers independently screened the articles for eligibility and charted the data. A narrative approach to synthesis was employed. RESULTS: The review includes 12 articles. Studies were limited to primarily investigations of physicians, quantitative designs, single disease states and few countries. The use of behavioral theories facilitated pooling of data of barriers and facilitators of adherence. The domains and constructs of a number of the reported theories are captured within the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF); the most common barriers aligned with the TDF domain of environmental context and resources, fewer studies reported facilitators. CONCLUSION: There is emerging use of behavioral theories investigating physicians' adherence to CPGs. Although limited in number, these studies present specific insight into common barriers and facilitators, thus providing valuable evidence for refining existing and future implementation strategies. Similar investigations of other health professionals are warranted.

A systematic review on the impact of pharmacist-provided services on patients' health outcomes in Arab countries.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The pharmacist's role has evolved dramatically over the last few decades and shows considerable impact globally. The aim of this systematic review was to describe the nature and extent of studies evaluating the impact of pharmacist-provided services on clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes in different healthcare settings across the Arab world. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using the following databases from their inception until June 2020: Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, ScienceDirect and Scopus. Reporting was done according to PRISMA guidelines, and the quality assessment utilized the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Thirty-five eligible studies were included in this review, the majority of which were randomized controlled trials (RCT) (n = 26) conducted in hospital settings (n = 26). Most of the studies involved patients with specific medical conditions (n = 29) and pharmacist's interventions involved mainly medication therapy management (n = 32), counselling and education (n = 29), and medication therapy recommendations (n = 12). Several studies showed a positive impact (i.e., a statistically and/or clinically significant difference in favour of pharmacist-provided care or intervention) of pharmacist-provided services on clinical (n = 28), humanistic (n = 6) and economic (n = 5) outcomes. Conversely, five studies showed neutral or mixed effect of pharmacist interventions on clinical and humanistic outcomes. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The findings of this systematic review demonstrate a positive impact of pharmacist-provided services on clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes across diverse settings in the Arab world. Most of the included studies evaluated clinical outcomes and were from hospital setting. Directed approaches are needed to advance pharmacy practice across various healthcare settings in the Arab world.

Determination of potential drug-drug interactions in prescription orders dispensed in a community pharmacy setting using Micromedex® and Lexicomp®: a retrospective observational study.

Background Community pharmacists have a role in identifying drug-drug interactions (DDIs) when processing prescription orders and dispensing medications to patients. The harmful effects of DDIs can be prevented or minimized by using an electronic DDI checker to screen for potential DDIs (pDDIs). However, different DDI checkers have variable rates of detecting pDDIs. Aim To estimate the prevalence of pDDIs in prescriptions dispensed in a community pharmacy setting using two electronic DDI databases and to evaluate the association between the pDDIs and contributory factors. Method Eligible prescription orders dispensed by a community pharmacy chain in Qatar from January to July 2020 were included in this retrospective observational study. For each prescription, Micromedex® and Lexicomp® were simultaneously used to identify pDDIs, and the interactions categorized based on severity and risk rating. Results Seven hundred-twenty prescriptions met the inclusion criteria, of which Micromedex® and Lexicomp® respectively identified 125 prescriptions (17.4%) and 230 prescriptions (31.9%) as having at least one pDDI. Moderate strength of agreement was found between Lexicomp® and Micromedex® in identifying pDDIs (Cohen's Kappa = 0.546). Micromedex® classified 61.6% of DDIs as major severity, while Lexicomp® classified 30.8% as major severity. The number of concurrent medications per prescription was significantly and positively associated with pDDI. Conclusion This study demonstrates a high prevalence of pDDIs among prescriptions dispensed in a community pharmacy setting. It is advisable that community pharmacists in Qatar, who typically do not have access to computerized patient profiles, use these DDI checkers to ensure all pDDIs are communicated to respective prescribers for appropriate action.

Use of ibuprofen for the closure of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a systematic review of meta-analyses.

Aim: To systematically review ibuprofen, including versus indomethacin and paracetamol/acetaminophen, for the closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Methods: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and gray literature were searched to summarize ibuprofen outcomes in closure of PDA in published meta-analyses (MAs). Results: Seven MAs were included. Including high dose (HD) use, ibuprofen is equivalent/superior to indomethacin, and inferior/equivalent to paracetamol. Oral ibuprofen had higher efficacy than IV ibuprofen, including compared with indomethacin and paracetamol. Ibuprofen had safety advantages over indomethacin. Indomethacin and paracetamol had safety advantages over IV ibuprofen. HD of ibuprofen increases efficacy, but not toxicity. Conclusion: Evidence on ibuprofen effectiveness and safety, including the dosage forms, is limited by heterogeneity in doses and the levels of methods quality and risk of bias.

Cost-effectiveness of Oral Versus Intravenous Ibuprofen Therapy in Preterm Infants With Patent Ductus Arteriosus in the Neonatal Intensive Care Setting: A Cohort-based Study.

PURPOSE: Use of ibuprofen for the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) has become increasingly common. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of oral ibuprofen versus intravenous ibuprofen for PDA among preterm infants. METHODS: This retrospective, cohort-based pilot study examined the clinical and economic associations of oral versus intravenous ibuprofen for PDA. A decision-analytic model was constructed, from the hospital perspective, to follow the oral versus intravenous administrations of ibuprofen for PDA and their clinical and economic consequences. The course regimen of either formulation was an initial 10 mg/kg followed by 5 mg/kg at 24- and 48-h intervals. Clinical and resource utilization data were extracted from Cerner medical database, from 2014 through 2018, at the tertiary neonatal intensive care unit setting in Qatar. The primary outcome measures were the rate of successful closure based on the ductal diameter measure after the first course of treatment and the overall direct medical cost of PDA management. A population of 118 neonates was required for results with 80% power and 0.05 significance. Sensitivity analyses involving unit costs and a subgroup analysis based on gestational age and birth weight, added to a second-order probabilistic analysis of all model inputs, were performed. FINDINGS: Forty infants were available for inclusion in the oral ibuprofen study group, not achieving the desired sample size, with successful PDA closure reported in 64% of cases compared with a reduced success of 36% with intravenous ibuprofen (n = 59) (risk ratio = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.97; P = 0.04), which was associated with economic advantage to oral ibuprofen. The probabilistic analysis illustrated that oral ibuprofen costs less than intravenous ibuprofen in 72% of patient cases, with QAR 48,751 (US $13,356) (95% CI, QAR 47,500-50,000, US $13,014-$13,699) in mean savings. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of study conclusions and found that the rate of closure success versus failure was the most influential on results, followed by the occurrence of adverse drug events with both intravenous and oral ibuprofen. Although both ibuprofen formulations had similar safety profiles (P = 0.16), the intravenous formulation was associated with a larger number of adverse drug effects. IMPLICATIONS: This is the first cost-effectiveness evaluation of oral versus intravenous formulations of ibuprofen among infants with PDA. The oral ibuprofen might be associated with an enhanced ductal closure at a considerably lower cost. The study results support recent trends in neonatal intensive care unit practices in favor of the oral administration of ibuprofen.

Caffeine for the Treatment of Apnea in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Overview of Meta-Analyses.

BACKGROUND: Caffeine is a common treatment for neonatal intensive care management of the developmental complication of apnea of prematurity in preterm infants. There are several systematic reviews (SRs) on the performance of caffeine in the treatment of apnea. The evidence provided by those, however, is depressed by an information overload due to high heterogeneity in the characteristics as well as the quality of these SRs. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to provide a systematic overview of SRs on the use of caffeine for the management of neonatal apnea. Such overviews are a recent method used to assess and filter top evidence among SRs, enabling enhanced access to targeted information of interest. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted via EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), and PubMed since inception to January 2020. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection and data extraction, and assessed the quality of methods and the risk of bias in included SRs based on A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2) and Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) tools. Extracted data related to study type, characteristics, patients, intervention, comparator, regimen, and outcome measures. RESULTS: Seven SRs with meta-analyses (SRMAs) were included in the current overview, involving a total of 63,315 neonates. SRMAs included randomized clinical and observational studies, with various types of patients, comparators, and outcomes. The quality of SRMAs ranged from critically low (n = 1), low (n = 1), moderate (n = 2), to high (n = 3), and the risk of bias was unclear (n = 2), low (n = 4), and high (n = 1). The effectiveness of caffeine with regard to treatment success and the rate of apnea was not significantly different from that of theophylline or doxapram in two SRMAs. Against control, in one SRMA, while caffeine reduced the rate of failure as well as the need for pressure ventilation, it did not significantly reduce mortality. This comparative effectiveness of caffeine was based on high-quality SRMAs with a low risk of bias. The effectiveness against apnea seems to be enhanced via the administration of early (0-2 days) or high doses of caffeine in one and three SRMAs, respectively. This, nevertheless, was based on lower-quality SRMAs with a higher risk of bias. Safety outcomes were mostly based on comparative SRMAs of different drug regimens, whereby, less tachycardia and lower risk for complications were reported with lower and earlier caffeine administrations, respectively. The evidence behind this, however, was limited in quantity and quality. CONCLUSION: While limited in quantity, there is evidence of non-inferior effectiveness of caffeine against other methylxanthines or doxapram for the management of apnea in neonates. Owing to the limited quality, however, limited evidence exists in support of an optimal administration regimen for caffeine. Further controlled studies are, therefore, needed to confirm the comparative usefulness of caffeine as well as to assess its different potential regimens, including in relation to safety.