α-Adrenergic regulation of skeletal muscle blood flow during exercise in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been characterized by lower blood flow to exercising limbs and lower peak oxygen utilization ( V ̇ O 2 ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_{\mathrm{2}}}}}$ ), possibly associated with disease-related changes in sympathetic (α-adrenergic) signaling. Thus, in seven patients with HFpEF (70 ± 6 years, 3 female/4 male) and seven controls (CON) (66 ± 3 years, 3 female/4 male), we examined changes (%Δ) in leg blood flow (LBF, Doppler ultrasound) and leg V ̇ O 2 ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_{\mathrm{2}}}}}$ to intra-arterial infusion of phentolamine (PHEN, α-adrenergic antagonist) or phenylephrine (PE, α1-adrenergic agonist) at rest and during single-leg knee-extension exercise (0, 5 and 10 W). At rest, the PHEN-induced increase in LBF was not different between groups, but PE-induced reductions in LBF were lower in HFpEF (-16% ± 4% vs. -26% ± 5%, HFpEF vs. CON; P < 0.05). During exercise, the PHEN-induced increase in LBF was greater in HFpEF at 10 W (16% ± 8% vs. 8% ± 5%; P < 0.05). PHEN increased leg V ̇ O 2 ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_{\mathrm{2}}}}}$ in HFpEF (10% ± 3%, 11% ± 6%, 15% ± 7% at 0, 5 and 10 W; P < 0.05) but not in controls (-1% ± 9%, -4% ± 2%, -1% ± 5%; P = 0.24). The 'magnitude of sympatholysis' (PE-induced %Δ LBF at rest - PE-induced %Δ LBF during exercise) was lower in patients with HFpEF (-6% ± 4%, -6% ± 6%, -7% ± 5% vs. -13% ± 6%, -17% ± 5%, -20% ± 5% at 0, 5 and 10 W; P < 0.05) and was positively related to LBF, leg oxygen delivery, leg V ̇ O 2 ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_{\mathrm{2}}}}}$ , and the PHEN-induced increase in LBF (P < 0.05). Together, these data indicate that excessive α-adrenergic vasoconstriction restrains blood flow and limits V ̇ O 2 ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_{\mathrm{2}}}}}$ of the exercising leg in patients with HFpEF, and is related to impaired functional sympatholysis in this patient group. KEY POINTS: Sympathetic (α-adrenergic)-mediated vasoconstriction is exaggerated during exercise in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which may contribute to limitations of blood flow, oxygen delivery and oxygen utilization in the exercising muscle. The ability to adequately attenuate α1-adrenergic vasoconstriction (i.e. functional sympatholysis) within the vasculature of the exercising muscle is impaired in patients with HFpEF. These observations extend our current understanding of HFpEF pathophysiology by implicating excessive α-adrenergic restraint and impaired functional sympatholysis as important contributors to disease-related impairments in exercising muscle blood flow and oxygen utilization in these patients.

Statin administration improves vascular function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is characterized by impaired vascular endothelial function that may be improved by hydroxy-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase enzyme inhibition. Thus, using a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, this study evaluated the efficacy of 30-day atorvastatin administration (10 mg daily) on peripheral vascular function and biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in 16 patients with HFpEF [Statin: n = 8, 74 ± 6 yr, ejection fraction (EF) 52-73%; Placebo: n = 8, 67 ± 9 yr, EF 56-72%]. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and sustained-stimulus FMD (SS-FMD) during handgrip (HG) exercise, reactive hyperemia (RH), and blood flow during HG exercise were evaluated to assess conduit vessel function, microvascular function, and exercising muscle blood flow, respectively. FMD improved following statin administration (pre, 3.33 ± 2.13%; post, 5.23 ± 1.35%; P < 0.01), but was unchanged in the placebo group. Likewise, SS-FMD, quantified using the slope of changes in brachial artery diameter in response to increases in shear rate, improved following statin administration (pre: 5.31e-5 ± 3.85e-5 mm/s-1; post: 8.54e-5 ± 4.98e-5 mm/s-1; P = 0.03), with no change in the placebo group. Reactive hyperemia and exercise hyperemia responses were unchanged in both statin and placebo groups. Statin administration decreased markers of lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde, MDA) (pre, 0.652 ± 0.095; post, 0.501 ± 0.094; P = 0.04), whereas other inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers were unchanged. Together, these data provide new evidence for the efficacy of low-dose statin administration to improve brachial artery endothelium-dependent vasodilation, but not microvascular function or exercising limb blood flow, in patients with HFpEF, which may be due in part to reductions in oxidative stress.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to investigate the impact of statin administration on vascular function and exercise hyperemia in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In support of our hypothesis, both conventional flow-mediated dilation (FMD) testing and brachial artery vasodilation in response to sustained elevations in shear rate during handgrip exercise increased significantly in patients with HFpEF following statin administration, beneficial effects that were accompanied by a decrease in biomarkers of oxidative damage. However, contrary to our hypothesis, reactive hyperemia and exercise hyperemia were unchanged in patients with HFpEF following statin therapy. These data provide new evidence for the efficacy of low-dose statin administration to improve brachial artery endothelium-dependent vasodilation, but not microvascular reactivity or exercising muscle blood flow in patients with HFpEF, which may be due in part to reductions in oxidative stress.

Impaired cardiopulmonary baroreflex function and altered cardiovascular responses to hypovolemia in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with autonomic dysregulation, which may be related to baroreflex dysfunction. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that cardiac and peripheral vascular responses to baroreflex activation via lower-body negative pressure (LBNP; -10, -20, -30, -40 mmHg) would be diminished in patients with HFpEF (n = 10, 71 ± 7 yr) compared with healthy controls (CON, n = 9, 69 ± 5 yr). Changes in heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP, Finapres), forearm blood flow (FBF, ultrasound Doppler), and thoracic impedance (Z) were determined. Mild levels of LBNP (-10 and -20 mmHg) were used to specifically assess the cardiopulmonary baroreflex, whereas responses across the greater levels of LBNP represented an integrated baroreflex response. LBNP significantly increased in HR in CON subjects at -30 and -40 mmHg (+3 ± 3 and +6 ± 5 beats/min, P < 0.01), but was unchanged in patients with HFpEF across all LBNP levels. LBNP provoked progressive peripheral vasoconstriction, as quantified by changes in forearm vascular conductance (FVC), in both groups. However, a marked (40%-60%) attenuation in FVC responses was observed in patients with HFpEF (-6 ± 8, -15 ± 6, -16 ± 5, and -19 ± 7 mL/min/mmHg at -10, -20, -30, and -40 mmHg, respectively) compared with controls (-15 ± 10, -22 ± 6, -25 ± 10, and -28 ± 10 mL/min/mmHg, P < 0.01). MAP was unchanged in both groups. Together, these data provide new evidence for impairments in cardiopulmonary baroreflex function and diminished cardiovascular responsiveness during hypovolemia in patients with HFpEF, which may be an important aspect of the disease-related changes in autonomic cardiovascular control in this patient group.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Data from the current study demonstrate diminished cardiovascular responsiveness during hypovolemia induced by incremental lower-body negative pressure in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). These diminished responses imply impaired cardiopulmonary baroreflex function and altered autonomic cardiovascular regulation which may represent an important aspect of HFpEF pathophysiology.

Evidence of impaired functional sympatholysis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Exercising muscle blood flow is reduced in patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which may be related to disease-related changes in the ability to overcome sympathetic nervous system (SNS)-mediated vasoconstriction during exercise, (i.e., "functional sympatholysis"). Thus, in 12 patients with HFpEF (69 ± 7 yr) and 11 healthy controls (Con, 69 ± 4 yr), we examined forearm blood flow (FBF), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and forearm vascular conductance (FVC) during rhythmic handgrip exercise (HG) at 30% of maximum voluntary contraction with or without lower-body negative pressure (LBNP, -20 mmHg) to increase SNS activity and elicit peripheral vasoconstriction. SNS-mediated vasoconstrictor responses were determined as LBNP-induced changes (%Δ) in FVC, and the "magnitude of sympatholysis" was calculated as the difference between responses at rest and during exercise. At rest, the LBNP-induced change in FVC was significantly lesser in HFpEF compared with Con (HFpEF: -9.5 ± 5.5 vs. Con: -21.0 ± 8.0%; P < 0.01). During exercise, LBNP-induced %ΔFVC was significantly attenuated in Con compared with rest (HG: -5.8 ± 6.0%; P < 0.05) but not in HFpEF (HG: -9.9 ± 2.5%; P = 0.88). Thus, the magnitude of sympatholysis was lesser in HFpEF compared with Con (HFpEF: 0.4 ± 4.7 vs. Con: -15.2 ± 11.8%; P < 0.01). These data demonstrate a diminished ability to attenuate SNS-mediated vasoconstriction in HFpEF and provide new evidence suggesting impaired functional sympatholysis in this patient group.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Data from the current study suggest that functional sympatholysis, or the ability to adequately attenuate sympathetic nervous system (SNS)-mediated vasoconstriction during exercise, is impaired in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). These observations extend the current understanding of HFpEF pathophysiology by implicating inadequate functional sympatholysis as an important contributor to reduced exercising muscle blood flow in this patient group.

Cardiovascular responses to static handgrip exercise and postexercise ischemia in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is characterized by reduced ability to sustain physical activity that may be due partly to disease-related changes in autonomic function that contribute to dysregulated cardiovascular control during muscular contraction. Thus, we used a combination of static handgrip exercise (HG) and postexercise ischemia (PEI) to examine the pressor response to exercise and isolate the skeletal muscle metaboreflex, respectively. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were assessed during 2-min of static HG at 30 and 40% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and subsequent PEI in 16 patients with HFpEF and 17 healthy, similarly aged controls. Changes in MAP were lower in patients with HFpEF compared with controls during both 30%MVC (Δ11 ± 7 vs. Δ15 ± 8 mmHg) and 40%MVC (Δ19 ± 14 vs. Δ30 ± 8 mmHg), and a similar pattern of response was evident during PEI (30%MVC: Δ8 ± 5 vs. Δ12 ± 8 mmHg; 40%MVC: Δ13 ± 10 vs. Δ18 ± 9 mmHg) (group effect: P = 0.078 and P = 0.017 at 30% and 40% MVC, respectively). Changes in HR, CO, and TPR did not differ between groups during HG or PEI (P > 0.05). Taken together, these data suggest a reduced pressor response to static muscle contractions in patients with HFpEF compared with similarly aged controls that may be mediated partly by a blunted muscle metaboreflex. These findings support a disease-related dysregulation in neural cardiovascular control that may reduce an ability to sustain physical activity in HFpEF.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The current investigation has identified a diminution in the exercise-induced rise in arterial blood pressure (BP) that persisted during postexercise ischemia (PEI) in an intensity-dependent manner in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared with older, healthy controls. These findings suggest that the pressor response to exercise is reduced in patients with HFpEF, and this deficit may be mediated, in part, by a blunted muscle metaboreflex, highlighting the consequences of impaired neural cardiovascular control during exercise in this patient group.

Pharmacological modulation of adrenergic tone alters the vasodilatory response to passive leg movement in young but not in old adults.

The age-related increase in α-adrenergic tone may contribute to decreased leg vascular conductance (LVC) both at rest and during exercise in the old. However, the effect on passive leg movement (PLM)-induced LVC, a measure of vascular function, which is markedly attenuated in this population, is unknown. Thus, in eight young (25 ± 5 yr) and seven old (65 ± 7 yr) subjects, this investigation examined the impact of systemic ß-adrenergic blockade (propanalol, PROP) alone, and PROP combined with either α1-adrenergic stimulation (phenylephrine, PE) or α-adrenergic inhibition (phentolamine, PHEN), on PLM-induced vasodilation. LVC, calculated from femoral artery blood flow and pressure, was determined and PLM-induced Δ peak (LVCΔpeak) and total vasodilation (LVCAUC, area under curve) were documented. PROP decreased LVCΔpeak (PROP: 4.8 ± 1.8, Saline: 7.7 ± 2.7 mL·mmHg-1, P < 0.001) and LVCAUC (PROP: 1.1 ± 0.7, Saline: 2.4 ± 1.6 mL·mmHg-1, P = 0.002) in the young, but not in the old (LVCΔpeak, P = 0.931; LVCAUC, P = 0.999). PE reduced baseline LVC (PE: 1.6 ± 0.4, PROP: 2.3 ± 0.4 mL·min-1·mmHg-1, P < 0.01), LVCΔpeak (PE: 3.2 ± 1.3, PROP: 4.8 ± 1.8 mL·min-1·mmHg-1, P = 0.004), and LVCAUC (PE: 0.5 ± 0.4, PROP: 1.1 ± 0.7 mL·mmHg-1, P = 0.011) in the young, but not in the old (baseline LVC, P = 0.199; LVCΔpeak, P = 0.904; LVCAUC, P = 0.823). PHEN increased LVC at rest and throughout PLM in both groups (drug effect: P < 0.05), however LVCΔpeak was only improved in the young (PHEN: 6.4 ± 3.1, PROP: 4.4 ± 1.5 mL·min-1·mmHg-1, P = 0.004), and not in the old (P = 0.904). Furthermore, the magnitude of α-adrenergic modulation (PHEN - PE) of LVCΔpeak was greater in the young compared with the old (Young: 3.35 ± 2.32, Old: 0.40 ± 1.59 mL·min-1·mmHg-1, P = 0.019). Therefore, elevated α-adrenergic tone does not appear to contribute to the attenuated vascular function with age identified by PLM.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Stimulation of α1-adrenergic receptors eliminated age-related differences in passive leg movement (PLM) by decreasing PLM-induced vasodilation in the young. Systemic ß-blockade attenuated the central hemodynamic component of the PLM response in young individuals. Inhibition of α-adrenergic receptors did not improve the PLM response in older individuals, though withdrawal of α-adrenergic modulation augmented baseline and maximal vasodilation in both groups. Accordingly, α-adrenergic signaling plays a role in modulating the PLM vasodilatory response in young but not in old adults, and elevated α-adrenergic tone does not appear to contribute to the attenuated vascular function with age identified by PLM.

Improved vascular function and functional capacity following l-citrulline administration in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a single-arm, open-label, prospective pilot study.

There is accumulating evidence for both peripheral vascular dysfunction and impaired functional capacity in patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Although derangements in the l-arginine-nitric oxide (l-Arg-NO) pathway are likely to contribute to these aspects of HFpEF pathophysiology, the impact of increased NO substrate on vascular health and physical capacity has not been evaluated in this patient population. Thus, using a single-arm study design, we evaluated the impact of enteral l-citrulline (l-Cit, 6 g/day for 7 days), a precursor for l-Arg biosynthesis, on vascular function [flow-mediated dilation (FMD), reactive hyperemia (RH), and passive limb movement (PLM)], functional capacity [6-min walk test (6MWT)], and biomarkers of l-Arg-NO signaling in 14 patients with HFpEF (n = 14, 4 M/10 F, 70 ± 10 yr, EF: 66 ± 7%). Compared with baseline (0d), 7 days of l-Cit administration improved FMD (0d: 2.5 ± 1.6%, 7d: 4.5 ± 2.9%), RH (0d: 468 ± 167 mL, 7d: 577 ± 199 mL), PLM blood flow area-under-the-curve (0d: 139 ± 130 mL, 7d: 198 ± 115 mL), and 6MWT distance (0d: 377 ± 27 m, 7d: 397 ± 27 m) (P < 0.05). An increase in plasma l-Cit (0d: 42 ± 11 µM/L, 7d: 369 ± 201 µM/L), l-Arg (0d: 65 ± 8 µM/L, 7d: 257 ± 25 µM/L), and the ratio of l-Arg to asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) (0d: 136 ± 13 AU, 7d: 481 ± 49 AU) (P < 0.05) was also observed. Though preliminary in nature, these functional and biomarker assessments demonstrate a potential benefit of l-Cit administration in patients with HFpEF, findings that provide new insight into the mechanisms that govern vascular and physical dysfunction in this patient group.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The current investigation has demonstrated that l-Cit administration may improve brachial artery endothelium-dependent vasodilation, upper and lower limb microvascular function, and physical capacity in patients with HFpEF, highlighting the potential therapeutic potential of interventions targeting the l-Arg-NO signaling cascade to improve outcomes in this patient group.

The impact of obesity on the regulation of muscle blood flow during exercise in patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction.

Obesity is now considered a primary comorbidity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) pathophysiology, mediated largely by systemic inflammation. Although there is accumulating evidence for a disease-related dysregulation of blood flow during exercise in this patient group, the role of obesity in the hemodynamic response to exercise remains largely unknown. Small muscle mass handgrip (HG) exercise was used to evaluate exercising muscle blood flow in nonobese (BMI < 30 kg/m2, n = 14) and obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2, n = 40) patients with HFpEF. Heart rate (HR), stroke index (SI), cardiac index (CI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), forearm blood flow (FBF), and vascular conductance (FVC) were assessed during progressive intermittent HG exercise [15%-30%-45% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)]. Blood biomarkers of inflammation [C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6)] were also determined. Exercising FBF was reduced in obese patients with HFpEF at all work rates (15%: 304 ± 42 vs. 229 ± 15 mL/min; 30%: 402 ± 46 vs. 300 ± 18 mL/min; 45%: 484 ± 55 vs. 380 ± 23 mL/min, nonobese vs. obese, P = 0.025), and was negatively correlated with BMI (R = -0.47, P < 0.01). In contrast, no differences in central hemodynamics (HR, SI, CI, and MAP) were found between groups. Proinflammatory biomarkers were markedly elevated in patients with obesity (CRP: 2,133 ± 418 vs. 4,630 ± 590 ng/mL, P = 0.02; IL-6: 2.9 ± 0.3 vs. 5.2 ± 0.7 pg/mL, nonobese vs. obese, P = 0.04), and both biomarkers were positively correlated with BMI (CRP: R = 0.40, P = 0.03; IL-6: R = 0.57, P < 0.01). Together, these findings demonstrate the presence of obesity and an accompanying milieu of systemic inflammation as important factors in the dysregulation of exercising muscle blood flow in patients with HFpEF.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Obesity is the primary comorbid condition in HFpEF pathophysiology, but the role of adiposity on the peripheral circulation is not well understood. The present study identified a 30%-40% reduction in forearm blood flow during handgrip exercise, accompanied by a marked elevation in proinflammatory plasma biomarkers, in obese patients with HFpEF compared with their nonobese counterparts. These findings suggest an exaggerated dysregulation in exercising muscle blood flow associated with the obese HFpEF phenotype.

Altered central and peripheral haemodynamics during rhythmic handgrip exercise in young adults with SARS-CoV-2.

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? Are central and peripheral haemodynamics during handgrip exercise different in young adults 3-4 weeks following infection with of SARS-CoV-2 compared with young healthy adults. What is the main finding and its importance? Exercising heart rate was higher while brachial artery blood flow and vascular conductance were lower in the SARS-CoV-2 compared with the control group. These findings provide evidence for peripheral impairments to exercise among adults with SARS-CoV-2, which may contribute to exercise limitations. ABSTRACT: The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can have a profound impact on vascular function. While exercise intolerance may accompany a variety of symptoms associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on exercising blood flow (BF) remains unclear. Central (photoplethysmography) and peripheral (Doppler ultrasound) haemodynamics were determined at rest and during rhythmic handgrip (HG) exercise at 30% and 45% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in young adults with mild symptoms 25 days after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 (SARS-CoV-2: n = 8M/5F; age: 21 ± 2 years; height: 176 ± 11 cm; mass: 71 ± 11 kg) and were cross-sectionally compared with control subjects (Control: n = 8M/5F; age: 27 ± 6 years; height: 178 ± 8 cm; mass: 80 ± 25 kg). Systolic blood pressure, end systolic arterial pressure and rate pressure product were higher in the SARS-CoV-2 group during exercise at 45% MVC compared with controls. Brachial artery BF was lower in the SARS-CoV-2 group at both 30% MVC (Control: 384.8 ± 93.3 ml min-1 ; SARS-CoV-2: 307.8 ± 105.0 ml min-1 ; P = 0.041) and 45% MVC (Control: 507.4 ± 109.9 ml min-1 ; SARS-CoV-2: 386.3 ± 132.5 ml min-1 ; P = 0.002). Brachial artery vascular conductance was lower at both 30% MVC (Control: 3.93 ± 1.07 ml min-1  mmHg-1 ; SARS-CoV-2: 3.11 ± 0.98 ml min-1  mmHg-1 ; P = 0.022) and 45% MVC (Control: 4.74 ± 1.02 ml min-1  mmHg-1 ; SARS-CoV-2: 3.46 ± 1.10 ml min-1  mmHg-1 ; P < 0.001) in the SARS-CoV-2 group compared to control group. The shear-induced dilatation of the brachial artery increased similarly across exercise intensities in the two groups, suggesting the decrease in exercising BF may be due to microvascular impairments. Brachial artery BF is attenuated during HG exercise in young adults recently diagnosed with mild SARS-CoV-2, which may contribute to diminished exercise capacity among those recovering from SARS-CoV-2 like that seen in severe cases.

Locomotor Muscle Microvascular Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

[Figure: see text].

Sympathoinhibitory effect of sacubitril-valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A pilot study.

Chronic sympathetic nervous system (SNS) overactivity, characteristic of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), is associated with poor prognosis and contributes to increased mortality risk. Sacubitril-valsartan is a recently approved, first-in-class, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) drug that markedly reduces the risks of death from cardiovascular causes and hospitalization for HF in patients with HFrEF, but the physiological mechanisms underlying these benefits are not fully understood. This single-arm, open-label, prospective study sought to test the hypothesis that short-term treatment with sacubitril-valsartan reduces SNS activity, measured directly via muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), in patients with HFrEF. MSNA, heart rate (HR), and arterial blood pressure (BP) were assessed in stable Class II and III patients with HFrEF (n = 9, 69 ± 8 yrs.; 28.6 ± 3.6 kg/m2) on contemporary, guideline-directed medical treatment who were subsequently started on sacubitril-valsartan. These measurements were repeated after two months of treatment with sacubitril-valsartan. Sacubitril-valsartan reduced MSNA burst frequency (baseline: 43 ± 10 bursts/min; 2-month: 36 ± 10 bursts/min, p = 0.05) and burst incidence (baseline: 68 ± 16 bursts/100 heartbeats; 2-month: 55 ± 16 bursts/100 heartbeats, p = 0.02), while HR and BP were unchanged following the treatment (p > 0.05). These preliminary findings provide new evidence regarding the ability of sacubitril-valsartan to rapidly reduce SNS activity in patients with HFrEF, suggesting the presence of a novel sympathoinhibitory effect of this new drug class.

Sacubitril-valsartan improves conduit vessel function and functional capacity and reduces inflammation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

The Prospective comparison of ARNI with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial identified a marked reduction in the risk of death and hospitalization for heart failure in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) treated with sacubitril-valsartan (trade name Entresto), but the physiological processes underpinning these improvements are unclear. We tested the hypothesis that treatment with sacubitril-valsartan improves peripheral vascular function, functional capacity, and inflammation in patients with HFrEF. We prospectively studied patients with HFrEF (n = 11, 10 M/1 F, left ventricular ejection fraction = 27 ± 8%) on optimal, guideline-directed medical treatment who were subsequently prescribed sacubitril-valsartan (open-label, uncontrolled, and unblinded). Peripheral vascular function [brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD, conduit vessel function) and reactive hyperemia (RH, microvascular function)], functional capacity [six-minute walk test (6MWT) distance], and the proinflammatory biomarkers tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-18 (IL-18) were obtained at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 mo of treatment. %FMD improved after 1 mo of treatment, and this favorable response persisted for months 2 and 3 (baseline: 3.25 ± 1.75%; 1 mo: 5.23 ± 2.36%; 2 mo: 5.81 ± 1.79%; 3 mo: 6.35 ± 2.77%), whereas RH remained unchanged. 6MWT distance increased at months 2 and 3 (baseline: 420 ± 92 m; 1 mo: 436 ± 98 m; 2 mo: 465 ± 115 m; 3 mo: 460 ± 110 m), and there was a sustained reduction in TNF-α (baseline: 2.38 ± 1.35 pg/mL; 1 mo: 2.06 ± 1.52 pg/mL; 2 mo: 1.95 ± 1.34 pg/mL; 3 mo: 1.92 ± 1.37 pg/mL) and a reduction in IL-18 at month 3 (baseline: 654 ± 150 pg/mL; 1 mo: 595 ± 140 pg/mL; 2 mo: 601 ± 176 pg/mL; 3 mo: 571 ± 127 pg/mL). This study provides new evidence for the potential of this new drug class to improve conduit vessel function, functional capacity, and inflammation in patients with HFrEF.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We observed an approximately twofold improvement in conduit vessel function (brachial artery FMD), increased functional capacity (6MWT distance), and a reduction in inflammation (TNF-α and IL-18) following 3 mo of sacubitril-valsartan therapy. These findings provide important new information concerning the physiological mechanisms by which this new drug class provokes favorable changes in HFrEF pathophysiology.

Chronic antioxidant administration restores macrovascular function in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? We aimed to examine oxidative stress, antioxidant capacity and macro- and microvascular function in response to 30 days of oral antioxidant administration in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. What is the main finding and its importance? We observed an approximately twofold improvement in macrovascular function, assessed via brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation, and a reduction in oxidative stress after antioxidant administration in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The improvement in macrovascular function was reversed 1 week after treatment cessation. These findings have identified the potential of oral antioxidant administration to optimize macrovascular health in this patient group. ABSTRACT: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is characterized by macrovascular dysfunction and elevated oxidative stress that may be mitigated by antioxidant (AOx) administration. In this prospective study, we assessed flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and reactive hyperaemia responses in 14 healthy, older control participants and 14 patients with HFrEF, followed by 30 days of oral AOx administration (1 g vitamin C, 600 I.U. vitamin E and 0.6 g α-lipoic acid) in the patient group. Blood biomarkers of oxidative stress (malondialdehyde) and AOx capacity (ferric reducing ability of plasma) were also assessed. Patients with HFrEF had a lower %FMD (2.63 ± 1.57%) than control participants (5.62 ± 2.60%), and AOx administration improved %FMD in patients with HFrEF (30 days, 4.90 ± 2.38%), effectively restoring macrovascular function to that of control participants. In a subset of patients, we observed a progressive improvement in %FMD across the treatment period (2.62 ± 1.62, 4.23 ± 2.69, 4.33 ± 2.24 and 4.97 ± 2.56% at days 0, 10, 20 and 30, respectively, n = 12) that was abolished 7 days after treatment cessation (2.99 ± 1.78%, n = 9). No difference in reactive hyperaemia was evident between groups or as a consequence of the AOx treatment. Ferric reducing ability of plasma levels increased (from 6.08 ± 2.80 to 6.70 ± 1.59 mm, day 0 versus 30) and malondialdehyde levels decreased (from 6.81 ± 2.80 to 6.22 ± 2.84 µm, day 0 versus 30) after treatment. These findings demonstrate the efficacy of chronic AOx administration in attenuating oxidative stress, improving AOx capacity and restoring macrovascular function in patients with HFrEF.

Impact of acute antioxidant administration on inflammation and vascular function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Although it is now well established that heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with marked inflammation and a prooxidant state that is accompanied by vascular dysfunction, whether acute antioxidant (AO) administration can effectively target these disease-related decrements has not been evaluated. Thus, the present study sought to evaluate the efficacy of an acute over-the-counter AO cocktail (600 mg α-lipoic acid, 1,000 mg vitamin C, and 600 IU vitamin E) to mitigate inflammation and oxidative stress, and subsequently improve nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability and vascular function, in patients with HFpEF. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and reactive hyperemia (RH) were evaluated to assess conduit vessel and microvascular function, respectively, 90 min after administration of either placebo (PL) or AO in 16 patients with HFpEF (73 ± 10 yr, EF 54-70%) using a double-blind, crossover design. Circulating biomarkers of inflammation (C-reactive protein, CRP), oxidative stress (malondialdehyde and protein carbonyl), free radical concentration (EPR spectroscopy), antioxidant capacity, ascorbate and NO bioavailability (plasma nitrate, [Formula: see text], and nitrite, [Formula: see text]) were also assessed. FMD improved following AO administration (PL: 3.49 ± 0.7%, AO: 5.83 ± 1.0%), whereas RH responses were similar between conditions (PL: 428 ± 51 mL, AO: 425 ± 51 mL). AO administration decreased CRP (PL: 4,429 ± 705 ng/mL, AO: 3,664 ± 520 ng/mL) and increased ascorbate (PL: 30.0 ± 2.9 µg/mL, AO: 45.1 ± 3.7 µg/mL) and [Formula: see text] (PL: 182 ± 21 nM, AO: 213 ± 24 nM) but did not affect other biomarkers. Together, these data suggest that acute AO administration can exert anti-inflammatory effects and improve conduit artery vasodilation, but not microvascular function, in patients with HFpEF.