Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros












Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Viruses ; 16(5)2024 04 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38793601

RESUMO

West Nile virus (WNV) is an arbovirus spread primarily by Culex mosquitoes, with humans being a dead-end host. WNV was introduced to Florida in 2001, with 467 confirmed cases since. It is estimated that 80 percent of cases are asymptomatic, with mild cases presenting as a non-specific flu-like illness. Currently, detection of WNV in humans occurs primarily in healthcare settings via RT-PCR or CSF IgM when patients present with severe manifestations of disease including fever, meningitis, encephalitis, or acute flaccid paralysis. Given the short window of detectable viremia and requirement for CSF sampling, most WNV infections never receive an official diagnosis. This study utilized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect WNV IgG antibodies in 250 patient serum and plasma samples collected at Tampa General Hospital during 2020 and 2021. Plaque reduction neutralization tests were used to confirm ELISA results. Out of the 250 patients included in this study, 18.8% of them were IgG positive, consistent with previous WNV exposure. There was no relationship between WNV exposure and age or sex.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais , Imunoglobulina G , Febre do Nilo Ocidental , Vírus do Nilo Ocidental , Humanos , Vírus do Nilo Ocidental/imunologia , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/epidemiologia , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/virologia , Florida/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Adulto , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Hospitalização , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/líquido cefalorraquidiano
2.
PLoS One ; 18(8): e0286832, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37582084

RESUMO

Pulmonary complications are common after SARS-CoV2- infection. However, data on pulmonary sequelae of COVID-19 after recovery in dialysis patients are limited. We determined the prevalence of abnormal lung function tests and CT findings and investigate the association factors impacting pulmonary dysfunction. This prospective observational cohort study enrolled 100 patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing dialysis who had recovered from COVID-19 for ≥3 months. Pulmonary function test (PFT) and chest computed tomography (CT) were performed. Demographic data and laboratory results were recorded. The mean patient age was 55.15 ± 12.84 years. Twenty-one patients (21%) had severe COVID-19, requiring mechanical ventilation or oxygen supplementation. Pulmonary function tests revealed a restrictive pattern in 41% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.73-50.78;) and an obstructive pattern in 7.29% (95% CI, 3.19-13.25) patients. The severe group showed PFT test results similar to the non-severe group, with three patients showing severe obstructive lung disease. The CT scan findings included reticulation (64%), multifocal parenchymal band (43%), ground glass opacities (32%), and bronchiectasis (28%). The median total CT score was 3 (interquartile range, 1-8.5). The CT score and PFT findings showed no association with pulmonary dysfunction extent, except in bronchiectasis. Lung function indices were associated with abnormal CT findings. Abnormal CT findings (bronchiectasis, reticulation, and ground-glass opacities) was associated with higher oxygen requirements than normal CT findings (p = 0.008, bronchiectasis; p = 0.041, reticulation; p = 0.032, ground-glass appearance). Aside from CT findings and CRP levels, no significant lung abnormalities were observed in severe and non-severe patients. Some patients had residual symptoms at follow-up. The findings indicate persistence of both radiological and physiological abnormalities in dialysis patients after COVID-19. However, the prevalence of these abnormalities was comparable to that in the normal population; few patients experienced ongoing symptoms. Follow-up observations and evaluations are warranted. Trial registration. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05348759.


Assuntos
Bronquiectasia , COVID-19 , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagem , Seguimentos , Estudos Prospectivos , RNA Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia
3.
J Am Coll Surg ; 228(4): 613-624, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30682410

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to examine our outcomes after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy and to compare our outcomes with predicted outcomes using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator and with outcomes reported through ACS NSQIP. METHODS: We prospectively followed 155 patients undergoing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Outcomes were compared with predicted outcomes calculated using the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator and with outcomes documented in ACS NSQIP for pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2012 to 2017. Median data are presented. RESULTS: Eighty-eight percent of our robotic pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed in 2015 to 2018. Predicted outcomes were like those reported in ACS NSQIP. Actual outcomes were superior to predicted outcomes and outcomes reported in ACS NSQIP for overall complications, serious complications, returned to operating room, surgical site infections, deep vein thrombosis, and length of stay. Seventeen percent had conversions to open operations, generally due to failure to progress or need for major vascular reconstruction; only 3 (3.5%) of the last 80 operations were converted to open. Robotic operations took 423 minutes; estimated blood loss was 200 mL. Biliary fistulas occurred in 5% and pancreatic fistulas occurred in 5%. Six percent of patients died perioperatively; 5 patients died due to cardiac deterioration and 4 (3.1%) patients died after pancreaticoduodenectomy completed robotically. CONCLUSIONS: Our patients were not a select group, they were like those reported in ACS NSQIP. Their outcomes after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy were like or better than predicted outcomes or national data. Our mortality was high because of preoperative ill health (eg renal failure) and cardiac risk. Although we believe our results will continue to improve, our current data document the salutary benefits of minimally invasive robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.


Assuntos
Pancreaticoduodenectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Segurança do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...