Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros












Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(3): 60-64, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721956

RESUMO

Delayed anaphylaxis after ingestion of red meat because of galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal) syndrome has increased in recent years. The mechanism involves an immunoglobulin E reaction to alpha-gal, a molecule found in mammalian meat, dairy products, medications and excipients containing mammalian-derived components, and tick salivary glycans. Sensitization occurs due to the bite of a lone star tick and the transmission of alpha-gal molecules into person's bloodstream. We describe a case of alpha-gal syndrome with severe food, drug, and perioperative allergy in which anaphylaxis with hypovolemic shock occurred immediately after an emergency surgical procedure, when a gelatin-containing drug was injected. This case study confirms that the clinical manifestations of alpha-gal syndrome could be different depending on the route of administration, with immediate reactions if an alpha-gal-containing drug is injected and delayed type allergic manifestations occurring several hours after oral intake. The purpose of this report is to highlight the importance of risk communication in case of exposure to medical products and surgical procedures of patients with alpha-gal syndrome and to encourage drug manufacturers to indicate clearly the origin of excipients in product literature.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Choque , Humanos , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/terapia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/complicações , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Choque/etiologia , Choque/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/terapia , Masculino , Animais , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Excipientes/efeitos adversos , Dissacarídeos/imunologia , Dissacarídeos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Trissacarídeos/imunologia , Gelatina/efeitos adversos , Síndrome
2.
Clin Transl Allergy ; 14(3): e12345, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38497844

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend treating asthma exacerbations (AAEs) with bronchodilators combined with inhaled and/or systemic corticosteroids. Indications for antibiotic prescriptions for AAEs are usually not incorporated although the literature shows antibiotics are frequently prescribed. AIM: To investigate the antibiotic prescription rates in AAEs and explore the possible determining factors of those practices. METHODS: A digital survey was created to determine the antibiotic prescription rates in AAEs and the influencing factors for the prescription practices. The survey was distributed among European academy of allergy and clinical immunology (EAACI) members by mass emailing and through regional/national societies in the Netherlands, Italy, Greece, and Poland. Furthermore, we retrieved local antibiotic prescription rates. RESULTS: In total, 252 participants completed the survey. Respondents stated that there is a lack of guidelines to prescribe antibiotics in AAEs. The median antibiotic prescription rate in this study was 19% [IQR: 0%-40%] and was significantly different between 4 professions: paediatrics 0% [IQR: 0%-37%], pulmonologists 25% [IQR: 10%-50%], general practitioners 25% [IQR: 0%-50%], and allergologists 17% [IQR: 0%-33%]) (p = 0.046). Additional diagnostic tests were performed in 71.4% of patients before prescription and the most common antibiotic classes prescribed were macrolides (46.0%) and penicillin (42.9%). Important clinical factors for health care providers to prescribe antibiotics were colorised/purulent sputum, abnormal lung sounds during auscultation, fever, and presence of comorbidities. CONCLUSION: In 19% of patients with AAEs, antibiotics were prescribed in various classes with a broad range among different subspecialities. This study stresses the urgency to compose evidence-based guidelines to aim for more rational antibiotic prescriptions for AAE.

3.
Allergy ; 79(3): 565-579, 2024 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38155501

RESUMO

In drug hypersensitivity, drug provocation testing (DPT), also called drug challenge, is the gold standard for investigation. In recent years, risk stratification has become an important tool for adjusting the diagnostic strategy to the perceived risk, whilst still maintaining a high level of safety for the patient. Skin tests are recommended before DPT but may be omitted in low-risk patients. The task force suggests a strict definition of such low-risk patients in children and adults. Based on experience and evidence from studies of allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics, an algorithm on how to adjust DPT to the risk, and when to omit skin tests before DPT, is presented. For other antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and other drugs, skin tests are poorly validated and DPT is frequently necessary. We recommend performing DPT with chemotherapeutics and biologicals to avoid unnecessary desensitization procedures and DPT with skin tests negative contrast media. We suggest DPT with anesthetics only in highly specialized centers. Specifics of DPT to proton pump inhibitors, anticonvulsants and corticosteroids are discussed. This position paper provides general recommendations and guidance on optimizing use of DPT, whilst balancing benefits with patient safety and optimizing the use of the limited available resources.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Criança , Adulto , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Meios de Contraste , Monobactamas , Antibióticos beta Lactam , Testes Cutâneos/métodos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...