Baseline Lung Allograft Dysfunction After Bilateral Lung Transplantation Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Death: Results From a Multicenter Cohort Study.

Background: A prior single-center, retrospective cohort study identified baseline lung allograft dysfunction (BLAD) as a risk factor for death in bilateral lung transplant recipients. In this multicenter prospective cohort study, we test the association of BLAD with death in bilateral lung transplant recipients, identify clinical risk factors for BLAD, and assess its association with allograft injury on the molecular level. Methods: This multicenter, prospective cohort study included 173 bilateral lung transplant recipients that underwent serial pulmonary function testing and plasma collection for donor-derived cell-free DNA at prespecified time points. BLAD was defined as failure to achieve ≥80% predicted for both forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced vital capacity after lung transplant, on 2 consecutive measurements at least 3 mo apart. Results: BLAD was associated with increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-3.69; P = 0.03) but not chronic lung allograft dysfunction alone (hazard ratio, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.87-2.95; P = 0.13). Recipient obesity (odds ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.15-2.80; P = 0.04) and donor age (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05; P = 0.004) increased the risk of developing BLAD. Patients with BLAD did not demonstrate higher log10(donor-derived cell-free DNA) levels compared with no BLAD (slope [SE]: -0.0095 [0.0007] versus -0.0109 [0.0007]; P = 0.15). Conclusions: BLAD is associated with an increased risk of death following lung transplantation, representing an important posttransplant outcome with valuable prognostic significance; however, early allograft specific injury on the molecular level does not increase the risk of BLAD, supporting further mechanistic insight into disease pathophysiology.

Extreme elevations of donor-derived cell-free DNA increases the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and death, even without clinical manifestations of disease.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplant recipients are traditionally monitored with pulmonary function testing (PFT) and lung biopsy to detect post-transplant complications and guide treatment. Plasma donor-derived cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a novel molecular approach of assessing allograft injury, including subclinical allograft dysfunction. The aim of this study was to determine if episodes of extreme molecular injury (EMI) in lung transplant recipients increases the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) or death. METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study included 238 lung transplant recipients. Serial plasma samples were collected for dd-cfDNA measurement by shotgun sequencing. EMI was defined as a dd-cfDNA above the third quartile of levels observed for acute rejection (dd-cfDNA level of ≥5% occurring after 45 days post-transplant). EMI was categorized as Secondary if associated with co-existing acute rejection, infection or PFT decline; or Primary if not associated with these conditions. RESULTS: EMI developed in 16% of patients at a median 343.5 (IQR: 177.3-535.5) days post-transplant. Over 50% of EMI episodes were classified as Primary. EMI was associated with an increased risk of severe CLAD or death (HR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.26-6.22, p = 0.012). The risk remained consistent for the Primary EMI subgroup (HR: 2.34, 95% CI 1.18-4.85, p = 0.015). Time to first EMI episode was a significant predictor of the likelihood of developing CLAD or death (AUC=0.856, 95% CI=0.805-0.908, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Episodes of EMI in lung transplant recipients are often isolated and may not be detectable with traditional clinical monitoring approaches. EMI is associated with an increased risk of severe CLAD or death, independent of concomitant transplant complications.

Higher Molecular Injury at Diagnosis of Acute Cellular Rejection Increases the Risk of Lung Allograft Failure: A Clinical Trial.

Rationale: The association of acute cellular rejection (ACR) with chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) in lung transplant recipients has primarily been described before consensus recommendations incorporating restrictive phenotypes. Furthermore, the association of the degree of molecular allograft injury during ACR with CLAD or death remains undefined. Objectives: To investigate the association of ACR with the risk of CLAD or death and to further investigate if this risk depends on the degree of molecular allograft injury. Methods: This multicenter, prospective cohort study included 188 lung transplant recipients. Subjects underwent serial plasma collections for donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) at prespecified time points and bronchoscopy. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards analysis was conducted to analyze the association of ACR with subsequent CLAD or death as well as the association of dd-cfDNA during ACR with risk of CLAD or death. Additional outcomes analyses were performed with episodes of ACR categorized as "high risk" (dd-cfDNA ⩾ 1%) and "low risk" (dd-cfDNA < 1%). Measurements and Main Results: In multivariable analysis, ACR was associated with the composite outcome of CLAD or death (hazard ratio [HR], 2.07 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-4.10]; P = 0.036). Elevated dd-cfDNA ⩾ 1% at ACR diagnosis was independently associated with increased risk of CLAD or death (HR, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.31-8.40; P = 0.012). Patients with high-risk ACR were at increased risk of CLAD or death (HR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.41-6.93; P = 0.005), whereas patients with low-risk status ACR were not. Conclusions: Patients with ACR are at higher risk of CLAD or death, but this may depend on the degree of underlying allograft injury at the molecular level. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02423070).

Hospitalization Rates in Interstitial Lung Disease: An Analysis of the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Registry.

RATIONALE: Little is known about hospitalization in other types of interstitial lung disease (ILD) besides idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the frequency of hospitalizations in various types of ILD and elucidate the association of hospitalization with outcomes. METHODS: An analysis of the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry data was performed. Inpatient hospitalization rates and survival following hospitalization were compared for various types of ILD. RESULTS: Hospitalization rates were similar across ILD types (40.6% of IPF participants, 42.8% of connective tissue disease related ILD (CTD-ILD), 44.9% of non-IPF idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIPs), 46.5% of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP) participants, and 53.3% of "other" ILD participants). All-cause hospitalization was not associated with decreased transplant-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.20, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.46, p=0.0759) after adjusting for co-morbidities and severity of illness; however respiratory-related hospitalization was (AHR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.90, p=0.0001). CTD-ILD (HR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.75, p=0.0031) and non-IPF IIP (HR 0.3, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.58, p=0.005) had a lower risk of death following hospitalization compared to IPF while CHP (HR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.37, 1.20, p=0.1747) and "other-ILD" (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.19, 1.54, p=0.25) had a comparable risk to IPF. CONCLUSION: Rates of hospitalization are similar across ILD subtypes. The risk of death or transplant following hospitalization is lower in CTD-ILD, CHP and non-IPF IIP compared to IPF participants. In a mixed population of ILD participants, all-cause hospitalizations were not associated with decreased transplant-free survival; however respiratory-related hospitalizations were.

Organizing pneumonia is associated with molecular allograft injury and the development of antibody-mediated rejection.

BACKGROUND: The association between organizing pneumonia (OP) after lung transplantation with the development of acute rejection (AR) remains undefined. In addition, molecular allograft injury, as measured by donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA), during episodes of OP and its relationship to episodes of AR, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), or death is unknown. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective cohort study collected serial plasma samples from 188 lung transplant recipients for dd-cfDNA at the time of bronchoscopy with biopsy. Multivariable Cox regression was used to analyze the association between OP with the development of AR (antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and acute cellular rejection (ACR)), CLAD, and death. Multivariable models were performed to test the association of dd-cfDNA at OP with the risk of AR, CLAD, or death. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, OP was associated with increased risk of AMR (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-4.92, p = 0.040) but not ACR (HR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.66-2.5, p = 0.45) or the composite outcome of CLAD or death (HR = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.47-1.65, p = 0.69). Median levels of dd-cfDNA were higher in OP compared to stable controls (1.33% vs 0.43%, p = 0.0006). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that levels of dd-cfDNA at diagnosis of OP were associated with increased risk of both AMR (HR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.03-1.62, p = 0.030) and death (HR = 1.16, 95% CI, 1.02-1.31, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: OP is independently associated with an increased risk of AMR but not CLAD or death. The degree of molecular allograft injury at the diagnosis of OP may further predict the risk of AMR and death.

Cell-Free DNA Maps Tissue Injury and Correlates with Disease Severity in Lung Transplant Candidates.

Rationale: Plasma cell-free DNA levels correlate with disease severity in many conditions. Pretransplant cell-free DNA may risk stratify lung transplant candidates for post-transplant complications. Objectives: To evaluate if pretransplant cell-free DNA levels and tissue sources identify patients at high risk of primary graft dysfunction and other pre- and post-transplant outcomes. Methods: This multicenter, prospective cohort study recruited 186 lung transplant candidates. Pretransplant plasma samples were collected to measure cell-free DNA. Bisulfite sequencing was performed to identify the tissue sources of cell-free DNA. Multivariable regression models determined the association between cell-free DNA levels and the primary outcome of primary graft dysfunction and other transplant outcomes, including Lung Allocation Score, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, and death. Measurements and Main Results: Transplant candidates had twofold greater cell-free DNA levels than healthy control patients (median [interquartile range], 23.7 ng/ml [15.1-35.6] vs. 12.9 ng/ml [9.9-18.4]; P < 0.0001), primarily originating from inflammatory innate immune cells. Cell-free DNA levels and tissue sources differed by native lung disease category and correlated with the Lung Allocation Score (P < 0.001). High pretransplant cell-free DNA increased the risk of primary graft dysfunction (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-2.46; P = 0.0220), and death (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.07-1.92; P = 0.0171) but not chronic lung allograft dysfunction (hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.97-1.94; P = 0.0767). Conclusions: Lung transplant candidates demonstrate a heightened degree of tissue injury with elevated cell-free DNA, primarily originating from innate immune cells. Pretransplant plasma cell-free DNA levels predict post-transplant complications.

Factors associated with listing for lung transplantation in IPF patients: An analysis of the pulmonary fibrosis foundation registry.

Rationale and objectives: Lung transplantation is a potentially life-saving treatment option for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF); however, not all eligible candidates get referred and listed for transplantation. Amongst IPF patients within the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (PFF-R), we sought to determine the proportion of patients who undergo lung transplant listing and the characteristics associated with transplant listing. Methods: An analysis of IPF patients with at least six months of follow-up data was performed. Patients with well-established contraindications to lung transplantation were excluded. Two complementary analyses were performed. The "prevalent" population included all patients with IPF at time of enrollment into the registry. The "incident severe" population included all patients with IPF who progressed to GAP Stage 3. Results: Of the 2003 patients in the PFF-R, 475 patients were included in the "prevalent" population. Of this group, only 42 (8.8%) were either listed for or underwent lung transplant. Univariable analysis of the "prevalent" population found age (per 10 year increase, OR 0.531, p = 0.0025), percent predicted FVC (OR 0.572, p=<0.0001), percent predicted DLCO (OR 0.606, p < 0.0001), 6-min walk distance (per 50 m, OR 0.831, p = 0.019), and oxygen use at rest (OR 5.157, p < 0.0001) were predictive of listing. On multivariable analysis, age (per 10 year increase, OR 0.558, p = 0.0088), percent predicted FVC (OR 0.728, p = 0.0161), and oxygen use at rest (OR 3.264, p = 0.0029) remained significant predictors for lung transplant listing. The "incident severe" group consisted of 176 patients (8.8%). 24 patients (13.6%) from this cohort were either listed for or received a transplant. Only age (per 10 year increase, OR 0.0286, p = 0.0465) was associated with transplant listing on univariable analysis in the Incident severe population. Conclusion: Only a small proportion of potentially eligible patients with IPF are listed for lung transplantation, even when seen at pulmonary fibrosis centers of excellence. Advanced age appears to be the primary factor associated with failure to be listed. Further refinement of future registry data is required to more clearly delineate exact reasons for low rates of listing.

External validation and longitudinal application of the DO-GAP index to individualise survival prediction in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Background: The Distance-Oxygen-Gender-Age-Physiology (DO-GAP) index has been shown to improve prognostication in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) compared to the Gender-Age-Physiology (GAP) score. We sought to externally validate the DO-GAP index compared to the GAP index for baseline risk assessment in patients with IPF. Additionally, we evaluated the utility of serial change in the DO-GAP index in predicting survival. Methods: We performed an analysis of patients with IPF from the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation-Patient Registry (PFF-PR). Discrimination and calibration of the two models were assessed to predict transplant-free survival and IPF-related mortality. Joint longitudinal time-to-event modelling was utilised to individualise survival prediction based on DO-GAP index trajectory. Results: There were 516 patients with IPF from the PFF-PR with available demographics, pulmonary function tests, 6-min walk test data and outcomes included in this analysis. The DO-GAP index (C-statistic: 0.73) demonstrated improved discrimination in discerning transplant-free survival compared to the GAP index (C-statistic: 0.67). DO-GAP index calibration was adequate, and the model retained predictive accuracy to identify IPF-related mortality (C-statistic: 0.74). The DO-GAP index was similarly accurate in the subset of patients taking antifibrotic medications. Serial change in the DO-GAP index improved model discrimination (cross-validated area under the curve: 0.83) enabling the personalised prediction of disease trajectory in individual patients. Conclusion: The DO-GAP index is a simple, validated, multidimensional score that accurately predicts transplant-free survival in patients with IPF and can be adapted longitudinally in individual patients. The DO-GAP may also find use in studies of IPF to risk stratify patients and possibly as a clinical trial end-point.

Prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in patients with COVID-19 related lung disease listed for lung transplantation: A UNOS registry analysis.

COVID-19 related lung disease (CRLD) has emerged as an indication for lung transplantation (LT) in highly select patients. The prevalence and prognostic implication of coexisting pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with CRLD listed for LT is not known. Adult patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing database listed for LT for COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome or fibrosis through March 2022 were identified. The prevalence and impact of precapillary PH on pre- and posttransplantation survival was determined. Time-to-event analysis was used to compare outcomes between those with and without precapillary PH. We identified 245 patients listed for LT for CRLD who had right heart catheterization data available at the time of registry listing. Median age of the cohort was 54 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 46, 60), 56 (22.9%) were female, and the median lung allocation score was 81.3 (IQR: 53.3, 89.4). The prevalence of precapillary PH at the time of transplant listing was 27.9%. There was no significant difference in pretransplant mortality in patients with and without precapillary PH (sHR: 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1-1.7, p = 0.261). A total of 187 patients ultimately underwent LT; of those, 60 (31.0%) were identified as having precapillary PH during the waitlist period. Posttransplantation survival was similar between patients with and without pretransplant precapillary PH (hazard ratio: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.2-3.7, p = 0.953). We observed a high rate of concomitant precapillary PH in patients listed for LT for CRLD. Though common, coexisting precapillary PH was not associated with a significant difference in either pre- or post-transplantation outcomes.

Efzofitimod for the Treatment of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary sarcoidosis is characterized by the accumulation of immune cells that form granulomas affecting the lungs. Efzofitimod (ATYR1923), a novel immunomodulator, selectively binds neuropilin 2, which is upregulated on immune cells in response to lung inflammation. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the tolerability, safety, and effect on outcomes of efzofitimod in pulmonary sarcoidosis? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating multiple ascending doses of efzofitimod administered intravenously every 4 weeks for 24 weeks, randomized patients (2:1) underwent a steroid taper to 5 mg/d by week 8 or < 5 mg/d after week 16. The primary end point was the incidence of adverse events (AEs); secondary end points included steroid reduction, change in lung function, and patient-reported outcomes on health-related quality-of-life scales. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received at least one dose of study medication. Efzofitimod was well tolerated at all doses, with no new or unexpected AEs and no dose-dependent AE incidence. Average daily steroid doses through end of study were 6.8 mg, 6.5 mg, and 5.6 mg for the 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, and 5 mg/kg groups compared with 7.2 mg for placebo, resulting in a baseline-adjusted relative steroid reduction of 5%, 9%, and 22%, respectively. Clinically meaningful improvements were achieved across several patient-reported outcomes, several of which reached statistical significance in the 5 mg/kg dose arm. A dose-dependent but nonsignificant trend toward improved lung function also was observed for 3 and 5 mg/kg. INTERPRETATION: Efzofitimod was safe and well tolerated and was associated with dose-dependent improvements of several clinically relevant end points compared with placebo. The results of this study support further evaluation of efzofitimod in pulmonary sarcoidosis. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03824392; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Elevated cell-free DNA in respiratory viral infection and associated lung allograft dysfunction.

Respiratory viral infection (RVI) in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) is a risk for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). We hypothesize that donor-derived cell-free DNA (%ddcfDNA), at the time of RVI predicts CLAD progression. We followed 39 LTRs with RVI enrolled in the Genomic Research Alliance for Transplantation for 1 year. Plasma %ddcfDNA was measured by shotgun sequencing, with high %ddcfDNA as ≥1% within 7 days of RVI. We examined %ddcfDNA, spirometry, and a composite (progression/failure) of CLAD stage progression, re-transplant, and death from respiratory failure. Fifty-nine RVI episodes, 38 low and 21 high %ddcfDNA were analyzed. High %ddcfDNA subjects had a greater median %FEV1 decline at RVI (-13.83 vs. -1.83, p = .007), day 90 (-7.97 vs. 0.91, p = .04), and 365 (-20.05 vs. 1.09, p = .047), compared to those with low %ddcfDNA and experienced greater progression/failure within 365 days (52.4% vs. 21.6%, p = .01). Elevated %ddcfDNA at RVI was associated with an increased risk of progression/failure adjusting for symptoms and days post-transplant (HR = 1.11, p = .04). No difference in %FEV1 decline was seen at any time point when RVIs were grouped by histopathology result at RVI. %ddcfDNA delineates LTRs with RVI who will recover lung function and who will experience sustained decline, a utility not seen with histopathology.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA as a composite marker of acute lung allograft dysfunction in clinical care.

BACKGROUND: As a marker of underlying lung allograft injury, donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) may be used to identify episodes of acute allograft injury in lung transplant recipients. We investigated the utility of dd-cfDNA to monitor subjects at risk of acute rejection or infection in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study collected data from lung transplant recipients within 3 years of transplant at 4 centers between March 24, 2020 and September 1, 2020. During this period, as part of routine care during the COVID-19 pandemic, these centers implemented a home-based surveillance program using plasma dd-cfDNA in preference to surveillance bronchoscopy. Dd-cfDNA was used to detect acute lung allograft dysfunction (ALAD) - a composite endpoint of acute rejection and infection. dd-cfDNA levels in patients with ALAD were compared to stable patients. The performance characteristics of dd-cfDNA ≥ 1.0% to detect ALAD were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients underwent 380 dd-cfDNA measurements, of which 290 were for routine surveillance purposes. dd-cfDNA was higher in patients with ALAD than stable patients (Median (IQR) 1.7% (0.63, 3.1) vs 0.35% (0.22, 0.79), p < 0.001). As an indication of underlying ALAD during surveillance testing, the estimated sensitivity of dd-cfDNA ≥1% was 73.9%, specificity of 87.7%, positive predictive value of 43.4% and negative predictive value of 96.5%. CONCLUSIONS: dd-cfDNA identified acute lung allograft dysfunction in asymptomatic lung transplant patients that may not have been identified by using a clinically indicated biopsy strategy alone. dd-cfDNA <1.0% may be useful in ruling out acute rejection and infection, supporting its use as a potential noninvasive marker for surveillance monitoring.

Biological Variation of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Stable Lung Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies demonstrate that donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in lung transplant recipients may serve as a marker of allograft injury for detecting allograft rejection and infection. Clinical interpretation of dd-cfDNA requires understanding its biological variation in stable lung transplant patients in order to identify abnormal results suggesting underlying allograft dysfunction. This study establishes the biological variation and reference change values (RCV) of dd-cfDNA in stable lung transplant recipients using an analytically validated assay with an established analytic coefficient of variation (CVA). METHODS: The AlloSure® assay, a targeted, sequencing-based approach, was used to measure plasma dd-cfDNA in a cohort of lung transplant patients at 4 centers that used dd-cfDNA to monitor for allograft dysfunction in preference to surveillance transbronchial biopsy. Patients with stable allograft function and ≥3 dd-cfDNA samples were included. Intraindividual coefficient of variation (CVI), interindividual CV (CVG), index of individuality (II) and the RCV were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with a combined 124 dd-cfDNA samples were included in the final analysis. The median dd-cfDNA was 0.31% (interquartile range 0.18%-0.68%), the 97.5th percentile and 95th percentile were 1.3% and 1.0%, respectively. In 30 stable patients with an average of 3.7 tests, the CVI was 25%, CVG 19%, II 1.33, and RCV 70%. CONCLUSION: In stable lung transplant patients, fluctuations in dd-cfDNA levels of up to 70% or levels less than 1% are within normal biological variation. With further validation, these thresholds may be incorporated into surveillance monitoring algorithms to identify potentially abnormal results indicating allograft dysfunction.

Fostamatinib for the Treatment of Hospitalized Adults With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring hospitalization is characterized by robust antibody production, dysregulated immune response, and immunothrombosis. Fostamatinib is a novel spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor that we hypothesize will ameliorate Fc activation and attenuate harmful effects of the anti-COVID-19 immune response. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in hospitalized adults requiring oxygen with COVID-19 where patients receiving standard of care were randomized to receive fostamatinib or placebo. The primary outcome was serious adverse events by day 29. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients underwent randomization (30 to fostamatinib and 29 to placebo). Serious adverse events occurred in 10.5% of patients in the fostamatinib group compared with 22% in placebo (P = .2). Three deaths occurred by day 29, all receiving placebo. The mean change in ordinal score at day 15 was greater in the fostamatinib group (-3.6 ±â€…0.3 vs -2.6 ±â€…0.4, P = .035) and the median length in the intensive care unit was 3 days in the fostamatinib group vs 7 days in placebo (P = .07). Differences in clinical improvement were most evident in patients with severe or critical disease (median days on oxygen, 10 vs 28, P = .027). There were trends toward more rapid reductions in C-reactive protein, D-dimer, fibrinogen, and ferritin levels in the fostamatinib group. CONCLUSION: For COVID-19 requiring hospitalization, the addition of fostamatinib to standard of care was safe and patients were observed to have improved clinical outcomes compared with placebo. These results warrant further validation in larger confirmatory trials. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04579393.

Lung Transplantation for Patients With COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused acute lung injury in millions of individuals worldwide. Some patients develop COVID-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) and cannot be liberated from mechanical ventilation. Others may develop post-COVID fibrosis, resulting in substantial disability and need for long-term supplemental oxygen. In both of these situations, treatment teams often inquire about the possibility of lung transplantation. In fact, lung transplantation has been successfully employed for both CARDS and post-COVID fibrosis in a limited number of patients worldwide. Lung transplantation after COVID infection presents a number of unique challenges that transplant programs must consider. In those with severe CARDS, the inability to conduct proper psychosocial evaluation and pretransplantation education, marked deconditioning from critical illness, and infectious concerns regarding viral reactivation are major hurdles. In those with post-COVID fibrosis, our limited knowledge about the natural history of recovery after COVID-19 infection is problematic. Increased knowledge of the likelihood and degree of recovery after COVID-19 acute lung injury is essential for appropriate decision-making with regard to transplantation. Transplant physicians must weigh the risks and benefits of lung transplantation differently in a post-COVID fibrosis patient who is likely to remain stable or gradually improve in comparison with a patient with a known progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (fILD). Clearly lung transplantation can be a life-saving therapeutic option for some patients with severe lung injury from COVID-19 infection. In this review, we discuss how lung transplant providers from a number of experienced centers approach lung transplantation for CARDS or post-COVID fibrosis.

Inhaled Nitric Oxide via High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure Related to COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Limited evidence exists regarding use of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in spontaneously breathing patients. We evaluated the effectiveness of continuous iNO via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in COVID-19 respiratory failure. METHODS: We performed a multicenter cohort study of patients with respiratory failure from COVID-19 managed with HFNC. Patients were stratified by administration of iNO via HFNC. Regression analysis was used to compare the need for mechanical ventilation and secondary endpoints including hospital mortality, length of stay, acute kidney injury, need for renal replacement therapy, and need for extracorporeal life support. RESULTS: A total of 272 patients were identified and 66 (24.3%) of these patients received iNO via HFNC for a median of 88 h (interquartile range: 44, 135). After 12 h of iNO, supplemental oxygen requirement was unchanged or increased in 52.7% of patients. Twenty-nine (43.9%) patients treated with iNO compared to 79 (38.3%) patients without iNO therapy required endotracheal intubation (P = .47). After multivariable adjustment, there was no difference in need for mechanical ventilation between groups (odds ratio: 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-3.17), however, iNO administration was associated with longer hospital length of stay (incidence rate ratio: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.31-1.51). No difference was found for mortality, acute kidney injury, need for renal replacement therapy, or need for extracorporeal life support. CONCLUSION: In patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure, iNO delivered via HFNC did not reduce oxygen requirements in the majority of patients or improve clinical outcomes. Given the observed association with increased length of stay, judicious selection of those likely to benefit from this therapy is warranted.

Experience of Treating COVID-19 With Remdesivir and Convalescent Plasma in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Prospective, Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) and remdesivir (REM) have been approved for investigational use to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Nepal. METHODS: In this prospective, multicentered study, we evaluated the safety and outcomes of treatment with CPT and/or REM in 1315 hospitalized COVID-19 patients over 18 years in 31 hospitals across Nepal. REM was administered to patients with moderate, severe, or life-threatening infection. CPT was administered to patients with severe to life-threatening infections who were at high risk for progression or clinical worsening despite REM. Clinical findings and outcomes were recorded until discharge or death. RESULTS: Patients were classified as having moderate (24.2%), severe (64%), or life-threatening (11.7%) COVID-19 infection. The majority of CPT and CPT + REM recipients had severe to life-threatening infections (CPT 98.3%; CPT + REM 92.1%) and were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU; CPT 91.8%; CPT + REM 94.6%) compared with those who received REM alone (73.3% and 57.5%, respectively). Of 1083 patients with reported outcomes, 78.4% were discharged and 21.6% died. The discharge rate was 84% for REM (n = 910), 39% for CPT (n = 59), and 54.4% for CPT + REM (n = 114) recipients. In a logistic model comparing death vs discharge and adjusted for age, gender, steroid use, and severity, the predicted margin for discharge was higher for recipients of remdesivir alone (0.82; 95% CI, 0.79-0.84) compared with CPT (0.58; 95% CI, 0.47-0.70) and CPT + REM (0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.74) recipients. Adverse events of remdesivir and CPT were reported in <5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a safe rollout of CPT and REM in a resource-limited setting. Remdesivir recipients had less severe infection and better outcomes.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier. NCT04570982.

Atraumatic forearm swelling in a patient with poorly controlled asthma.

We present a case of sarcoidosis presenting as unilateral forearm swelling. A 65-year-old male with a long history of asthma presented with unexplained left forearm and hand swelling. Over many years, chest imaging had been devoid of adenopathy or parenchymal findings suspicious for sarcoid, until after the extremity findings emerged. The patient was diagnosed based on subcutaneous, dermal and mediastinal lymph node histopathology. Sarcoid presenting with isolated extremity findings prior to more typical pulmonary manifestations is rare even for cutaneous or soft tissue sarcoid, highlighting the need to maintain a high index of suspicion for sarcoidosis.

Incidence and prognostic significance of pleural effusions in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

It has been suggested pleural effusions may develop in right heart failure in the absence of left heart disease. The incidence and prognostic significance of pleural effusions in pulmonary arterial hypertension is uncertain. Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension followed at our tertiary care center were reviewed. Survival was examined based on the subsequent development of a pleural effusion. A total of 191 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of pleural effusions on initial assessment was 7.3%. Among patients without a pleural effusion on initial imaging and at least one follow-up computerized tomography (N = 142), pleural effusion developed in 27.5% (N = 39) of patients. No alternative etiology of the effusion was identified in 19 (48.7%) cases and effusions deemed related to pulmonary arterial hypertension occurred at an incident rate of 38.6 cases per 1000 person-years. Of these, 14 (73.7%) were bilateral, 3 (15.8%) were right-sided, and 2 (10.5%) were left-sided. Effusion size was trace or small in 18 patients (94.7%). Development of a new pleural effusion was associated with attenuated survival in unadjusted survival analysis (HR: 3.80; 95% CI: 1.55-9.31), multivariate analysis (HR: 5.13; 95% CI: 1.86-14.16), and after the multivariate model was adjusted for concomitant pericardial effusion (HR: 4.86; 95% CI: 1.51-15.71). Negative impact on survival remained unchanged when effusions more likely related to an alternative cause were removed from analysis. In conclusion, pleural effusions can complicate pulmonary arterial hypertension in the absence of left heart disease. These effusions are frequently small in size, bilateral in location, and their presence is associated with decreased survival. Attenuated survival appears independent of the risk associated with a new pericardial effusion.