Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros












Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Nutr Rep ; 8(4): 397-401, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31691201

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Drug shortages continue to impact our patients with intestinal failure and their ability to receive nutrition. ASPEN guidelines address the management of certain shortages in compounded total parenteral nutrition (TPN); however, some institutions have utilized premixed total parenteral nutrition (pTPN) in place of TPN. RECENT FINDINGS: Premixed TPN appears to be as safe, if not safer, as compounded TPN when comparing the risk of bloodstream infection. However, there is an increased use of supplemental electrolytes to meet patient needs. Cost-effectiveness depends on multiple factors and should be evaluated by each institution when considering the use of TPN. In light of the published information on the use of pTPN compared to TPN, institutions and nutrition clinicians should consider their current practice and opportunities to consider when pTPN may be beneficial for their patients, not only from a safety perspective, but also considering cost savings. However, close monitoring and individual patient needs should be considered as these formulas may not meet all patient nutritional and electrolyte needs.


Assuntos
Nutrição Parenteral Total , Nutrição Parenteral , Redução de Custos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Planejamento em Desastres , Alimentos Formulados , Hospitais , Humanos , Estado Nutricional , Nutrição Parenteral/efeitos adversos , Nutrição Parenteral/economia , Soluções de Nutrição Parenteral , Nutrição Parenteral Total/efeitos adversos , Nutrição Parenteral Total/economia , Viagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...