Omission and Commission in Morally Injurious Experiences Among COVID-19 Health Care Professionals.

Objective: To produce a qualitative description of the impact of moral injury on medical providers during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: A convergent mixed-methods study design was used to explore experiences of health care workers during the first 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants completed the Moral Injury Symptom Scale-HP (MISS-HP) and a 60-minute interview, in which they described their work experiences from March 2020 through January 2021. The study was conducted between May 2021 and August 2021.Results: Eight physicians and 6 nurses were interviewed. Most participants (71%) worked in the emergency department, while 29% worked in the medical intensive care unit (MICU). MISS-HP scores were 49 on average and ranged from 29 to 73. Among the demographic groups, MICU participants scored the highest (56) and men scored the lowest (40). There were no significant differences in scores between any demographic group. The analysis of interview data showed how omissions and commissions in one's professional duties created internal conflicts, which were inextricably linked to a deeper sense of feelings of guilt and blame around experiences of betraying or being betrayed and an inability to uphold one's moral values.Conclusions: The pandemic upended a previously reliable and imperceptible experience of a background of safety, in which the provision of both material resources and human presence was expected without question. Future directions generated from this study might examine the role of dependency on leadership structures and relationships with self and others that create the conditions for moral injury.Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2024;26(1):23m03651. Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.

A Psychodynamic Approach to Co-occurring Borderline Personality and Substance Use Disorders in the Emergency Department.

Patients with co-occurring substance use disorders and borderline personality disorder have high rates of morbidity, mortality, and utilization of medical services. Their acute symptoms present complex challenges to clinical staff in the medical emergency department related to both logistics and management of countertransference. This article examines patterns in countertransference and proposes application of psychodynamically informed principles and strategies to facilitate safety and enhance communication during fraught clinical encounters.

Demonstrating the Efficacy of Incorporating Peers Into Addiction Training for Internal Medicine Residents.

Objective: Although internists frequently care for patients with substance use disorders (SUDs), they do not receive training that is adequate for the task. The resultant deficiencies in care are compounded by widespread stigma toward SUDs that exists within medicine. However, research demonstrates that sharing personal perspectives and experiences of living with an SUD generate empathy and change attitudes toward this disorder. The objective of this study was to improve internal medicine residents' attitudes with an educational seminar that incorporates perspectives from patients with SUDs and their families.Methods: The study was conducted with internal medicine residents at Weill Cornell Medical College from February 2019 to August 2019. The study used a cross-sectional, longitudinal survey design. Attitudes were measured using a validated Medical Condition Regard Scale (MCRS).Results: A total of 31 internal medicine residents participated. Results showed significant increases in MCRS scores, both from pre- to post-seminar and 6 months after the seminar. For alcohol use disorder, mean (SD) MCRS score increased from 3.80 (SD = 0.69) to 4.60 (SD = 0.87) to 5.00 (SD = 0.68) (P < .001). For opioid use disorder, mean MCRS score increased from 3.30 (SD = 0.92) to 4.36 (SD = 0.99) to 4.62 (SD = 0.70) (P < .001).Conclusion: The study demonstrates that long-term attitudes toward patients with SUDs may be modified through training that integrates peer-based perspectives.

Is your own team against you? Implicit bias and interpersonal regard in criminal defense.

Racial disparities in conviction and incarceration have been lamentable features of legal systems for a long time. Research has addressed the attitudes and decisions of police, prosecutors, jurors, and judges in contributing to these disparities, but very little attention has been paid to defendants' own team members-i.e., criminal defense attorneys. Researchers have specifically identified this as a "scholarly gap". To address this, we conducted an empirical study of criminal defense attorneys practicing in forty-three U.S. states (N = 327). The attorneys completed both an implicit measure designed to capture racial bias (a race Implicit Association Test) and an explicit measure designed to capture interpersonal regard for clients. The results provided support for longstanding, but previously speculative, assertions of bias in criminal defense.

Physicians' and Attorneys' Beliefs and Attitudes Related to the Brain Disease Model of Addiction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Addiction is increasingly considered a chronic, relapsing brain disease; however, many scholars still disagree with the brain disease model of addiction. We set out to provide evidence of attorneys' and physicians' beliefs regarding the model. First, we asked the following question: do attorneys and physicians affirm the full brain disease model, or its modified form, or do they believe that addiction is driven by deficits in self-control or moral weakness? Second, we evaluated the extent to which such beliefs correspond to attitudes toward individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs). METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to resident physicians (N = 301) and criminal defense attorneys (N = 483) practicing in the United States. It was comprised of (i) an attitudes measure, (ii) a measure regarding conceptions of addiction, and (iii) demographic questions. RESULTS: Attorneys were more likely to believe that individuals with SUDs had "practically no choice" about whether to seek and use, whereas physicians were more likely to believe that such individuals had "genuine choice." For both groups of participants, the rejection of the full brain disease model of addiction was associated with more negative attitudes toward individuals with SUDs. CONCLUSION AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: These results represent an important advance, as past research has neglected attorneys' attitudes and is inconclusive regarding the manner in which beliefs about the brain disease model of addiction are related to attitudes toward individuals with SUDs. Educating practitioners regarding this relationship would raise awareness regarding when and to what extent stigma is likely to be present, which may in turn provide a foundation from which to address stigma. (Am J Addict 2020;00:00-00).

Attitudes Toward Individuals With Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorders Among Resident Physicians.

OBJECTIVE: Resident physicians frequently provide care for individuals diagnosed with mental illness and substance use disorders (SUDs). Clinicians-including psychiatrists and addiction professionals-have been shown to possess negative attitudes toward these individuals, which is concerning since negative attitudes may have an adverse impact on patient engagement, treatment, and outcomes. However, little is known about resident physicians' attitudes toward individuals with mental illness and SUDs. The objective of this study was to examine the attitudes of emergency medicine, internal medicine, and obstetrics-gynecology residents toward individuals with diagnoses of schizophrenia, multiple SUDs, co-occurring schizophrenia and SUDs, and major depressive disorder. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire, including demographic information, level of training, and the 11-item Medical Condition Regard Scale (MCRS) for individuals with 4 different diagnoses, which assesses the degree to which clinicians find individuals with a given medical condition to be enjoyable, treatable, and worthy of medical resources, was sent to residents across the United States from May 2016 to April 2017. RESULTS: A total of 411 resident physicians completed the questionnaire. Respondents had more negative attitudes toward individuals with diagnoses of SUDs with and without schizophrenia than toward those individuals with diagnoses of schizophrenia or major depressive disorder alone. Senior residents possessed more negative attitudes toward individuals with SUDs than did junior residents. Emergency medicine residents had more negative attitudes than the other resident physician groups. CONCLUSIONS: The attitudes of resident physicians toward individuals with SUDs with and without schizophrenia were negative and were worse among emergency medicine residents and senior residents. Additional research and programmatic work are needed to understand the reasons for these negative attitudes and to develop interventions during residency training to improve them.

Attitudes toward defendants with substance-related charges: An analysis of a national sample of criminal defense attorneys.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: While a large percentage of criminal offenders suffer from substance use disorders (SUDs), virtually nothing is known about the attitudes criminal defense attorneys possess toward their clients who are facing substance-related charges. This is a serious concern, as the burden of steering individuals with SUDs into treatment often falls to criminal defense attorneys. The goal of this study was to examine the attitudes of criminal defense attorneys toward individuals who have been accused of drug crimes. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to criminal defense attorneys (N = 1,933) from all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. It was comprised of (i) demographic information and (ii) a version of the 11-item Medical Condition Regard Scale (MCRS). RESULTS: Criminal defense attorneys held generally positive attitudes toward clients with substance-related charges, but there was a significant divergence in attitudes between private and public attorneys, with the latter showing both greater familiarity with and better attitudes toward this same group of clients. These differences were impactful: worse attitudes toward clients strongly correlated with greater predictions that the clients would reoffend. CONCLUSION AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Given the magnitude of the incarcerated population with SUDs and the centrality of defense attorneys in the treatment process, especially its initiation, the divergence in attitudes between private and public criminal defense attorneys is concerning. There is a clear need for increased collaboration between physicians and attorneys, with an aim of increasing the number of individuals with SUDs receiving proper treatment (Am J Addict 2018;XX:1-7).

Malignant spinal cord compression: a hospice emergency.

Malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) is an uncommon but debilitating complication of advanced malignancy. Clinician knowledge about diagnosis, prognosis, therapy, and hospice referral is important if MSCC patients are to be treated in an optimal way.