[Meteo-U-rology: climate impact on urological emergencies]. / Météo-U-rologie : influence du climat sur les principales urgences urologiques - étude épidémiologique.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the weather influence on the onset of renal colic (RC), acute urinary retention (AUR) and testicular torsion (TT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We correlated the daily number of RC, AUR and TT cases admitted to our urology department and weather conditions between 2005 and 2009 on day-to-day basis. Eight hundred and seventy-six RC, 453 AUR and 50 TT were analyzed. Information on temperature, atmospheric pressure, relative humidity, vapor pressure, wind force, evapotranspiration and sunshine level were collected from the national meteorological office (Meteo-France) in Besançon, France. We performed a univariate and a multivariate Stepwise method in linear regression using Akaike Information Criterion. RESULTS: We reported a statistically significant increased risk of renal colic at higher vapor pressure. Likewise, temperature seemed to be a risk factor for occurrence of renal colics. We determined an increased daily rate when maximal daily temperature rises above 20 Celsius degrees (P = 0.05). Furthermore, we observed a positive link between mean (P = 0.05) and minimal (P = 0.08) daily temperature and urolithiasis. Contrarywise AUR was more frequent when the mean temperature falls below zero Celsius degree. We also demonstrated a non-significant influence of temperature on TT, with 3 fold higher events during cold period. Much more mystic, we noted a higher AUR rate on new moon days, and fewer renal colic on full moon. CONCLUSIONS: Further investigations are necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying the relationship between urologic diseases and climate. But our findings could help us justify healthy living messages.

[Evaluation of the activity of a urological emergency unit in university hospital]. / Évaluation de l'activité d'une unité d'urgences urologiques en centre hospitalier universitaire.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To determine the epidemiology of urological emergencies in a university hospital and the interest of a dedicated urological emergency unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 2008, a dedicated urological emergency unit was individualized in our department of urology. We conducted a retrospective study including all patients consulting in this unit in 2009 with epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic data. RESULTS: During 2009, 1257 patients consulted in this unit. Main diagnoses were acute urinary retention (303, 24.11%), renal colic (219, 17.42%), urinary infections (278, 22.11%), postoperative complications (141, 11.22%), symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia (65, 5.17%), genitourinary cancers (61, 4.85%), trauma of urinary apparel (41, 3.26%), and spermatic cords torsion (10, 0.8%). In 99 cases (7.88%) diagnosis did not involved the urinary system. The treatment was surgical in 213 (17.7%) cases, technical procedure under local anesthesia in 368 (29.3%) and a medical treatment in 675 (53.7%) cases. Six hundred and sixty (52.5%) patients were managed ambulatory whereas 596 (47.5%) needed hospitalization. CONCLUSION: The opening of a dedicated urological emergency unit lead to 1257 emergency consultations. Frequent etiologies were acute urinary retention, renal colic and urinary infection. The creation of this unit allowed to register and to valorize this emergency activity through the ATU emergency amount.

Outcomes of renal transplantation in obese recipients.

PURPOSE: Although obesity has been shown to paradoxically increase dialysis patient survival, its impact has not been clearly defined on renal transplantation. We assessed outcomes of obesity renal transplant patients by evaluating graft and patient survivals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective study was performed on 202 renal transplant recipients from January 2004 to December 2008 excluding two combined kidney and liver transplantations. Recipients were classified based on body mass index (BMI) at the time of transplantation: obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)) and nonobese recipients (BMI < 30 kg/m(2)). The comparative analysis included surgical complications, hospital stay, onset of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection episodes and graft patient survivals. RESULTS: Twenty-one renal transplants were performed in obese recipients versus 179 in the control group. Obese patients were older (53.3 ± 11.2 versus 46.4 ± 14.4 years old; P = .035) and more often diabetic (29% ± 0.46 versus 60% ± 0.24, P = .001), but there were no differences among other combidities of high blood pressure, arteriopathy, thrombophilia, and smoking. Obesity did not appear to be a risk factor for urinary or vascular as well as parietal complications, but did tend to augment lymphatic complications (14.3% ± 0.36 versus 4.5% ± 0.21; P = .065). DGF occurred more frequently in obese patients (38% ± 0.50 versus 14% ± 0.34; P = .004) and hospital stays were therefore longer in this group (24.9 ± 23.53 days versus 15.6 ± 13.67 days; P = .008). Graft (hazard ratio [HR] 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.25-6.0], P = .63) and patient survivals (HR:0,81; 95% CI [0.12- 5.3], P = .83) were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: Obese patients seeking renal transplantation are usually older and more often diabetic compared with nonobese recipients. The higher rate of lymphatic complications and DGF lead to longer hospital stays among the group with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2). However, long-term results showed similar graft and patient survivals as nonobese patients. Consequently, there seemed to be no reason to avoid renal transplantation in obese recipients.

Risk factors for surgical complications after renal transplantation and impact on patient and graft survival.

PURPOSE: We report herein the incidence of and factors predisposive to surgical complications (SC) after renal transplantation. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2008, we performed 200 renal transplantation. We retrospectively studied recipient and donor characteristics, cold ischemia time, surgical revision in the month after transplantation, delayed graft function, surgical complications (vascular, urologic, wound, or bleeding), as well as graft and patient 5-year survival rates. RESULTS: Sixty-six surgical complications were reported among 49 patients with a preponderance of urologic complications. We noted 6.1% Clavien I, 1.5% Clavien II, 30.3% Clavien IIIa, 53% Clavien IIIb, and 9.1% Clavien IVa SCs. Vascular complications showed a worse prognosis. Among recipients, dialysis duration before transplantation (40.3 ± 50.8 months in SCs versus 28 ± 26.5 months in the control unaffected group, P = .032) and anti-HLA immunization (34.7 ± 48% versus 21.2 ± 41%, P = .05) appeared to be risk factor. No significant factor was identified among donors, although patients with surgical complications received older transplants than the control popuation (49.7 ± 14.5 years versus 45.5 ± 15.1 years, P = .08). A greater percentage of delayed graft function (30.6 ± 46.6% versus 11.4 ± 31.9%; P = .001) and graft rejection episodes (34.7 ± 48.1% versus 17.9 ± 38.4%, P .013) were observed among the SC compared with the control group. No significant difference in patient (89.5% versus 95.6% confidence interval, CI 95% [0.7-10.0]; P = .14) or graft survival (88.7% versus 91.8%, CI 95% [0.4-3.9] P = .63) was observed between the groups. CONCLUSION: Surgical complications, especially urologic complications appear frequently after renal transplantation. Dialysis duration and pre-transplant immunization were linked to the occurrence of a surgical complication, which did not affect graft or patient survival.

[Urinary complications of one-stitch ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation]. / Complications urinaires après réimplantation urétérovésicale selon la technique du "one-stitch" en transplantation rénale.

PURPOSE: To assess urinary complications related to the "one-stitch" technique extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation, and evaluate the impact of such complications on kidney graft and patient survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective study was performed on 202 renal transplant recipients, from January 2004 to December 2008. Two combined kidney and liver transplantations were excluded. The "one-stitch" extravesical ureteroneocystostomy technique, fast and easy to perform, was systematically used. The evaluated urinary complications were urinary fistula, ureteral stenosis, symptomatic ureteral reflux, stone formation and complicated hematuria. We tried to point out factors impacting urinary complications occurrence and studied grafts and patients survival according to the existence of urinary complications. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients presented urinary complications (27.5%). The most frequent urinary complications were complicated hematuria (36 over 200, 18%), ureteral stenosis (15 over 200, 7.5%). Few cases of stone disease (one over 200, 0.5%), urinary fistula (two over 200, 1%) and symptomatic ureteral reflux (one over 200, 0.5%) were noted. Male gender (100 vs 34, P=0.95), age (46.78 ± 14.17 vs 48.06 ± 14.19 years, P=0.58), Body mass index (24.14 ± 5.04 vs 24.28 ± 4.83, P=0.86) and past history of renal transplantations (16 ± 3% vs 10 ± 3%, P=0.27) as well as cold ischemia time (17.08 ± 7.07 vs 16.9 ± 8.95 hours, P=0.71) were not significantly different in the urinary complications group and the non-urinary complications group. Median hospitalization time was similar in both groups (14 vs 12 days, P=0.37). The existence of urinary complications didn't affect the 5 years kidney graft survival (91.9% vs 89.9%, HR 1.21, CI 95% [0.37-3.3], P=0.83) neither the 5 years patient survival (94.8% vs 92.15%, HR 0.52 CI 95% [0.13-2.07], P=0.85). CONCLUSION: If benign urinary complications in "one-stitch" ureteroneocystostomy were frequent in our study (17% grade II Clavien Dindo), kidney graft and patients survivals were not affected.