Icosapent ethyl modulates circulating vascular regenerative cell content: The IPE-PREVENTION CardioLink-14 trial.

BACKGROUND: REDUCE-IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial) showed that icosapent ethyl (IPE) reduced major adverse cardiovascular events by 25%. Since the underlying mechanisms for these benefits are not fully understood, the IPE-PREVENTION CardioLink-14 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04562467) sought to determine if IPE regulates vascular regenerative (VR) cell content in people with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia. METHODS: Seventy statin-treated individuals with triglycerides ≥1.50 and <5.6 mmol/L and either atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or type 2 diabetes with additional cardiovascular risk factors were randomized to IPE (4 g/day) or usual care. VR cells with high aldehyde dehydrogenase activity (ALDHhi) were isolated from blood collected at the baseline and 3-month visits and characterized with lineage-specific cell surface markers. The primary endpoint was the change in frequency of pro-vascular ALDHhiside scatter (SSC)lowCD133+ progenitor cells. Change in frequencies of ALDHhiSSCmid monocyte and ALDHhiSSChi granulocyte precursor subsets, reactive oxygen species production, serum biomarkers, and omega-3 levels were also evaluated. FINDINGS: Baseline characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, and medications were balanced between the groups. Compared to usual care, IPE increased the mean frequency of ALDHhiSSClowCD133+ cells (-1.00% ± 2.45% vs. +7.79% ± 1.70%; p = 0.02), despite decreasing overall ALDHhiSSClow cell frequency. IPE assignment also reduced oxidative stress in ALDHhiSSClow progenitors and increased ALDHhiSSChi granulocyte precursor cell content. CONCLUSIONS: IPE-PREVENTION CardioLink-14 provides the first translational evidence that IPE can modulate VR cell content and suggests a novel mechanism that may underlie the cardioprotective effects observed with IPE in REDUCE-IT. FUNDING: HLS Therapeutics provided the IPE in kind and had no role in the study design, conduct, analyses, or interpretation.

Vascular Regenerative Cell Deficiencies in South Asian Adults.

BACKGROUND: South Asian individuals shoulder a disproportionate burden of cardiometabolic diseases. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine if vascular regenerative cell content varies significantly between South Asian and White European people. METHODS: Between January 2022 and January 2023, 60 South Asian and 60 White European adults with either documented cardiovascular disease or established diabetes with ≥1 other cardiovascular risk factor were prospectively enrolled. Vascular regenerative cell content in venous blood was enumerated using a flow cytometry assay that is based on high aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDHhi) activity and cell surface marker phenotyping. The primary outcome was the difference in frequency of circulating ALDHhi progenitor cells, monocytes, and granulocytes between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Compared with White European participants, those of South Asian ethnicity were younger (69 ± 10 years vs 66 ± 9 years; P < 0.05), had lower weight (88 ± 19 kg vs 75 ± 13 kg; P < 0.001), and exhibited a greater prevalence of type 2 diabetes (62% vs 92%). South Asian individuals had markedly lower circulating frequencies of pro-angiogenic ALDHhiSSClowCD133+ progenitor cells (P < 0.001) and ALDHhiSSCmidCD14+CD163+ monocytes with vessel-reparative capacity (P < 0.001), as well as proportionally more ALDHhi progenitor cells with high reactive oxygen species content (P < 0.05). After correction for sex, age, body mass index, and glycated hemoglobin, South Asian ethnicity was independently associated with lower ALDHhiSSClowCD133+ cell count. CONCLUSIONS: South Asian people with cardiometabolic disease had less vascular regenerative and reparative cells suggesting compromised vessel repair capabilities that may contribute to the excess vascular risk in this population. (The Role of South Asian vs European Origins on Circulating Regenerative Cell Exhaustion [ORIGINS-RCE]; NCT05253521).

Addressing Insulin Injection Technique: A Follow-up Study of Canadian Patients with Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Proper insulin injection technique is important for optimal glycaemic control, yet patients with diabetes often inject insulin incorrectly. Previous studies identified common errors in insulin injection in Canada, and this article seeks to evaluate the current insulin injection technique practices among patients and explore the effectiveness of feedback and education in improving their technique. METHODS: The study recruited 147 patients and 16 physicians across Canada to gather insights into current insulin injection practices and education gaps. Eligible patients were people living with diabetes who inject insulin using an insulin pen and pen needles. Eligible physicians, who were unsupported by diabetes educators, completed a practice assessment survey and selected 10 eligible patients to complete a baseline assessment survey. During the patient visit, if an error in the patient's technique was identified, a pop-up knowledge transfer (KT) prompt would appear, providing feedback and information on best practices at the point of care. Follow-up surveys were completed 1-3 months later. RESULTS: Physicians reported facing barriers to providing education and feedback, including lack of time and personnel, and lack of effective educational material. Patients demonstrated modest improvements in some injection technique domains at their follow-up visit, including injection force factors, time the needle was held in the skin, pen needle reuse, injection area size, and injection angle. The most common initial mistakes by patients were selecting an area smaller than recommended and not paying attention to the injection force. At the second visit, patients reduced an average of one error in their injection technique. CONCLUSION: Results showed that basic feedback by their physician during one visit could exert moderate improvements on patients' injection technique. Proper injection technique is critical for diabetes management, and incorporating targeted ongoing education and support can significantly enhance physician practices, ultimately reducing risks and improving outcomes.

Generalizability of the REDUCE-IT trial to South Asians with cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: South Asians (SAs) represent ∼25% of the world's population and account for >50% of global cardiovascular (CV) deaths, yet they continue to be underrepresented in contemporary clinical trials. The REDUCE-IT study demonstrated in a high-risk and predominantly White population that icosapent ethyl (IPE) lowered major adverse cardiovascular events by 25%. We sought to determine the generalizability of these results to a high-risk population of SAs with established CV disease living in Canada. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional observational study of 200 statin-treated SAs (≥45 years) with atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD) (NCT05271591). SA ethnicity was self-identified as being of Anglo-Indian, Bangladeshi, Bengali, Bhutanese, Goan, Gujarati, Indian, Jatt, Kashmiri, Maharashtrian, Malayali, Nepali, Pakistani, Punjabi, Sindhi, Sinhalese, Sri Lankan, Tamil, Telugu, or other SA. ASCVD was defined as the presence of coronary, carotid, or peripheral atherosclerosis. FINDINGS: Mean age of the cohort was 67 years, where 82% were men and 57% had diabetes. The predominant ASCVD phenotype was coronary artery disease (94%). Mean (SD) baseline LDL-C and triglycerides were 1.70 (0.8) mmol/L and 1.42 (1.0) mmol/L, respectively. Three-quarters were on high-intensity statin therapy. According to the Health Canada/Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines and FDA-approved indication, 33% and 25% of the participants were, respectively, eligible for IPE. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of high-intensity, statin-treated, high-risk patients with ASCVD and of self-reported SA ethnicity are eligible for IPE. These data have important translational implications for SAs who are at a disproportionately higher risk of CV morbidity and mortality. FUNDING: This study was funded by an unrestricted grant provided by HLS Therapeutics Inc, Canada.

A randomized trial of icosapent ethyl in ambulatory patients with COVID-19.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains a source of considerable morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Therapeutic options to reduce symptoms, inflammatory response, or disease progression are limited. This randomized open-label trial enrolled 100 ambulatory patients with symptomatic COVID-19 in Toronto, Canada. Results indicate that icosapent ethyl (8 g daily for 3 days followed by 4 g daily for 11 days) significantly reduced high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and improved symptomatology compared with patients assigned to usual care. Specifically, the primary biomarker endpoint, change in hs-CRP, was significantly reduced by 25% among treated patients (-0.5 mg/L, interquartile range [IQR] [-6.9,0.4], within-group p = 0.011). Conversely, a non-significant 5.6% reduction was observed among usual care patients (-0.1 mg/L, IQR [-3.2,1.7], within-group p = 0.51). An unadjusted between-group primary biomarker analysis was non-significant (p = 0.082). Overall, this report provides evidence of an early anti-inflammatory effect of icosapent ethyl in a modest sample, including an initial well-tolerated loading dose, in symptomatic outpatients with COVID-19. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04412018.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Switching to Insulin Degludec from Other Basal Insulins in a Real-World Canadian Population with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes: The CAN-TREAT Study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to examine glycaemic control and safety of insulin degludec (degludec) in patients with either type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) under routine care settings in Canada. METHODS: Data were extracted from medical records of adults with T1D or T2D who switched to degludec (± prandial insulin) from another basal insulin (± prandial insulin) ≥ 6 months prior to data collection. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at 6 ± 3 months after degludec initiation. Secondary endpoints included change in hypoglycaemia rate in the 6 months before versus the 6 months after switching, and change in mean total daily insulin dose. RESULTS: Of 667 patients assessed for eligibility, 626 were included. After 6 ± 3 months, HbA1c decreased from baseline in patients with T1D (- 0.3% [- 0.42, - 0.14]95% CI; p < 0.001) and in patients with T2D (- 0.4% [- 0.55, - 0.30]95% CI; p < 0.001). In patients with T1D, there were significant reductions in the rates of overall (rate ratio [RR] 0.70), non-severe (RR 0.69), non-severe nocturnal (RR 0.36), and severe nocturnal hypoglycaemia (RR 0.12; all p ≤ 0.004). In patients with T2D there was a significant reduction in non-severe nocturnal hypoglycaemia (RR 0.22; p < 0.001). Mean daily basal insulin dose decreased in patients with T1D (- 1.6 units [- 2.8, - 0.4]95% CI; p = 0.008); there was no significant change in patients with T2D (- 0.6 units [- 2.7, 1.4]95% CI; p = 0.543). CONCLUSION: In routine clinical practice, improved glycaemic control was observed in patients with T1D or T2D switching to insulin degludec from other basal insulins, with either improvement or no change in hypoglycaemia rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03674866.

Insulin Injection Practices in a Population of Canadians with Diabetes: An Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Proper insulin injection technique has demonstrated positive clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes. A Canadian-based practice reflective was undertaken to evaluate the current state of understanding of injection technique practices by patients administering insulin, and the importance physicians place on proper injection technique. METHODS: Twenty-four sites across Canada completed a practice profile survey and enrolled adult non-pregnant patients with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes injecting insulin using an insulin pen. Seven areas of proper injection technique to be evaluated were identified by the study steering committee: size of injection site, use of a skin lift, needle reuse, length of the needle, duration of the needle in the skin, injection into lipohypertrophic tissue, and applied injection force. During a scheduled visit, each patient filled out the Injection Technique Survey and the physician documented the answers via an electronic database. RESULTS: Almost all physicians surveyed agreed (96%) that proper insulin injection technique is important or very important and 80% indicated they were either completely confident or fairly confident in discussing overall insulin injection technique. All patients surveyed were making at least one insulin injection technique error within the following categories: applied injection force (76%), area size of injection site (64%), duration of pen needle in skin (61%), pen needle reuse (39%), performs a skin lift with a 4 or 5 mm needle (38%), uses a longer pen needle than required (34%), and injection of insulin into lipohypertrophic tissue (37%). CONCLUSION: Patients commonly make insulin injection errors. Patient and physician education on optimal insulin injection technique continues to be an unmet medical need for the treatment of patients with diabetes. Prospective trials examining the impact of new technology, diabetes educational teams, and e-learning as educational interventions are potential avenues to explore in future studies to support improved insulin injection technique.