A pilot study evaluating high dose esomeprazole, bismuth subcitrate and amoxicillin for eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection in Iran.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is strongly associated with peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. We evaluated two triple therapy regimens comprising esomeprazole, high dose bismuth, and different doses of amoxicillin for first-line H. pylori eradication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients with dyspepsia and naive H. pylori infection were randomly assigned into two groups (n = 100). Both groups were treated for 14 days similarly with esomeprazole (40 mg, twice daily) and bismuth subcitrate (240 mg, three times daily), but the dose of amoxicillin was varied between Groups A (750 mg) and B (1000 mg) three times daily. Treatment compliance and side effect were evaluated following the therapies and after 8 weeks, a negative test of stool H. pylori antigen confirmed eradication. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable with respect to sex and age. According to intention to treat analysis, eradication rates were 80% (95% CI: 77.2%-82.8%) and 90% (95% CI: 84.1%-95.9%) in A and B groups, respectively (p = 0.22). Per-protocol eradication rates were 87% (95% CI: 80.4%-93.6%) and 92.8% (95% CI: 87.7%-97.9%), respectively (p = 0.23). Severe adverse effects were 3% and 2%, respectively (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: High dose esomeprazole, amoxicillin and bismuth achieved 92.8% cure rates per protocol in a country with a high background rate of resistance. Additional studies are needed to ascertain whether this therapy can be further improved. Until then, it can be recommended as a first-line H. pylori eradication in north of Iran.

Effects of 14-days bismuth- and tetracycline-containing quadruple therapy with concomitant regimen for the first line Helicobacterpylori eradication.

Background: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has infected about 50% of the world's population and it is the main cause for peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma and even a major cause for gastric MALT lymphoma. Methods: This study was performed in Mazandaran, Sari, situated in North of Iran. Three-hundred and twenty-eight adult patients with endoscopically approved gastric or duodenal ulcers or erosions and H. pylori infection were randomly divided into 2 groups to receive either 14 days PABT (Pantoprazole 40 mg, Amoxicillin 1 g, Bismuth 425 mg (all twice daily) and Tetracycline 500 mg four times a day) and PACM (Pantoprazole 40 mg, Amoxicillin 1g, Clarithromycin 500 mg, and Metronidazole 500 mg, all twice daily). To evaluate H. pylori eradication, fecal H. pylori antigen test was performed 8 weeks after treatment. Results: The eradication rates were 94.51% in the PABT and 91.46% in PACM group based on the intention to treat analysis. Moreover, the eradication rates were 95.58% and 92.72% according to per-protocol analysis, respectively. Also, both groups had very low rates of severe side effects. Conclusion: Regarding the ideal eradication rates achieved by both treatment groups and the low rates of severe side effects, both treatment protocols can be prescribed for H. pylori eradication in North of Iran.

Concomitant occurrence of appendiceal mucocele and ulcerative colitis: Case reports.

Background: Appendiceal mucocele (AM) is a rare disease, manifested by accumulation of mucus in appendiceal lumen. The role of ulcerative colitis (UC) in the occurrence of appendiceal mucocele is not known. However, it is suggested that AM may be a presentation of colorectal cancer in IBD patients. Case Presentation: Here, we presented 3 cases of concomitant AM and ulcerative colitis. The first patient was a 55-year-old woman with 2-year history of left sided UC; the second person was a 52-year-old woman with 12-year history of pan-UC; and the third patient was a 60-year-old man with 11-year history of pan-colitis. They were all referred due to indolent right lower quadrant abdominal pain. Imaging evaluations suggested the presence of appendiceal mucocele and therefore, they all went under operation. Pathologic evaluation reported AM of mucinous cyst adenoma type; low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm of appendix with intact serosa; and cyst-adenoma type AM for the three above-mentioned patients, respectively. Conclusion: Although concomitant occurrence of AM and ulcerative colitis is rare, regarding the potential of neoplastic changes in AM, physicians must keep in mind the diagnosis of AM in UC patients with non-specific abdominal RLQ pain or bulged appendiceal orifice during colonoscopy.

Epidemiological, Endoscopic, Clinical, and Pathological Features of Patients with Celiac Diseases in Southern Littoral of Caspian Sea.

Background: Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder resulting from gluten consumption in genetically predisposed individuals. The present study investigated the epidemiological, endoscopic, and clinicopathological features of patients with celiac disease in the southern littoral of the Caspian Sea. Methods: 140 patients with celiac disease were interviewed and examined regarding demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and serologic, endoscopic, and pathological findings. Results: 44 (31.4%) of the patients were male and 68.6% were female. The mean age of the patients at diagnosis was 27.13±13.4 years (ranging from 2 to 60 years). The most common gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were bloating (47.8%), abdominal pain (47.1%) and diarrhea (30.7%), respectively. Also, 17 (12.1%) patients did not complain of any GI symptoms.18 (12.8%) patients had aphthous stomatitis, 10.7% had dermatitis herpetiformis, 3.6% suffered from itching without a rash, two (1.4%) mentioned psoriasis and one (0.7%) had lichen planus. 19 (19.7%) of the female patients complained of menstrual bleeding disorders, 4% mentioned infertility, and 2% experienced primary amenorrhea. The most common comorbid condition was hypothyroidism in 16 (11.4%) patients. The most common endoscopic finding was duodenal scalloping (37.25%). In addition, 7.8% of the patients had a normal endoscopic appearance. 43 (30.7%) patients were classified as Marsh IIIC, 25.7% Marsh IIIB, 17.8% Marsh IIIA, 12.8% Marsh II and 12.8% were classified as Marsh I. Conclusion: Since celiac disease can present with non-GI manifestations and the majority of our patients had Marsh III classification, it seems that celiac disease must be considered as a routine screening test in GI clinics, and also, it should be kept in mind as a differential diagnosis in other specialty fields.

Efficacy of 14-day concomitant quadruple therapy and 14-day high-dose dual therapy on H. pylori eradication.

Aim: We compared the efficacy of two different regimens for H. pylori eradication in areas with high antibiotic resistance. Background: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a gram-negative bacillus that has a strong association with chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer disease. Different regimens with varying degrees of effectiveness have been used for H. pylori eradication. Methods: The current randomized controlled trial (RCT) randomly assigned 217 patients who had indications for H. pylori eradication therapy to two groups. One group were administered concomitant quadruple therapy (pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 gr, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg every 12 hours) for 14 days, and the second group received 14 days of high-dose dual therapy, consisting of esomeprazole 40 mg BID and amoxicillin 1g TDS. H. pylori eradication was assessed eight weeks after the end of treatment. Results: H. pylori eradication rates by PP analysis for 14 days concomitant quadruple therapy and high-dose dual therapy were 88.6% (95% CI, 80.3-92.8) and 82.2% (95% CI, 74.8-89.5), respectively (p = 0.19). According to intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the eradication rates were 81.6% (95% CI, 74.5-88.6) and 80.6% (95% CI, 73-88.1), respectively (p = 0.58). Overall drug side effects were 20.8% in high-dose dual therapy and 49.6% in concomitant quadruple therapy (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Fourteen days concomitant quadruple therapy can be considered as a relatively acceptable regimen for H. pylori eradication in areas with high clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance. It seems that high-dose dual therapy could be a promising alternative regimen in these areas.

A Comprehensive Review on the Ethnobotany, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, and Toxicology of Mentha aquatic L (water mint) as a Wild Shallow Vegetable.

Mentha spp. are aromatic plants and have been used in the medical, cosmetics, and food industries. These plants have been used as a traditional herbal medicine for various types of diseases. Mentha aquatica L. (water mint) is a perennial plant used as a wild vegetable and a culinary herb. As its name suggests, it grows in the shallow margins and channels of streams, rivers, wet meadows, etc. It has been used as a tonic plant, sedative, and soothing for intestinal parasites, constipation, diarrhea, stomach troubles, biliousness, liver diseases, impotence, low or high blood pressure, and expelling intestinal worms in children, enhancing longevity. Researchers from all over the world have studied the chemical composition and pharmacological activities of this plant, such as its anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory, and anti-oxidant activities. In addition, the neurochemical properties, larvicidal activity, and phytochemical analysis of the plant have also been reported. However, there is no review article available that gathers all the information and provides insights for future studies on M. aquatica. Against this backdrop, the present research is conducted to categorize the published studies and to offer more suggestions to researchers for future studies.

A Comparison between 10-day and 12-day Concomitant Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is one of the most common bacterial infections worldwide, which is associated with peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. In this study, we compared the efficacy of 10-day versus 12-day concomitant therapy as the first-line treatment for H. pylori eradication in Iran. METHODS 218 patients with peptic ulcer disease and naïve H. pylori infection, were randomly divided into two groups to receive either 10-day or 12-day concomitant regimens, composed of pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg, all given twice daily. Eight weeks after treatment, H. pylori eradication was assessed by 14C- urea breath test. The trial was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (code: IRCT20170521034070N2). RESULTS 212 patients completed the study. According to the intention to treat analysis, the eradication rates were 83.6% (95% CI: 76.6-90.5) and 88.8% (95% CI: 82.8-94.7) in 10-day and 12-day concomitant therapy groups, respectively (p = 0.24). Per-protocol eradication rates were 85.9% (95% CI: 79.3-92.4) and 92.6% (95% CI: 87.6-97.5), respectively (p = 0.19). The rates of severe side effects were not statistically different between the two groups (3.6% vs. 8.1%; p = 0.428). CONCLUSION 12-day concomitant therapy could achieve ideal eradication rates by both intention to treat and perprotocol analyses. In order to reduce the cost of drugs and the rate of adverse effects of therapy, among 10-day and 12day regimens, 12-day concomitant therapy seems to be a good alternative to 14-day concomitant therapy that has been suggested by international guidelines.

Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori in Iran: A Review.

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is one of the most common bacterial infections, affecting almost half of the world's population. It is associated with peptic ulcer disease, gastric adenocarcinoma, and lymphoma. In Iran, the prevalence of H. pylori infection has been reported to be between 36% and 90% in different geographic regions. Several studies have assessed the efficacy of different therapeutic options for firstline and second-line H. pylori eradication in Iran; however, the results are conflicting. Therefore, we conducted a review to evaluate different studies in order to select the best options and to provide recommendations for H. pylori eradication in Iran. Accordingly, we searched through PubMed to obtain relevant randomized clinical trials published in English language up to June 2017. According to our study, among first-line eradication regimens, bismuth-based furazolidone- or clarithromycin-containing quadruple therapies, hybrid regimen, and concomitant therapy seem to be appropriate options. Also, 10- or 14-day clarithromycin-containing triple therapy can be used if local H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin is known to be less than 15%. For second-line H. pylori eradication, bismuth-based quadruple therapies and 14-day levofloxacin-based triple therapy can be used, provided that antibiotics other than those used in the first-line regimen are used. Third-line H. pylori eradication regimens have not been addressed in Iranian studies. However, most guidelines recommend treatment according to the results of culture and susceptibility testing. Although we limited our investigation to H. pylori eradication regimens in Iran, the results are transferrable to any region as long as the patterns of antibiotic resistance are the same.

Comparison of Oral versus Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitors in Preventing Re-bleeding from Peptic Ulcer after Successful Endoscopic Therapy.

BACKGROUND Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are now widely prescribed for the management of patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding; although its optimal dose and route of administration has remained a controversial issue. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of high dose oral versus intravenous (IV) PPI after successful endoscopic therapy in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer disease. METHODS 178 patients with active upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to a peptic ulcer with stigmata of high risk for re-bleeding entered the study. After successful endoscopic hemostasis, they were randomized to receive either high dose oral pantoprazole (80 mg stat and 80 mg twice daily for 3 days) or high dose intravenous pantoprazole (80 mg IV infusion within 30 minutes and 8 mg per hour for 3 days). After the 3rd day, the patients in both groups received oral pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily for one month. The end points were comparing the rate of re-bleeding or mortality, and the need for blood transfusion or surgery during the first month between the two groups. RESULTS There were not significant statistical differences between the two groups in the volume of blood transfusion, mean duration of hospital stay, need to surgery, or mortality rates. However, the rates of re-bleeding were 2.3% (2:88) in the IV group and 3.3% (3:90) in the oral group (p = 0.6). CONCLUSION According to our findings, it seems that high dose oral PPI can be a good alternative to high dose IV PPI in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer who are at high risk of re-bleeding. Due to the lower cost and the availability of oral PPIs, their use can be economically much more affordable.

A Comparison between Hybrid and Concomitant Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is one of the most common bacterial infections worldwide. We designed a study to compare the efficacy of 14-day hybrid regimen with 10-day concomitant therapy for H. pylori eradication in Iran. METHODS 252 patients with naïve H. pylori infection were randomly divided to receive either hybrid regimen (pantoprazole 40 mg, and amoxicillin 1 gr twice daily for 14 days, accompanied by clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg, twice daily just during the last 7 days) or concomitant regimen (pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 gr, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg, all twice daily for 10 days). 8 weeks after therapy, 14C- urease breath test was performed to confirm eradication. RESULTS According to intention to treat analysis, the eradication rates were 87.3% (95% CI: 81.4-93.1) and 80.9% (95% CI: 74-87.8) in hybrid and concomitant groups, respectively (p=0.38). Per-protocol eradication rates were 89.3% (95% CI: 83.8-94.7) and 83.1% (95% CI: 76.3-89.8), respectively (p=0.19). The rates of severe side effects were not statistically different between the two groups (4% vs. 8.7%). CONCLUSION 14-day hybrid therapy can be considered as a nearly acceptable regimen with few severe side effects in Iran. However, it seems that the efficacy of this therapy is decreasing as the resistance rates to antibiotics are increasing. We suggest further studies to assess the efficacy of a more prolonged concomitant therapy for H. pylori eradication in Iran.

A Comparison between Hybrid Therapy and Standard Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Patients with Uremia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND The prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in hemodialysis patients is more than the general population. They are also more prone to complications including upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 14 days hybrid regimen with 14 days triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori ) eradication in hemodialysis patients. METHODS Forty hemodialysis patients with naïve H.pylori infection were randomized to receive either hybrid regimen (pantoprazole 40 mg + amoxicillin 500 mg, both twice a day during the first 7 days, followed by pantoprazole 40 mg + amoxicillin 500 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + tinidazole 500 mg, all twice a day, for the second 7 days, or standard triple therapy including pantoprazole 40 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and amoxicillin 500 mg, all twice a day for 14 days. H.pylori eradication was assessed by fecal H.pylori antigen test 8 weeks after the treatment. RESULTS All the patients completed the study. According to both intention to treat and per-protocol analyses, H.pylori eradication rates were 100% (95% confidence interval (CI): 100) in those who received hybrid therapy and 70% (95% CI: 69.4 - 70.8) in those who were treated by standard triple therapy (p=0.02). Severe adverse effects were not reported by any patient; however, mild adverse effects were more frequent in those who received standard triple therapy (p<0.05). CONCLUSION Hybrid regimen could achieve ideal H.pylori eradication rates with low rates of adverse effects.

Effects of Clarithromycin-Containing Quadruple Therapy on Helicobacter Pylori Eradication after Nitroimidazole-Containing Quadruple Therapy Failure.

BACKGROUND Several large clinical trials and meta-analyses have shown about 20% failure to eradicate Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori), necessitating investigations for second-line treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of clarithromycin-containing quadruple regimen after nitroimidazole-containing quadruple therapy failure. METHODS Thirty two patients who had failed 10-day H.pylori treatment with omeprazole, amoxicillin, bismuth subcitrate, and metronidazole (OABM) regimen and 31 patients who had failed 10-day treatment with omeprazole, amoxicillin, bismuth subcitrate, and furazolidone (OAMF) regimen entered the study. They all received omeprazole (20 mg), amoxicillin (1 gr), bismuth subcitrate (240 mg) and clarithromycin (500 mg) twice a day for 10 days. Eight weeks after treatment, H. pylori eradication was assessed by (14)C-urea breath test. RESULTS Totally 61 patients completed the study. According to intention to treat (ITT) analysis, eradication rates by second-line OABC regimen were 84.37% (95% CI= 71.7-96.9%) in OABM group and 77.41% (95% CI= 62.71-92.11%) in OABF group (p=0.756). Per-protocol (pp) eradication rates were 87.09% (95% CI= 75.2-98.8%) and 82.75% (95% CI= 79.4-96%), respectively (p=0.638). Also the cumulative eradication rates by OABC regimen were 80.9% (95% CI= 71.2-90.6%) and 85% (95% CI= 75.9-94%) according to ITT and PP analyses, respectively. Severe side effects were reported in 3.1% of the patients. CONCLUSION Regarding ideal eradication rate (>80%) and very low adverse effects, it seems that clarithromycin-containing quadruple therapy can be an encouraging regimen after nitroimidazole-containing regimen failure.

Significance of Response to Hepatitis B Recombinant Vaccine in Subjects with Isolated Antibody to Hepatitis B Core Antigen.

BACKGROUND It is important to differentiate whether isolated anti-HBc is due to false positive results or the prior exposure to hepatitis B virus, because individuals with false-positive anti-HBc can benefit from vaccination and their blood can be safely transfused. To distinguish between these two conditions, we evaluated the serologic response to hepatitis B vaccine. METHODS Ninety subjects with isolated anti-HBc (cases) and 100 subjects with totally negative hepatitis B serologic markers (controls) were recruited to receive three doses of hepatitis-B (HB) vaccine. Thirty days after the first dose of the vaccine, anti-HBs titers were checked and individuals with anti-HBs titer >50 mIU/mL did not receive additional doses of the vaccine. However, others completed the vaccination course, and another blood sample was collected 30 days after the third dose to measure anti-HBs level. RESULTS Nineteen (21.1%) cases and three (3%) controls had no sero-conversion (anti-HBs titers <10 mIU/mL) 30 days after the third dose (p<0.0001). Primary response, defined as the development of anti-HBs antibody titers ≥10 mIU/mL 30 days after the third dose, was observed in 43 (47.8%) cases and 92 (92%) controls (p<0.0001). Also, 31.1% of cases developed anti-HBs titers ≥ 50 mIU/mL 30 days after the first dose of vaccine, but the rate was significantly lower (5%) in the control group (p<0.0001). Furthermore, half of the individuals with positive isolated anti-HBc developed protective levels of anti-HBs after three doses of HB vaccination. CONCLUSION More than 75% of individuals with positive isolated anti-HBc can benefit from vaccination and can be included in donor pool. Also, one fifth seemed to have occult HBV infection. So HB vaccination may be used as a diagnostic tool for clarifying the situation of the subjects with isolated anti-HBc.

Large Bowel Obstruction after Colonoscopy; A Case Report.

Postpolypectomy bleeding and perforation are the major complications of colonoscopy. This report presents a rare case of colon obstruction immediately after colonoscopy. A 56-year-old man underwent colonoscopy because of 6 months lower abdominal pain. Colonoscopy revealed diverticulosis and multiple small sessile polyps in sigmoid colon. Biopsy samples were taken from the polyps and the procedure was continued up to cecum. Soon after the procedure, the patient complained of colicky abdominal pain accompanied by diaphoresis. In physical examination, the abdomen seemed distended and bowel sounds were high-pitched. There was no abdominal tenderness or guarding. Plain and upright abdominal radiography showed multiple colonic air-fluid levels. Immediately, the patient underwent second colonoscopy, but passage of scope through sigmoid colon (at the site of biopsies) was somewhat hard because of edema and spasm. The colonoscope proceeded gently up to cecum and decompressed the entire colon by suctioning the air that was entrapped in proximal parts. By second colonoscopy and further conservative treatments, the patient's condition improved without any surgical procedure and was discharged after 24 hours.

Comparison Between 10- and 14-Day Hybrid Regimens for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication has always been a concern. In our previous study, 14-day hybrid regimen showed ideal results. Based on these findings, we decided to compare the efficacy of 10- and 14-day hybrid regimens for H. pylori eradication. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy patients with peptic ulcer disease and H. pylori infection were enrolled in the study. One hundred and thirty-four patients received 10-day hybrid regimen (PACT-10): pantoprazole, 40 mg, and amoxicillin, 1 g, both twice daily for 10 days; plus clarithromycin, 500 mg, and tinidazole, 500 mg, both twice daily just during the last 5 days. One hundred and thirty-six patients received 14-day hybrid regimen (PACT-14): pantoprazole, 40 mg, and amoxicillin, 1 g, both twice a day for 14 days; plus clarithromycin, 500 mg, and tinidazole, 500 mg, both twice daily just for the last 7 days. Eight weeks after treatment, (14) C-urea breath test was performed to evaluate H. pylori eradication. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty patients (124 patients in PACT-10 and 126 patients in PACT-14 regimens) completed the study. The intention-to-treat eradication rates were 77.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 70.6-84.6%) and 86% (95% CI: 80-92%) for the two regimens, respectively (p = .17). Per-protocol eradication rates were 83.8% (95% CI: 80-86%) and 92.8% (95% CI: 88-96%), respectively (p < .01). There were no significant intergroup differences in compliance to treatment or discontinuation of therapy due to severe side effects. CONCLUSION: Ten-day hybrid regimen could not achieve acceptable eradication rate. However, 14-day hybrid regimen seems to be an acceptable option for H. pylori eradication in Iran.

A Comparison between Moderate- and High-dose Furazolidone in Triple Regimens for Helicobacterpylori Eradication in Iran.

BACKGROUND Furazolidone has been used as an alternative for clarithromycin or metronidazole in Helicobacterpylori (H.pylori) eradication regimens. In Iran, 14-day Furazolidone-containing quadruple regimens have shown promising eradication rates, but short-course, low dose therapies are always attractive. Therefore, we designed a study to compare the efficacy of two 10-day triple regimens containing moderate and high dose furazolidone for H.pylori eradication. METHODS Two hundred and ten patients with peptic ulcer disease who were naïve to H.pylori treatment were included. They were randomized into 2 groups: 105 patients received omeprazole 20mg, amoxicillin 1000mg, and furazolidone 200mg(OAF-400), all twice a day for ten days.And the remaining 105 patients received omeprazole 20mg twice a day, amoxicillin 1000mg twice a day and furazolidone 200mg three times a day for ten days(OAF-600). Urease breath test was performed 8 weeks after the treatment to confirm H. pylori eradication. RESULTS The intention-to-treat eradication rate was 76.19% in group OAF-400 and 80.95% in group OAF-600 (pp=0.38). Per protocol eradication rates were 81.63% and 89.47%, respectively (p= 0.11).Severe adverse effects were reported by 8.6% of the patients in group OAF-400 and 5.7% of the patient in group OAF-600 (p=0.1). However, the total side effects (including mild, moderate, and severe ones) were significantly more prevalent in the OAF-600 group (p=0.001). CONCLUSION None of our triple furazolidone-based regimens (moderate- and high-dose) could achieve the standard eradication rate, and therefore, cannot be considered as a suitable option for first-line treatment.

Target antigens for perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in Iranian patients with ulcerative colitis.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) carry autoantibodies such as perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (p-ANCA). OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the target antigens for p-ANCA in Iranian patients with UC. METHODS p-ANCA target antigens including elastase, lactoferrin, cathepsin G, myeloproxidase, lysozyme, and bactericidal permeability increasing protein (BPI) were determined in 113 patients with UC using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS 59.2% of the patients were positive for at least one antigen and p-ANCA directed against lactoferrin, elastase, lysozyme, cathepsin G, Bactericidal permeability increasing protein, and myeloproxidase in 31.5%, 25.9%, 8.3%, 7.4%, 5.6%, and 0% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSION The highest prevalence of p-ANCA was observed against lactoferrin and elastase. Also, myeloproxidase was not an antigen for p-ANCA among our patients.

Helicobacter pylori eradication in West Asia: a review.

The efficacy of first- and second-line Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication regimens varies considerably in West Asian countries, mainly due to the variable prevalence of resistant organisms. However, no review article has yet evaluated and compared the efficacy of different regimens among different countries of this region. Therefore, we conducted a review to select the best options and provide recommendations for H. pylori treatment in this geographic region. A search through PubMed was carried out to obtain relevant randomized clinical trials published in English language up to June 2013. According to the results, among different therapeutic regimens used as the first-line protocols, 10-d Bismuth-Furazolidone/Metronidazole quadruple therapy, 14-d Clarithromycin-containing hybrid therapy and 14-d quadruple therapy including a proton pump inhibitor + Bismuth + Tetracycline (500 mg QID) + Metronidazole (500 mg TDS) seemed to be appropriate options. Among second-line therapeutic regimens, Bismuth-based quadruple therapies containing Tetracycline and Furazolidone/Metronidazole, triple therapy containing Amoxicillin and Gatifloxacin and Quadruple therapy including Bismuth + Azithromycin and Ofloxacin seemed to be effective options. Third-line therapies were not evaluated in West Asia; most guidelines, however, recommend choosing optimal eradication regimen according to the pattern of antibiotic susceptibility of H. pylori. Although we limited our investigation to H. pylori eradication regimens in West Asia, the clinical significance of the results goes beyond the countries situated in this geographic region. In fact, the results are transferrable to any region as long as the patterns of resistance are the same.

A comparison between standard triple therapy and sequential therapy on eradication of Helicobacter pylori in uremic patients: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in hemodialysis dependent patients is higher than the general population. These patients are also more prone to upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a standard triple therapy with a sequential therapy on Helicobacter pylori eradication in azotemic and hemodialysis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty nine hemodialysis and azotemic patients, naïve to H. pylori treatment, were randomized into two groups to receive either standard triple therapy (pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 500 mg and clarithromycin 250 mg twice a day for 14 days) or a sequential therapy (pantoprazole 40 mg for 10 days, amoxicillin 500 mg twice a day for the first 5 days and clarithromycin 250 mg + tinidazole 500 mg twice a day just during the second 5 days). H. pylori eradication was evaluated by fecal H. pylori antigen assessment 8 weeks after the treatment. RESULTS: Of 49 patients, 45 patients (21 in triple therapy group and 24 in the sequential group) completed the study. Based on intention to treat analysis, H. pylori eradication rates were 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 47.8-85.5%) in standard triple therapy group and 84% (95% CI: 69.6-98.3%) in sequential therapy group (P = 0.34). Per-protocol (PP) eradication rates were (95% CI: 76.2%. 6-89.3%) 54 and 87.5% (95% CI: 68.8-95.5%), respectively (P = 0.32). CONCLUSION: According to Maastricht III consensus report, the results of our study showed that sequential therapy might be a better choice compared with the standard triple therapy in azotemic and hemodialysis patients Iran. We propose to assess the effects of shorter-duration sequential therapy (less than 10 days) for H. pylori eradication.