Retrospective review of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome presenting to the emergency department of a major tertiary center in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) comprises a spectrum of diseases ranging from unstable angina (UA), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Treatment of ACS without STEMI (NSTEMI-ACS) can vary, depending on the severity of presentation and multiple other factors. OBJECTIVE: Analyze the NSTEMI-ACS patients in our institution. DESIGN: Retrospective observational. SETTING: A tertiary care institution with accredited chest pain center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The travel time from ED booking to the final disposition for patients presenting with chest pain was retrieved over a period of 6 months. The duration of each phase of management was measured with a view to identify the factors that influence their management and time from the ED to their final destination. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Travel time from ED to final destination. SAMPLE SIZE: 300 patients. RESULTS: The majority of patients were males (64%) between 61 and 80 years of age (45%). The median disposition time (from ED booking to admission order by the cardiology team) was 5 hours and 19 minutes. Cardiology admissions took 10 hours and 20 minutes from ED booking to the inpatient bed. UA was diagnosed in 153 (51%) patients and non-STEMI in 52 (17%). Coronary catheterization was required in 79 (26%) patients, 24 (8%) had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and 8 (3%) had both catheterization and CABG. CONCLUSION: The time from ED booking to final destination for NSTEMI-ACS patients is delayed due to multiple factors, which caused significant delays in overall management. Additional interventional steps can help improve the travel times, diagnosis, management and disposition of these patients. LIMITATIONS: Single center study done in a tertiary care center so the results from this study may not be extrapolated to other centers.

Door-to-balloon time in the treatment of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic heart disease is still a leading cause of mortality despite improvements in cardiovascular care. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the recommended reperfusion therapy in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and the international guideline is to achieve a door-to-balloon (D2B) time within 90 minutes of patient arrival to an emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVES: Describe interventions, data for the study period, challenges in ensuring 24/7 patient access to PCI and quality indicators. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary care institution in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included all acute coronary syndrome patients from 2010-2018 who presented or were transferred to our ED from nearby non-PCI capable hospitals, and for whom a 'code heart' was activated. Electronic medical records and the patient care report from the ambulance services were accessed for data collection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: D2B time, readmission and mortality rate. SAMPLE SIZE AND CHARACTERISTICS: 354 patients, mean age (standard deviation) 55.6 (12.6) years, males 84.5% (n=299). RESULTS: STEMI patients constituted 94% (n=334) of the study group; the others had non-STEMI or unstable angina. Hypertension (51%) was the most prevalent risk factor. Coronary artery stenting was the most frequent intervention (77.4%) followed by medical therapy (14.7%). The most common culprit artery was the left anterior descending (52.5%) followed by the right coronary artery (26.0%). A D2B time of within 90 minutes was achieved in over 85% of the patients in four of the years in the 278 patients who underwent PCI. The median D2B time (interquar-tile range) over 2010-2018 was 79 (31) minutes. CONCLUSION: Meeting the international benchmark of D2B time within 90 minutes for STEMI patients is achievable when the main stakeholders collaborate in patient-centric care. Our patient demographics represent regional trends. LIMITATIONS: Patient acceptance to our institution is based upon eligibility criteria. Transfer of 'code heart' patients from other institutions was carried out by our ambulance team. The credentials and experience of cardiologists, emergency physicians, and ambulance services are not standardized across the country. Therefore, the results may not be generalizable to other institutions. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.