RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the domain match (truth) and feasibility of candidate instruments assessing flare in knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) according to the identified domains. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From a literature review (575 papers), instruments were selected and evaluated using the truth and feasibility elements of the OMERACT Filter 2.2. These were evaluated by 26 experts, including patients, in two Delphi survey rounds. The final selection was obtained by a vote. RESULTS: 44 instruments were identified. In Delphi Round 1, five instruments were selected. In Round 2, all instruments obtained at least 75 % in terms of content match with the endorsed domains and feasibility. In the final selection, the Flare-OA questionnaire obtained 100 % favorable votes. CONCLUSION: Through consensus of the working group, the Flare-OA questionnaire was selected as the best candidate instrument to move into a full assessment of its measurement properties using the OMERACT Filter 2.2.
Assuntos
Osteoartrite do Quadril , Humanos , Osteoartrite do Quadril/diagnóstico , Estudos de Viabilidade , Articulação do Joelho , ConsensoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A series of qualitative studies conducted by the OMERACT Myositis Working Group identified pain interference, fatigue, and physical function as highly important life impact domains for adults with idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM). In this study, our goal was to assess the responsiveness and minimal important difference of PROMIS pain interference (6a), fatigue (7a), and physical function (8b). METHODS: Adults with IIM from USA, Netherlands, Korea, Sweden, and Australia with two "clinical" visits were enrolled in this prospective study. Anchor questions on a Likert scale were collected at baseline, and manual muscle testing (MMT), physician and patient reported global disease activity, and PROMIS instruments were collected at both visits. Responsiveness was assessed with i) ANOVA, ii) paired t-test, effect size and standardized response mean, and iii) Pearson correlation. Minimal important difference (MID), minimal important change (MIC) and minimal detectable change (MDC) values were calculated. RESULTS: 114 patients with IIM (median age 60, 60 % female) completed both visits. Changes in PROMIS instruments were significantly different among anchor categories. Patients who reported improvement had a significant improvement in their PROMIS scores with at least medium effect size, while patients who reported worsening and stability did not show a significant change with weak effect size. PROMIS instruments had weak to moderate correlations with MMT, patient and physician global disease activity. MID was approximately 2-3 points for Pain Interference and 3-4 points for Fatigue and Physical Function forms based on the method used. MIC was approximately 4-5 for improvement of all the instruments, while MDC was 1.7-2 points for Pain Interference and Physical Function and 3.2-3.9 for Fatigue. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence towards the responsiveness of the PROMIS instruments in a large international prospective cohort of adults with IIM supporting their use as PROMs in adult myositis.
Assuntos
Miosite , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Dor , Miosite/complicações , Miosite/diagnóstico , Fadiga/diagnóstico , Fadiga/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many research studies were adapted, including our longitudinal study examining cognitive impairment (CI) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Cognitive testing was switched from in-person to virtual. This analysis aimed to determine if the administration method (in-person vs. virtual) of the ACR-neuropsychological battery (ACR-NB) affected participant cognitive performance and classification. METHODS: Data from our multi-visit, SLE CI study included demographic, clinical, and psychiatric characteristics, and the modified ACR-NB. Three analyses were undertaken for cognitive performance: (1) all visits, (2) non-CI group visits only and (3) intra-individual comparisons. A retrospective preferences questionnaire was given to participants who completed the ACR-NB both in-person and virtually. RESULTS: We analysed 328 SLE participants who had 801 visits (696 in-person and 105 virtual). Demographic, clinical, and psychiatric characteristics were comparable except for ethnicity, anxiety and disease-related damage. Across all three comparisons, six tests were consistently statistically significantly different. CI classification changed in 11/71 (15%) participants. 45% of participants preferred the virtual administration method and 33% preferred in-person. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 19 tests in the ACR-NB, we identified one or more problems with eight (42%) tests when moving from in-person to virtual administration. As the use of virtual cognitive testing will likely increase, these issues need to be addressed - potentially by validating a virtual version of the ACR-NB. Until then, caution must be taken when directly comparing virtual to in-person test results. If future studies use a mixed administration approach, this should be accounted for during analysis.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Reumatologia , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/complicações , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/psicologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pandemias , COVID-19/complicações , CogniçãoRESUMO
The brain's endocannabinoid system plays a crucial role in reward processes by mediating appetitive learning and encoding the reinforcing properties of substances. Evidence also suggests that endocannabinoids are an important constituent of neuronal substrates involved in emotional responses to stress. Thus, it is critical to understand how the endocannabinoid system and stress may affect reward processes given their importance in substance use disorders. We examined the relationship between factors that regulate endocannabinoid system signaling (i.e., cannabinoid receptor genes and prolonged cannabis exposure) and stress on fMRI BOLD response to reward cues using multivariate statistical analysis. We found that proxies for endocannabinoid system signaling (i.e., endocannabinoid genes and chronic exposure to cannabis) and stress have differential effects on neural response to cannabis cues. Specifically, a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variant in the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CNR1) gene, early life stress, and current perceived stress modulated reward responsivity in long-term, heavy cannabis users, while a variant in the fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) gene and current perceived stress modulated cue-elicited response in non-using controls. These associations were related to distinct neural responses to cannabis-related cues compared to natural reward cues. Understanding the contributions of endocannabinoid system factors and stress that lead to downstream effects on neural mechanisms underlying sensitivity to rewards, such as cannabis, will contribute towards a better understanding of endocannabinoid-targeted therapies as well as individual risks for cannabis use disorder.
Assuntos
Endocanabinoides/genética , Abuso de Maconha/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética , Receptor CB1 de Canabinoide/genética , Recompensa , Estresse Psicológico/genética , Adulto , Endocanabinoides/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Abuso de Maconha/diagnóstico por imagem , Abuso de Maconha/metabolismo , Receptor CB1 de Canabinoide/metabolismo , Estresse Psicológico/diagnóstico por imagem , Estresse Psicológico/metabolismo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The current Canadian and Romanian model predictions for tritium dose following an atmospheric tritiated hydrogen gas (HT) release is based on a default Canadian Standards Association (CSA) conversion factor of HT to tritiated water (HTO) of 4.3%. The determination of an empirical site specific value for the conversion factor was essential for the CANDU Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) in Romania to verify if the CSA value is appropriate for use at this site. Given the role of soil characteristics on the conversion of HT to HTO, on-site experiments would provide the best evaluation of the conversion factor. The objective of the study was to define the soil HT to HTO conversion parameters specific to the Cernavoda NPP site. In June 2016, a series of experiments were conducted to meet this objective. First, the in situ deposition velocity of D2 gas, as a surrogate for HT gas, was obtained using an exposure chamber. Diffusion of D2 into the soil was then evaluated based on the measurements of DHO concentrations in the exposed soil. As soil microbes play a role in the conversion of HT to HTO, this work included a microbiological characterization of the soil, which targeted total soil bacteria (cultivable and gene-based) and hydrogen oxidizing bacteria (cultivable and gene-based). The fraction of hydrogen oxidizing cultivable soil bacteria represented 14-20% of the total cultivable bacteria population estimated as 2.8-29.2 × 105 cfu/g of soil. The empirically derived HT to HTO conversion factor was lower than the default value (4.3%). It fell between 0.9% and 2.0%. The default value is therefore more conservative than the Cernavoda site-specific derived value obtained from the study.
Assuntos
Óxido de Deutério/metabolismo , Deutério/metabolismo , Centrais Nucleares , Poluentes Radioativos do Solo/metabolismo , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Monitoramento de Radiação/métodos , Romênia , Microbiologia do SoloRESUMO
Mortality rates in our fracture liaison service ranged from 2.7% at year 1 to 14.8% at year 5 post-screening. Presentation with multiple simultaneous fractures at screening was associated with higher risk of death. This finding indicates the need for increased focus on this high-risk group. PURPOSE: To examine all-cause mortality rates in a provincial fracture liaison service (FLS) and the association between the index fracture type, particularly multiple simultaneous fractures, and the risk of death at follow-up. METHODS: This cohort study includes fragility fracture patients aged 50+, enrolled in a provincial FLS in Ontario, Canada, between 2007 and 2010. All-cause mortality was assessed using administrative data. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the risk of death 5 years after screening. RESULTS: Crude mortality rates for 6543 fragility fracture patients were 2.7% at year 1, 5.6% at year 2, and 14.8% at year 5 after screening. After adjusting for age and sex, and relative to distal radius fracture, patients with multiple (simultaneous) fractures at screening had a higher risk of dying (HR = 1.8, 95%CI 1.3-2.4), followed by those with a hip fracture (HR = 1.5, 95%CI 1.3-1.8), a proximal humerus fracture (HR = 1.4, 95%CI 1.2-1.7), and other single fractures (HR = 1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.7). Having an index ankle fracture was not associated with the risk of death over a distal radius fracture. As compared to the 50-65 age group, patients 66 years and older had a higher risk of death (for 66-70 age group: HR = 2.5, 95%CI 1.9-3.3; for 71-80: HR = 4.3, 95%CI 3.5-5.4; and for 81+: HR = 10.6, 95%CI 8.7-13.0). Females had a lower risk of death (HR = 0.5, 95%CI 0.5-0.6) than males. CONCLUSIONS: Presenting with multiple fractures was an indicator of higher risk of death relative to a distal radius fracture. This finding indicates the need for increased focus on this high-risk group.
Assuntos
Fraturas Múltiplas , Fraturas do Quadril , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Fraturas Múltiplas/mortalidade , Fraturas do Quadril/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/mortalidade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
We examined the 5-year refracture rate of 6543 patients and found an overall rate of 9.7%. Adjusted analysis showed that presenting with multiple fractures was an indicator of a higher refracture risk; while presenting with an ankle fracture was associated with a lower refracture risk. INTRODUCTION: To examine refractures among patients screened in a province-wide fracture liaison service (FLS). METHODS: We assessed the 5-year refracture rate of fragility fracture patients aged 50+ who were screened at 37 FLS fracture clinics in Ontario, Canada. Refracture was defined as a new hip, pelvis, spine, distal radius, or proximal humerus fracture. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, sex, and index fracture type were used to examine refracture rates. RESULTS: The 5-year refracture rate of 6543 patients was 9.7%. Those presenting with multiple fractures at baseline (i.e., two or more fractures occurring simultaneously) had the highest refracture rate of 19.6%. As compared to the 50-65 age group, refracture risk increased monotonically with age group (66-70 years: HR = 1.3, CI 95%, 1.0-1.7; 71-80 years: HR = 1.7, CI 1.4-2.1; 81+ years: HR = 3.0, CI 2.4-3.7). Relative to distal radius, presenting with multiple fractures at screening was associated with a higher risk of refracture (HR = 2.3 CI 1.6-3.1), while presenting with an ankle fracture was associated with a lower risk of refracture (HR = 0.7 CI 0.6-0.9). Sex was not a statistically significant predictor of refracture risk in this cohort (HR = 1.2, CI 1.0-1.5). CONCLUSIONS: One in ten patients in our cohort refractured within 5 years after baseline. Presenting with multiple fractures was an indicator of a higher refracture risk, while presenting with an ankle fracture was associated with a lower refracture risk. A more targeted FLS approach may be appropriate for patients at a higher refracture risk.
Assuntos
Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fraturas do Tornozelo/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fraturas Múltiplas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/organização & administração , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário/epidemiologia , Recidiva , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Prevenção Secundária/organização & administração , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Life expectancy is increasing in Ireland, but whether this has resulted in healthier life years among the elderly and its impact (if any) on hospital services is unknown. The purpose of the study was to use routinely available data to explore the relationship of age and indicators of clinical complexity in acute hospitals over ten years. The study included all in-patients aged 65+ years from the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) discharged between 2005 and 2014. Indicators of complexity included the Charlson index, overall length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS and deaths in hospital, analysed by the major clinical classification software (CCS). Over the period, the number and rate of admissions increased, especially among those aged 85+. Indicators of patient complexity increased and LOS decreased. In-hospital mortality decreased from 5.9% to 4.7%. Hospitals appear to be managing the emergency care of the older and more complex patient more efficiently and with better outcomes.
Assuntos
Tempo de Internação/tendências , Expectativa de Vida/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Irlanda , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
We evaluated gender imbalance in osteoporosis management in a provincial coordinator-based fracture prevention program and found no difference by gender in treatment of high-risk fragility fracture patients. This establishes that a systemic approach with interventions for all fragility fracture patients can eliminate the gender inequity that is often observed. INRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate an Ontario-based fracture prevention program for its ability to address the well-documented gender imbalance in osteoporosis (OP) management, by incorporating its integrated fracture risk assessments within a needs-based evaluation of equity. METHODS: Fragility fracture patients (≥ 50 years) who were treatment naïve at screening and completed follow-up within 6 months of screening were studied. Patients who underwent bone mineral density (BMD) testing done in the year prior to their current fracture were excluded. All participants had BMD testing conducted through the Ontario OP Strategy Fracture Screening and Prevention program, thus providing us with fracture risk assessment data. Our primary study outcome was treatment initiation at follow-up within 6 months of screening. Gender differences were compared using Fisher's exact test, at p < 0.05. RESULTS: After adjusting for subsequent fracture risk, study participants did not show a statistically significant gender difference in pharmacotherapy initiation at follow-up (p > 0.05). 68.4% of women and 66.2% of men at high risk were treated within 6 months of screening. CONCLUSION: Needs-based analyses show no difference by gender in treatment of high-risk fragility fracture patients. An intensive coordinator-based fracture prevention model adopted in Ontario, Canada was not associated with gender inequity in OP treatment of fragility fracture patients after fracture risk adjustment.
Assuntos
Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Secundária/organização & administração , Sexismo , Idoso , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/organização & administração , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Aquatic ecosystems are chronically exposed to radionuclides as well as other pollutants. Increased concentrations of pollutants in aquatic environments can present a risk to exposed organisms, including fish. The goal of this study was to characterize the effects of tritium, in the context of natural environments, on the health of fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas. Fish were exposed to tritium (activity concentrations ranging from 2 to 23,000Bq/L) and also to various concentrations of several metals to replicate multiple-stressor environments. Fish were exposed for 60days, then transferred to the tritium background site where they stayed for another 60days. Tritium, in the forms of tritiated water (HTO) and organically bound tritium (OBT), and a series of fish health indicators were measured in fish tissues at seven time points throughout the 120days required to complete the exposure and the depuration phases. Results showed effects of environmental exposure following the increase of tritium activity and metals concentrations in water. The internal dose rates of tritium, estimated from tissue HTO and OBT activity concentrations, were consistently low (maximum of 0.2µGy/h) compared to levels at which population effects may be expected (>100µGy/h) and no effects were observed on survival, fish condition, gonado-somatic, hepato-somatic, spleno-somatic and metabolic indices (RNA/DNA, proteins/DNA and protein carbonylation (in gonads and kidneys)). Using multivariate analyses, we showed that several biomarkers (DNA damages, MN frequency, gamma-H2AX, SFA/MUFA ratios, lysosomal membrane integrity, AChE, SOD, phagocytosis and esterase activities) were exclusively correlated with fish tritium internal dose rate, showing that tritium induced genotoxicity, DNA repair activity, changes in fatty acid composition, and immune, neural and antioxidant responses. Some biomarkers were responding to the presence of metals, but overall, more biomarkers were linked to internalized tritium. The results are discussed in the context of multiple stressors involving metals and tritium.
RESUMO
We examined the impact of fragility fractures on the work outcomes of employed patients. The majority successfully returned to their previous jobs in a short amount of time, and productivity loss at work was low. Our findings underscore the fast recovery rates of working fragility fracture patients. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to describe the impact of fragility fractures on the work outcomes of patients who were employed at the time of their fracture. METHODS: A self-report anonymous survey was mailed to fragility fracture patients over 50 who were screened as part of the quality assurance programs of fracture clinics across 35 hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Measures of return to work (RTW), at-work productivity loss (Work Limitations Questionnaire), and sociodemographic, fracture-related, and job characteristics were included in the survey. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative proportion of patients still off work were computed. Factors associated with RTW time following a fragility fracture were examined using Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Of 275 participants, 242 (88 %) returned to work. Of these, the median RTW time was 20.5 days. About 86 % returned to the same job, duties, and hours as before their injury. Among full-time workers, the median number of lost hours due to presenteeism was 2.9 h (Q1-Q3 0.4-8.1 h). The median cost of presenteeism was $75.30 based on the month prior to survey completion. In multivariable analyses, female gender, needing surgery, and medium/heavy work requirements were associated with longer RTW time. Earlier RTW time was associated with elbow fracture and feeling completely better at time of survey completion. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of fragility fracture patients successfully returned to their previous jobs in a short amount of time, and productivity loss at work was low. Our findings underscore their fast recovery rates and give reason for optimism regarding the resilience of this population.
Assuntos
Fraturas por Osteoporose/reabilitação , Retorno ao Trabalho , Absenteísmo , Idoso , Eficiência , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
We evaluated the impact of a more intensive version of an existing post-fracture coordinator-based fracture prevention program and found that the addition of a full-risk assessment improved treatment rates. These findings provide additional support for more intensive programs aimed at reducing the risk of re-fractures. INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based guidelines support coordinator-based programs to improve post-fracture osteoporosis guideline uptake, with more intensive programs including bone mineral density (BMD) testing and/or treatment being associated with better patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a more intensive version (BMD "fast track") of an existing provincial coordinator-based program. METHODS: We compared two versions of the program that screened treatment naïve fragility fracture patients (>50 years). Cases came from the BMD fast track program that included full fracture risk assessment and communication of relevant guidelines to the primary care provider (PCP). Matched controls were selected from the usual care program matching according to age, sex, fracture type, and date. Two matching techniques were used: traditional (hard) matching (TM) and propensity score matching (PS). The outcomes were treatment initiation with bone sparing medication, BMD testing rate, and the rate of returning to discuss the test results with a PCP. RESULTS: The program improvements led to a significant improvement in treatment initiation within 6 months from 16 % (controls based on PS) or 21 % (controls based on TM) to 32 % (cases). Ninety percent of patients in the BMD fast track program returned to their PCP to discuss bone health in the cases versus 60 % of the controls (for TM and PS). BMD testing occurred in 96 % of cases compared to the 66 (TM) or 65 % (PS) of the matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of a full-risk assessment to a coordinator-based program significantly improved treatment rates within 6 months of screening.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Idoso , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário/epidemiologia , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Osteoporose/fisiopatologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/fisiopatologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Medição de Risco/métodosRESUMO
UNLABELLED: In our qualitative study, men with fragility fractures described their spouses as playing an integral role in their health behaviours. Men also described taking risks, preferring not to dwell on the meaning of the fracture and/or their bone health. Communication strategies specific to men about bone health should be developed. INTRODUCTION: We examined men's experiences and behaviours regarding bone health after a fragility fracture. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of five qualitative studies. In each primary study, male and female participants were interviewed for 1-2 h and asked to describe recommendations they had received for bone health and what they were doing about those recommendations. Maintaining the phenomenological approach of the primary studies, the transcripts of all male participants were re-analyzed to highlight experiences and behaviours particular to men. RESULTS: Twenty-two men (50-88 years old) were identified. Sixteen lived with a wife, male partner, or family member and the remaining participants lived alone. Participants had sustained hip fractures (n = 7), wrist fractures (n = 5), vertebral fractures (n = 2) and fractures at other locations (n = 8). Fourteen were taking antiresorptive medication at the time of the interview. In general, men with a wife/female partner described these women as playing an integral role in their health behaviours, such as removing tripping hazards and organizing their medication regimen. While participants described giving up activities due to their bone health, they also described taking risks such as drinking too much alcohol and climbing ladders or deliberately refusing to adhere to bone health recommendations. Finally, men did not dwell on the meaning of the fracture and/or their bone health. CONCLUSIONS: Behaviours consistent with those shown in other studies on men were described by our sample. We recommend that future research address these findings in more detail so that communication strategies specific to men about bone health be developed.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Saúde do Homem , Fraturas por Osteoporose/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Assunção de RiscosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether a commonly used model of behaviour change, stages of change, is helpful in understanding osteoporosis treatment initiation in a cohort of fragility fracture patients. STUDY DESIGN: This longitudinal cohort study used data from a provincial osteoporosis screening program targeting fragility fracture patients age 50 and over. Logistic regression was used to identify baseline factors associated with patients moving from the first, pre-contemplation stage at baseline to the more advanced stages of action/maintenance at follow-up, when treatment is initiated and maintained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient's stage-of-change readiness to accept osteoporosis treatment. RESULTS: At baseline, 91% of patients were in the pre-contemplation stage. Of these, 74.1% remained at the same stage at follow-up, 2.7% moved to contemplation and preparation while 23.2% moved to action/maintenance. The adjusted analysis showed that those who moved from pre-contemplation to action/maintenance were more likely to have a previous fracture OR 1.5 (1.1-2.0), history of oral steroid use OR 2.1 (1.3-3.5), higher perceived benefits to osteoporosis drug treatment OR 1.2 (1.0-1.3), perception of bones as "thin" OR 2.8 (2.0-4.0) and were less likely to perceive that they were taking too many medications OR 0.6 (0.5-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: With the majority of patients in the pre-contemplation and the action/maintenance stages, our results suggest an existence of a two-stage model. The baseline factors that we identified can be used to predict which patients are less likely to initiate treatment, which in turn, can be used to inform post-fracture interventions and facilitate behaviour change.
Assuntos
Modelos Teóricos , Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/diagnósticoRESUMO
UNLABELLED: We examined fracture patients' understanding of "high" fracture risk after they were screened through a post-fracture secondary prevention program and educated about their risk verbally, numerically, and graphically. Our findings suggest that messages about fracture risk are confusing to patients and need to be modified to better suit patients' needs. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine fracture patients' understanding of high risk for future fracture. METHODS: We conducted an in-depth qualitative study in patients who were high risk for future fracture. Patients were screened through the Osteoporosis Exemplary Care Program where they were educated about fracture risk: verbally told they were "high risk" for future fracture, given a numerical prompt that they had a >20 % chance of future fracture over the next 10 years, and given a visual graph highlighting the "high risk" segment. This information about fracture risk was also relayed to patients' primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists. Participants were interviewed at baseline (within six months of fracture) and follow-up (after visit with a PCP and/or specialist) and asked to recall their understanding of risk and whether it applied to them. RESULTS: We recruited 27 patients (20 females, 7 males) aged 51-87 years old. Fractures were sustained at the wrist (n = 7), hip (n = 7), vertebrae (n = 2), and multiple or other locations (n = 11). While most participants recalled they had been labeled as "high risk" (verbal cue), most were unable to correctly recall the other elements of risk (numerical, graphical). Further, approximately half of the patients who recalled they were high risk did not believe that high risk applied, or had meaning, to them. Participants also had difficulty explaining what they were at risk for. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that health care providers' messages about fracture risk are confusing to patients and that these messages need to be modified to better suit patients' needs.
Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Rememoração Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Fraturas por Osteoporose/psicologia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Recidiva , Medição de Risco/métodos , Prevenção Secundária/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
UNLABELLED: The cost-effectiveness of a less intensive fracture liaison service is unknown. We evaluated a fracture liaison service that had been educating and referring patients for secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures for 6 years. Our results suggest that a less intensive fracture liaison service, with moderate effectiveness, can still be worthwhile. INTRODUCTION: Fragility fractures are common among older patients; the risk of re-fracture is high but could be reduced with treatments; different versions of fracture liaison service have emerged to reduce recurrent osteoporotic fractures. But the cost-effectiveness of a less intensive model is unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Ontario Fracture Clinic Screening program, a fracture liaison service that had been educating and referring fragility fracture patients across Ontario, Canada to receive bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis treatments since 2007. METHODS: We developed a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of the program over the patients' remaining lifetime, using rates of bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis treatment and cost of intervention from the program, and supplemented it with the published literature. The analysis took the perspective of a third-party health-care payer. Costs and benefits were discounted at 5 % per year. Sensitivity analyses assessed the effects of different assumptions on the results. RESULTS: The program improved quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) by 4.3 years and led to increased costs of CAD $83,000 for every 1000 patients screened, at a cost of $19,132 per QALY gained. The enhanced model, the Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Fast Track program that includes ordering bone mineral density testing, was even more cost-effective ($5720 per QALY gained). CONCLUSIONS: The Ontario Fracture Clinic Screening program appears to be a cost-effective way to reduce recurrent osteoporotic fractures.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Absorciometria de Fóton/economia , Absorciometria de Fóton/métodos , Idoso , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/economia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/economia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/fisiopatologia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Prevenção Secundária/economia , Prevenção Secundária/organização & administração , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
UNLABELLED: We examined patients' experiences regarding bone mineral density (BMD) testing and bone health treatment after being screened through Ontario's Fracture Clinic Screening Program. Provider-level barriers to testing and treatment appeared to be as significant as patient-level barriers and potentially had more of an impact on treatment than on testing. INTRODUCTION: Post-fracture secondary prevention programs have had modest effects on bone densitometry rates and osteoporosis (OP) treatment initiation. Few studies have examined in depth the reasons that patients choose to seek or avoid investigation and treatment after screening through such a program. Our purpose was to examine patients' experiences regarding bone mineral density (BMD) testing and bone health treatment after screening through Ontario's Fracture Clinic Screening Program (FCSP). METHODS: We conducted a prospective qualitative study in fragility fracture patients screened through one site of the FCSP. Eligible patients not on antiresorptive medication at the time of fracture were assessed by an osteoporosis screening coordinator and advised to follow up with their primary care physician for a BMD test and appropriate treatment. Participants were interviewed within 6, and within 18, months of their clinic visit. Fracture risk was assessed by the study team. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed by two researchers. RESULTS: We conducted 51 interviews with 25 patients (22 females, 3 males) aged 50-79 years old, of whom 8 were deemed high risk for future fracture. Eighteen participants had a BMD test between baseline and follow-up and three reported receiving a prescription for pharmacotherapy. We categorized 21 participants as experiencing at least one barrier to BMD testing and appropriate treatment including health care providers telling participants that the fracture was not a fragility fracture, using participants' appearance/demographic information and X-rays to judge bone density, telling participants that a BMD test was not appropriate, failing to discuss fracture risk status, and giving unclear or incorrect information about treatment. CONCLUSION: We identified modifiable barriers to post-fracture secondary prevention from the patient's perspective. Provider-level barriers appeare to be as significant as patient-level barriers and potentially had more of an impact on treatment than on BMD testing.
Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Secundária/organização & administração , Idoso , Densidade Óssea , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Medição de Risco/métodosRESUMO
The Canadian input parameters related to tritiated hydrogen gas (HT) used in tritium dose models are currently based on experiments performed at the Chalk River Laboratories (CRL) site in 1986, 1987 and 1994. There is uncertainty in how well other sites experiencing atmospheric HT releases are represented by these data. In order to address this uncertainty, HT to HTO conversion factors were evaluated at different locations near the Darlington Nuclear Power Generating Station (DNPGS) site using various experimental approaches. These were D2 gas exposure chamber experiments, atmospheric tritium measurements, and HTO and OBT measurements in vegetation and soil. In addition to these field experiments, chamber experiments were conducted using HT gas on field soil samples. The suggested Canadian input parameters for atmospheric tritium releases estimate the total fraction of HT oxidized in air and in soil, at the site, to be up to a maximum of 2.4%. Based on the more limited data obtained near DNPGS in early spring, this fraction would likely be closer to 0.5%. The result suggests that current parameters provide a conservative estimate for the DNPGS site.
Assuntos
Poluentes Radioativos do Ar/análise , Gases , Hidrogênio/química , Centrais Nucleares , Monitoramento de Radiação/métodos , Trítio/análise , Atmosfera , Canadá , Oxigênio/química , Rios , Solo , Poluentes Radioativos do Solo/análise , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Qualitative research has been recognized in recent years as a field of inquiry used to understand people's beliefs, attitudes, behaviors, culture or lifestyle. While quantitative results are challenging to apply in everyday practice, the qualitative paradigm can be useful to fill in a research context that is poorly understood or ill-defined. It can provide an in-depth study of interactions, a way to incorporate context, and a means to hear the voices of participants. Understanding experiences, motivation, and beliefs can have a profound effect on the interpretation of quantitative research and generating hypotheses. In this paper, we will review different qualitative approaches that healthcare providers and researchers may find useful to implement in future study designs, specifically in the context of osteoporosis and fracture. METHODS: We will provide insight into the qualitative paradigm gained from the osteoporosis literature on fractures using examples from the database Scopus. Five prominent qualitative techniques (narratives, phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, and case study) can be used to generate meanings of the social and clinical world. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: We have highlighted how these strategies are implemented in qualitative research on osteoporosis and fractures and are anchored to specific methodological practices. We focus on studies that explore patient psychosocial experiences of diagnosis and treatment, cultural boundaries, and interprofessional communication. After reviewing the research, we believe that action research, that is not frequently used, could also effectively be used by many professions to improve programs and policies affecting those dealing with osteoporosis issues.