Clonal Hematopoiesis in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumor Treated With Lutetium-177 and the Risk of Thrombocytopenia: A Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: Thrombocytopenia is a relatively common dose-limiting toxicity during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with NET. Although uncommon, some patients develop persistent cytopenia and eventually therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (t-MN), which has a dismal prognosis. As the indications for PRRT are expanding, it is important to investigate factors that may predict cytopenias during/after PRRT. We prospectively evaluated the prevalence of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) and cytopenia in patients with NET undergoing PRRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic NET with plan to receive four cycles of lutetium-177 were enrolled. CH was evaluated before PRRT using a panel of 220 genes with a targeted depth of ≥1,000×. Patients were followed during PRRT and every 3 months thereafter. RESULTS: Of 37 patients enrolled, the median age was 68 years and 51.4% were male. Previous treatment exposures included alkylating agents in 30%, platinum agents in 8%, and external radiation in 13%. CH was detected in 35.1% using a variant allele frequency (VAF) cutoff of ≥2% and 45.9% with a VAF of ≥1%. The most common mutations were in age-related genes (DNMT3A, TET2). CH was not associated with anemia or neutropenia; however, it was associated with lower platelet count at baseline and more time spent in a thrombocytopenic state during/after PRRT. Five patients had bone marrow biopsies (BMBs) because of sustained hematologic dysfunction post-PRRT, and of those, diagnoses included clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) in three and idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS) in two. CONCLUSION: CH is present in 35.1% of patients with NET and is associated with thrombocytopenia risk during PRRT. Future studies with long-term follow-up will delineate whether CH might be a predictor for higher risk of t-MN after PRRT.

Adverse event costs of systemic therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy and biologics in the US.

Aim: The objective of this study was to compare adverse event (AE) management costs for fruquintinib, regorafenib, trifluridine/tipiracil (T/T) and trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (T/T+bev) for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with at least two prior lines of therapy from the US commercial and Medicare payer perspectives. Materials & methods: A cost-consequence model was developed to calculate the per-patient and per-patient-per-month (PPPM) AE costs using rates of grade 3/4 AEs with incidence ≥5% in clinical trials, event-specific management costs and duration treatment. Anchored comparisons of AE costs were calculated using a difference-in-differences approach with best supportive care (BSC) as a common reference. AE rates and treatment duration were obtained from clinical trials: FRESCO and FRESCO-2 (fruquintinib), RECOURSE (T/T), CORRECT (regorafenib) and SUNLIGHT (T/T, T/T+bev). AE management costs for the commercial and Medicare perspectives were obtained from publicly available sources. Results: From the commercial perspective, the AE costs (presented as per-patient, PPPM) were: $4015, $1091 for fruquintinib (FRESCO); $4253, $1390 for fruquintinib (FRESCO-2); $17,110, $11,104 for T/T (RECOURSE); $9851, $4691 for T/T (SUNLIGHT); $8199, $4823 for regorafenib; and $11,620, $2324 for T/T+bev. These results were consistent in anchored comparisons: the difference-in-difference for fruquintinib based on FRESCO was -$1929 versus regorafenib and -$11,427 versus T/T; for fruquintinib based on FRESCO-2 was -$2257 versus regorafenib and -$11,756 versus T/T. Across all analyses, results were consistent from the Medicare perspective. Conclusion: Fruquintinib was associated with lower AE management costs compared with regorafenib, T/T and T/T+bev for patients with previously treated mCRC. This evidence has direct implications for treatment, formulary and pathways decision-making in this patient population.

A comprehensive analysis of POLE/POLD1 genomic alterations in colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Pathogenic mutations in POLE/POLD1 lead to decreased fidelity of DNA replication, resulting in a high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H), defined as TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb, independent of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) status. METHODS: De-identified records of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) profiled with the Tempus xT assay (DNA-seq of 595-648 genes at 500×) were identified from the Tempus Database. RESULTS: Among 9136 CRC samples profiled, the frequency of POLE/POLD1 genomic alterations was 2.4% (n = 217). Copy number loss was the most common genomic alteration (64%, n = 138) of POLE/POLD1, followed by copy number amplifications (18%, n = 40) and short variant mutations (18%, n = 39). The POLE/POLD1 mutated group presented with a higher frequency of TMB-H phenotype relative to wild type (WT; 22% vs. 9%, P < .001), with a median TMB of 127 mut/Mb in the TMB-H POLE/POLD1 subset. The TMB showed a dramatic contrast between POLE/POLD1 short variant mutations as compared to the group with copy number alterations, with a TMB of 159 mut/Mb vs 15 mut/Mb, respectively. Thus, the short variant mutations represented the so-called ultra-hypermutated phenotype. The POLE/POLD1 mutated group, as compared to WT, exhibited a higher rate of coexisting mutations, including APC, ALK, ATM, BRCA2, and RET mutations. CONCLUSION: Patients with POLE/POLD1 mutations exhibited significant differences across immunological markers (ie, TMB, MMR, and MSI-H) and molecular co-alterations. Those with short variant mutations represented 18% of the POLE/POLD1 cohort and 0.4% of the total cohort examined. This group of patients had a median TMB of 159 mut/Mb (range 34-488), representing the ultra-hypermutated phenotype. This group of patients is important to identify given the potential for exceptional response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

A decade of progress: advances in the third-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains challenging. There has been substantial progress in understanding the molecular pathology of the disease that has led to meaningful advancements in treatment options with varying mechanisms of action, although treatment remains costly. Cytotoxic therapies, which are typically combined with targeted therapies, remain the mainstay of first- and second-line treatment for mCRC. While also relevant in earlier lines of therapy, molecular testing has become increasingly important to guide therapy across lines of therapy, for which treatment options are limited. A paucity of data exists in establishing clinical criteria for optimizing the sequencing of therapies in the third line and beyond. A customized approach should consider the efficacy of the therapy balanced with the patient's goals. Sequencing criteria should include a consideration for exposing patients to as many different modes of therapy as possible while preserving quality of life, avoiding serious toxicities, and accounting for the potential impact of cumulative toxicities from prior therapies.

Sequencing considerations in the third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Numerous advances in the standard of care for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), including the approval of several new treatments indicated for treatment in the third line or later (3L+), have been made, yet data and appropriate guidance on the optimal sequencing and treatment strategies for these lines of therapy are lacking. Four treatments-regorafenib, trifluridine/tipiracil alone or with bevacizumab, and fruquintinib-are FDA-approved and recommended by the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for the treatment of mCRC in the 3L+. When considering sequencing of treatment options for patients in the 3L+, the goal of treatment is to improve survival, but also maintain quality of life, a goal that requires consideration of relative efficacy and cumulative toxicity such as persistent myelosuppression.

Molecular Characterization and Therapeutic Opportunities in KRAS Wildtype Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate the molecular characteristics of and potential for precision medicine in KRAS wildtype pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated 27 patients with KRASWT PDAC at our institution. Clinical data were obtained via chart review. Tumor specimens for each subject were interrogated for somatic single nucleotide variants, insertion and deletions, and copy number variants by DNA sequencing. Gene fusions were detected from RNA-seq. A patient-derived organoid (PDO) was developed from a patient with a MET translocation and expanded ex vivo to predict therapeutic sensitivity prior to enrollment in a phase 2 clinical trial. RESULTS: Transcriptomic analysis showed our cohort may be stratified by the relative gene expression of the KRAS signaling cascade. The PDO derived from our patient harboring a TFG-MET rearrangement was found to have in vitro sensitivity to the multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib. The patient was enrolled in the phase 2 SPARTA clinical trial and received monotherapy with vebrelitinib, a c-MET inhibitor, and achieved a partial and durable response. CONCLUSIONS: KRASWT PDAC is molecularly distinct from KRASMUT and enriched with potentially actionable genetic variants. In our study, transcriptomic profiling revealed that the KRAS signaling cascade may play a key role in KRASWT PDAC. Our report of a KRASWT PDAC patient with TFG-MET rearrangement who responded to a cMET inhibitor further supports the pursuit of precision oncology in this sub-population. Identification of targetable mutations, perhaps through approaches like RNA-seq, can help enable precision-driven approaches to select optimal treatment based on tumor characteristics.

Improving survival in metastatic colorectal cancer through optimized patient selection.

The systemic treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have recently expanded with the US Food and Drug Administration approval of fruquintinib being added to previously approved trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab and regorafenib. These therapies are recommended for use based on the initial clinical trials that focused on their safety and efficacy in extending overall survival of patients with refractory metastatic disease, as well as later studies, including the ReDOS study that confirmed the dose-escalation strategy of regorafenib to be key in optimizing duration of therapy and preventing side effects. Although more research is needed on how to sequence third-line therapies, data from real-world studies showed that switching from regorafenib to trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab allowed patients to have a chemotherapy-free break and led to improved survival, suggesting that there may be a benefit for using regorafenib first. Current treatment guidelines state that each therapy can be given before or after the others. Generally, sequencing considerations in the refractory setting include multiple variables such as tumor characteristics, toxicities, factors that are important to the patient, response to prior lines of therapy, and extent of disease.

Efficacy and Safety of Adagrasib plus Cetuximab in Patients with KRASG12C-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Adagrasib, an irreversible, selective KRASG12C inhibitor, may be an effective treatment in KRASG12C-mutated colorectal cancer, particularly when combined with an anti-EGFR antibody. In this analysis of the KRYSTAL-1 trial, patients with previously treated KRASG12C-mutated unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer received adagrasib (600 mg twice daily) plus cetuximab. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review. Ninety-four patients received adagrasib plus cetuximab. With a median follow-up of 11.9 months, ORR was 34.0%, disease control rate was 85.1%, and median duration of response was 5.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2-7.6). Median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.7-7.4) and median overall survival was 15.9 months (95% CI, 11.8-18.8). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in all patients; grade 3-4 in 27.7% and no grade 5. No TRAEs led to adagrasib discontinuation. Exploratory analyses suggest circulating tumor DNA may identify features of response and acquired resistance. SIGNIFICANCE: Adagrasib plus cetuximab demonstrates promising clinical activity and tolerable safety in heavily pretreated patients with unresectable or metastatic KRASG12C-mutated colorectal cancer. These data support a potential new standard of care and highlight the significance of testing and identification of KRASG12C mutations in patients with colorectal cancer. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 897.

A multicenter phase Ia study of AbGn-107, a novel antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer.

AbGn-107 is an antibody-drug conjugate directed against AG-7 antigen, a Lewis A-like glycol-epitope expressed in a variety of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Based on promising antitumor activity of AbGn-107 in both in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies, we performed a GI cancer-specific Phase I trial. Standard 3 + 3 dose escalation was used evaluating intravenous doses ranging from 0.1 mg/kg every 4 weeks to 1.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Key eligibility included chemo-refractory locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic gastric, colorectal, pancreatic, or biliary cancer, with ECOG PS 0-1; positive AG-7 expression was not required during dose escalation phase. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, with tumor assessments every 8 weeks. Primary objectives included safety and determination of maximum tolerated dose; secondary objectives included efficacy defined by objective response rate. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled across seven dose levels during dose escalation phase. Based on safety profile and pharmacokinetic data, 1.0 mg/kg Q2W was selected as the dose schedule for cohort expansion phase, in which an additional seven patients were enrolled. Median number of lines of prior therapy was 3 (range 1-7). AbGn-107 was generally well-tolerated, with infections, cytopenias, hyponatremia, fatigue, abdominal pain, and diarrhea representing the most common grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events. One subject achieved a partial response, while 18 (46.2%) achieved a best response of stable disease. Disease control lasting > 6 months was observed in 6 subjects (13.0%), including 4 of 15 (26.7%) treated at the highest dose level. AbGn-107 showed a reasonable safety profile and modest clinical activity in this highly pretreated patient population. Further evaluation is required to assess the clinical validity of AG-7 as a suitable antigen for therapeutic targeting. Clinical Trial information: NCT02908451.

Improved Risk-Stratification Scheme for Mismatch-Repair Proficient Stage II Colorectal Cancers Using the Digital Pathology Biomarker QuantCRC.

PURPOSE: There is a need to improve current risk stratification of stage II colorectal cancer to better inform risk of recurrence and guide adjuvant chemotherapy. We sought to examine whether integration of QuantCRC, a digital pathology biomarker utilizing hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides, provides improved risk stratification over current American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: ASCO and QuantCRC-integrated schemes were applied to a cohort of 398 mismatch-repair proficient (MMRP) stage II colorectal cancers from three large academic medical centers. The ASCO stage II scheme was taken from recent guidelines. The QuantCRC-integrated scheme utilized pT3 versus pT4 and a QuantCRC-derived risk classification. Evaluation of recurrence-free survival (RFS) according to these risk schemes was compared using the log-rank test and HR. RESULTS: Integration of QuantCRC provides improved risk stratification compared with the ASCO scheme for stage II MMRP colorectal cancers. The QuantCRC-integrated scheme placed more stage II tumors in the low-risk group compared with the ASCO scheme (62.5% vs. 42.2%) without compromising excellent 3-year RFS. The QuantCRC-integrated scheme provided larger HR for both intermediate-risk (2.27; 95% CI, 1.32-3.91; P = 0.003) and high-risk (3.27; 95% CI, 1.42-7.55; P = 0.006) groups compared with ASCO intermediate-risk (1.58; 95% CI, 0.87-2.87; P = 0.1) and high-risk (2.24; 95% CI, 1.09-4.62; P = 0.03) groups. The QuantCRC-integrated risk groups remained prognostic in the subgroup of patients that did not receive any adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of QuantCRC into risk stratification provides a powerful predictor of RFS that has potential to guide subsequent treatment and surveillance for stage II MMRP colorectal cancers.

Act Local, Think Global: IR and Its Role in Immuno-Oncology in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Interventional oncology (IO) is evolving rapidly. The treatment landscape of liver cancer is changing rapidly, and immunotherapy combinations have become the standard of care for most patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The higher response rates and improved outcomes observed with these agents are leading to initiatives for their earlier incorporation in the course of the disease, including in combination with ablative and transarterial treatment options. The intersectionality of systemic therapies and liver-directed approaches has allowed IO to be at the center stage of a rapidly evolving dynamic field across all stages of HCC. This review article will address the current state of treatment for advanced HCC and the incorporation of these options in both localized and advanced stages along with IO to further enhance the observed benefits.

Treatment options for HER2-expressing colorectal cancer: updates and recent approvals.

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Approximately 3-5% of colorectal tumors harbor human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) amplification which is associated with a higher incidence of intracranial metastasis and overall worse outcomes. In the setting of refractory metastatic RAS wild-type tumors, evidence supports the use of various HER2-blocking agents, including monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and novel antibody-drug conjugates. With a number of relatively active agents clinically available and even more in development, it is crucial for clinicians to familiarize themselves with the mechanisms of action, efficacy data, and safety profiles of these treatments. In this review, we aim to summarize key findings from past and ongoing trials with anti-HER2 agents in metastatic colorectal cancer.

APRI score is not predictive of post-surgical outcomes in cholangiocarcinoma patients.

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma is an epithelial malignancy of the intrahepatic or extrahepatic biliary tree, primarily driven by chronic inflammation and fibrosis. Fibrosis has been shown to correlate with malignancy, and the aminotransferase-platelet ratio index (APRI) score, a marker for hepatic fibrosis, has proved useful in prognosticating hepatocellular carcinoma. This study aimed to assess the utility of APRI score in predicting post-surgical outcomes in cholangiocarcinoma patients. Methods: Clinical data from a total of 152 cholangiocarcinoma patients who underwent surgical resection at the Mayo Clinic were collected. The data were subsequently analyzed to determine if there was a relationship between APRI score and the demographic, laboratory, pathologic and outcome data, including overall survival. To determine the relationship between quantitative and qualitative data and the APRI score, a P-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: No relationship between APRI score and demographic factors was identified. There were correlations between APRI score and alanine transaminase, albumin and bilirubin, but the remaining laboratory parameters showed no correlation. APRI score did not prove to be useful as a prognostic tool, as it did not correlate with tumor pathology features (tumor grade t-test P=0.86, N stage ANOVA P=0.94, vascular invasion t-test P=0.59, and perineural invasion t-test P=0.14), or with post-surgical recurrence (t-test P=0.22) and mortality (t-test P=0.39). Conclusion: APRI score is not a prognostic tool for post-surgical outcomes in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

PD-1 Blockade Induces Reactivation of Nonproductive T-Cell Responses Characterized by NF-κB Signaling in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) trials have evaluated CTLA-4 and/or PD-(L)1 blockade in patients with advanced disease in which bulky tumor burden and limited time to develop antitumor T cells may have contributed to poor clinical efficacy. Here, we evaluated peripheral blood and tumor T cells from patients with PDAC receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation plus anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab) versus chemoradiation alone. We analyzed whether PD-1 blockade successfully reactivated T cells in the blood and/or tumor to determine whether lack of clinical benefit could be explained by lack of reactivated T cells versus other factors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We used single-cell transcriptional profiling and TCR clonotype tracking to identify TCR clonotypes from blood that match clonotypes in the tumor. RESULTS: PD-1 blockade increases the flux of TCR clonotypes entering cell cycle and induces an IFNγ signature like that seen in patients with other GI malignancies who respond to PD-1 blockade. However, these reactivated T cells have a robust signature of NF-κB signaling not seen in cases of PD-1 antibody response. Among paired samples between blood and tumor, several of the newly cycling clonotypes matched activated T-cell clonotypes observed in the tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Cytotoxic T cells in the blood of patients with PDAC remain sensitive to reinvigoration by PD-1 blockade, and some have tumor-recognizing potential. Although these T cells proliferate and have a signature of IFN exposure, they also upregulate NF-κB signaling, which potentially counteracts the beneficial effects of anti-PD-1 reinvigoration and marks these T cells as non-productive contributors to antitumor immunity. See related commentary by Lander and DeNardo, p. 474.

A study to learn how well tucatinib plus trastuzumab works for treating participants with metastatic colorectal cancer, and how safe it is: a plain language summary of the MOUNTAINEER study.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of an article describing an ongoing study called MOUNTAINEER. This article was published in The Lancet Oncology in 2023. The study included 117 adults with metastatic HER2-positive colorectal cancer. The researchers wanted to know whether a combination of 2 drugs called tucatinib and trastuzumab could shrink the participants' cancer. The researchers also wanted to know whether receiving tucatinib alone could also shrink the participants' cancer. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: In this study, researchers found that 32 out of 84 participants had their tumors respond to treatment with tucatinib with trastuzumab. This was about 4 in 10 participants. This means that the tumors shrank by at least 30% or disappeared. Participants whose tumors responded to tucatinib with trastuzumab responded for a median of 12.4 months. 60 out of 84 participants had their tumors respond or remain about the same size after treatment with tucatinib with trastuzumab. This was about 7 in 10 participants. For those who received tucatinib with trastuzumab the median length of time participants lived during the study was 24.1 months and the median length of time participants lived during the study without their cancer growing or spreading was 8.2 months. 1 out of 30 participants had their tumors respond to treatment with tucatinib alone within 12 weeks. 19 out of 86 participants who received tucatinib with trastuzumab had serious medical problems, also called serious adverse events. This was about 2 in 10 participants. Not all of these serious adverse events were related to tucatinib with trastuzumab. 3 out of 30 participants who received tucatinib alone who had serious adverse events. This was 1 in 10 participants. Not all of these serious adverse events were related to tucatinib alone. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: Tucatinib with trastuzumab could be a good treatment option for people with HER2-positive colorectal cancer that has spread to other parts of the body. On January 19, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to the combination of two targeted drugs, tucatinib (Tukysa) and trastuzumab (Herceptin) for people with HER2-positive colorectal cancer that is metastatic or that cannot be treated with surgery. The FDA can grant accelerated approval for new treatments that fill unmet needs for patients with serious medical conditions. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03043313 (MOUNTAINEER study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

SEAMARK: phase II study of first-line encorafenib and cetuximab plus pembrolizumab for MSI-H/dMMR BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC.

Patients with both BRAF V600E mutations and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have poor prognosis. Currently, there are no specifically targeted first-line treatment options indicated for patients with mCRC whose tumors harbor both molecular aberrations. Pembrolizumab is a checkpoint inhibitor approved for the treatment of MSI-H/dMMR mCRC, and the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib, in combination with cetuximab, is approved for previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. Combination of pembrolizumab with encorafenib and cetuximab may synergistically enhance antitumor activity in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant, MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. SEAMARK is a randomized phase II study comparing the efficacy of the combination of pembrolizumab with encorafenib and cetuximab versus pembrolizumab alone in patients with previously untreated BRAF V600E-mutant, MSI-H/dMMR mCRC.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) occurs when there is an abnormal growth of cells (known as a tumor) in the colon or rectum. Some people with CRC have changes in their tumor genes (known as gene mutations). A gene is a piece of DNA that tells the cell to make specific molecules, such as proteins. Mutations in a gene called BRAF can turn on signals that help the cancer cells grow. Gene mutations that impair DNA repair mechanisms can also make the cancer cells grow more quickly and allow the immune system to detect the cancer cells as being foreign to the body. Targeted therapy is a type of cancer treatment that turns off specific genes and proteins involved in cancer cell survival and growth. BRAF and EGFR inhibitors are targeted therapies that work well together in treating people with BRAF-mutant CRC. BRAF proteins can help cancer cells grow, and BRAF inhibitors block these proteins to prevent, slow, or stop the growth of the cancer cells. Immunotherapy is a type of cancer treatment that helps a person's immune system fight cancer. Immunotherapy is effective for treating CRC that has mutations in the DNA repair mechanisms. By combining targeted therapy and immunotherapy, patients may be able to live longer without their disease getting worse. In the SEAMARK study, we will use a treatment combination including a BRAF inhibitor (encorafenib), an EGFR inhibitor (cetuximab) and an immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) in patients with CRC who have a BRAF mutation and deficiencies in the DNA repair mechanism. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05217446 (ClinicalTrials.gov), 2021-003715-26 (EudraCT).

Risk factors for early-onset pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Emerging cancer trends suggest an increase in pancreatic cancer incidence in individuals younger than its typical age of onset, potentially reflecting changes in population exposures and lifestyles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a PRISMA-standard systematic literature review to identify non-heritable risk factors for early-onset pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (PROSPERO number: CRD42022299397). Systematic searches of MEDLINE and Embase bibliographic databases were performed (January 2022), and publications were screened against predetermined eligibility criteria; data were extracted using standardised data fields. The STROBE checklist was used to assess the completeness of reporting as a proxy for publication quality. Data were categorised by risk factor and analysed descriptively. RESULTS: In total, 24 publications were included. All publications reported observational study data; thresholds for age group comparisons ranged between 40 and 65 years. Lifestyle factors investigated included smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, physical inactivity, meat intake, socioeconomic status and geographical residence. Clinical factors investigated included pancreatitis, diabetes/insulin resistance, prior cancer and cancer stage at diagnosis, hepatitis B infection, metabolic syndrome and long-term proton pump inhibitor exposure. Publication STROBE scores were 6-21 (maximum, 22). Eight studies reported results adjusted for confounders. Potential non-heritable risk factors for early-onset PDAC that warrant further investigation included smoking, alcohol consumption, pancreatitis and hepatitis B infection. CONCLUSION: Evidence for non-heritable risk factors for early-onset PDAC is heterogeneous, but four factors were identified that might aid the identification of at-risk individuals who may benefit from screening and risk reduction strategies.