RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: TNF inhibitors (TNFi) have dramatically changed the prognosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), but it is not clear how and when stop therapy. We aim to describe a multicentric cohort of JIA treated with adalimumab or etanercept who discontinued the treatment for persistent inactivity and to identify factors associated with relapse. METHODS: In a multicentric Italian retrospective cohort study, medical records of patients with oligoarticular and polyarticular JIA were evaluated if they stopped therapy for persistent inactivity after the first TNFi. RESULTS: 136 patients were enrolled (102 female, median age at onset 3 years (range 1-15), of whom 55.9% had oligoJIA, 40.4% uveitis and 72.8% ANA positivity. Adalimumab (59.3%) and etanercept (40.7%) were started at a median age of 6 years (range 1-16), TNFi were discontinued after a median time of 30 months (range 6-90), increasing the interval (76.5%), reducing the dose (18.4%) and abrupt discontinuation (16.9%). 79.4% of patients relapsed after a median time of 5 months (range 0.5-66). Patients with uveitis relapsed earlier (log rank χ² 16.4 p<0.0001), while patients who lengthened the interval of administration showed a later relapse (log rank χ² 6.95 p=0.008). Uveitis (HR 2.11 CI 1.34-3.31), age at onset (HR 0.909 CI 0.836-0.987), duration of tapering (HR 0.938 CI 0.893-0.985) and to have a persistent OligoJIA (HR 0.597 CI 0.368-0.968) are significant predictors of disease relapse (Mantel-Cox χ² 34.23 p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Younger age at onset, uveitis, duration of tapering, and not-persistent OligoJIA seem to be independent risk factors for earlier relapse after the first TNFi withdrawal.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Scientific evidence of the effectiveness of the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor adalimumab (ADA) in pediatric patients with non-infectious non-anterior uveitis is still limited. The aim of this study is to investigate the therapeutic role of ADA in a cohort of pediatric patients with non-anterior uveitis. METHODS: This is an international multicenter study analyzing real-life data referred to pediatric patients treated with ADA for intermediate uveitis/pars planitis, posterior uveitis and panuveitis. Data were drawn from the AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) registry for patients with uveitis. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (36 affected eyes) were enrolled, and all patients benefited from ADA administration. In detail, 11 patients (19 affected eyes) did not experience further ocular inflammation after ADA introduction; 10 cases (17 affected eyes) showed a significant clinical improvement consisting of a decrease in severity and/or frequency of ocular relapses. The number of ocular flares dropped from 3.91 to 1.1 events/patient/year after ADA introduction (p = 0.0009); macular edema and retinal vasculitis were respectively observed in 18 eyes and 20 eyes at the start of ADA and in 4 eyes and 2 eyes at the last assessment. The mean daily glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased from 26.8 ± 16.8 mg/day at the start of ADA to 6.25 ± 6.35 mg/day at the last assessment (p = 0.002). Intermediate uveitis/pars planitis (p = 0.01) and posterior uveitis (p = 0.03) were more frequently observed in patients with full response to ADA; panuveitis (p = 0.001) was significantly more frequent among patients continuing to experience uveitic flares. This could be related to a higher use of systemic glucocorticoids (p = 0.002) and conventional immunosuppressants (p = 0.007) at the start of ADA when treating intermediate uveitis/pars planitis. Regarding the safety profile, only one adverse event was reported during ADA treatment, consisting of the development of generalized adenopathy. CONCLUSIONS: ADA proved to have an effective therapeutic role in all pediatric patients with non-anterior uveitis enrolled in the study. An overall glucocorticoid-sparing effect was observed despite the severity of cases enrolled. A more aggressive treatment of panuveitis and posterior uveitis at start of ADA could increase the likelihood of full response to therapy.
