Surgical site infection after pelvic bone and soft tissue sarcoma resection: Risk factors, microbiology, and impact of extended postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic bone and/or soft tissue sarcoma removal surgeries are associated with a high rate of surgical site infection (SSI). The recommended antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) duration is 24-48 h. We aimed to assess the impact of extended ABP (5 days) on the SSI rate and describe the microbiology of SSI in bone and/or soft tissue pelvic sarcomas. METHODS: We retrospectively included all consecutive patients who underwent pelvic bone and/or soft tissue sarcoma removal surgery between January 2010 and June 2020. RESULTS: We analyzed 146 patients with pelvic bone (45, 31%) or soft tissue (101, 69%). Sixty patients (41%) developed SSI. SSI occurred in 13/28 (46.4%) in the extended ABP group versus 47/118 (39.8%) in the standard group (p = 0.53). In multivariable analysis, risk factors for SSI were surgery duration (OR: 1.94 [1.41-2.92] per h), stay in postoperative ICU for more than 2 days (12.0 [2.8-61.3]), and shred or autologous skin flap (39.3 [5.8-409.5]). Extended ABP was not associated with SSI. SSI were mainly polymicrobial with Enterobacterales (57.4%) and Enterococcus (45%). CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION: Pelvic bone and/or soft tissue sarcoma removal surgery is highly prone to postoperative infection. Extending the ABP to 5 days does not reduce the level of SSI.

Frequency and factors associated with infusion-related local complications of vancomycin on peripheral venous catheters.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is a reference antibiotic against methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Its administration is associated with infusion-related local complications (IRLC). To reduce this risk, it has been proposed to increase vancomycin dilution in the IV bag and to perform continuous infusion using the volumetric pump. The aim of our study was to assess the safety of peripheral infusion of vancomycin with the volumetric pump. OBJECTIVES: To compare the frequency of IRLC between patients receiving vancomycin and those receiving ß-lactam (BL) antibiotics. Our secondary objective was to assess factors associated with the occurrence of IRLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in a French tertiary hospital. Between February 2021 and November 2021, we included all patients receiving continuous infusions of vancomycin or BL through a peripherally inserted venous catheter (PIVC). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of IRLC on Day 1 (D1). RESULTS: We included 168 patients (56 vancomycin, 112 BL). At D1, 14 patients (25%) presented IRLC in the vancomycin group versus 11 patients (10%) in the BL group (P = 0.01). There was significantly more IRLC in the group receiving vancomycin at an infused concentration above 5 mg/mL than those receiving BL (8/15, 53.3% versus 11/112, 10%, respectively, P < 0.01). However, no significant difference was observed between patients receiving infused vancomycin concentration ≤5 mg/mL and patients receiving BL (P = 0.4). CONCLUSION: Our data support safe administration of vancomycin if infused at a concentration under 5 mg/mL, through the volumetric pump on PIVC.

TIVAP-related infection due to Gram-negative aerobic bacilli: should TIVAP stay or should it go?

We aimed to describe the outcome of totally implantable venous-access port (TIVAP)-related infections due to Gram-negative aerobic bacilli (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia), or GNAB, and assess the safety of conservative treatment. We conducted a retrospective study in a French teaching hospital, from January 2016 to December 2020, including adult patients treated for TIVAP-related infection due to GNAB. Success of conservative treatment was defined as a functional TIVAP 3 months after infection with no recurrence. We performed a bivariate analysis and analyzed causes for treatment failure. We included 68 patients (53 TIVAP-related bloodstream infections, 11 TIVAP-related infections, and 4 probable TIVAP-related infections) due to GNAB, mostly P. aeruginosa (50/68, 74%). TIVAP removal was initially decided for 49/68 patients (72%). Among the 19/68 (28%) patients with conservative treatment (all for infections caused by P. aeruginosa), 5/19 (26%) had successful treatment, 7/19 (37%) experienced failure (without sepsis or septic shock), 6/19 (32%) died within 3 months without TIVAP removal and no signs of infection recurrence, and 1 patient had TIVAP removal as it was no longer required. TIVAP-related infections caused by GNAB frequently require TIVAP removal. Conservative treatment can be performed in selected patients with a non-complicated infection caused by P. aeruginosa, who can benefit from the continuation of antineoplastic chemotherapy or palliative care. Treatment failures were not associated with sepsis or septic shock.