Comparing the surgical management of acute paediatric scrotal pain between adult urologists and general surgeons in the UK: an observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Acute scrotal pain is a common paediatric surgical emergency. Assessment and timely exploration are required to rule out testicular torsion (TT) and prevent unnecessary morbidity. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was carried out at two district general hospitals in the UK for boys aged ≤16 years presenting with acute scrotal pain between January 2014 and October 2017 managed by adult general surgery (AGS) at one hospital and adult urology (AU) at the other. RESULTS: Some 565 patients were eligible for inclusion (n=364 AGS, n=201 AU). A higher proportion of patients underwent surgical exploration at AGS compared with AU (277/346 (80.1%) vs 96/201 (47.8%); p<0.001). Of those who underwent exploration, 101/373 (27.1%) had TT, of whom 25/101 (24.8%) underwent orchidectomy and 125/373 (33.5%) had torted testicular appendage. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of orchidectomy between AGS (19/68, 27.9%) and AU (6/33, 18.2%) with testicular salvage rates of 72.1% and 81.8%, respectively (p=0.334). Patients were twice as likely to be readmitted at AGS as at AU (28/346 (8.1%) vs 8/201 (4.0%); p=0.073). CONCLUSION: Although intraoperative findings were similar between adult general surgeons and urologists, there were significant differences in surgical management, with a higher rate of surgical exploration by general surgeons. Testicular salvage and 30-day postoperative morbidity rates at both institutions were acceptable but the readmission rate was high at 6.6%. It is not known why there is a heterogeneity in management of acute scrotal pain between specialist centres, and further prospective investigations are warranted.

The significance of extramural venous invasion in R1 positive rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Evidence has shown that a positive resection margin (R1) is a key determinant of subsequent local recurrence and a poor prognostic factor in rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and prognosticators in patients with R1 resection of rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of all patients operatively managed within our institution between April 2008 and April 2013 for rectal cancer. Baseline demographics and multiple outcome measures recorded. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence were the primary outcome measures. RESULTS: Overall, there were 306 primary rectal cancers. Seventy-six percent were grade T3/4 tumours. OS was 30 months. R1 rate was 16 % (48 patients). Thirty-one patients underwent APR and 17 AR. In patients who responded to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), overall survival was 55 months, with no extramural venous invasion (EMV) seen in this cohort. In non-responders OS was 29 months, with EMV in 48 %. In patients who did not receive NAC, OS was 23 months, with EMV in 74 %. EMV is a strong predictor for poor survival following R1 (p = 0.001). We also found a correlation between number of positive nodes and OS/DFS (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In this small cohort of patients with R1 positive rectal cancers, response to NAC is the strongest predictor of poor overall and disease-free survival. In patients who respond to NAC, OS and DFS has been shown to be positive, with a reduced rate of EMV.

Motor function of the proximal stomach and visceral perception in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: The abnormally high postprandial rate of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations seen in patients with reflux disease may be related to altered proximal gastric motor function. Heightened visceral sensitivity may also contribute to reporting of symptoms in these patients. AIMS: To assess motor function of the proximal stomach and visceral perception in reflux disease with a barostat. METHODS: Fasting and postprandial proximal gastric motility, sensation, and symptoms were measured in nine patients with reflux disease and nine healthy subjects. Gastric emptying of solids and liquids was assessed in six of the patients on a different day (and compared to historical controls). RESULTS: Minimal distending pressure and gastric compliance were similar in the two groups, whereas the patients experienced fullness at lower pressures (p < 0.05) and discomfort at lower balloon volumes (p < 0.005) during isobaric and isovolumetric distensions respectively. Maximal gastric relaxation induced by the meal was similar in the two groups. Late after the meal, however, proximal gastric tone was lower (p < 0.01) and the score for fullness higher (p < 0.01) in the reflux patients, in whom the retention of both solids and liquids in the proximal stomach was greater (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Reflux disease is associated with delayed recovery of proximal gastric tone after a meal and increased visceral sensitivity. The former may contribute to the increased prevalence of reflux during transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations and the delay in emptying from the proximal stomach, whereas both may contribute to symptom reporting.

Physiological variations in blood glucose concentration affect oesophageal motility and sensation in normal subjects.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A marked elevation in the blood glucose concentration (approximately 15 mmol L-1) slows oesophageal peristalsis. Recent studies indicate that changes in blood glucose within the normal postprandial range affect gastric motility and emptying. The aim of this study was to investigate whether such alterations in blood glucose also affect oesophageal motility. METHODS: In eight healthy subjects oesophageal motility and sensation to balloon distension were measured on two separate days while blood glucose concentrations were stabilized with an insulin-glucose clamp at 4 mmol L-1 and 8 mmol L-1. RESULTS: Peristaltic velocity in the proximal oesophagus and over the oesophagus as a whole was faster at a plasma glucose concentration of 8 mmol L-1 compared with those at 4 mmol L-1 (proximal 3.3 +/- 0.3 cm s-1 vs 2.6 +/- 0.2 cm s-1, P < 0.05, total 3.1 +/- 0.2 cm s-1 vs 2.7 +/- 0.2 cm s-1, P < 0.005) but there were no differences in wave amplitude or duration, or basal lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (LOSP). The threshold for initial perception of oesophageal distension was lower at a plasma glucose of 8 mmol L-1 (2.9 +/- 0.5 mL vs 4.9 +/- 1.0 mL, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: physiological variations in plasma glucose concentration influence oesophageal motility and sensation. These observations suggest that in order to minimize effects of varying plasma glucose levels on oesophageal motility, manometry should be performed under the same fasting or fed conditions when oesophageal motor function is evaluated.

Effects of mediastinal irradiation on oesophageal function.

Although it is well recognised that oesophageal symptoms are common during therapeutic mediastinal irradiation of intrathoracic malignant diseases, the effects of mediastinal irradiation on oesophageal function are poorly defined. To clarify the pathogenesis of these sequelae a prospective study was performed to document comprehensively the effects of mediastinal irradiation on oesophageal function. Oesophageal symptoms, barium swallow, endoscopy, and combined radionuclide scintigraphy and oesophageal manometry were evaluated in eight patients with potentially curable intrathoracic malignant disease before treatment, during the last week of mediastinal irradiation, and six to eight weeks after its completion. Before irradiation, structural abnormalities were excluded by barium swallow and endoscopy. All but one patient experienced odynophagia or dysphagia, or both, during mediastinal irradiation (p < 0.001) but endoscopic abnormalities were observed in only three patients and there was no correlation between oesophageal symptoms and endoscopic changes. Irradiation, however, had no significant effect on oesophageal motility or transit. It is concluded that oesophageal symptoms which develop during mediastinal irradiation are not a result of altered oesophageal motility or transit and may reflect increased mucosal sensitivity.