Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Pregnant Patients With Brain and Head and Neck Cancers.

PURPOSE: When radiation therapy is medically necessary for pregnant patients, photon-based treatments (XRT) have traditionally been used, whereas proton radiation therapy (PRT) is avoided due to concerns about neutron dose. This retrospective study analyzes pregnant patients treated with XRT and models the equivalent dose that would have been delivered to the fetus with proton radiation compared with XRT. The purpose of this work is to provide a comprehensive analysis of pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PRT) for pregnant patients and to evaluate whether PBS-PRT should be the new standard of practice for treating pregnant patients with brain and head and neck cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: PBS-PRT plans were made for seven pregnant patients who received XRT: four treated for brain tumors and three for head and neck tumors. Measurements were performed with the patient plans using an anthropomorphic phantom and Wendi-2 meter placed at the phantom's abdomen. Patient-specific measurements were used to determine the total fetal equivalent dose from PBS-PRT compared with XRT. Imaging dose was also evaluated with a Fluke 451 dose meter. RESULTS: The average measured fetal equivalent dose, accounting for photons and neutrons, for the brain plans was 0.4 mSv for PBS-PRT and 7 mSv for XRT. For the head and neck plans, it was 6 mSv and 90 mSv for PBS-PRT and XRT, respectively. The PBS-PRT plans were preferred by the physicians for both tumor coverage and normal-tissue sparing. Daily imaging added between 0.05 and 1.5 mSv to the total dose. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study showed that when treating brain or head and neck cancers in pregnant patients, fetal equivalent dose is reduced by approximately a factor of 10 with PBS-PRT compared with XRT without making any compromises in treatment planning objectives. These results support a change of practice to using PBS-PRT as the new standard for treating pregnant patients with brain or head and neck tumors compared with XRT.

Design and characterization of an economical (192)Ir hemi-brain small animal irradiator.

PURPOSE: To describe the design and dosimetric characterization of a simple and economical small animal irradiator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A high dose rate (HDR) (192)Ir brachytherapy source from a commercially available afterloader was used with a 1.3 cm thick tungsten collimator to provide sharp beam penumbra suitable for hemi-brain irradiation of mice. The unit was equipped with continuous gas anesthesia to allow robust animal immobilization. Dosimetric characterization of the device was performed with Gafchromic film measurements. RESULTS: The tungsten collimator provided a sharp penumbra suitable for hemi-brain irradiation, and dose rates on the order of 200 cGy/minute were achieved. The sharpness of the penumbra attainable with this device compares favorably to those measured experimentally for 6 MV photons, and 6 and 20 MeV electron beams from a linear accelerator, and was comparable to those measured for a 300 kVp orthovoltage beam and a Monte Carlo simulated 90 MeV proton beam. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its simplicity and low cost, the apparatus described is an attractive alternative for small animal irradiation experiments requiring steep dose gradients.

Report on use of a methodology for commissioning and quality assurance of a VMAT system.

INTRODUCTION: Results of use of methodology for VMAT commissioning and quality assurance, utilizing both control point tests and dosimetric measurements are presented. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A generalizable, phantom measurement approach is used to characterize the accuracy of the measurement system. Correction for angular response of the measurement system and inclusion of couch structures are used to characterize the full range gantry angles desirable for clinical plans. A dose based daily QA measurement approach is defined. RESULTS: Agreement in the static vs. VMAT picket fence control point test was better than 0.5 mm. Control point tests varying gantry rotation speed, leaf speed and dose rate, demonstrated agreement with predicted values better than 1%. Angular dependence of the MatriXX array, varied over a range of 0.94-1.06, with respect to the calibration condition. Phantom measurements demonstrated central axis dose accuracy for un-modulated four field box plans was ≥2.5% vs. 1% with and without angular correction respectively with better results for VMAT (0.4%) vs. IMRT (1.6%) plans. Daily QA results demonstrated average agreement all three chambers within 0.4% over 9 month period with no false positives at a 3% threshold. DISCUSSION: The methodology described is simple in design and characterizes both the inherit limitations of the measurement system as well at the dose based measurements that may be directly related to patient plan QA.

Effects of scatter radiation on ICD and CRT function.

BACKGROUND: Effects of direct radiation on implantable cardiac devices have been well studied. However, the effects of scatter radiation are not as clear. Recommendations on management of patients with implantable cardiac devices undergoing radiotherapy are based on limited studies mostly involving pacemakers. We sought to elucidate the effects of scatter radiation on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-ICDs. METHODS: We exposed 12 ICDs and eight CRT-ICDs to 400 cGy of scatter radiation from a 6-MV photon beam. Devices were programmed with nominal parameters and interrogated prior to radiation, after each fraction, upon completion of the radiation course and again 1 week later. A retrospective review of patients undergoing radiotherapy at the Mayo Clinic-Rochester between 2002 and 2007 in whom the device was outside the radiation field was also performed. There were 13 patients with devices undergoing radiotherapy during this time period, 12 of whom were interrogated prior to and after radiation. RESULTS: Interrogation reports were reviewed for device reset or parameter changes. There was no evidence of reset or malfunction during or after radiation. Also, no episodes of device reset, inappropriate sensing or therapy, or changes in programmed parameters were found in our review of patients undergoing radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Device reset or malfunction associated with scatter radiation likely represents an unpredictable, rare occurrence. While we see no clear contraindication to radiotherapy in patients with ICDs or CRT-ICDs, precautions should be taken to avoid direct radiation exposure and to closely evaluate patient outcomes before and after the radiation course.