Contemporary view on the care of the rheumatoid wrist.

SUMMARY: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common inflammatory condition that can lead to debilitating hand and wrist deformity. Since the introduction of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the 1990s, the rate of surgery for rheumatoid arthritis has dramatically decreased 1. Nonetheless, surgical intervention remains an important tool in the management of patients with RA, and young surgeons must seek out expertise in this domain due to diminished exposure during their training. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the evaluation and management of patients with wrist pathology due to RA as well as surgical technical pearls.

A Near-Miss in Clinical Outcomes Research Data Collection.

ABSTRACT: We present the case of a near-miss in clinical research to illustrate a situation in which errors in data collection would have led to different results in the data analysis, with the potential for drawing incorrect conclusions. Conclusions based on data errors may adversely influence future medical decision-making in patient care. In the interest of presenting this as an educational, nonpunitive, quality-improvement report, the study and the involved researchers remain anonymous, and the specific details and exact number of patients are not reported.

Risk Factors for Failure of Nonsurgical Management of Ulnar Shaft Fractures.

PURPOSE: Isolated ulnar shaft fractures are frequently managed nonsurgically. However, rates of nonsurgical treatment failure remain substantial, and risk factors for the failure of nonsurgical management are not well described. This study investigated radiographic and patient-specific risk factors for the failure of nonsurgical management of isolated ulnar shaft fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with ulnar shaft fractures initially treated nonsurgically was performed at two tertiary referral centers over a 19-year period from 2001 to 2020. Patient- and injury-related variables, surgical interventions, and plain radiographic measurements were recorded. The outcome of interest was failure of nonsurgical management, defined as failure to achieve fracture union nonsurgically within 3 months of injury. RESULTS: One hundred fifty four patients initially treated nonsurgically for isolated ulnar shaft fractures were included. Twenty six patients (17%) experienced failure of nonsurgical management; these included five nonunions, 16 delayed unions, and 10 conversions to surgical management. Patients who experienced failure of nonsurgical management had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, a higher employment rate, and fractures with higher initial median posteroanterior and lateral translations, fracture gap, and angulation; 83% of the patients with an initial fracture gap of ≥4 mm and 41% of the patients with an initial fracture angulation of >10° failed nonsurgical management. CONCLUSIONS: Although most ulnar shaft fractures heal successfully with nonsurgical management, a substantial percentage of these fractures do not. Patients who are currently working, have diabetes mellitus, or have fractures with an initial fracture gap of ≥4 mm or an initial fracture angulation of > 10° may be more likely to fail nonsurgical treatment, although additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these associations. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Long-Term Outcomes and Return to Work After Isolated Coronal Shear Fractures of the Capitellum.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the ability of patients to return to work after ORIF of isolated capitellar shear fractures and assess long-term functional outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 18 patients with isolated capitellar shear fractures with or without lateral trochlear extension and investigated demographic data, occupation, worker's compensation status, injury characteristics, surgical details, motion, radiographic appearance at final in-person follow-up, complications, and return to work status via in-person and long-term telemedicine follow-ups. Results: Final follow-up was at an average of 76.6 (7-222.6) months or 6.4 (0.58-18.6) years. Of the 14 patients working at the time of injury, 13 patients had returned to work at final clinical follow-up. The work status of the remaining patient was not documented. Mean elbow motion at final follow-up was 4° (range, 0-30) to 138° (range, 130-145) of flexion, 83° of supination, 83° of pronation. Two patients had complications that required reoperation but had no further complications. For the 13 of 18 patients with long-term telemedicine follow-up, the average Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 6.8 (0-25). Conclusions: In our series, rates of return to work were high after ORIF of coronal shear fractures of the capitellum with or without lateral trochlear extension. This was true across all occupational classes including manual labor, clerical, and professional. With anatomic restoration of articular congruity, stable internal fixation, and postoperative rehabilitation, these patients had excellent ROM and functional scores at an average of 7.9 years of follow-up. Clinical relevance: After ORIF of isolated capitellar shear fractures with or without lateral trochlear extension, patients can expect a high rate of return to work with excellent ROM and functionality and low long-term disability.

Patient-Perceived Outcomes of Recovery After Trigger Digit Release.

PURPOSE: Trigger finger release (TFR) is one of the most commonly performed hand surgeries; nevertheless, the time until patients subjectively feel recovered has not been well documented. The limited literature on patient perceptions of recovery after any type of surgery has described that patients and surgeons may have differing views on the time until full recovery. Our primary study question was to determine how long it takes for patients to subjectively feel fully recovered after TFR. METHODS: In this prospective study, patients who underwent isolated TFR completed questionnaires before surgery and at multiple time points following surgery until they reported full recovery. Patients completed visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) and were asked if they felt fully recovered at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS: The average time to self-reported full recovery was 6.2 months (SD 2.6), and the median time to self-reported full recovery was 6 months (IQR 4 months). At 12 months, four out of 50 patients (8%) did not feel fully recovered. QuickDASH and VAS pain scores improved significantly from preoperative assessment to final follow-up. All patients reported improvement in both VAS pain scores and QuickDASH scores greater than the minimal clinically important difference between 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery. Higher preoperative VAS and QuickDASH scores were associated with failure to fully recover by 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The length of time after surgery until patients felt fully recovered after isolated TFR is longer than the senior authors' expectations. This suggests that patients and surgeons may consider distinctly different parameters when discussing recovery. Surgeons should be aware of this discrepancy when discussing recovery after surgery. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Perioperative Complications Associated With Limited Surgical Fasciectomy After Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum for Dupuytren Contracture.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the perioperative complication rate of surgical fasciectomy following previous treatment with collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) treatment in patients with Dupuytren disease. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients at a large health system undergoing CCH treatment and subsequent limited surgical fasciectomy for recurrence on the same digit between 2010 and 2020 was performed. Fifty-two patients with 62 affected digits met inclusion criteria, and cases were reviewed for preoperative demographics, treatment characteristics, clinical outcomes, and perioperative complications. RESULTS: Fifty-five digits in 48 patients were treated with CCH and underwent subsequent limited surgical fasciectomy. Of all digits in the present study, 3 (6.3%) had a documented surgical complication following open surgical fasciectomy. There were zero postoperative infections, vascular injuries, or tendon injuries. The rate of nerve injury was 2.1%. The rate of postoperative skin necrosis was 4.2%. These rates were comparable or lower than those of historical published data. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of perioperative complications in patients undergoing limited surgical fasciectomy after previous CCH treatment is low. The findings of this study will aid the counseling of Dupuytren patients in deciding whether to pursue treatment with CCH versus open surgical fasciectomy.

Do Patients Want to Be Involved in Their Carpal Tunnel Surgery Decisions? A Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: Carpal tunnel syndrome requires multiple decisions during its management, including regarding preoperative studies, surgical technique, and postoperative wound management. Whether patients have varying preferences for the degree to which they share in decisions during different phases of care has not been explored. The goal of our study was to evaluate the degree to which patients want to be involved along the care pathway in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome. METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicenter study of patients undergoing carpal tunnel surgery at 5 academic medical centers. Patients received a 27-item questionnaire to rate their preferred level of involvement for decisions made during 3 phases of care for carpal tunnel surgery: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. Preferences for participation were quantified using the Control Preferences Scale. These questions were scored on a scale of 0 to 4, with patient-only decisions scoring 0, semiactive decisions scoring 1, equally collaborative decisions scoring 2, semipassive decisions scoring 3, and physician-only decisions scoring 4. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients completed the survey between November 2018 and April 2019. Overall, patients preferred semipassive decisions in all phases of care (median score, 3). Patients preferred equally collaborative decisions for preoperative decisions (median score, 2). Patients preferred a semipassive decision-making role for intraoperative and postoperative decisions (median score, 3), suggesting these did not need to be equally shared. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome prefer varying degrees of involvement in the decision-making process of their care and prefer a semipassive role in intraoperative and postoperative decisions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Strategies to engage patients to varying degrees for all decisions during the management of carpal tunnel syndrome, such as decision aids for preoperative surgical decisions and educational handouts for intraoperative decisions, may facilitate aligning decisions with patient preferences for shared decision-making.

Feasibility, effectiveness and patient satisfaction of telerehabilitation after thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Telemedicine is an effective, emerging interface to connect practitioners with patients. It facilitates access to healthcare expertise, reduces costs, time demands and health disparities while improving satisfaction. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility, effectiveness and patient satisfaction of telerehabilitation for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). METHODS: This prospective investigation was performed at a single academic institution with two hand and upper extremity fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons. All patients undergoing CMC arthroplasty or rTSA were eligible for inclusion. Telerehabilitation was delivered by a hybrid model including an in-person post-operative visit, followed by alternating in-clinic and virtual videoconference visits. All patients were offered participation in the study arm; those that preferred in-person therapy were included as a control group. Therapy was initiated two weeks post-operative with an in-clinic evaluation. Patients then participated in alternating in-clinic and virtual visits weekly for eight weeks, followed by one virtual visit at 14-weeks post-operative and one clinical visit at 16-weeks post-operative. Patient reported and functional outcomes were collected at each visit. RESULTS: In the CMC group, 19 study and 11 control patients were enrolled. In the rTSA group, five study and 14 control patients were enrolled. No statistically significant differences between telerehabilitation and control for range-of-motion, pain and patient-reported functional outcomes was noted. All patients in the telerehabilitation arms reported high satisfaction. DISCUSSION: Utilizing telehealth in rehabilitation may be a viable option in upper extremity recovery. We hope this pilot programme can be a model for development of future telerehabilitation programmes.

Factors Influencing Patient Preference for Anesthesia in Ambulatory Hand Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify factors that influence preoperative patient preferences toward anesthesia in patients in a hand and upper extremity clinic. METHODS: A survey was administered to consecutive patients in a hand and upper extremity orthopedic clinic at an urban tertiary academic institution. The survey addressed presenting clinical complaint, anesthesia preference for minor soft tissue hand and wrist procedures, factors influencing anesthesia preference, and patient history of anesthesia and surgical treatment. The primary outcome measure was anesthesia preference: local-only or local with sedation. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 219 patients over a 1-month period with a mean patient age of 55 years. Most patients presented with a hand/wrist complaint (56%). One hundred fifty-two patients (71%) preferred local anesthesia with sedation and 61 patients (29%) preferred local-only anesthesia. Patients who preferred local-only anesthesia reported being more likely to be influenced by surgeon preference and cost, and also were more likely to have had prior experience with local-only anesthesia. In contrast, patients who preferred local anesthesia with sedation were more likely to be concerned about pain or were nervous about surgery. Prior surgical experience did not influence preference for anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Patient preferences for local-only anesthesia versus local anesthesia with sedation for ambulatory hand surgery are mixed, with most patients preferring sedation. Understanding patient preferences for anesthesia can better inform preoperative discussions and shared decision-making in anesthesia choice.

Implicit and Explicit Factors That Influence Surgeons' Decision-Making for Distal Radius Fractures in Older Patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors that influence surgeons' decision-making in the treatment of distal radius fractures in older patients. METHODS: Fourteen clinical vignettes of a 72-year-old patient with a distal radius fracture were sent to 185 orthopedic hand and/or trauma surgeons. The surgeons were surveyed regarding the demographic/practice details, treatment decision (surgical or nonsurgical), and factors that influenced management, including the Charlson Comorbidity Index, functional status, radiographic appearance, and handedness. Multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the effect of both surgeon-described (explicit) and given clinical (implicit) factors on the treatment decision and to evaluate for discrepancies. RESULTS: Sixty-six surgeons completed the survey, and 7 surgeons completed 10-13 vignettes. Surgeons made the explicit determination to pursue nonsurgical treatment based on the presence of comorbidities (odds ratio [OR], 0.02 for surgery; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.05), but the observation of the underlying clinical data suggested that the recommendation for surgical treatment was instead based on a higher functional status (OR, 3.54/increase in functional status; 95% CI, 2.52-4.98). Those employed by hospitals/health systems were significantly less likely to recommend surgery than those in private practice (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.79) CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the presence of comorbidities, functional status, and practice setting has a significant impact on a surgeon's decision to treat distal radius fractures in older patients. The discrepancy between the surgeon-described factors and underlying clinical data demonstrates cognitive bias. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons should be aware of cognitive biases in clinical reasoning and should work through consequential patient decisions using an analytical framework that attempts to reconcile all available clinical data.

The Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Restrictions on an Academic Hand Surgery Practice.

PURPOSE: The impact of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (coronavirus disease 2019) has been felt worldwide. We examined the quantitative impact during the first 4 weeks of hospital system and state-mandated restrictions on an academic, urban hand surgery practice. We hypothesized that the volume of clinic encounters, office procedures, and surgical cases would decrease and that the volume of nonelective care would remain unchanged. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all encounters at a hand surgery practice from March 16, 2020, through April 12, 2020 and compared those to two 4-week control time periods. Weekly encounter volumes and work relative value units (RVUs) were obtained for clinic encounters, office procedures, and surgical cases. The type of ambulatory visit was also identified. Surgical cases were categorized into 4 types (fracture or dislocation, acute soft tissue or nerve injury, infection, or elective/nonurgent) for the most recent time periods. We performed t tests to compare weekly volumes and RVUs between time periods. RESULTS: After the implementation of mandated restrictions on elective health care, ambulatory hand surgery clinic encounters decreased 72% to 73%, clinic procedures decreased by 87% to 90%, and surgical cases decreased by 87% to 88%. The percentage of ambulatory visits performed via telemedicine increased from 0.06% to 74%. Similar impacts on RVUs were seen. Surgeries for fractures and dislocations declined by 58% and those for acute soft tissue or nerve injury declined by 40%; the number of surgical procedures for infection remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The coronavirus restrictions on elective healthcare led to an immediate, substantial impact on hand surgery practice. There were significant decreases in the volumes of ambulatory encounters, office procedures, and surgical cases. The long-term financial impact of this change in practice is still to be determined but, based on the quantitative impacts seen, is likely to be significant. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic/Decision Analysis IV.

Unplanned Reoperation and Implant Revision After Total Wrist Arthroplasty.

Background: Total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) is a treatment option for many debilitating wrist conditions. With recent improvements in implant design, indications for TWA have broadened. However, despite these improvements, there are still complications associated with TWA, such as unplanned reoperation and eventual implant removal. The goal of this study was to identify risk factors for an unplanned reoperation or implant revision after a TWA at 2 academic medical centers between 2002 and 2015. Methods: In this retrospective study, 24 consecutive TWAs were identified using CPT codes. Medical records were manually reviewed to identify demographic, patient- or disease-related, and surgery-related risk factors for reoperation and implant removal after a primary TWA. Results: Forty-six percent of wrists (11 of 24 TWAs performed) had a reoperation after a median of 3.4 years, while 29% (7 of 24) underwent implant revision after a median of 5 years. Two patients had wrist surgery prior to their TWA, both eventually had their implant removed (P = .08). There were no risk factors associated with reoperation or implant removal. Conclusion: Unplanned reoperation and implant removal after a primary TWA are common. Approximately 1 in 3 wrists are likely to undergo revision surgery. We found no factors associated with reoperation or implant removal; however, prior wrist surgery showed a trend toward risk of implant removal after TWA.

Pronator Quadratus Repair Does Not Affect Reoperation Rates Following Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of pronator quadratus (PQ) repair on reoperation rates after distal radius open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) using a volar locking plate. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients undergoing distal radius ORIF with a volar locking plate between January 2012 and December 2016 at 2 urban, academic level I trauma centers was performed. Patient demographics, fracture and procedure characteristics, surgeon subspecialty, PQ repair, and reoperations were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to determine whether patient-related or injury-related characteristics were associated with PQ repair. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the effect of PQ repair on subsequent reoperations. RESULTS: In total, 509 patients were included, including 31 patients with bilateral injuries. The average follow-up time was 3.7 ± 2.8 years. Patients undergoing PQ repair were younger (57 ± 17 years vs 61 ± 17 years) and were more likely to have a lower Soong grade (53% vs 44% with Soong grade 0) than patients without PQ repair. Pronator quadratus repair was not found to have a significant impact on hardware removal, reoperations for flexor tendon pathology, or overall reoperations. CONCLUSIONS: Pronator quadratus repair was more commonly performed in younger patients and in patients with a lower Soong grade. Hand-subspecialized surgeons are more likely to pursue PQ repair than trauma-subspecialized surgeons. This study did not detect statistically significant differences in hardware removal, flexor tendon pathology, or overall reoperations between groups.

The Impact of the Soong Index on Hardware Removal and Overall Reoperation Rates After Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.

PURPOSE: This study sought to determine the impact of volar plate prominence on reoperation rates after open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures with volar locking plates and to identify other factors associated with removal of hardware (ROH) or a reoperation. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients who underwent distal radius open reduction and internal fixation between 2012 and 2016 at 2 level I trauma centers was conducted. Plate prominence was evaluated using the Soong index at the first postoperative visit. The details of patient demographics, fracture and plate characteristics, complications, and reoperations were recorded. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with increased rates of ROH and overall reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 732 (70.2%) of 1,042 patients completed follow-up at an average of 38.2 months, including 34 patients with bilateral operations, yielding 766 distal radius fractures. One hundred sixteen (15.1%) patients underwent reoperation at an average of 12.1 ± 13.6 months after the index surgery. Removal of hardware was the most commonly performed reoperation (77 patients, 10%). The multivariable regression analysis revealed significantly higher rates of ROH in Soong grade 1 or 2 patients (odds ratio 16, 95% CI 5.8-47; odds ratio 44, 95% CI 14-140, respectively) than in Soong grade 0 patients. Plate type, younger age, bilateral injuries, and concomitant procedures at the time of the index operation were all associated with increased risk of ROH. There were significant differences between individual surgeons the in rates of ROH (range 2.1%-22%) and overall reoperation (range 5.2%-36%). Compared with other hand surgeons, fellowship-trained hand surgeons had lower rates of ROH (8% vs 14%, respectively) and overall reoperation (12% vs 22%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The rates of ROH and overall reoperation increase with increasing Soong grade. Plate type is independently predictive of future ROH. Older patients and those undergoing open reduction and internal fixation experience lower rates of subsequent reoperation. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Radiographic Outcomes and Complications of Delayed Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons are sometimes presented with patients with distal radius fractures who present in a delayed fashion or lose reduction after several weeks of attempted closed management. There are limited studies on delayed surgical treatment of distal radius fractures to assist providers in decision-making. METHODS: We conducted a matched cohort study to compare radiographic outcomes and complications for patients with a distal radius fracture treated with delayed (3-5 weeks) or early (0-2 weeks) surgical fixation. Patients ages 18+ who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures by a volar approach at 2 Level I trauma centers between 2003 and 2015 were eligible. We measured radiographic outcomes and reviewed medical records to determine operative approach and complications. RESULTS: There were 25 cases and 50 controls matched for age (18-87), sex, and AO fracture type. The delayed group had surgery at a mean of 24.8 days from injury and the early group at 5.6 days. There was no statistically significant difference between the delayed and early cohorts in radiographic parameters on injury x-rays, in improvement in radiographic parameters on first postoperative x-rays, or in maintenance of radiographic parameters at union. CONCLUSION: We did not find significant differences in radiographic outcomes or complication rates between patients with delayed versus early surgical treatment for distal radius fracture. Providers treating patients with late presentation or late displacement have the option of surgical fixation beyond the first few weeks after injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (Retrospective matched cohort study).

Is Grit Associated with Burnout and Well-being in Orthopaedic Resident and Faculty Physicians? A Multi-institution Longitudinal Study Across Training Levels.

BACKGROUND: Grit has been defined as "perseverance and passion for long-term goals" and is characterized by maintaining focus and motivation toward a challenging ambition despite setbacks. There are limited data on the impact of grit on burnout and psychologic well-being in orthopaedic surgery, as well as on which factors may be associated with these variables. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is grit inversely correlated with burnout in orthopaedic resident and faculty physicians? (2) Is grit positively correlated with psychologic well-being in orthopaedic resident and faculty physicians? (3) Which demographic characteristics are associated with grit in orthopaedic resident and faculty physicians? (4) Which demographic characteristics are associated with burnout and psychologic well-being in orthopaedic resident and faculty physicians? METHODS: This study was an institutional review board-approved interim analysis from the first year of a 5-year longitudinal study of grit, burnout, and psychologic well-being in order to assess baseline relationships between these variables before analyzing how they may change over time. Orthopaedic residents, fellows, and faculty from 14 academic medical centers were enrolled, and 30% (335 of 1129) responded. We analyzed for the potential of response bias and found no important differences between sites in low versus high response rates, nor between early and late responders. Participants completed an email-based survey consisting of the Duckworth Short Grit Scale, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services (Medical Personnel) Survey, and Dupuy Psychological Well-being Index. The Short Grit Scale has been validated with regard to internal consistency, consensual and predictive validity, and test-retest stability. The Psychological Well-being Index has similarly been validated with regard to reliability, test-retest stability, and internal consistency, and the Maslach Burnout Inventory has been validated with regard to internal consistency, reliability, test-retest stability, and convergent validity. The survey also obtained basic demographic information such as survey participants' age, gender, race, ethnicity, marital status, current year of training or year in practice (as applicable), and region of practice. The studied population consisted of 166 faculty, 150 residents, and 19 fellows. Beyond the expected age differences between sub-populations, the fellow population had a higher proportion of women than the faculty and resident populations did. Pearson correlations and standardized ß coefficients were used to assess the relationships of grit, burnout, psychologic well-being, and continuous participant characteristics. RESULTS: We found moderate, negative relationships between grit and emotional exhaustion (r = -0.30; 95% CI -0.38 to -0.21; p < 0.001), depersonalization (r = -0.34; 95% CI -0.44 to -0.23; p < 0.001), and the overall burnout score (r = -0.39; 95% CI -0.48 to -0.31; p < 0.001). The results also showed a positive correlation between grit and personal accomplishment (r = 0.39; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.48; p < 0.001). We also found a moderate, positive relationship between grit and psychologic well-being (r = 0.39; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.49; p < 0.001). Orthopaedic surgeons with 21 years or more of practice had higher grit scores than physicians with 10 to 20 years of practice. Orthopaedic surgeons in practice for 21 years or more also had lower burnout scores than those in practice for 10 to 20 years. Married physicians had higher psychologic well-being than unmarried physicians did. CONCLUSION: Among orthopaedic residents, fellows, and faculty, grit is inversely related to burnout, with lower scores for emotional exhaustion and depersonalization and higher scores for personal accomplishment as grit increases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results suggest that grit could be targeted as an intervention for reducing burnout and promoting psychologic well-being among orthopaedic surgeons. Other research has suggested that grit is influenced by internal characteristics, life experiences, and the external environment, suggesting that there is potential to increase one's grit. Residency programs and faculty development initiatives might consider measuring grit to assess for the risk of burnout, as well as offering curricula or training to promote this psychologic characteristic.

Long-term Outcomes of Silastic Arthroplasty of the Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Joint.

Background: Silastic metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty (SMPA) has proven to be a durable option for end-stage arthritis in the non-thumb digits, while fusion has been the mainstay procedure for the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint (MP). Few studies exist to comment on the viability of thumb MP arthroplasty. This study reports both survival and objective outcomes following SMPA of the thumb. Methods: In an institutional review board-approved retrospective study, we identified 18 patients who underwent thumb SMPA at a tertiary academic center by 3 board-certified hand surgeons. Primary outcome measures were implant survival and post-operative complications. Secondary outcomes measures were quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (quickDASH) scores, brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (bMHQ), and postoperative pain as rated by the numerical rating scale. Results: Mean quickDASH and bMHQ scores at final follow-up were 35.6 and 70.6, respectively. The most common short-term complication was clinical deformity, followed by instability. The sole long-term complication was an implant dislocation in a previously asymptomatic patient. All patients reported reduction in pain. Three patients were indicated for revision surgery, 2 for persistent instability, and 1 for implant dislocation. Primary survivorship was 83% at mean follow-up of 5.8 years. Conclusions: Thumb SMPA is a viable option for end-stage arthritis. Pain relief in our series was unanimous. Among those that reported persistent symptoms or required revision, a majority had one or more key preoperative risk factors for failure as currently reported in literature. Larger, prospective series are needed to prove superior longevity and functional outcomes of thumb SMPA versus fusion.

Predictors of Insurance Claim Rejection in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Insurance claim rejections represent a challenge for healthcare providers because of the potential for lost revenue and administrative costs of reworking claims. METHODS: The billing records of five hand and upper extremity surgeons at a tertiary academic center were queried for all patient billing activity over a 1-year period yielding a total of 14,421 unique patient encounters. RESULTS: A total of 11,839 unique patient encounters were included, and the overall claim rejection rate was 19.3%. Claim rejection rate varied significantly by payer (P < 0.0001) and was lowest in private insurance (14.0%) and highest in Medicare (31.2%). The use of multiple Current Procedure Terminology codes for an encounter was independently associated with an increased risk of claim rejection for both office (25.6%, relative risk [RR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 1.49, P = 0.0032) and surgical (25.6%, RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.18, P = 0.0002) settings. After multivariate regression adjustment, modifier 25 was associated with a decreased risk of claim rejection (23.3%, RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.85, P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Insurance claim rejection occurs frequently (19.3%) in hand/upper extremity surgery and varies by insurance type, with the highest rejection rate occurring in Medicare (31.2%). For a given encounter, the use of multiple Current Procedure Terminology codes and specific modifiers are predictive of rejection risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic.

The Early Effect of COVID-19 Restrictions on an Academic Orthopedic Surgery Department.

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a global influence on health care. The authors examined the early effect of hospital- and state-mandated restrictions on an orthopedic surgery department and hypothesized that the volume of ambulatory clinic encounters, office and surgical procedures, and cases would dramatically decrease. A retrospective review was performed of all encounters in an orthopedic surgery department at a level I academic trauma center during a 4-week period, from March 16, 2020, to April 12, 2020. The results were compared with two control 4-week periods, February 17, 2020, to March 15, 2020, and March 16, 2019, to April 12, 2019. Weekly volume and work relative value units (RVUs) of clinic encounters, office and surgical procedures, and cases were assessed. The type of ambulatory visit also was recorded. Comparisons of mean weekly volume and RVUs between the study and control periods were performed with Student's t test. Surgical cases were categorized into fracture or dislocation, acute soft tissue or nerve injury, infection, oncology, and elective or nonurgent. After implementation of hospital- and state-mandated restrictions on elective health care, the volume of ambulatory orthopedic surgery clinic encounters decreased by 74% to 77%, the volume of clinic procedures decreased by 95%, and the volume of surgical cases decreased by 88%. The percentage of clinic visits performed via telemedicine increased from 0.3% to 81.2%. Elective surgical cases ceased, and the volume of nonelective surgical cases decreased by 51%. During the first 4 weeks after COVID-19-related restrictions were imposed, an immediate and dramatic effect was observed. Compared with the control periods, significant reductions were seen in the volume of ambulatory encounters, office-based procedures, and surgical cases. In addition, the volume of nonelective surgical cases decreased by 51%. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(4):228-232.].

Notch signalling drives synovial fibroblast identity and arthritis pathology.

The synovium is a mesenchymal tissue composed mainly of fibroblasts, with a lining and sublining that surround the joints. In rheumatoid arthritis the synovial tissue undergoes marked hyperplasia, becomes inflamed and invasive, and destroys the joint1,2. It has recently been shown that a subset of fibroblasts in the sublining undergoes a major expansion in rheumatoid arthritis that is linked to disease activity3-5; however, the molecular mechanism by which these fibroblasts differentiate and expand is unknown. Here we identify a critical role for NOTCH3 signalling in the differentiation of perivascular and sublining fibroblasts that express CD90 (encoded by THY1). Using single-cell RNA sequencing and synovial tissue organoids, we found that NOTCH3 signalling drives both transcriptional and spatial gradients-emanating from vascular endothelial cells outwards-in fibroblasts. In active rheumatoid arthritis, NOTCH3 and Notch target genes are markedly upregulated in synovial fibroblasts. In mice, the genetic deletion of Notch3 or the blockade of NOTCH3 signalling attenuates inflammation and prevents joint damage in inflammatory arthritis. Our results indicate that synovial fibroblasts exhibit a positional identity that is regulated by endothelium-derived Notch signalling, and that this stromal crosstalk pathway underlies inflammation and pathology in inflammatory arthritis.