Single-Layer Continuous Versus Double-Layer Continuous Suture in Colonic Anastomoses-a Randomized Multicentre Trial (ANATECH Trial).

PURPOSE: Apart from stapling methods, single- or double-layer continuous hand sutures are established techniques for colonic anastomoses. It is unclear which hand suture technique has superior anastomotic safety. This randomized trial evaluated the incidence of postoperative complications depending on anastomosis technique. METHODS: This multicentre randomized trial enrolled adult elective patients between February 2004 and June 2012 in four German university hospitals. Primary endpoint was incidence of clinical anastomotic leakage until 3 months postoperatively. Estimated sample size was 768 randomized patients. Main secondary endpoints were duration of anastomotic suture, postoperative morbidity and stool patterns at 3-month follow-up. Patients and postoperative outcome assessors were blinded to the group assignment. This trial is registered (NCT00996554). RESULTS: Due to slow recruitment, the trial was stopped prematurely. Two hundred fifty-two patients (129 to single-layer suture anastomosis (SLA), 123 to double-layer suture anastomosis (DLA)) were randomized and analysed. Nine patients (3.6 %) were lost during follow-up. Exploratory primary endpoint analysis by intention-to-treat principle showed no significant difference for clinical anastomotic leakage between suturing techniques (SLA, 4 of 129 (3.1 %) vs. DLA, 6 of 123 (4.9 %), p = 0.532). Secondary endpoint analysis showed on average a 6-min shorter suture duration for SLA than DLA (18 min (4-49) vs. 24 min (8-50), p < 0.001). At 3-month follow-up, subjective well-being and stool patterns were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study did not reach sufficient power and cannot confirm whether both techniques might be equally or if one technique might be superior. Exploratory analysis suggests that in elective colonic resections, the single-layer continuous hand suture technique may be equally effective as the double-layer technique regarding incidence of anastomotic leakage, length of hospital stay, overall postoperative complications, subjective short-term well-being and stool patterns. Lessons learned from this trial course are summarized. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered (Trial registration: NCT00996554). Link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00996554 .

Imaging EGFR phosphorylation in intact human pancreatic carcinoma cells.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Carcinoma of the pancreatic duct is a highly malignant tumor characterized by aggressive and early metastastatic growth. A high rate of tumor recurrence after surgical resection and the lack of effective chemotherapeutic approaches result in low 5-year survival rates. Overexpression of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and its receptor have been correlated to a higher tumor biological aggressiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated EGFR RNA and protein expressions in different pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. EGFR phosphorylation was determined using acceptor photobleaching fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). RESULTS: The imaging method allowed determination of receptor phorphorylation in intact cells without external calibration. Significant differences between the cell lines were found in EGFR expression but not in phosphorylation of EGFR without EGF stimulation. After stimulation with EGF, significant differences were found in receptor phorphorylation. EGFR expression did not correlate with EGFR phorphorylation. CONCLUSION: Since EGFR phosphorylation conveys signal transduction within cells, this molecular imaging method could be useful for the identification of patients with a high level of EGFR phosphorylation within tumor cells and, thus, to select patients for an EGFR-targeted therapy.