Similar clinical and neuroimaging features in monozygotic twin pair with mutation in progranulin.

OBJECTIVE: To report the phenotypic characterization of monozygotic twins with mutations encoding progranulin (PGRN). METHODS: We studied a twin pair with an exon 4 gene deletion in the PGRN gene. Both twins had clinical and neuropsychological examinations as well as structural MRI and fluorodeoxyglucose PET (FDG-PET) scans. PGRN gene sequencing was performed followed by progranulin ELISA in plasma. RESULTS: Both twins manifested symptoms within 3 years of each other, with early behavioral, language, dysexecutive, and memory problems. MRI and FDG-PET imaging demonstrated a strikingly similar topography of findings with clear left hemisphere predominance. Serum progranulin levels in both were well below those from a normal population sample. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the heterogeneity seen in many families with PGRN mutations, these monozygotic twins demonstrated strong clinical, neuroimaging, and serum progranulin level similarities, demonstrating the importance of shared genetic profiles beyond environmental influences in the symptomatic expression of the disease.

Inclusion of RBD improves the diagnostic classification of dementia with Lewy bodies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adding REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) to the dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) diagnostic criteria improves classification accuracy of autopsy-confirmed DLB. METHODS: We followed 234 consecutive patients with dementia until autopsy with a mean of 4 annual visits. Clinical diagnoses included DLB, Alzheimer disease (AD), corticobasal syndrome, and frontotemporal dementia. Pathologic diagnoses used the 2005 DLB consensus criteria and included no/low likelihood DLB (non-DLB; n = 136) and intermediate/high likelihood DLB (DLB; n = 98). Regression modeling and sensitivity/specificity analyses were used to evaluate the diagnostic role of RBD. RESULTS: Each of the 3 core features increased the odds of autopsy-confirmed DLB up to 2-fold, and RBD increased the odds by 6-fold. When clinically probable DLB reflected dementia and 2 or more of the 3 core features, sensitivity was 85%, and specificity was 73%. When RBD was added and clinically probable DLB reflected 2 or more of 4 features, sensitivity improved to 88%. When dementia and RBD were also designated as probable DLB, sensitivity increased to 90% while specificity remained at 73%. The VH, parkinsonism, RBD model lowered sensitivity to 83%, but improved specificity to 85%. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of RBD as a core clinical feature improves the diagnostic accuracy of autopsy-confirmed DLB.

Cervical spondylodiscitis caused by Blastoschizomyces capitatus.

A 37-year-old woman, during her second remission of acute myeloid leukemia, presented with severe neck pain and cervico-brachial neuralgia. Investigation revealed a C5-C6 spondylodiscitis. A CT-guided anterior biopsy decompressed the mass, immediately alleviated the symptoms, and isolated a rare yeast: Blastoschizomyces capitatus. To our knowledge, only three cases of spondylodiscitis with this yeast have been described. Six months of voriconazole and liposomal amphotericin B treatment produced a complete resolution on CT and MRI imaging. However, the ongoing severe yeast infection prevented the planned bone marrow allograft.

Are women appropriately represented and assessed in clinical trials submitted for marketing authorization? A review of the database of the European Medicines Agency.

OBJECTIVE: There is concern that patients included in trials do not represent the true patient population and women in particular may selectively be excluded. We looked at trial data submitted to the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) by drug companies to achieve marketing authorization in Europe between 2000 and 2003. METHODS: We reviewed the EMEA database and included the main studies for the risk/benefit assessment (pivotal trials) submitted between 2000 and 2003. RESULTS: In pivotal trials submitted to the EMEA there was no, or generally clinically negligible, evidence for gender bias; however, women were underrepresented in hypertension, diabetes and hepatitis B trials, and overrepresented in rheumatoid arthritis and allergic conjunctivitis. CONCLUSIONS: In trials submitted for marketing authorization to the EMEA gender bias was not a serious problem.

Streptococcus milleri group infection associated with digestive fistula in patients with vascular graft: report of seven cases and review.

We described seven patients with Streptococcus milleri group aortic (six patients) or vena cava (one patient) graft infection secondary to a vasculo-digestive fistula. Time between vascular graft setting and first clinical signs varied from eight months to more than thirteen years. Six patients had fever. Three patients presented with recurrent fever for more than nine months and in two of these cases, delay before diagnosis was long because repeated blood cultures were sterile. Three patients had abdominal pain and/or digestive haemorrhage. Abdominal CT-scan S. milleri was not contributive for the diagnosis in four patients. Streptococcus anginosus was isolated in four patients, Streptococcus constellatus in three patients. One patient died before surgical management. The other six patients were cured by a surgical management associated with a prolonged antibiotic (lactams) treatment. S. milleri group graft infections are rare (or misdiagnosed) while we found only 4 similar cases in the English medical literature. We conclude that a peri-prosthetic infection secondary to a digestive fistula must be insistently searched (and blood cultures must be repeated many times) in any patient with an aortic (or any other vascular) graft presenting prolonged or recurrent fever or acute digestive symptoms.

[Severe adverse reactions after the use of sulphur hexafluoride (SonoVue) as an ultrasonographic contrast agent]. / Ernstige bijwerkingen bij gebruik van zwavelhexafluoride (SonoVue) als echografisch contrastmiddel.

European Medicines Agency (EMEA) recently took precautionary measures to limit the use of the ultrasonographic contrast agent sulphur hexafluoride (SonoVue) in patients with cardiac disease. Throughout Europe a number of serious allergic reactions with probable secondary cardiovascular problems have been reported. In addition to this, there have been 3 reports of a fatal outcome soon after the administration of SonoVue. For all of these patients there was a risk of serious cardiac complications as a consequence of underlying cardiac problems. In The Netherlands 3 anaphylactic reactions have been reported, two in women aged 59 and 70 years respectively, and one in a man aged 80 years.

Nuclear medicine in the treatment of endocrine and neuroendocrine tumors

Radionuclide therapy plays an important role in the treatment of endocrine and neuroendocrine tumors. Therapy with 131I is used in patients with papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma for ablation of thyroid remnants and for treatment of distant metastases. In neck recurrence, 131I may be used as monotherapy or in combination with surgery. Both radioimmunotherapy and 90Y-DOTATOC are being applied in non-131I-avid thyroid malignancies such as medullary thyroid carcinoma. 131I-MIBG is currently used in various treatment schedules for recurrences and metastases of neuroblastoma, pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma and carcinoid. In neuroblastoma 131I-MIBG can be given upfront to reduce large and bulky tumors for subsequent surgery, chemotherapy and autologus bone marrow infusion. In carcinoid and other neuroendocrine tumors therapy with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues appears to be a promising modality. Radiopharmaceutical quality requirements, patient preparation, radiation protection and hospital isolation facilities are important supportive factors to enable adequate radionuclide therapy

The use of placebo-controlled and non-inferiority trials for the evaluation of new drugs in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Registration of new agents for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis has been based over the past few years on placebo-controlled phase III trials with the incidence of patients with new vertebral/nonvertebral fractures as the most usual primary endpoint. The use of a placebo in diseases where an active treatment is available has been a matter of debate following the update of the Declaration of Helsinki by the World Medical Association which questioned this trial design. Current regulatory recommendations within the European Union suggest that placebo-controlled trials are still the best option when assessing the efficacy and safety of new drugs intended for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. This suggestion seems to be in apparent contradiction with the current content of the Declaration of Helsinki. This paper addresses the ethics and feasibility of placebo-controlled trials in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, in the light of available therapeutic options, and discusses possible alternative approaches in those patients where placebo treatment could be deemed to be unethical. It is concluded that placebo-controlled trials remain the most efficient design to establish the efficacy and safety of a new agent for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Such trials are feasible and ethically acceptable in patients with osteoporosis but without prevalent vertebral fractures. Conversely, in patients with prevalent vertebral fractures, placebo-controlled trials are ethically questionable and non-inferiority trials are more appropriate. A relative margin of non-inferiority of 20-30% is suggested, to be discussed on a case by case basis.

[Clinical evaluation of efficacy and adverse effects in the (European) registration of drugs: what does it mean for the doctor and patient?]. / De klinische beoordeling van werkzaamheid en schadelijkheid bij de (Europese) registratie van geneesmiddelen: wat betekent dit voor de dokter en de patiënt?

The clinical criteria for admission of new drugs to the European common market have become more stringent in recent years. Increasingly often, the manufacturer is required to demonstrate that the new drug offers a clinically visible and relevant benefit to the patient. Efficacy and adverse effects should not only be studied by comparative trials with placebo, the registration authorities also expect the drug to be compared with the standard treatment already available. Such trials should prove that the balance between efficacy and adverse effects of the drug is better than that of placebo and at least as good as the standard treatment, as regards not only statistical significance but also clinical relevance. Therefore, Dutch and European assessment reports and product information may be increasingly useful to prescribers, patients and insurers in determining the role and therapeutic value of new drugs within the existing therapeutic possibilities concerning certain diseases.

Outcome measures for the assessment of new antiepileptic drugs.

For the approval of any new medicinal product quality, safety and efficacy are essential requirements. This manuscript focuses on the clinical development programme. For the investigation of antiepileptic drugs some international guidelines are of special importance. They are based on the knowledge of many experts and can be seen as a consensus on minimal requirements; deviations must be thoroughly justified. In phases II and III, usually randomised, double-blind add-on studies versus placebo in patients with therapy-resistant seizures are used to get an impression of the efficacy and certain safety issues. A clear dose-response relationship may be a good indication for efficacy. However, assessment of safety of the new product in add-on studies is difficult. Therefore comparative phase III monotherapy studies versus established antiepileptic drugs are essential to confirm the results obtained in add-on studies and are needed for a proper judgement of the efficacy/safety balance. The percentage of reduction of seizure frequency has played a dominating role as efficacy criterium. Nowadays preference is being given to the percentage responders. Which parameter is the most relevant for the given group of patients and what change is considered clinically relevant must be thoroughly argued. The definition of responder should focus on major benefit for the patients involved.

Disability, outcome and case-mix in acute psychiatric in-patient units.

BACKGROUND: Eighteen acute in-patient psychiatric units in Australia funded a syndicate to measure case-mix, disability and outcome of treatment. This syndicate included eight units in public general hospitals, five in stand-alone public psychiatric hospitals and five in private psychiatric hospitals. METHOD: Up to 100 in-patients admitted consecutively to each hospital (1359 in all) were assigned to a Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG), rated on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) and asked to complete the Medical Outcomes Trust Short Form 36 (SF36). These scales were administered again at discharge. Demographic information and length of stay were also recorded. Disability was measured by scores on the HoNOS and SF36 at admission, and outcome was assessed by the change in scores between admission and discharge. RESULTS: The public hospitals treated significantly more patients with schizophrenia and fewer with affective disorders, and their case load on admission was more disabled, on the whole, than that of the private hospitals. They achieved the same outcome or health gain as the private hospitals, but needed a shorter length of stay to do so. The addition of disability scores to DRG moderately increased the ability to predict length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Routine outcome assessment using reliable and valid instruments is practical, and could lead to improvements in the quality of care for psychiatric patients.