RESUMO
PURPOSE: To examine social factors associated with the 5-year risk of glaucoma suspects (GS) converting to open-angle glaucoma (OAG). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SUBJECTS: We screened for participants diagnosed with GS in the All of Us database. Cases that converted to OAG within 5 years of GS diagnosis (the "conversion group") were compared with control cases that did not convert. METHODS: Demographic, socioeconomic and healthcare utilization data of the cases were extracted and compared between the conversion group and the control group. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to identify potential factors associated with the risk of conversion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hazard ratios (HRs) of significant factors associated with the risk of conversion. RESULTS: A total of 5274 GS participants were identified, and 786 (15%) cases converted to OAG within 5-year follow-up. The two groups showed significant differences in age, race, gender, employment status, income/education level, history of intra-ocular surgery, and healthcare utilization patterns. In the multivariable model, African American/Black race (HR [95% confidence interval] =1.70 [1.44-2.00]), older age at GS diagnosis (1.17 [1.09-1.25]), male gender (1.30 [1.13-1.50], no history of recreational drug use (1.23 [1.07-1.42]), history of intra-ocular surgery (1.60 [1.02-1.53]) and having more reasons for delayed healthcare access (2.27 [1.23-4.18]) were associated with a greater hazard of conversion, while being employed (0.71 [0.60-0.86]) was associated with a smaller hazard of conversion (P<0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Several social factors were associated with the conversion from GS to OAG, which may help to identify patients at higher risk of disease progression. Future studies are needed to examine the basis for these findings and the potential interventions that could address them.
RESUMO
Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Blood pressure (BP) dysregulation is a known risk factor, and home-based BP monitoring is increasingly used, but the usability of digital health devices to measure BP among glaucoma patients is not well studied. There may be particular usability challenges among this group, given that glaucoma disproportionately affects the elderly and can cause visual impairment. Therefore, the goal of this mixed-methods study was to assess the usability of a smart watch digital health device for home BP monitoring among glaucoma patients. Adult participants were recruited and given a smartwatch blood pressure monitor for at-home use. The eHEALS questionnaire was used to determine baseline digital health literacy. After a week of use, participants assessed the usability of the BP monitor and related mobile app using the Post-study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) and the System Usability Scale (SUS), standardized instruments to measure usability in health information technology interventions. Variations in scores were evaluated using ANOVA and open-ended responses about participants' experience were analyzed thematically. Overall, usability scores corresponded to the 80th-84th percentile, although older patients endorsed significantly worse usability based on quantitative scores and additionally provided qualitative feedback describing some difficulty using the device. Usability for older patients should be considered in the design of digital health devices for glaucoma given their disproportionate burden of disease and challenges in navigating digital health technologies, although the overall high usability scores for the device demonstrates promise for future clinical applications in glaucoma risk stratification.
