A simplified biventricular defibrillator with fixed long detection intervals reduces implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) interventions and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy implanted for primary prevention: the RELEVANT [Role of long dEtection window programming in patients with LEft VentriculAr dysfunction, Non-ischemic eTiology in primary prevention treated with a biventricular ICD] study.

AIMS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of a cardiac resynchronization therapy with cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D) device with simplified ventricular tachycardia management in patients with non-ischaemic heart failure (HF) and primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) indication. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective, controlled, parallel, multicentre, non-randomized study enrolling 324 primary prevention non-ischaemic HF patients implanted with CRT-D devices from 2004 to 2007: Protect group, 164 patients implanted with a Medtronic Insync III Protect device and Control group, 160 patients utilizing other Medtronic CRT-D devices. Efficacy was assessed by computing appropriate and inappropriate detections and therapies during follow-up; safety compared hospitalizations and syncopal events between groups. Ninety per cent of both ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias terminated within the 13-29 beat detection interval with the Protect algorithm. The Protect group showed a significantly better event-free survival to first delivered therapy for total (P = 0.0001), appropriately treated (P = 0.002), and inappropriately treated episodes (P = 0.017). The total number of delivered shocks was significantly lower in the Protect group (22 vs. 59, P < 0.0001). In the Protect group, a significantly reduced HF hospitalization (hazard ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-0.98, P = 0.044) was observed without any increase of syncope or death. CONCLUSION: A simplified CRT-D device with fixed long detection reduced overall ICD therapy burden and HF hospitalizations without entailing any additional adverse events in primary prevention non-ischaemic HF patients.

Aortic root performance after valve sparing procedure: a comparative finite element analysis.

David and Yacoub sparing techniques are the most common procedures adopted for the surgical correction of aortic root aneurysms. These surgical procedures entail the replacement of the sinuses of Valsalva with a synthetic graft, inside which the cusps are re-suspended. Root replacement by a synthetic graft may result in altered valve behaviour both in terms of coaptation and stress distribution, thus leading to the failure of the correction. A finite element approach was used to investigate this phenomenon; four 3D models of the aortic root were developed to simulate the root in physiological, pathological and post-operative conditions after the two different surgical procedures. The physiological 3D geometrical model was developed on the basis of anatomical data obtained from echocardiographic images; it was then modified to obtain the pathological and post-operative models. The effectiveness of both techniques was assessed by comparison with the first two simulated conditions, in terms of stresses acting on the root, leaflet coaptation and interaction between leaflets and the graft during valve opening. Results show that both sparing techniques are able to restore aortic valve coaptation and to reduce stresses induced by the initial root dilation. Nonetheless, both techniques lead to altered leaflet kinematics, with more evident alterations after David repair.