Transforming body composition with semaglutide in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor-agonists (GLP-1ra), such as semaglutide, have emerged as promising treatments, demonstrating sustained weight reduction and metabolic benefits. This study aims to assess the impact of oral and subcutaneous semaglutide on body composition and metabolic parameters in patients with T2DM and obesity. Methods: A 24-week quasi-experimental retrospective study including adults with T2DM and obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) who were treated with either daily-oral or weekly-subcutaneous semaglutide. Body composition was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis, evaluating fat mass, fat-free mass, total body water, skeletal muscle mass, and whole-body phase angle. Analytical parameters included lipid profile and glycaemic control. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v.26. Results: Participants (n=88) experienced significant weight loss after treatment with semaglutide (9.5% in subcutaneous, 9.4% in oral, P<0.001). Weight reduction primarily resulted from fat mass reduction without substantial lean mass compromise. Visceral fat area decreased, whiles phase-angle remained stable. Improvements in lipid profiles and glycaemic control were observed, with a decrease in both HbA1c and insulin requirements. Multivariate analysis demonstrated comparable impacts of oral and subcutaneous semaglutide on body composition. Conclusion: Semaglutide, administered orally or subcutaneously, demonstrated positive effects on body composition, metabolic and glycaemic control in patients with T2DM and obesity. This real-world study highlights the potential of bioelectrical impedance analysis in assessing antidiabetic drugs' impact on body composition, providing valuable insights for future research and clinical applications.

A Multinational Real-World Study on the Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Initiating Dapagliflozin in Southern Europe.

INTRODUCTION: A real-world study was performed to describe the clinical characteristics of patients who received dapagliflozin to better understand differences when initiating dapagliflozin in various countries and different prescribing settings. METHODS: We assessed pooled data from observational studies carried out in Italy (n = 2484), Spain (n = 564) and Greece (n = 87). The primary objective was to compare the clinical profile of patients initiating dapagliflozin in the three countries. We also evaluated the percentage of patients who received dapagliflozin in clinical practice who satisfied DECLARE-TIMI 58 enrolment criteria. RESULTS: In Italy and Spain, around 90% of patients were receiving metformin vs. 66% in Greece (p < 0.0001). Patients in Greece had lower levels of estimated glomerular filtration rate and lower prevalence rates of retinopathy, prior stroke, acute myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Grouping the cohorts by prescribing setting (primary vs. specialist care), baseline HbA1c was lower in primary care (8.4 ± 1.7 vs. 8.7 ± 1.5, respectively; p < 0.0001). Significantly more patients were receiving other medications for concomitant conditions in specialist care. A total of 1416 patients (48%) did not meet DECLARE inclusion criteria, while 1561 (52%) patients met the criteria (Greece 41.05%, Italy 53.19%, Spain 51.35%). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were seen among patients initiating dapagliflozin in southern Europe. Our results suggest that dapagliflozin was being initiated at different stages of the disease according to the country and prescribing settings. Such geographic heterogeneity may have an impact upon effectiveness of dapagliflozin on glucose lowering, as well as cardiovascular and renal outcomes.