Routine screening for HIV, hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus in individuals undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Given the effectiveness of treatment of HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, there are considerable benefits associated with determining HIV/HBV/HCV status. We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of systematic screening and subsequent care in an oral and maxillofacial surgery department. METHODS: The anaesthesiologists proposed screening for HIV, HBV and HCV to all individuals of unknown infection status undergoing surgery between 19 April 2016 and 19 April 2017. The endpoints were the rates of test offer, acceptance/refusal and new diagnoses. Seropositive individuals were referred to infectious disease specialists. Associations between age, sex or surgery type and test offer (eligible individuals) or acceptance/refusal (those offered testing) were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 1407 individuals attending the department, 1322 were eligible for inclusion in the study. Testing was proposed to 899 individuals [68%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 65-71%], 831 of whom accepted the offer (92.4%; 95% CI 90.5-94.1%). Results were obtained for 787 individuals (41 samples were uncollected and three were invalid). Age was the only factor associated with test offer in multivariable analysis [odds ratio (OR) 0.90; 95% CI 0.84-0.97, per additional 10 years], and no factor was associated with acceptance. Of the five, three and eight individuals testing positive for HIV, HBV and HCV, four, two and one patient, respectively, reported prior knowledge of seropositivity. The new diagnosis rate was 0.13% (95% CI 0-0.7%) for HIV and HBV, and 0.89% (95% CI 0.36-1.82%) for HCV [three positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests]. All individuals newly diagnosed with HIV or HCV infection received specific antiviral treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of screening offer and acceptance were high. Substantial screening resources are required to decrease the impact of the hidden epidemics of HIV, HBV and HCV infections.

Darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy at a low dose (600/100 mg/day) in HIV-1-infected individuals with suppressed HIV viraemia.

Background: Darunavir/ritonavir is a potent PI with a high genetic barrier and pharmacological robustness favourably investigated as monotherapy. Whether darunavir could be dose reduced in the context of monotherapy deserves investigation. Methods: Patients with HIV suppressed viraemia (plasma viral load <50 copies/mL for 12 months) under ART who had switched to darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy at 600/100 mg/day between 2013 and 2015 were included in this observational 48 week single-centre study. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with virological success (defined as plasma viral load <50 copies/mL) at week 24. Secondary outcomes included treatment strategy success and resistance. Results: Thirty-one patients were included with the following baseline characteristics [median (IQR)]: age 52 years (47-57), CD4+ 649 cells/mm3 (463-813), ART duration 16.3 years (9.2-22.3), nadir CD4+ 195 cells/mm3 (144-261) and duration of HIV suppression 7.8 years (4.8-9.7). Prior to switch, ART consisted of PI monotherapy for 28 of 31 patients [darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg/day (n = 26), lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 1) and atazanavir/ritonavir (n = 1)] and a triple drug regimen for 3 of 31 patients. Within the 48 weeks of follow-up, no virological failure occurred and two patients discontinued 600/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir due to side effects at week 16 and 40, leading to a virological suppression rate of 100% (95% CI = 89-100) at weeks 24 and 48. Strategy success rates were 96.8% (95% CI = 83.3-99.9) at week 24 and 93.5% (95% CI = 78.6-99.2) at week 48. Median (IQR) Ctrough values of 800/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir and 600/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir were 1537 ng/mL (1286-1724) and 1255 ng/mL (873-2161), respectively. Conclusions: A lower dose of darunavir/ritonavir used as monotherapy (600/100 mg/day) was highly effective in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these data.

Dolutegravir as monotherapy in HIV-1-infected individuals with suppressed HIV viraemia.

BACKGROUND: Reducing drug burden is a key challenge for achieving lifelong suppressive HIV therapy. Dolutegravir, with a high potency, long half-life and high genetic barrier, offers potential for monotherapy. METHODS: This observational single-centre study enrolled all patients with HIV RNA (viral load) <50 copies/mL for at least 12 months, with CD4 >350 cells/mm(3) and with no failure under integrase inhibitor therapy who had switched from suppressive ART to dolutegravir monotherapy (50 mg/day). Primary outcome was proportion of patients with viral load <50 copies/mL at week 24. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients treated for a median ART duration of 17 years (IQR 11-20), virally suppressed for a median of 79 months (IQR 42-95) and with a median CD4 count of 624 cells/mm(3) (IQR 524-761), were enrolled. Baseline ART consisted of a three-drug (n = 10), two-drug (n = 10) or single-drug (n = 8) regimen with integrase inhibitor exposure in 13 patients. The proportion of patients maintaining viral load <50 copies/mL was 96% (95% CI 79%-100%) at week 4, 100% (95% CI = 85%-100%) at week 8, 93% (95% CI 76%-99%) at week 12 and 92% (75-99) at week 24. Three patients (3.70%; 95% CI 3.4%-10.8%) with prior integrase inhibitor experience had HIV RNA rebound with the presence of resistance mutations. Genotyping of HIV DNA using the Sanger method or ultradeep sequencing showed no integrase inhibitor resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) except for the mutation 74I in a patient on a suppressive elvitegravir regimen. The median within- and between-subject variability of dolutegravir C24 was 25% and 34%, respectively. Nine patients with a year of follow-up remained virally suppressed. CONCLUSIONS: Dolutegravir has the potency to be further investigated as a single ART in randomized studies, particularly in patients with no prior exposure to integrase inhibitors.

Soluble biomarkers of immune activation and inflammation in HIV infection: impact of 2 years of effective first-line combination antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of rapid and sustained viral control produced by combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) on HIV-associated immune activation and inflammation. METHODS: In this longitudinal observational study, we examined changes in interleukin-6 (IL-6), interferon-γ-inducible protein-10 (IP-10), monokine induced by interferon-γ (MIG) and soluble CD14 (sCD14) levels during 2 years of effective first-line cART. Biomarker levels before and after cART were compared with those observed in healthy subjects, using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Elevated biomarker levels were defined with respect to values for healthy subject (mean + 2 standard deviations). Factors associated with persistently elevated biomarker levels after 2 years of cART were identified by logistic regression. RESULTS: We included in the study 139 patients with a median HIV-1 RNA level of 4.8 log10 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and a median CD4 cell count of 294 cells/µL at cART initiation [day 0 (D0)]. At D0, all biomarker levels were higher than in healthy subjects (P < 0.05). After 2 years of cART, IL-6, IP-10 and MIG levels fell significantly, by a median of 0.54, 420 and 1107 pg/mL, respectively (all P < 0.001), and were no longer elevated in > 75% of patients. In contrast, sCD14 levels did not change significantly (0.18 × 10(6) pg/mL; P = 0.102) and remained elevated. Older age was associated with elevated levels of IP-10 [odds ratio (OR) 1.60 per 10 years older; P = 0.047] and MIG (OR 1.92 per 10 years older; P = 0.007) after 2 years of cART. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid and sustained viral suppression produced by first-line cART reduced IL-6, IP-10 and MIG to normal levels, while sCD14, a marker of monocyte activation, remained elevated. High levels of IP-10 and MIG tended to persist in older patients.

Rapid plasma viral suppression in naive HIV-infected patients with high CD4 cells and low viraemia initiating a dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor strategy: a proof-of-concept study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether a dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) strategy can control HIV replication in antiviral therapy (ART)-naive HIV-infected patients with a high CD4 cell count and a low viral load (VL). METHODS: This observational study included all HIV-infected treatment-naive patients with a CD4 cell count >300 cells/mm(3), a plasma HIV RNA between 1000 copies/mL and 30,000 copies/mL and wild-type virus who initiated dual NRTI ART between January 2008 and December 2012. HIV RNA and CD4 cell count were assessed at Day 0, Week (W) 4, W12, W24 and W48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a plasma VL (pVL) <50 copies/mL at W24. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included. The median (IQR) baseline characteristics were: time since HIV diagnosis, 25 months (8-66 months); CD4 cell count, 592 cells/mm(3) (405-798 cells/mm(3)); HIV RNA, 10,395 copies/mL (4106-16,566 copies/mL); and HIV DNA, 464 copies/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (195-1168 copies/10(6) PBMC). Nineteen patients received tenofovir/emtricitabine and one patient received abacavir/lamivudine. At W12, 88% of the patients with available data (n = 16/18, 95% CI 0.65-0.99) had a pVL <50 copies/mL. Overall, the proportion of patients with a pVL <50 copies/mL was 100% (n = 20/20, 95% CI 0.83-1.0) at W24 and 95% (n = 18/19, 95% CI 0.74-0.99) at W48 (with one patient lost to follow-up and one patient with poor treatment compliance). The median increase in CD4 cells was 83 cells/mm(3) (40-310 cells/mm(3)). There was no discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy for any reason such as lack of efficacy or toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that, in patients with a high CD4 cell count and a low VL, a dual NRTI strategy may represent a potentially effective treatment strategy to control HIV replication. This needs to be confirmed in larger controlled clinical studies.

Efficacy of raltegravir switching strategies in HIV-infected patients with suppressed viraemia according to the genotypic sensitivity score.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The lack of antiretroviral (ARV) backbone activity associated with raltegravir has been proposed as the main explanation for virological relapse observed in patients with undetectable viraemia who are switched from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) to raltegravir. However ARV activity remains difficult to assess in this context. The aim of our study was to precisely assess the ARV backbone activity in patients with undetectable viraemia who underwent raltegravir switching strategies and to evaluate the efficacy of such switching strategies based on the genotypic sensitivity score (GSS). METHODS: Patients with a plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA level of <50 copies/mL on a stable two ARV-class regimen were enrolled if they switched one of their ARV drugs to raltegravir 400 mg twice daily. The GSS was calculated using a genotyping test performed on the HIV-1 RNA of the last plasma measurement with a HIV-1 RNA level of >50 copies/mL before the switch and on the results of all previous genotyping tests. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a plasma HIV-1 RNA level of <50 copies/mL at week 24. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were enrolled in this study. The proportion of patients with a plasma HIV-1 RNA level of <50 copies/mL at week 24 was 92.9 % (range 83.0-97.2 %) in the intent-to-treat analysis and 98.1 % (90.0-99.7 %) in per-protocol analysis. When the backbone was fully active, the proportion was 100.0 % (86.7-100.0 %) at week 24 and week 48 in the per-protocol analysis. We observed a decrease in plasma total cholesterol and triglycerides of -12.7 % (p = 0.005) and -26.5 % (p = 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Raltegravir switching strategies are effective when the associated backbone is fully active according to the GSS. In the context of undetectable viraemia, where ARV activity remains difficult to assess, the determination of the GSS requires the entire ARV history of the patient and all previous HIV-RNA genotyping test results.

Switch from etravirine twice daily to once daily in non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-resistant HIV-infected patients with suppressed viremia: the Monetra study.

BACKGROUND: Etravirine (ETR) is recommended as twice-daily dosing in pretreated patients. There are no data regarding the use of ETR once daily in HIV-experienced patients with prior resistance to first-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcripase inhibitors (NNRTIs). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the capacity of once-daily ETR to maintain suppressed viremia over 48 weeks after switching from ETR twice daily in NNRTI-experienced patients. METHODS: In this pilot open-label study, patients with plasma viral load (pVL) <50 copies/mL on a stable ETR 200 mg bid regimen were enrolled to switch to ETR 400 mg qd and followed up over 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with pVL <50 copies/mL at week 24. Secondary endpoints included the rate of pVL< 50 copies/mL at week 48, ETR pharmacokinetic parameters, and tolerability and resistance profile. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included. They had extensive antiretroviral treatment for a median of 14 years (range, 1-19). All except for 2 had prior resistance to NNRTIs. Seven patients discontinued ETR once daily prior to week 48 for virological failure (3), protocol deviation (3), and side effects (1). At week 24, 95% of patients maintained pVL< 50 copies/mL (95% CI, 78.4-99.7) and 85% at week 48 (95%CI, 65.6-95.8). Two of the 3 patients with virological failure had ETR resistance mutations prior to initiation. The median ETR C(trough) level remained stable after switching from twice daily 515 ng/mL (340-758) to once daily 422 ng/mL (264-655). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ETR is effective as a once-daily regimen in patients with prior NNRTI experience when HIV is sensitive to ETR. The stability of C(trough) concentrations on a once-daily regimen confirms the once-daily profile of the drug in experienced patients.

Fetal death as a result of placental immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome.

A 26-year-old woman was HIV-1 diagnosed at 11 weeks of pregnancy (CD4 = 7/mm(3), HIV-1 RNA = 108,000 copies/mL) with immunity against toxoplasmosis (Toxoplasma IgG = 1800 UI/mL). A fetal death was diagnosed 7 weeks after starting HAART (CD4 = 185/mm(3), HIV-1 RNA = 391 copies/mL) with a positive Toxoplasma PCR on fetal tissues and amniotic fluid. The absence of severe toxoplasmic foetopathy, the very exaggerated and atypical placental inflammation and the immune restoration context led to the diagnosis of placental IRIS associated with Toxoplasma gondii reactivation. This outcome remains undescribed and could represent an issue in resource-limited settings where HIV-pregnant patients are often severely immunodeficient and infected with opportunistic pathogens.