RESUMO
The significant and growing global prevalence of diabetes continues to challenge people with diabetes (PwD), healthcare providers, and payers. While maintaining near-normal glucose levels has been shown to prevent or delay the progression of the long-term complications of diabetes, a significant proportion of PwD are not attaining their glycemic goals. During the past 6 years, we have seen tremendous advances in automated insulin delivery (AID) technologies. Numerous randomized controlled trials and real-world studies have shown that the use of AID systems is safe and effective in helping PwD achieve their long-term glycemic goals while reducing hypoglycemia risk. Thus, AID systems have recently become an integral part of diabetes management. However, recommendations for using AID systems in clinical settings have been lacking. Such guided recommendations are critical for AID success and acceptance. All clinicians working with PwD need to become familiar with the available systems in order to eliminate disparities in diabetes quality of care. This report provides much-needed guidance for clinicians who are interested in utilizing AIDs and presents a comprehensive listing of the evidence payers should consider when determining eligibility criteria for AID insurance coverage.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Insulina , Humanos , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Consenso , Glicemia , Automonitorização da GlicemiaRESUMO
Numerous studies have demonstrated that use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves glycemic control and reduces diabetes-related hospitalizations and emergency room service utilization in individuals with diabetes who are treated with intensive insulin regimens. Recent studies have revealed disparities in use of CGM within racially and ethnically diverse and lower socioeconomic populations, leading to underutilization of CGM in these populations. This article reviews the scope and impact of these disparities on utilization of CGM and explores the factors that may be contributing to this issue.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Hipoglicemia , Glicemia , Automonitorização da Glicemia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Insulina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
There are three automated insulin delivery devices on the U.S. market, two of which are currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. These systems have already made a significant impact for the people who use them in improving diabetes outcomes, including glycemic control and hypoglycemia prevention. This article aims to help primary care and endocrinology providers better understand the components, differences, limitations, and potential fit of these systems into clinical practice.
