Interim analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with or without preservation of splenic vessels: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) is a widely adopted surgical approach for benign and low-grade malignant neoplasms of the distal pancreas. The Kimura and Warshaw techniques represent two principal strategies, yet it still needs to be determined which one is superior. Our investigation aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with each technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center, parallel-group, patient-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at the XXXXX University. Stratified block randomization was utilized to enroll 114 patients starting in March 2022, with an interim analysis of short-term outcomes scheduled after 45%-50% of participant enrollment. Patients were randomized to receive LSPDP via either the Kimura or Warshaw technique. The primary endpoint was intraoperative blood loss, while secondary endpoints included a range of outcomes from composite outcome to quality of life, as quantified by the EQ-5D-5L. RESULTS: From March 2022 to November 2023, 53 patients were randomly allocated to the Kimura (n=25) or Warshaw (n=28) groups for LSPDP. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were similar between the groups, such as pancreatic fistula incidence, EQ-5D-5L index scores, and delayed gastric emptying rates. Per-protocol (PP) analysis revealed that the Kimura group experienced significantly less blood loss (52.5±51.6 mL vs. 91.7±113.5 mL, P=0.007) and a reduced rate of composite outcome (23.8% vs. 56.7%, P=0.019), but incurred higher costs in the Warshaw group (¥56,227.4±¥7,027.0 vs. ¥63,513.8±¥12,944.5, P=0.013). Splenic infarction rates were higher in the Warshaw group, though not statistically significant (ITT: 39.3% vs. 12.5%, P=0.058; PP: 36.7% vs. 14.3%, P=0.113), without necessitating intervention. Neither group experienced postpancreatectomy haemorrhage, 90-day mortality, or ICU admissions, and all postoperative complications were mild (Clavien-Dindo Grade

Artificial intelligence automated surgical phases recognition in intraoperative videos of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) is one of the most challenging operations and has a long learning curve. Artificial intelligence (AI) automated surgical phase recognition in intraoperative videos has many potential applications in surgical education, helping shorten the learning curve, but no study has made this breakthrough in LPD. Herein, we aimed to build AI models to recognize the surgical phase in LPD and explore the performance characteristics of AI models. METHODS: Among 69 LPD videos from a single surgical team, we used 42 in the building group to establish the models and used the remaining 27 videos in the analysis group to assess the models' performance characteristics. We annotated 13 surgical phases of LPD, including 4 key phases and 9 necessary phases. Two minimal invasive pancreatic surgeons annotated all the videos. We built two AI models for the key phase and necessary phase recognition, based on convolutional neural networks. The overall performance of the AI models was determined mainly by mean average precision (mAP). RESULTS: Overall mAPs of the AI models in the test set of the building group were 89.7% and 84.7% for key phases and necessary phases, respectively. In the 27-video analysis group, overall mAPs were 86.8% and 71.2%, with maximum mAPs of 98.1% and 93.9%. We found commonalities between the error of model recognition and the differences of surgeon annotation, and the AI model exhibited bad performance in cases with anatomic variation or lesion involvement with adjacent organs. CONCLUSIONS: AI automated surgical phase recognition can be achieved in LPD, with outstanding performance in selective cases. This breakthrough may be the first step toward AI- and video-based surgical education in more complex surgeries.

Impact of an AI-Based laparoscopic cholecystectomy coaching program on the surgical performance: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for treating symptomatic gallstones but carries inherent risks like bile duct injury (BDI). While critical view of safety (CVS) is advocated to mitigate BDI, its real-world adoption is limited. Additionally, significant variations in surgeon performance impede procedural standardization, highlighting the need for a feasible, innovative, and effective training approach. The aim of this study is to develop an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted coaching program for LC to enhance surgical education and improve surgeon's performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multi-center, randomized controlled trial from May 2022 to August 2023 to assess the impact of an AI-based coaching program, SmartCoach, on novice performing LC. Surgeons and patients meeting specific inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to either a coaching group with AI-enhanced feedback or a self-learning group. The primary outcome was assessed using the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Rating Form (LCRF), with secondary outcomes including surgical safety, efficiency, and adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, with significance set at P-value less than 0.05. RESULTS: Between May 2022 and August 2023, 22 surgeons were initially enrolled from 10 hospitals, with 18 completing the study. No demographic differences were noted between coaching and self-learning groups. In terms of surgical performance (LCRF scores), the coaching group showed significant improvement over time (31 to 40, P=0.008), outperforming the self-learning group by study end (40 vs 38, P=0.032). Significant improvements in CVS achievement were also noted in the coaching group (11% to 78%, P=0.021). Overall, the coaching program was well-received, outpacing traditional educational methods in both understanding and execution of CVS and participants in the intervention group expressed strongly satisfaction with the program. CONCLUSIONS: The AI-assisted surgical coaching program effectively improved surgical performance and safety for novice surgeons in LC procedures. The model holds significant promise for advancing surgical education.

Single-incision plus one port laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with major venous resection and reconstruction for pancreatic cancer with video recordings.

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with superior mesenteric/portal vein (SMV/PV) resection and reconstruction was the most technically challenging procedure and had been rarely reported. However, single-incision plus one-port LPD (SILPD +1) with SMV/PV resection and reconstruction has never been reported. In this study, we will demonstrate the feasibility, safety, key surgical procedure, and long-term outcomes for SILPD +1 with SMV/PV resection and reconstruction using video evidence. Two cases of SILPD +1 with SMV/PV wedge resection were carried out by the authors. There was no tumor recurrence during the one-year follow-up. It is worth noting that skilled laparoscopic technicians are necessary to safely complete the procedure with good short-term and long-term outcomes.

Delayed gastric emptying after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center experience of 827 cases.

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) commonly occurs after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Risk factors for DGE have been reported in open PD but are rarely reported in laparoscopic PD (LPD). This study was designed to evaluate the perioperative risk factors for DGE and secondary DGE after LPD in a single center. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent LPD between October 2014 and April 2023. Demographic data, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. The risk factors for DGE and secondary DGE were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 827 consecutive patients underwent LPD. One hundred and forty-two patients (17.2%) developed DGE of any type. Sixty-five patients (7.9%) had type A, 62 (7.5%) had type B, and the remaining 15 (1.8%) had type C DGE. Preoperative biliary drainage (p = 0.032), blood loss (p = 0.014), and 90-day any major complication with Dindo-Clavien score ≥ III (p < 0.001) were independent significant risk factors for DGE. Seventy-six (53.5%) patients were diagnosed with primary DGE, whereas 66 (46.5%) patients had DGE secondary to concomitant complications. Higher body mass index, soft pancreatic texture, and perioperative transfusion were independent risk factors for secondary DGE. Hospital stay and drainage tube removal time were significantly longer in the DGE and secondary DGE groups. CONCLUSION: Identifying patients at an increased risk of DGE and secondary DGE can be used to intervene earlier, avoid potential risk factors, and make more informed clinical decisions to shorten the duration of perioperative management.

CDK4/6 inhibition sensitizes MEK inhibition by inhibiting cell cycle and proliferation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is not sensitive to most chemotherapy drugs, leading to poor chemotherapy efficacy. Recently, Trametinib and Palbociclib have promising prospects in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. This article aims to explore the effects of Trametinib on pancreatic cancer and address the underlying mechanism of resistance as well as its reversal strategies. The GDSC (Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer) and CTD2 (Cancer Target Discovery and Development) were utilized to screen the potential drug candidate in PDAC cell lines. The dose-increase method combined with the high-dose shock method was applied to induce the Trametinib-resistant PANC-1 and MIA PaCa-2 cell lines. The CCK8 proliferation assay, colony formation assay, flow cytometry, and western blot were conducted to verify the inhibitory effect of Trametinib and Palbociclib. RNA-seq was performed in resistant PDAC cell lines to find the differential expression genes related to drug resistance and predict pathways leading to the reversal of Trametinib resistance. The GDSC and CTD2 database screening revealed that Trametinib demonstrates a significant inhibitory effect on PDAC. We found that Trametinib has a lower IC50 than Gemcitabine in PDAC cell lines. Both Trametinib and Gemcitabine can decrease the proliferation capacity of pancreatic cells, induce cell cycle arrest, and increase apoptosis. Simultaneously, the phosphorylation of the AKT and ERK pathways were inhibited by the treatment of Trametinib. In addition, the RNA-seq of Trametinib-induced resistance PDAC cell lines reveals that the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-RB-E2F regulatory axis and G2/M DNA damage checkpoint might lead the drug resistance. Besides, the combination of Trametinib with Palbociclib could inhibit the proliferation and cell cycle of both resistant cells lines and also restore the sensitivity of drug-resistant cells to Trametinib. Last but not least, the interferon-α and interferon-γ expression were upregulated in resistance cell lines, which might lead to the reversal of drug resistance. The study shows Trametinib has a critical inhibitory effect on PDAC. Besides, the combination of Trametinib with Palbociclib can inhibit the proliferation of PDAC-resistant cells.

Independent external validation and comparison of existing pancreatic fistula risk scores after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with Bing's pancreaticojejunostomy.

BACKGROUND: The fistula risk score (FRS) is the widely acknowledged prediction model for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). In addition, the alternative FRS (a-FRS) and updated alternative FRS (ua-FRS) have been developed. This study performed external validation and comparison of these 3 models in patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with Bing's pancreaticojejunostomy. METHODS: The FRS total points and predictive probabilities of a-FRS and ua-FRS were retrospectively calculated using patient data from a completed randomized controlled trial. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and CR-POPF were defined according to the 2016 International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery criteria. The correlations of the 4 risk items of the FRS model with CR-POPF and POPF were analyzed and represented using the Cramer V coefficient. The performance of the 3 models was measured using the area under the curve (AUC) and calibration plot and compared using the DeLong test. RESULTS: This study enrolled 200 patients. Pancreatic texture and pathology had discrimination for CR-POPF (Cramer V coefficient: 0.180 vs 0.167, respectively). Pancreatic duct diameter, pancreatic texture, and pathology had discrimination for POPF (Cramer V coefficient: 0.357 vs 0.322 vs 0.257, respectively). Only the calibration of a-FRS predicting CR-POPF was good. The differences among the AUC values of the FRS, a-FRS, and ua-FRS were not statistically significant (CR-POPF: 0.687 vs 0.701 vs 0.710, respectively; POPF: 0.733 vs 0.741 vs 0.750, respectively). After recalibrating, the ua-FRS got sufficient calibration, and the AUC was 0.713 for predicting CR-POPF. CONCLUSION: For LPD cases with Bing's pancreaticojejunostomy, the 3 models predicted POPF with better discrimination than predicting CR-POPF. The recalibrated ua-FRS had sufficient discrimination and calibration for predicting CR-POPF.

Textbook oncologic outcomes are associated with increased overall survival in patients with pancreatic head cancer after undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Textbook oncologic outcomes (TOO) have been used to evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes for patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) but not laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic value of TOO for patients with pancreatic head cancer undergoing LPD and discuss the risk factors associated with achieving TOO. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic head cancer who underwent LPD in West China Hospital from January 2015 to May 2022 were consecutively enrolled. TOO was defined as achieving R0 resection, examination of ≥ 12 lymph nodes, no prolonged length of stay, no 30-day readmission/death, and receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Survival analysis was used to determine the prognostic value of a TOO on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors of a TOO. The rates of a TOO and of each indicator were compared in patients who suffered or not from delayed gastric emptying (DGE). RESULTS: A total of 44 (25.73%) patients achieved TOO which was associated with improved median OS (TOO 32 months vs. non-TOO 20 months, P = 0.034) and a better RFS (TOO 19 months vs. non-TOO 13 months, P = 0.053). Patients suffering from DGE [odds ratio (OR) 4.045, 95% CI 1.151-14.214, P = 0.029] were independent risk factors for TOO. In addition, patients with DGE after surgery had a significantly lower rate of TOO (P = 0.015) than patients without DGE. CONCLUSIONS: As there were significant differences between patients who achieved TOO or not, TOO is a good indicator for long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with pancreatic head cancer after undergoing LPD. DGE is the risk factor for achieving TOO, so it is important to prevent the DGE after LPD to improve the rate of TOO.

Extended pancreatic neck transection versus conventional pancreatic neck transection during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPDEXCEPT): protocol for a multicentre superiority randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains one of the most severe complications of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). Theoretically, transecting the pancreatic neck more distally has both advantages (more blood supply, and more central pancreatic duct) and disadvantages (maybe smaller the pancreatic duct) in preventing POPF. This theoretical contradiction pushed us to organise this trial to explore the impact of the level of pancreatic transection in clinical practice. We conduct this randomised trial with the hypothesis that extended pancreatic neck transection has superiority to conventional pancreatic neck transection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The LPDEXCEPT (Extended pancreatic neck transection versus conventional pancreatic neck transection during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy) trial is a multicentre, randomised-controlled, open-label, superiority trial in 4 centres whose annual surgical volume for LPD is more than 25 cases with pancreatic surgeons who had completed their learning curve. A total of 154 patients who meet the inclusive and exclusive criteria are randomly allocated to the extended pancreatic neck transection group or conventional pancreatic neck transection group in a 1:1 ratio. The stratified randomised block design will be applied, with stratified factors are surgical centre and the diameter of the main pancreatic duct measured by preoperative CT scan (preMPD). The primary outcome is the incidence of the clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research of West China Hospital of Sichuan University has approved this trial in March 2023 (approval no. 2023-167). Results of this trial will be published in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05808894.

Decoding surgical skill: an objective and efficient algorithm for surgical skill classification based on surgical gesture features -experimental studies.

BACKGROUND: Various surgical skills lead to differences in patient outcomes and identifying poorly skilled surgeons with constructive feedback contributes to surgical quality improvement. The aim of the study was to develop an algorithm for evaluating surgical skills in laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on the features of elementary functional surgical gestures (Surgestures). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos were collected from 33 surgeons in five hospitals. The phase of mobilization hepatocystic triangle and gallbladder dissection from the liver bed of each video were annotated with 14 Surgestures. The videos were grouped into competent and incompetent based on the quantiles of modified global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills (mGOALS). Surgeon-related information, clinical data, and intraoperative events were analyzed. Sixty-three Surgesture features were extracted to develop the surgical skill classification algorithm. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the classification and the top features were evaluated. RESULTS: Correlation analysis revealed that most perioperative factors had no significant correlation with mGOALS scores. The incompetent group has a higher probability of cholecystic vascular injury compared to the competent group (30.8 vs 6.1%, P =0.004). The competent group demonstrated fewer inefficient Surgestures, lower shift frequency, and a larger dissection-exposure ratio of Surgestures during the procedure. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the classification algorithm achieved 0.866. Different Surgesture features contributed variably to overall performance and specific skill items. CONCLUSION: The computer algorithm accurately classified surgeons with different skill levels using objective Surgesture features, adding insight into designing automatic laparoscopic surgical skill assessment tools with technical feedback.

Initial experience of single-incision plus one port total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: The use of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (SILPD + 1) has been never reported, and its safety and efficacy remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of SILPD + 1 compared with those of conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (CLPD). METHOD: Fifty-seven cases of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) were performed between November 2021, and March 2022. Among them, 10 cases of LPD were performed using a single-incision plus one-port device. Based on the same inclusion and exclusion criteria, 47 cases of LPD performed using traditional 5-trocar were included as a control group. The patient's demographic characteristics, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Three men and seven women were included in the SILPD + 1 group. All baseline parameters of both groups were comparable, except for age. Patients were younger in the SILPD + 1 group (47.2 ± 18.3 years vs. 60.6 ± 11.7 years, P = 0.05) than that in the CLPD group. Compared with the CLPD group, median operation time (222.5 (208.8-245.0) vs. 305.0 (256.0-37.0) min, P < 0.001) was shorter, median postoperative VAS scores on days 1-3 were lower, and median cosmetic score (21.0 (19.0-23.5) vs. 17.0 (16.0-20.0), P = 0.026) was higher one month after the surgery in the SILPD + 1 group. The estimated blood loss, conversion rate, blood-transfusion rate, exhaust time, time of drainage tube removal, postoperative hospital stays, and perioperative complications were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In a high-volume LPD center, SILPD + 1 is safe and feasible for well-selected patients without increasing the operation time and complications. It even has the advantages of reduced postoperative pain and improved cosmetic results.

Laparoscopic transduodenal ampullectomy: initial experience from a single center.

Background: Laparoscopic transduodenal ampullectomy (LTDA) is a function-preserving surgery for pre-malignant tumors of the ampulla of Vater (AoV). However, it is technically challenging, and only a few case reports of LTDA are available in the literature. Methods: A total of 43 cases of pre-malignant tumors of AoV were operated in West China Hospital, Sichuan University between January 2017 and July 2022. Among these patients, 9 patients (group 1) underwent LTDA, 19 patients (group 2) underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD), and 15 patients (group 3) underwent open transduodenal ampullectomy (OTDA). Prospective collection and retrospective analysis of the demographic characteristics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative variables were carried out. Results: The patients in the three groups were comparable in terms of sex, age, body mass index, tumor size, and preoperative blood tests. In comparison to the patients in group 2, the patients in group 1 were found to require less operative time (159.7 ± 47.5 min vs. 298.1 ± 62.6, p < 0.01) and suffered lower blood losses (23.3 ± 16.7 ml vs. 156.8 ± 112.1, p = 0.002) and complications. Moreover, the postoperative hospital stays (POHS) were significantly shorter for patients in group 1 (9.0 ± 5.3 days vs. 15.5 ± 7.3 days, p = 0.04). Compared to patients who underwent OTDA, the patients in LTDA suffered from less blood loss. The operative time and post-operative details were comparable. Conclusion: Therefore, LTDA was found to be safe and feasible in the setting of pre-malignant tumors of AoV in well-selected patients. However, multidisciplinary preoperative planning is essential before the surgery.

Laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resections for solid pseudopapillary tumors located in the head of pancreas.

BACKGROUND: Solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) of the pancreas is a rare low-grade malignant tumor. Here, we aimed to determine the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing pancreatectomy for SPT located in the pancreatic head. METHODS: From July 2014 to February 2022, 62 patients with SPT located in the pancreatic head were operated laparoscopically in two institutions. These patients were divided into two groups according to the operative strategy: laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing pancreatectomy (27 patients, group 1) and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (35 patients, group 2). The clinical data were retrospectively collected and analyzed in terms of demographic characteristics, perioperative variables, and long-term follow-up outcomes. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of the patients in the two groups were comparable. Compared to the patients in group 2, those in group 1 required less operative time (263.4 ± 37.2 min vs. 332.7 ± 55.6 min, p < 0.001) and experienced less blood loss (105.1 ± 36.5mL vs. 188.3 ± 150.7 mL, p < 0.001). None of the patients in group 1 had tumor recurrence or metastasis. However, 1 (2.5%) patient in group 2 showed liver metastasis. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing pancreatectomy is a safe and feasible approach for SPT located in the pancreatic head, with favorable long-term functional and oncological results.

Laparoscopic revision of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

PURPOSE: Pancreaticojejunostomy stricture (PJS) is an uncommon late complication of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). The incidence, clinical characteristics, and managements of PJS after LPD are still unreported. METHODS: All patients undergoing LPD between January 2015 and December 2019 were identified from an institutional database. All pancreaticojejunostomies were performed using Bing's duct-to-mucosa anastomosis. PJS was diagnosed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography with secretin administration. Re-operation was performed in those patients with persistent abdominal pain and/or recurrent pancreatitis. Patients' demographic characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up outcomes were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: During the 5-year study period, 506 cases of LPD were performed. Among these patients, 13 patients (2.6%) were diagnosed with PJS. Only seven patients presented with abdominal pain and/or recurrent pancreatitis and underwent re-operation. The interval between the diagnosis of PJS and the original operation was 23 months. The median operative time was 140 min (range 90 to 210 min). The estimated blood loss was 40 ml (range 10 to 100 ml). The post-operative outcomes were favorable. Only one patient suffered from biochemical fistula. Six of these 7 patients (85.7%) reported complete pain resolution after the re-operation. The other patient reported partial resolution after surgery. All patients did not need to take analgesic drugs after the operation. CONCLUSION: PJS following LPD is a late complication that was underestimated. It is technically safe and clinically effective to perform laparoscopic revision of the PJS after LPD.

The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with different type of mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: a Chinese multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction (LPD-MPVRs) for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma are rarely reported. The aim of present study was to explore the short- and long-term outcomes of different type of LPD-MPVRs. METHODS: Patients who underwent LPD-MPVRs in 14 Chinese high-volume pancreatic centers between June 2014 and December 2020 were selected and compared. RESULTS: In total, 142 patients were included and were divided into primary closure (n = 56), end-end anastomosis (n = 43), or interposition graft (n = 43). Median overall survival (OS) and median progress-free survival (PFS) between primary closure and end-end anastomosis had no difference (both P > 0.05). As compared to primary closure and end-end anastomosis, interposition graft had the worst median OS (12 months versus 19 months versus 17 months, P = 0.001) and the worst median PFS (6 months versus 15 months versus 12 months, P < 0.000). As compared to primary closure, interposition graft had almost double risk in major morbidity (16.3 percent versus 8.9 percent) and about triple risk (10 percent versus 3.6 percent) in 90-day mortality, while End-end anastomosis had only one fourth major morbidity (2.3 percent versus 8.9 percent). Multivariate analysis revealed postoperation hospital stay, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, number of positive lymph nodes had negative impact on OS, while R0, R1 surgical margin had protective effect on OS. Postoperative hospital stay had negative impact on PFS, while primary closure, end-end anastomosis, short-term vascular patency, and short-term vascular stenosis positively related to PFS. CONCLUSIONS: In LPD-MPVRs, interposition graft had the worst OS, the worst PFS, the highest rate of major morbidity, and the highest rate of 90-day mortality. While there were no differences in OS and PFS between primary closure and end-end anastomosis.

Laparoscopic Transduodenal Ampullectomy: How We Have Standardized the Technique (with Video).

BACKGROUND: The procedure of choice for the resection of ampullary tumors comprises transduodenal ampullectomy (TDA), endoscopic papillectomy (EP), and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).1 For neoplasms with low-grade dysplasia, TDA and EP have equivalent efficacies and lower morbidities than PD1. Compared with EP, also as an organ-preserving procedure, TDA could be applicable for tumors involving the pancreatic ducts or common bile ducts.2 Because TDA has a lower incidence of postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding and a higher R0 resection rate, its use could avoid the need to use multiple endoscopic procedures for larger lesions.3 Furthermore, during TDA, surgeons could convert to PD as necessary. However, TDA has rarely been performed using a minimally invasive approach that addresses the shortcomings of both the endoscopic and open surgical techniques without adding significant morbidity or compromising outcomes.2,4 Conventional laparoscopic TDA (LTDA) remains limited due to the complexity of the surgical anatomy of the ampulla and the reconstruction required compared with robot-assisted procedures.2-5 However, robot-assisted surgery is less popular and much more expensive than laparoscopic surgery. This report with a video describes the LTDA approach to standardize and simplify the surgical processes. METHODS: A 48-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with epigastric pain. He had a history of cholecystolithiasis with chronic cholecystitis. A tumor approximately 2.2 cm in diameter located in the duodenal papilla was diagnosed by an enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan. The endoscopic biopsy result indicated a villous adenoma with moderate dysplasia. Laparoscopic TDA and cholecystectomy were planned. However, if the frozen sample analysis showed adenocarcinoma, laparoscopic PD (LPD) would be applied. The patient was placed in the supine position with both legs apart. Trocars were distributed in the same manner as in the authors' previous study to facilitate conversion to LPD.6 The procedure began with kocherization and dissection of the gastrocolic ligament to explore the second and third portions of the duodenum. A figure-eight suture was made using 4-0 prolene in the seromuscular layer, and then the duodenum was retracted to the left side of the patient. A longitudinal duodenotomy was made, and the ampulla of Vater was identified. A transfixing suture was placed through the tumor. Submucosal injection of norepinephrine (1:500) was performed to divide the mucosa from the muscular planes. Ampullectomy was performed by first dissecting in the submucosal plane with a harmonic scalpel at the 6 o'clock position until the pancreatic duct was reached. A 6-Fr plastic catheter was inserted into the pancreatic duct for subsequent reconstruction. Continued dissection around the tumor identified the bile duct. Another 6-Fr plastic catheter was inserted into the bile duct. The dissection was completed in the submucosal plane, and the specimen was retrieved for frozen sectioning. After confirmation of villous adenoma with moderate dysplasia and the proximal margin without residual tumor on frozen biopsy, reconstruction was performed. The septum between the ducts was plastered, and the bile and pancreatic ducts were reconstructed on the duodenal wall with 5-0 PDS-II interrupted sutures to ensure that these ducts remained patent and connected. After reconstruction, the plastic catheter was kept in the pancreatic duct but removed from the bile duct. Then, cholecystectomy was applied. Finally, the duodenum was closed obliquely in two layers, and two drains were routinely placed. RESULTS: The operation time was 139 min, and the estimated blood loss was 50 ml. Final pathology confirmed villous adenoma with mild to moderate dysplasia. The postoperative course was uneventful, with a hospital stay of 9 days. There was no evidence of recurrence or patency of the reimplanted ducts 5 months after surgery. From February 2022 to May 2022, four cases of LTDA with the same surgical processes were managed by the authors, and all the patients recovered quickly without any postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: After standardization of the surgical processes, laparoscopic TDA was safe for highly selected patients. However, long-term follow-up is required to observe the quality of life and survival of patients.

Single-port laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Performing a single-port laparoscopic pancreatectomy is technically challenging. Single-port laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (SPLPD) is rarely reported in English literature. METHODS: Eighty-seven cases of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) were performed by a single surgical team in the Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University between February 2020 and December 2020. Among these, 13 cases of LPD (group 1) were performed using a single-port device. Basing on the same inclusion and exclusion criteria, 68 cases of LPD performed using traditional 5-trocar were included as a control group (group 2). The patient's demographic characteristics, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Five men and eight women were included in the SPLPD group. The median age of these patients was 57 years. The patients who underwent SPLPD required a longer operative time (332.7 ± 38.1 min vs. 305.8 ± 64.7 min; p = 0.03) than those in the LPD group. The estimated blood loss, conversion rate, blood transfusion rate, time to oral intake, postoperative hospital stays, and perioperative complications were comparable between the two groups. The short-term oncological outcomes, such as R0 rate and lymph node harvested, were comparable between the two groups. The 90-day mortality of all patients was zero. CONCLUSIONS: SPLPD is a safe and feasible procedure for well-selected patients in an experienced minimally invasive pancreatic surgery team. SPLPD may provide several potential advantages, such as the requirement of fewer trocars, fewer abdominal complications, and reduced participation of assistants than conventional LPD.

"Plane first" approach for laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (L-RAMPS) has not been widely performed due to its technical challenging. We introduce a novel approach, named "Plane first" approach, for L-RAMPS in this study. METHODS: From January 2015 to August 2021, we performed 51 cases of L-RAMPS. Patients were divided into two groups basing on the surgical approach: conventional approach (group 1) and "Plane first" approach (group 2). Data were retrospectively collected in terms of demographic characteristics, intra-operative variables, post-operative variables, and follow-up outcomes. RESULTS: The age, sex, BMI, and tumor size were comparable between two groups. Two patients in the group 1 required converting to open surgery. The patients in the group 2 required fewer operative time (210.5 ± 65.5 min vs. 252.4 ± 24.7 min, p < 0.01). They also suffered from less blood loss (136.0 ± 100.0 ml vs. 158.8 ± 137.0 ml, p = 0.15). The overall complications for patients in two groups were comparable. In terms of oncological outcomes, posterior margin was positive in two patients (10.5%) in the group 1. One patient (3.1%) in the group 2 had positive pancreatic neck margin. The number of lymph nodes harvested and overall survival between the two groups were comparable. CONCLUSION: "Plane first" approach RAMPS for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the left pancreas is safe and feasible, even in patients with PV/SMV involvement.