Outcome of curcumin-based photodynamic therapy in endodontic microsurgery: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Persistent apical periodontitis after root canal treatment may require surgical retreatment when non-surgical options are ineffective or impractical due to anatomical challenges or iatrogenic errors. Endodontic microsurgery (EMS) is a precise technique that aims to overcome extraradicular biofilm and root morphology issues. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emerging supplementary disinfection approach that utilizes a photosensitizer agent and light to eliminate microorganisms through oxidative reactions. REPORT: A 60-year-old male with persistent apical periodontitis in a left maxillary first molar underwent non-surgical root canal retreatment followed by surgical reintervention due to anatomical complexities. During surgery, PDT was performed using a novel curcumin-based photosensitizer agent. After the procedure, the tooth was retrofilled with bioceramic cement, and photobiomodulation was applied to enhance tissue healing. One year post-surgery, the patient exhibited complete periradicular repair and remained asymptomatic. DISCUSSION: EMS is considered a last resort to salvage an endodontically treated tooth and has shown moderate success rates. PDT has demonstrated promise in improving periapical healing and reducing microorganisms. In this case, curcumin, diluted with 2 % chlorhexidine gel, served as an effective photosensitizer agent with antimicrobial properties. Moreover, performing photobiomodulation aided in cell recovery and reduced postoperative discomfort. CONCLUSION: The proposed EMS treatment protocol with PDT using curcumin yielded positive outcomes in this case report. Further randomized clinical trials are necessary to assess the efficacy of this approach in EMS. Additionally, further research on curcumin-based photosensitizer agents encapsulated in nanoparticles and enhanced antimicrobial agents is recommended to refine this treatment protocol for routine use.

Intentional foraminal enlargement: a systematic review with bibliometric analysis / Ampliação foraminal intencional: uma revisão sistemática com análise bibliométrica

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review with bibliometric analysis was to map the available scientific evidence on intentional foraminal enlargement (IFE) and explore publication trends. Methods: This review is in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 Statement and is registered on the Open Science Framework. Two independent reviewers carried out a comprehensive search of seven databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, LILACS, and BBO) up to January 31 st, 2022. Studies that investigated IFE were considered eligible, and the data were analyzed using the VOSViewer software. Results:The search identified a total of 55 IFE-related articles from 10 countries and 25 journals, with an increasing trend for publications over the last decade. The majority of evidence was based on laboratory assays (65.4%), followed by randomized clinical trials (18.1%) with follow-up periods of up to 2 months. The main clinical outcome evaluated was post-operative pain. The highest number of studies were carried out by the State University of Campinas, and published in the Journal of Endodontics. Also, studies with the highest level of evidence found that IFE resulted in greater post-operative pain in the initial days post-treatment. Conclusion:This systematic review with bibliometric analysis mapped the scientific progress and publication trends in the field of IFE, thus shedding light on gaps in the literature with the aim of guiding researchers to conduct more high-impact investigations by performing clinical studies evaluating rates of periapical repair and IFE treatment success using long-term observation periods (AU)

Objetivo: O objetivo desta revisão sistemática com análise bibliométrica foi mapear as evidências científicas disponíveis sobre ampliação foraminal intencional (IFE) e explorar as tendências de publicação. Métodos: Esta revisão está de acordo com a declaração PRISMA 2020 e está registrada no Open Science Framework. Dois revisores independentes realizaram uma busca abrangente em sete bases de dados (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, LILACS e BBO) até 31 de janeiro de 2022. Os estudos que investigaram IFE foram considerados elegíveis e os dados foram analisados usando o software VOSViewer. Resultados: A busca identificou um total de 55 artigos relacionados ao IFE provenientes de 10 países e 25 periódicos, com tendência crescente de publicações na última década. A maioria das evidências foi baseada em ensaios laboratoriais (65,4%), seguido de ensaios clínicos randomizados (18,1%) com períodos de follow-up de até 2 meses. O principal desfecho clínico avaliado foi a dor pós-operatória. O maior número de estudos foi realizado pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas e publicado no Journal of Endodontics. Estudos com os maiores níveis de evidência constataram que IFE resultou em maior dor pós-operatória nos primeiros dias pós- tratamento. Conclusão: Esta revisão sistemática com análise bibliométrica mapeou o progresso científico e as tendências de publicação na área de IFE, lançando luz sobre lacunas na literatura com o objetivo de orientar pesquisadores a realizar investigações de maior impacto, realizando estudos clínicos avaliando taxas de reparo periapical e sucesso do tratamento usando essa técnica e com acompanhamento à longo prazo. (AU)