Reimagining Initial Certification as a Process That Begins During Residency to Support Continuous Development Across Training and Practice.

ABSTRACT: In the United States, initial board certification remains focused on a high-stakes knowledge examination after completion of training. A more contemporary view supports a program of assessment that includes multiple types and sources of data with an emphasis on direct workplace observation to get the best picture of an individual's performance. In this article, the authors reimagine initial certification as a continuous assessment for learning that begins in residency, focuses on both knowledge acquisition and its application, and interdigitates intentionally with the first cycle of maintenance of certification to advance learning and smooth the transition from training to practice. A more expanded view of competence, as a 3-layered construct (canonical, contextual, and personalized), supports this proposal. Canonical competence (context-independent knowledge)-best assessed through examinations of knowledge-is most heavily weighted and assessed during medical school but remains critical throughout one's career. Contextual competence (context-dependent knowledge) is best assessed in the workplace and is key during residency and fellowship as trainees navigate a myriad of clinical work environments. Personalized competence, representing the totality of one's unique areas of expertise, is best demonstrated during the practice years when deliberate practice experience supports the growth of personalized expertise and discoveries that advance the field. Shifting initial board certification from relying on an anxiety-provoking, high-stakes, often single moment in time standardized examination to a nuanced approach that is part of an individual trainee's program of assessment offers a more just and robust decision about readiness for unsupervised practice. Such a model would also sow the seeds of meaningful individualization of learning needs that begins in training, continues through practice, and lays the foundation for improving the quality of care for patients within a given practice as well as shifting the current contiguous phases of training and practice into a true continuum.

Competency-based medical education: The spark to ignite healthcare's escape fire.

High-value care is what patients deserve and what healthcare professionals should deliver. However, it is not what happens much of the time. Quality improvement master Dr. Don Berwick argued more than two decades ago that American healthcare needs an escape fire, which is a new way of seeing and acting in a crisis situation. While coined in the U.S. context, the analogy applies in other Western healthcare contexts as well. Therefore, in this paper, the authors revisit Berwick's analogy, arguing that medical education can, and should, provide the spark for such an escape fire across the globe. They assert that medical education can achieve this by fully embracing competency-based medical education (CBME) as a way to place medicine's focus on the patient. CBME targets training outcomes that prepare graduates to optimize patient care. The authors use the escape fire analogy to argue that medical educators must drop long-held approaches and tools; treat CBME implementation as an adaptive challenge rather than a technical fix; demand genuine, rich discussions and engagement about the path forward; and, above all, center the patient in all they do.

Relationship between epa level of supervision with their associated subcompetency milestone levels in pediatric fellow assessment.

BACKGROUND: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) and competencies represent components of a competency-based education framework. EPAs are assessed based on the level of supervision (LOS) necessary to perform the activity safely and effectively. The broad competencies, broken down into narrower subcompetencies, are assessed using milestones, observable behaviors of one's abilities along a developmental spectrum. Integration of the two methods, accomplished by mapping the most relevant subcompetencies to each EPA, may provide a cross check between the two forms of assessment and uncover those subcompetencies that have the greatest influence on the EPA assessment. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that 1) there would be a strong correlation between EPA LOS ratings with the milestone levels for the subcompetencies mapped to the EPA; 2) some subcompetencies would be more critical in determining entrustment decisions than others, and 3) the correlation would be weaker if the analysis included only milestones reported to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). METHODS: In fall 2014 and spring 2015, the Subspecialty Pediatrics Investigator Network asked Clinical Competency Committees to assign milestone levels to each trainee enrolled in a pediatric fellowship for all subcompetencies mapped to 6 Common Pediatric Subspecialty EPAs as well as provide a rating for each EPA based upon a 5-point LOS scale. RESULTS: One-thousand forty fellows were assessed in fall and 1048 in spring, representing about 27% of all fellows. For each EPA and in both periods, the average milestone level was highly correlated with LOS (rho range 0.59-0.74; p < 0.001). Correlations were similar when using a weighted versus unweighted milestone score or using only the ACGME reported milestones (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found a strong relationship between milestone level and EPA LOS rating but no difference if the subcompetencies were weighted, or if only milestones reported to the ACGME were used. Our results suggest that representative behaviors needed to effectively perform the EPA, such as key subcompetencies and milestones, allow for future language adaptations while still supporting the current model of assessment. In addition, these data provide additional validity evidence for using these complementary tools in building a program of assessment.

"Dismantling Fixed Time, Variable Outcome Education: Abandoning 'Ready or Not, Here they Come' is Overdue".

Two decades after competency-based medical education appeared in the lexicon of medical educators, the community continues to struggle with realizing its full potential. The implementation of the time variable, fixed outcome component has languished based on complexity compounded by resistance to change. Learners continue to transition from medical school to residency, and then practice, primarily based on time rather than having achieved the ability to meet the needs of the patient populations they will serve. Only those few who demonstrate glaring deficiencies do not graduate. The authors urge the medical education community to move from the current fixed time path of medical education toward the implementation of a true continuum of time variable, fixed outcome education, training, and deliberate practice. The latter is defined by purposeful learning, coaching, feedback, and repetition on the path to achieving and maintaining expertise. The opportunities afforded by such a time-variable, fixed outcome approach include: 1) development of a career long growth mindset, 2) ability to address evolving population health needs and careers within the context of one's practice, and 3) continual improvement of care quality and outcomes for patients on the journey towards expertise for providers.

The education passport: connecting programmatic assessment across learning and practice.

Competency-based medical education (CBME) shifts us from static assessment of learning to developmental assessment for learning. However, implementation challenges associated with CBME remain a major hurdle, especially after training and into practice. The full benefit of developmental assessment for learning over time requires collaboration, cooperation, and trust among learners, regulators, and the public that transcends each individual phase. The authors introduce the concept of an "Education Passport" that provides evidence of readiness to travel across the boundaries between undergraduate medical education, graduate medical education, and the expanse of practice. The Education Passport uses programmatic assessment, a process of collecting numerous low stakes assessments from multiple sources over time, judging these data using criterion-referencing, and enhancing this with coaching and competency committees to understand, process, and accelerate growth without end. Information in the Passport is housed on a cloud-based server controlled by the student/physician over the course of training and practice. These data are mapped to various educational frameworks such Entrustable Professional Activities or milestones for ease of longitudinal performance tracking. At each stage of education and practice the student/physician grants Passport access to all entities that can provide data on performance. Database managers use learning analytics to connect and display information over time that are then used by the student/physician, their assigned or chosen coaches, and review committees to maintain or improve performance. Global information is also collected and analyzed to improve the entire system of learning and care. Developing a true continuum that embraces performance and growth will be a long-term adaptive challenge across many organizations and jurisdictions and will require coordination from regulatory and national agencies. An Education Passport could also serve as an organizing tool and will require research and high-value communication strategies to maximize public trust in the work.

La formation médicale fondée sur les compétences (FMFC) nous fait passer d'une évaluation statique à une évaluation évolutive de l'apprentissage. Cependant, les défis qui accompagnent sa mise en œuvre demeurent un obstacle majeur, en particulier après la formation et dans la pratique. Pour tirer pleinement parti de l'évaluation évolutive de l'apprentissage au fil du temps, il faut une collaboration, une coopération et une confiance entre les apprenants, les organismes de réglementation et le public qui transcendent chaque phase individuelle. Les auteurs présentent le concept de «passeport éducatif¼ en guise de titre attestant que l'on est prêt à franchir les frontières entre la formation médicale de premier cycle, la formation postdoctorale et l'étendue de la pratique.Dans le passeport éducatif, on utilise l'évaluation programmatique, un processus qui consiste à rassembler de nombreuses évaluations à faible enjeu provenant de sources multiples au fil du temps, dont les données sont évaluées à l'aide de critères de référence et améliorées par un encadrement et un examen par des comités de compétences afin de comprendre, de développer et d'accélérer la croissance de façon continue. Les informations contenues dans le passeport sont hébergées sur un serveur nuagique contrôlé par l'étudiant/médecin au cours de sa formation et de sa pratique. Ces données sont cartographies en fonction de divers cadres éducatifs comme les activités professionnelles confiables ou des jalons pour faciliter le suivi longitudinal des performances. À chaque étape de la formation et de la pratique, l'étudiant/médecin accorde l'accès au passeport à toutes les entités qui peuvent fournir des données sur ses performances. Les gestionnaires de la base de données utilisent l'analyse de l'apprentissage pour recouper et afficher les informations au fil du temps, informations qui sont ensuite utilisées par l'étudiant/médecin, les coachs qu'on lui a désignés ou qu'il a choisis, et les comités d'examen pour maintenir ou améliorer les performances. Des informations globales sont également recueillies et analysées pour améliorer l'ensemble du système d'apprentissage et de soins.L'élaboration d'un véritable continuum qui englobe la performance et la croissance constituera un défi d'adaptation à long terme pour les organisations et les provinces, et nécessitera une coordination entre instances réglementaires à l'échelle du pays. Le passeport éducatif pourrait également servir d'outil d'organisation, mais il impliquera des recherches et des stratégies de communication importantes pour maximiser la confiance du public dans ce travail.

Fellow Entrustment for the Common Pediatric Subspecialty Entrustable Professional Activities Across Subspecialties.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between level of supervision (LOS) ratings for the Common Pediatric Subspecialty Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) with their associated subcompetency milestones across subspecialties and by fellowship training year. METHODS: Clinical Competency Committees (CCCs) in 14 pediatric subspecialties submitted LOS ratings for 6 Common Subspecialty EPAs and subcompetency milestone levels mapped to these EPAs. We examined associations between these subcompetency milestone levels and LOS ratings across subspecialty training year by fitting per-EPA linear mixed effects models, regressing LOS rating on milestone level and on training year. RESULTS: CCCs from 211 pediatric fellowship programs provided data for 369 first, 336 second, and 331 third year fellows. Mean subcompetency milestone levels increased similarly among subspecialties for most EPAs compared with the reference, Adolescent Medicine. Mean subcompetency milestones mapped to each EPA and mean EPA LOS ratings generally increased by training year across all subspecialties. CONCLUSIONS: Subcompetency milestones levels mapped to each Common Subspecialty EPA and the EPA LOS ratings increase similarly across subspecialties and by training year, providing validity evidence for using EPA LOS to assess pediatric subspecialty trainee performance. This study supports the development of tools to facilitated the CCC evaluation process across all pediatric subspecialties.

Achieving Entrustable Professional Activities During Fellowship.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) were developed to assess pediatric fellows. We previously showed that fellowship program directors (FPDs) may graduate fellows who still require supervision. How this compares with their expectations for entrustment of practicing subspecialists is unknown. METHODS: We surveyed US FPDs in 14 pediatric subspecialties through the Subspecialty Pediatrics Investigator Network between April and August 2017. For each of 7 common pediatric subspecialty EPAs, we compared the minimum level of supervision that FPDs required for graduation with the level they expected of subspecialists for safe and effective practice using the Friedman rank sum test and paired t test. We compared differences between subspecialties using linear regression. RESULTS: We collected data from 660 FPDs (response rate 82%). For all EPAs, FPDs did not require fellows to reach the level of entrustment for graduation that they expected of subspecialists to practice (P < .001). FPDs expected the least amount of supervision for the EPAs consultation and handovers. Mean differences between supervision levels for graduation and practice were smaller for clinical EPAs (consultation, handovers, lead a team) when compared with nonclinical EPAs (quality improvement, management, lead the profession and scholarship; P = .001) and were similar across nearly all subspecialties. CONCLUSIONS: Fellowship graduates may need continued development of clinical and nonclinical skills in their early practice period, underscoring a need for continued assessment and mentoring. Graduation readiness must be based on clear requirements, with alignment of FPD expectations and regulatory standards, to ensure quality care for patients.

Minimum Supervision Levels Required by Program Directors for Pediatric Pulmonary Fellow Graduation.

Background: Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) define the essential tasks expected of subspecialists in unsupervised practice. Although EPAs have been piloted in some programs, their use for summative assessment of pediatric pulmonology fellows for graduation has not been studied. Objective: To determine the minimum level of supervision that pediatric pulmonary program directors (PDs) require of their fellows for graduation and compare it with the minimum level of supervision they expect for a practicing subspecialist for the five pediatric pulmonology EPAs. Methods: Using a modified Delphi approach, we developed supervision scales for the five pediatric pulmonology EPAs and conducted a national survey of pediatric pulmonary PDs in the United States through the Subspecialty Pediatric Investigators Network between April 2017 and August 2017. Results: Forty-six pediatric pulmonary PDs completed the survey, representing a response rate of 85%. The majority did not require fellows to be trusted to practice without supervision for graduation for any of the five EPAs (level 5); the median minimum level of supervision they required was 4, equating to indirect supervision for complex cases. The minimum level for graduation, defined by consensus as the level of supervision for which no more than 20% of PDs would want the level to be lower to allow a fellow to graduate, was 3, which corresponded to requiring supervision for both simple and complex cases. There was a statistically significant difference between the minimum level of supervision deemed necessary by PDs for graduation and for practice as a subspecialist for each of the EPAs. Conclusion: Most pediatric pulmonary PDs reported that they would graduate fellows who may still require indirect supervision for the five pediatric pulmonology EPAs. The findings suggest a need for stakeholders to reevaluate the structure and outcomes of training programs and ensure support for pediatric pulmonologists in their early practice period.

Harnessing the Potential Futures of CBME Here and Now.

The COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 exposed the reactive nature of the medical education community in response to a disruption that, at one time, may have seemed preposterous. In this article, the author reflected on the impact of an unpredictable plight on a system of medical education that (1) is continuous but doesn't function as a continuum and (2) requires adaptation but is steeped in a fixed mindset and structure that resists change. As a result, innovations which were previously considered impossible, such as time variable education and training, were forced into being. Inspired by the changes brought about by the pandemic, the ensuing decade is explored through a lens of possible futures to envision a path forward based on resilience rather than reactivity.

Continued Supervision for the Common Pediatric Subspecialty Entrustable Professional Activities May Be Needed Following Fellowship Graduation.

PURPOSE: Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are one approach to competency-based medical education (CBME), and 7 EPAs have been developed that address content relevant for all pediatric subspecialties. However, it is not known what level of supervision fellowship program directors (FPDs) deem necessary for graduation. The Subspecialty Pediatrics Investigator Network (SPIN) investigated FPD perceptions of the minimum level of supervision required for a trainee to successfully graduate. METHOD: In 2017, SPIN surveyed all FPDs of accredited fellowships for 14 subspecialties. For each EPA, the minimum supervision level for graduation (ranging from observation only to unsupervised practice) was set such that no more than 20% of FPDs would accept a lower level. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 82% (660/802). The minimum supervision level for graduation varied across the 7 EPAs from 2 (direct) to 4 (indirect for complex cases), with significant differences between EPAs. The percentage of FPDs desiring a lower minimum supervision level ranged from 3% to 17%. Compared with the 4 nonclinical EPAs (quality improvement, management, lead within the profession, scholarship), the 3 clinical EPAs (consultation, handover, lead a team) had higher minimum supervision graduation levels (P < .001), with less likelihood that an FPD would graduate a learner below their minimum level (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Consensus among FPDs across all pediatric subspecialties demonstrates the potential need for ongoing supervision for graduates in all 7 common pediatric subspecialty EPAs after fellowship. As CBME programs are implemented, processes and infrastructure to support new graduates are important considerations for leaders.

Learner Levels of Supervision Across the Continuum of Pediatrics Training.

PURPOSE: To describe trajectories in level of supervision ratings for linked entrustable professional activities (EPAs) among pediatric learners in medical school, residency, fellowship. METHOD: The authors performed secondary analyses of 3 linked datasets of level of supervision ratings for the Core EPAs for Entering Residency, the General Pediatrics EPAs, and the Subspecialty Pediatrics EPAs. After identifying 9 activities in common across training stages and aligning the level of entrustment-supervision scales across the datasets, piecewise ordinal and linear mixed effects models were fitted to characterize trajectories of supervision ratings. RESULTS: Within each training period, learners were rated as needing less supervision over time in each activity. When transitioning from medical school to residency or during the first year of residency, learners were rated as needing greater supervision in activities related to patient management, teamwork, emergent care, and public health/QI than in earlier periods. When transitioning from residency to fellowship, learners were always rated as needing greater supervision than they had been accorded at the end of residency and sometimes even more than they had been accorded at the start of residency. CONCLUSIONS: Although development over training is often imagined as continuous and monotonically increasing competence, this study provides empirical evidence supporting the idea that entrustment is a set of discrete decisions. The relaxation of supervision in training is not a linear process. Even with a seamless curriculum, supervision is tightly bound to the training setting. Several explanations for these findings are discussed.

AI-ssessment: Towards Assessment As a Sociotechnical System for Learning.

Two decades ago, the advent of competency-based medical education (CBME) marked a paradigm shift in assessment. Now, medical education is on the cusp of another transformation driven by advances in the field of artificial intelligence (AI). In this article, the authors explore the potential value of AI in advancing CBME and entrustable professional activities by shifting the focus of education from assessment of learning to assessment for learning. The thoughtful integration of AI technologies in observation is proposed to aid in restructuring our current system around the goal of assessment for learning by creating continuous, tight feedback loops that were not before possible. The authors argued that this personalized and less judgmental relationship between learner and machine could shift today's dominating mindset on grades and performance to one of growth and mastery learning that leads to expertise. However, because AI is neither objective nor value free, the authors stress the need for continuous co-production and evaluation of the technology with geographically and culturally diverse stakeholders to define desired behavior of the machine and assess its performance.

Competency-based time-variable training internationally: Ensuring practical next steps in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Competency-based medical education has been advocated as the future of medical education for nearly a half-century. Inherent to this is the promise that advancement and transitions in training would be defined by readiness to practice rather than by time. Of the logistical problems facing competency-based, time-variable (CBTV) training, enacting time variability may be the largest hurdle to clear. Although it is true that an 'all or nothing' approach to CBTV training would require massive overhauls of both medical education and health care systems, the authors propose that training institutions should gradually evolve within their current environments to incrementally move toward the best version of CBTV training for learners, supervisors, and patients. In support of this evolution, the authors seek to demonstrate the feasibility of advancing toward the goal of realistic CBTV training by detailing examples of successful CBTV training and describing key features of initial steps toward CBTV training implementation.

Clarifying essential terminology in entrustment.

With the rapid uptake of entrustable professional activties and entrustment decision-making as an approach in undergraduate and graduate education in medicine and other health professions, there is a risk of confusion in the use of new terminologies. The authors seek to clarify the use of many words related to the concept of entrustment, based on existing literature, with the aim to establish logical consistency in their use. The list of proposed definitions includes independence, autonomy, supervision, unsupervised practice, oversight, general and task-specific trustworthiness, trust, entrust(ment), entrustable professional activity, entrustment decision, entrustability, entrustment-supervision scale, retrospective and prospective entrustment-supervision scales, and entrustment-based discussion. The authors conclude that a shared understanding of the language around entrustment is critical to strengthen bridges among stages of training and practice, such as undergraduate medical education, graduate medical education, and continuing professional development. Shared language and understanding provide the foundation for consistency in interpretation and implementation across the educational continuum.

Identifying Core Components of EPA Implementation: A Path to Knowing if a Complex Intervention Is Being Implemented as Intended.

PURPOSE: Competency-based assessment, using entrustable professional activities (EPAs), is rapidly being implemented worldwide without sufficient agreement on the essential elements of EPA-based assessment. The rapidity of implementation has left little time to understand what works in what circumstances and why or why not. The result is the attempted execution of a complex service intervention without a shared mental model for features needed to remain true to implementing an EPA assessment framework as intended. The purpose of this study was to identify the essential core components necessary to maintain integrity in the implementation of this intended intervention. METHOD: A formal consensus-building technique, the Delphi process, was used to identify core components for implementing an EPA-based assessment framework. Twelve EPA experts from the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands participated in this process in February and March 2020. In each Delphi round, participants rated possible core components on a scale from 1 to 6, with 1 reflecting the worst fit and 6 the best fit for EPA-based assessment implementation. Predetermined automatic inclusion and exclusion criteria for candidate core components were set at ≥ 80% of participants assigning a value of 5 or 6 and ≥ 80% assigning a value of 1 or 2, respectively. RESULTS: After 3 rounds, participants prioritized 10 of 19 candidate core components for inclusion: performance prediction, shared local mental model, workplace assessment, high-stakes entrustment decisions, outcomes based, value of the collective, informed clinical competency committee members, construct alignment, qualitative data, and entrustment decision consequences. The study closed after 3 rounds on the basis of the rankings and comments. CONCLUSIONS: Using the core components identified in this study advances efforts to implement an EPA assessment framework intervention as intended, which mitigates the likelihood of making an incorrect judgment that the intervention demonstrates negative results.

Medical Students' Perspectives on Entrustment Decision Making in an Entrustable Professional Activity Assessment Framework: A Secondary Data Analysis.

PURPOSE: Research on how entrustment decisions are made identifies 5 influential factors (supervisor, trainee, supervisor-trainee relationship, context, task). However, this literature primarily represents the perspective of supervisors in graduate medical education and is conducted outside of an assessment framework where entrustment decisions have consequences for trainees and for patients. To complement the literature, the authors explored how medical students in a pilot program that used an entrustable professional activity (EPA) assessment framework perceived factors influencing entrustment decisions. METHOD: The authors conducted a secondary analysis of qualitative data from program evaluation of a pilot project using an EPA assessment framework to advance students through their curriculum and into residency. Data were derived from 8 focus groups conducted over 4 years (2015-2018) with 27 students who shared their experience of learning and supervision in the project. Sensitized by the entrustment literature, the authors coded and analyzed focus group transcripts according to principles of thematic analysis. RESULTS: Components of the trainee and supervisor-trainee relationship factors predominated students' perceptions of entrustment decisions. Students directed their own learning by asking for feedback, seeking opportunities to engage in learning, sharing limitations of their knowledge with supervisors, and pushing supervisors to recalibrate assessments when appropriate. Students' agentic actions were facilitated by longitudinal supervisor-trainee relationships wherein they felt comfortable asking for help and built confidence in patient care. Students mentioned components of other factors that influenced entrustment decisions (supervisor, clinical task, clinical context), but did so less frequently and from a nonagentic vantage point. CONCLUSIONS: Students' perspectives on entrustment decisions can be derived from their views on learning and supervision in an EPA assessment framework. Their perspectives complement the literature by highlighting students' agentic actions to influence entrustment decisions and promotion of agentic action through practices incorporating longitudinal supervisor-trainee relationships.

Facilitators and Inhibitors to Assessing Entrustable Professional Activities in Pediatric Residency.

OBJECTIVE: Research on entrustable professional activities (EPAs) has focused on EPA development with little attention paid to implementation experiences. This constructivist grounded theory study sought to begin filling this gap by exploring the experiences of pediatric residency programs with implementing EPA-based assessment. METHODS: Interviews with 19 program leader and clinical competency committee participants from 13 sites were held between January and July 2019. Participants were asked about their experiences with implementing EPA-based assessment. Data collection and analysis were iterative. RESULTS: Participants described a range of facilitators and inhibitors that influenced their efforts to implement EPA-based assessment. These fell into 4 thematic areas: 1) alignment of EPA construct with local views of performance and assessment, 2) assessing EPAs illuminates holes in the residency curriculum, 3) clinical competency committee structure and process impacts EPA-based assessment, and 4) faculty engagement and development drives ability to assess EPAs. Areas described as facilitators by some participants were noted to be inhibitors for others. The sum of a program's facilitators and inhibitors led to more or less ability to assess EPAs on the whole. Finally, the first area functions differently from the others; it can shift the entire balance toward or away from the ability to assess EPAs overall. CONCLUSION: This study helps fill a void in implementation evidence for EPA-based assessment through better understanding of facilitators and inhibitors to such efforts.

Entrustment Decision Making: Extending Miller's Pyramid.

The iconic Miller's pyramid, proposed in 1989, characterizes 4 levels of assessment in medical education ("knows," "knows how," "shows how," "does"). The frame work has created a worldwide awareness of the need to have different assessment approaches for different expected outcomes of education and training. At the time, Miller stressed the innovative use of simulation techniques, geared at the third level ("shows how"); however, the "does" level, assessment in the workplace, remained a largely uncharted area. In the 30 years since Miller's conference address and seminal paper, much attention has been devoted to procedures and instrument development for workplace-based assessment. With the rise of competency-based medical education (CBME), the need for approaches to determine the competence of learners in the clinical workplace has intensified. The proposal to use entrustable professional activities as a framework of assessment and the related entrustment decision making for clinical responsibilities at designated levels of supervision of learners (e.g., direct, indirect, and no supervision) has become a recent critical innovation of CBME at the "does" level. Analysis of the entrustment concept reveals that trust in a learner to work without assistance or supervision encompasses more than the observation of "doing" in practice (the "does" level). It implies the readiness of educators to accept the inherent risks involved in health care tasks and the judgment that the learner has enough experience to act appropriately when facing unexpected challenges. Earning this qualification requires qualities beyond observed proficiency, which led the authors to propose adding the level "trusted" to the apex of Miller's pyramid.

Implementing the Behavioral and Mental Health Entrustable Professional Activity: Insights for a Path Forward.

OBJECTIVE: Mental health problems in children are growing exponentially. General pediatricians, while in a unique position to address these issues as they arise, report they lack adequate training in assessing and managing behavioral/mental health (B/MH) problems. Underscoring the importance of this area, the American Board of Pediatrics has defined B/MH as one of only 17 foundational entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for general pediatric practice. Our goal was to explore the facilitators and barriers associated with implementing and assessing the B/MH EPA among pediatric residency programs in order to identify best practices and potential solutions to common barriers. METHODS: In this qualitative study, 18 key faculty members from 4 residency programs with 3 years' experience implementing and assessing their residents on the B/MH EPA were purposively sampled. Semistructured interviews were conducted with each participant, and interviews were analyzed utilizing a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Five themes were defined in the thematic analysis 1) B/MH training: who's responsible? 2) local context can serve as a barrier or facilitator, 3) B/MH may require longitudinal, integrated, and multidisciplinary training, 4) B/MH specialists: indispensable, yet a hurdle?, and 5) resident and faculty confidence and skill impact B/MH training. CONCLUSIONS: The need for robust training to prepare pediatric residency graduates to meet the needs of patients with B/MH problems has never been greater. This study provides important insights about gaps in B/MH training. These should inform future directions focused on addressing this need.