DIRECTIVE CLINIQUE CONJOINTE DE LA SOGC ET DE LA SCP: Directive clinique no 424 : Prise en charge du cordon ombilical chez le nourrisson prématuré ou à terme.

Objectif: Évaluer l'effet du clampage retardé du cordon et de la traite du cordon ombilical sur les risques de mortalité et de morbidité maternelles et néonatales en contexte de grossesses monofœtale ou gémellaire. Population cible: Femmes enceintes dont la grossesse monofœtale ou gémellaire est à terme ou avant terme. Bénéfices risques et coûts: Chez les prématurés de grossesse monofœtale, le clampage retardé de 60 à 120 secondes idéalement, mais d'au moins 30 secondes, réduit le risque de mortalité et de morbidité. Chez les jumeaux prématurés, le clampage retardé est associé à certains bénéfices. Chez les nourrissons de grossesse monofœtale à terme, le clampage retardé de 60 secondes améliore les paramètres hématologiques. Chez les grands prématurés, la traite du cordon ombilical augmente le risque d'hémorragie intraventriculaire. Données probantes: Une recherche a été effectuée au moyen des bases de données Medline, PubMed, Embase et Cochrane Library, de leur création jusqu'à mars 2020, à partir de termes MeSH et de mot-clés liés au clampage retardé du cordon et à la traite du cordon ombilical. Le présent document est un résumé des données probantes et non pas une revue méthodologique. Méthodes de validation: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique d'évaluation, de développement et d'évaluation (GRADE). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]).

JOINT SOGC-CPS CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE: Guideline No. 424: Umbilical cord management in preterm and term infants.

Objective: To assess the impact of deferred (delayed) cord clamping (DCC) and umbilical cord milking in singleton and twin gestations on maternal and infant mortality and morbidity. Target Population: Women who are pregnant with preterm or term singletons or twins. Benefits Harms and Costs: In preterm singletons, DCC for (ideally) 60 to 120 seconds, but at least for 30 seconds, reduces infant risk of mortality and morbidity. DCC in preterm twins is associated with some benefits. In term singletons, DCC for 60 seconds improves hematological parameters. In very preterm infants, umbilical cord milking increases risk for intraventricular hemorrhage. Evidence: Searches of Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to March 2020 were undertaken using Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and key words related to deferred cord clamping and umbilical cord milking. This document represents an abstraction of the evidence rather than a methodological review. Validation Methods: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).

Association of SARS-CoV-2 Infection During Pregnancy With Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes.

Importance: There are limited high-quality, population-level data about the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy using contemporaneous comparator cohorts. Objectives: To describe maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy and to assess variables associated with severe disease in the pregnant population. Design, Setting, and Participants: CANCOVID-Preg is an observational surveillance program for SARS-CoV-2-affected pregnancies in Canada. This analysis presents exploratory, population-level data from 6 Canadian provinces for the period of March 1, 2020, to October 31, 2021. A total of 6012 pregnant persons with a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test result at any time in pregnancy (primarily due to symptomatic presentation) were included and compared with 2 contemporaneous groups including age-matched female individuals with SARS-CoV-2 and unaffected pregnant persons from the pandemic time period. Exposure: SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. Incident infections in pregnancy were reported to CANCOVID-Preg by participating provinces/territories. Main Outcomes and Measures: Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as risk factors for severe disease (ie, disease requiring hospitalization, admission to an intensive care unit/critical care unit, and/or oxygen therapy). Results: Among 6012 pregnant individuals with SARS-CoV-2 in Canada (median age, 31 [IQR, 28-35] years), the greatest proportion of cases were diagnosed at 28 to 37 weeks' gestation (35.7%). Non-White individuals were disproportionately represented. Being pregnant was associated with a significantly increased risk of SARS-CoV-2-related hospitalization compared with SARS-CoV-2 cases among all women aged 20 to 49 years in the general population of Canada (7.75% vs 2.93%; relative risk, 2.65 [95% CI, 2.41-2.88]) as well as an increased risk of intensive care unit/critical care unit admission (2.01% vs 0.37%; relative risk, 5.46 [95% CI, 4.50-6.53]). Increasing age, preexisting hypertension, and greater gestational age at diagnosis were significantly associated with worse maternal outcomes. The risk of preterm birth was significantly elevated among SARS-CoV-2-affected pregnancies (11.05% vs 6.76%; relative risk, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.52-1.76]), even in cases of milder disease not requiring hospitalization, compared with unaffected pregnancies during the same time period. Conclusions and Relevance: In this exploratory surveillance study conducted in Canada from March 2020 to October 2021, SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was significantly associated with increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes and preterm birth.

Guideline No. 424: Umbilical Cord Management in Preterm and Term Infants.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of deferred (delayed) cord clamping (DCC) and umbilical cord milking in singleton and twin gestations on maternal and infant mortality and morbidity. TARGET POPULATION: People who are pregnant with preterm or term singletons or twins. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: In preterm singletons, DCC for (ideally) 60 to 120 seconds, but at least for 30 seconds, reduces infant risk of mortality and morbidity. DCC in preterm twins is associated with some benefits. In term singletons, DCC for 60 seconds improves hematological parameters. In very preterm infants, umbilical cord milking increases risk for intraventricular hemorrhage. EVIDENCE: Searches of Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to March 2020 were undertaken using Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and key words related to deferred cord clamping and umbilical cord milking. This document represents an abstraction of the evidence rather than a methodological review. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations). INTENDED USERS: Maternity and newborn care providers.

Directive clinique no 424 : Prise en charge du cordon ombilical chez le nourrisson prématuré ou à terme.

OBJECTIF: Évaluer l'effet du clampage retardé du cordon et de la traite du cordon ombilical sur les risques de mortalité et de morbidité maternelles et néonatales en contexte de grossesses monofœtale ou gémellaire. POPULATION CIBLE: Femmes enceintes dont la grossesse monofœtale ou gémellaire est à terme ou avant terme. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: Chez les prématurés de grossesse monofœtale, le clampage retardé de 60 à 120 secondes idéalement, mais d'au moins 30 secondes, réduit le risque de mortalité et de morbidité. Chez les jumeaux prématurés, le clampage retardé est associé à certains bénéfices. Chez les nourrissons de grossesse monofœtale à terme, le clampage retardé de 60 secondes améliore les paramètres hématologiques. Chez les grands prématurés, la traite du cordon ombilical augmente le risque d'hémorragie intraventriculaire. DONNéES PROBANTES: Une recherche a été effectuée au moyen des bases de données Medline, PubMed, Embase et Cochrane Library, de leur création jusqu'à mars 2020, à partir de termes MeSH et de mots clés liés au clampage retardé du cordon et à la traite du cordon ombilical. Le présent document est un résumé des données probantes et non pas une revue méthodologique. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique d'évaluation, de développement et d'évaluation (GRADE). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CIBLES: Fournisseurs de soins de maternité et néonataux.

Technicity in Canada: A Nationwide Whole-Population Analysis of Temporal Trends and Variation in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomies.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to provide a contemporary description of hysterectomy practice and temporal trends in Canada. DESIGN: A national whole-population retrospective analysis of data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information. SETTING: Canada. PATIENTS: All women who underwent hysterectomy for benign indication from April 1, 2007, to March 31, 2017, in Canada. INTERVENTIONS: Hysterectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 369 520 hysterectomies were performed in Canada during the 10-year period, during which the hysterectomy rate decreased from 313 to 243 per 100 000 women. The proportion of abdominal hysterectomies decreased (59.5% to 36.9%), laparoscopic hysterectomies increased (10.8% to 38.6%), and vaginal hysterectomies decreased (29.7% to 24.5%), whereas the national technicity index increased from 40.5% to 63.1% (p <.001, all trends). The median length of stay decreased from 3 (interquartile range 2-4) days to 2 (interquartile range 1-3), and the proportion of patients discharged within 24 hours increased from 2.1% to 7.2%. In year 2016-17, women aged 40 to 49 years had significantly increased risk of abdominal hysterectomy compared with women undergoing hysterectomy in other age categories (p <.001). Comparing women with menstrual bleeding disorders, women undergoing hysterectomy for endometriosis (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-1.44) and myomas (aRR 2.01; 95% CI, 1.94-2.08) were at increased risk of abdominal hysterectomy, whereas women undergoing hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic pain (aRR 1.47; 95% CI, 1.41-1.53) were at decreased risk. Using Ontario as the comparator, Nova Scotia (aRR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.27-1.43), New Brunswick (aRR 1.25; 95% CI, 1.18-1.32]), Manitoba (aRR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.28-1.43), and Newfoundland and Labrador (aRR 1.18; 95% CI, 1.10-1.27) had significantly higher risks of abdominal hysterectomy. In contrast, Saskatchewan (aRR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.74-0.77) and British Columbia (aRR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.85-0.88) had significantly lower risks, whereas Prince Edward Island, Quebec, and Alberta were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The proportion of minimally invasive hysterectomies for benign indication has increased significantly in Canada. The declining use of vaginal approaches and the variation among provinces are of concern and necessitate further study.

No. 381-Assisted Vaginal Birth.

OBJECTIVES: To provide evidence-based guidelines for safe and effective assisted vaginal birth. OUTCOMES: Prerequisites, indications, contraindications, along with maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with assisted vaginal birth. EVIDENCE: Medline database was searched for articles published from January 1, 1985, to February 28, 2018 using the key words "assisted vaginal birth," "instrumental vaginal birth," "operative vaginal delivery," "forceps delivery," "vacuum delivery," "ventouse delivery." The quality of evidence is described using the Evaluation of Evidence criteria outlined in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. VALIDATION: These guidelines were approved by the Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee and the Board of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

No 381 - Accouchement vaginal assisté.

OBJECTIFS: Fournir des directives factuelles qui favorisent l'accouchement vaginal assisté sécuritaire et efficace. RéSULTATS: Conditions préalables, indications, contre-indications, ainsi que les morbidités maternelles et néonatales liées à l'accouchement vaginal assisté. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans la base de données Medline pour trouver des articles publiés entre le 1er janvier 1985 et le 28 février 2018 en utilisant les termes anglais suivants : assisted vaginal birth, instrumental vaginal birth, operative vaginal delivery, forceps delivery, vacuum delivery, ventouse delivery. La qualité des données probantes indiquées s'appuie sur les critères d'évaluation des données décrits dans le rapport du Groupe d'étude canadien sur les soins de santé préventifs. VALIDATION: La présente directive a été approuvée par le comité de pratique clinique - obstétrique et le conseil d'administration de la Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. RECOMMANDATIONS.

Female genital cosmetic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To provide Canadian gynaecologists with evidence-based direction for female genital cosmetic surgery in response to increasing requests for, and availability of, vaginal and vulvar surgeries that fall well outside the traditional realm of medically-indicated reconstructions. EVIDENCE: Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed or MEDLINE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library in 2011 and 2012 using appropriate controlled vocabulary and key words (female genital cosmetic surgery). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date or language restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to May 2012. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES: The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table). Recommendations 1. The obstetrician and gynaecologist should play an important role in helping women to understand their anatomy and to respect individual variations. (III-A) 2. For women who present with requests for vaginal cosmetic procedures, a complete medical, sexual, and gynaecologic history should be obtained and the absence of any major sexual or psychological dysfunction should be ascertained. Any possibility of coercion or exploitation should be ruled out. (III-B) 3. Counselling should be a priority for women requesting female genital cosmetic surgery. Topics should include normal variation and physiological changes over the lifespan, as well as the possibility of unintended consequences of cosmetic surgery to the genital area. The lack of evidence regarding outcomes and the lack of data on the impact of subsequent changes during pregnancy or menopause should also be discussed and considered part of the informed consent process. (III-L) 4. There is little evidence to support any of the female genital cosmetic surgeries in terms of improvement to sexual satisfaction or self-image. Physicians choosing to proceed with these cosmetic procedures should not promote these surgeries for the enhancement of sexual function and advertising of female genital cosmetic surgical procedures should be avoided (III-L) 5. Physicians who see adolescents requesting female genital cosmetic surgery require additional expertise in counselling adolescents. Such procedures should not be offered until complete maturity including genital maturity, and parental consent is not required at that time. (III-L) 6. Non-medical terms, including but not restricted to vaginal rejuvenation, clitoral resurfacing, and G-spot enhancement, should be recognized as marketing terms only, with no medical origin; therefore they cannot be scientifically evaluated. (III-L).

Objectif : Fournir aux gynécologues canadiens des directives factuelles en matière de chirurgie esthétique génitale chez la femme, en réponse au nombre grandissant de demandes (et d'interventions) de chirurgie vaginale et vulvaire se situant bien au-delà des reconstructions traditionnellement indiquées sur le plan médical. Résultats : La littérature publiée a été récupérée par l'intermédiaire de recherches menées dans PubMed ou MEDLINE, CINAHL et The Cochrane Library en 2011 et en 2012 au moyen d'un vocabulaire contrôlé et de mots clés appropriés (« female genital cosmetic surgery ¼). Les résultats ont été restreints aux analyses systématiques, aux essais comparatifs randomisés / essais cliniques comparatifs et aux études observationnelles. Aucune restriction n'a été appliquée en matière de date ou de langue. Les recherches ont été mises à jour de façon régulière et intégrées à la directive clinique jusqu'en mai 2012. La littérature grise (non publiée) a été identifiée par l'intermédiaire de recherches menées dans les sites Web d'organismes s'intéressant à l'évaluation des technologies dans le domaine de la santé et d'organismes connexes, dans des collections de directives cliniques, dans des registres d'essais cliniques et auprès de sociétés de spécialité médicale nationales et internationales. Valeurs : La qualité des résultats est évaluée au moyen des critères décrits dans le rapport du Groupe d'étude canadien sur les soins de santé préventifs (Tableau). Recommandations 1. Un des rôles importants des obstétriciens-gynécologues devrait consister à aider les femmes à comprendre leur anatomie et à en respecter les variantes qui leur sont propres. (III-A) 2. Lorsqu'une femme demande la tenue d'interventions esthétiques vaginales, une anamnèse médicale, sexuelle et gynécologique exhaustive devrait être obtenue et l'absence de tout dysfonctionnement sexuel ou psychologique majeur devrait être établie. La présence possible de coercition ou d'exploitation devrait également être écartée. (III-B) 3. Le counseling devrait constituer une priorité dans le cas des femmes qui demandent la tenue d'une chirurgie esthétique génitale. Les sujets abordés dans le cadre du counseling devraient comprendre les variations normales et les modifications physiologiques qui se manifestent au cours de la vie, ainsi que la possibilité de connaître des conséquences imprévues à la suite de la tenue d'une chirurgie esthétique visant les organes génitaux. Le manque de données en ce qui concerne les issues de la chirurgie et les effets des modifications subséquentes attribuables à la grossesse ou à la ménopause devrait également faire l'objet de discussions et être considéré comme faisant partie du processus de consentement éclairé. (III-L) 4. Peu de données soutiennent l'amélioration de la satisfaction sexuelle ou de l'image de soi qui serait attribuable aux interventions de chirurgie esthétique génitale chez la femme. Les médecins qui choisissent de procéder à de telles interventions esthétiques ne devraient pas en faire la promotion à des fins d'amélioration de la fonction sexuelle; de surcroît, le recours à la publicité pour promouvoir les interventions de chirurgie esthétique génitale chez la femme devrait être évité. (III-L) 5. Les médecins qui reçoivent des demandes de chirurgie esthétique génitale de la part d'adolescentes doivent chercher à obtenir des compétences additionnelles en ce qui a trait à l'offre de services de counseling aux adolescentes. De telles interventions chirurgicales ne devraient pas être offertes avant l'atteinte de la pleine maturité physiologique (y compris la maturité génitale); le consentement parental n'est alors pas requis. (III-L) 6. Les termes non médicaux (y compris, entre autres, le rajeunissement vaginal, le resurfaçage clitoridien et l'augmentation du point G) devraient être reconnus comme n'étant que des termes de marketing, sans aucune origine médicale; ainsi, ils ne peuvent faire l'objet d'une évaluation scientifique. (III-L).

The origins and outcomes of triplet and quadruplet pregnancies in Nova Scotia: 1980 to 2001.

The objective of this study was to determine the rate, origin, maternal and perinatal outcomes, and the associated hospital costs of higher order multiple births in one Canadian province. All higher order multiple pregnancies (triplets and above) in Nova Scotia over a 22-year period (1980 to 2001) were reviewed, and the maternal and perinatal outcomes and hospital costs were compared with singletons and twins in the same hospital population. During the 22-year period, 116,785 infants were delivered, including 3448 twins, 99 triplets, and 16 quadruplets. Of the higher order multiple gestations, 51.4% were conceived through infertility therapy. When compared with mothers of either singletons or twins, mothers of higher order gestations were significantly older, had longer antepartum and postpartum hospital stays, were more likely to have cesarean delivery, preterm labor, preeclampsia, and require intensive care unit admission. Triplets and quadruplets had significantly higher rates of preterm delivery, major anomalies, neonatal intensive care, respiratory distress syndrome, intrauterine growth restriction, serious morbidity, 5-minute Apgar scores < or = 3, and neonatal death than twins or singletons. The estimated hospital costs for this population ranged from 6,750 US dollars for a singleton pregnancy to 278,400 US dollars for a quadruplet pregnancy. Maternal morbidity, perinatal morbidity and mortality, and hospital costs are significantly increased in higher order births compared with both twins and singletons.