Assessing the impact of structured reporting on learning how to report lung cancer staging CT: A triple cohort study on inexperienced readers.

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical utility of chest computed tomography (CT) reports for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) staging generated by inexperienced readers using structured reporting (SR) templates from the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR-SR) and the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM-SR), compared to traditional non-systematic reports (NSR). METHODS: In a cohort of 30 NSCLC patients, six third-year radiology residents reported CT examinations in two 2-month-apart separate sessions using NSR in the first and NSR, RCR-SR, or SIRM-SR in the second. Couples of expert radiologists and thoracic oncologists in consensus evaluated completeness, accuracy, and clarity. All the quality indicators were expressed on a 100-point scale. The Wilcoxon signed ranks, and Wilcoxon-Mann Whitney tests were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Results showed significantly higher completeness for RCR-SR (90 %) and SIRM-SR (100 %) compared to NSR (70 %) in the second session (all p < 0.001). SIRM-SR demonstrated superior accuracy (70 % vs. 55 %, p < 0.001) over NSR, while RCR-SR and NSR accuracy did not significantly differ (60 % vs. 62.5 %, p = 0.06). In the second session, RCR-SR and SIRM-SR surpassed NSR in completeness, accuracy, and clarity (all p < 0.001, except p = 0.04 for accuracy between RCR-SR and NSR). SIRM-SR outperformed RCR-SR in completeness (100 % vs. 90 %, p < 0.001) and accuracy (70 % vs. 62.5 %, p = 0.002), with equivalent clarity (90 % for both, p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: Inexperienced readers using RCR-SR and SIRM-SR demonstrated high-quality reporting, indicating their potential in radiology residency programs to enhance reporting skills for NSCLC staging and effective interaction with all the physicians involved in managing NSCLC patients.

Structured report for chest high-resolution computed tomography in patients with connective tissue disease: Impact on the report quality as perceived by referring clinicians.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact on perceived report quality of referring rheumatologists for a chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) structured report (SR) template for patients with connective tissue disease (CTD), compared to the traditional narrative report (NR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively considered 123 HRCTs in patients with CTD. Three radiologists, blinded to the original NRs they wrote during clinical routine, re-reported each HRCT using an SR dedicated template. We then divided all NR-SR couples into three groups (41 HRCT each). Each group was evaluated by one of three rheumatologists (R1, R2, R3), who expressed their perceived report quality for the respective pools of NRs and SRs in terms of completeness, clarity (both on a 10-points scale), and clinical relevance (on a 5-points scale). The Wilcoxon test and the McNemar test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: For each rheumatologist, SR received higher ratings compared to NR for completeness (median ratings: R1, 10 vs. 7; R2, 10 vs. 8; R3, 10 vs. 6, all p < 0.0001), clarity (median ratings: R1, 10 vs. 7; R2, 10 vs. 8; R3, 10 vs. 7, all p < 0.0001), and clinical relevance (median ratings: R1, 5 vs. 4; R2, 5 vs. 4; R3, 5 vs. 1, all p < 0.0001). After rating dichotomization, the use of SR led to a significant increase (p < 0.01) in completeness, clarity, and clinical relevance as compared to NR, except for clarity as perceived by R2 (p = 1). CONCLUSION: Referring rheumatologists' perceived report quality for structured reporting of HRCT in patients with CTD was superior to narrative reporting.

Humoral primary immunodeficiency diseases: clinical overview and chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) features in the adult population.

Humoral primary immunodeficiency diseases (hPIDs) are a heterogeneous group of hereditary disorders resulting in abnormal susceptibility to infections of the sinopulmonary tract. Some of these conditions (e.g., common variable immunodeficiency disorders [CVID]) imply a number of non-infectious thoracic complications such as non-infectious airway disorders, diffuse lung parenchymal diseases, and neoplasms. Chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is a key imaging tool to characterise and quantify the extent of underlying thoracic involvement, as well as to direct and monitor treatment. The aims of this review are to provide a brief clinical overview of hPIDs and describe the related chest HRCT imaging features in the adult population, with a special focus on CVID and its complications.

Accuracy of visual analysis vs. apparent diffusion coefficient quantification in differentiating solid benign and malignant focal liver lesions with diffusion-weighted imaging.

PURPOSE: The authors compared the accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) visual analysis (VA) vs. apparent diffusion coefficient quantification (ADC-Q) in assessing malignancy of solid focal liver lesions (FLLs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a 1.5-T system, two radiologists retrospectively assessed as benign or malignant 50 solid FLLs: (a) by VA of signal intensity on DWI images at b=800 s/mm(2) and ADC map; (b) by quantifying lesion ADC. Reference standard included histology or follow-up confirmation of diagnosis by a consensus panel. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: because of 20 false-negative hepatocellular carcinomas, VA showed lower accuracy than ADC-Q (52.0% VS. 68.0%). however, stratified accuracy for metastases was higher with VA (75.0 VS. 66%). ADC and signal features of malignant and benign FLLs were found to largely overlap. CONCLUSIONS: VA performed worse than ADC-Q for hepatocellular carcinoma and better for metastases. Overall, the accuracy of both methods was limited because of the overlap in visual appearance and ADC values between solid benign and malignant FLLs.

Impact of magnetic resonance cholangiography in managing liver-transplanted patients: preliminary results of a clinical decision-making study.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to assess the role of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in the clinical decision-making process of referring physicians when managing liver-transplanted patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 6-month period, 21 liver-transplanted patients with a suspected biliary complication were referred for MRC. Referring physicians were asked to prospectively state, before and after MRC, the leading diagnosis; the level of confidence (on a 0-100% scale); the most appropriate diagnostic/therapeutic plan. Data analysis assessed was the diagnostic yield of MRC; the proportion of change in the leading diagnosis; the therapeutic efficacy (i.e. proportion of change in the initial diagnostic/therapeutic plan); the diagnostic thinking efficacy (i.e., gain in diagnostic confidence). Statistical significance was assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test. MRC accuracy was also calculated. RESULTS: Data analysis showed a diagnostic yield of 85.7%; a proportion of change in leading diagnosis of 19.0%; a therapeutic efficacy of 42.8%; a diagnostic thinking efficacy for concordant and discordant leading diagnoses of 18.8% and 78.7%, respectively (p<0.01). MRC accuracy was 92.3%. CONCLUSIONS: MRC significantly increased the diagnostic confidence, irrespective of the concordance between pre- and posttest diagnoses. Moreover, MRC determined a change in patient management in a significant proportion of cases, leading to clinical benefits.

Chest multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism: diagnostic yield and proportion of other clinically relevant findings.

PURPOSE: The authors evaluated the diagnostic yield of chest multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and the proportion of other clinically relevant findings in a large cohort of consecutive inpatients and patients referred from the emergency department (outpatients). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 327 radiological reports of chest MDCT scans performed for suspected acute PE in 327 patients (158 men, 169 women; mean age 69 years, standard deviation 17.33 years; 233 inpatients, 94 outpatients) were retrospectively evaluated and classified into four categories: 1, positive for PE; 2, negative for PE but positive for other findings requiring specific and immediate intervention; 3, completely negative or positive for findings with a potential for significant morbidity requiring specific action on follow-up; 4, indeterminate. The distribution of findings by categories among the entire population and inpatients and outpatients separately was calculated (chi-square test, α=0.05). RESULTS: In the entire population, the diagnostic yield (i.e. proportion of cases classified as category 1) was 20.2% (66/327). Proportions of cases classified as categories 2, 3 and 4 were 27.5% (90/327), 44.3% (145/327) and 7.9% (26/327), respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between inpatients and outpatients (p=0.193). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected acute PE, chest MDCT provides evidence of conditions requiring immediate and specific intervention (i.e. categories 1 and 2) in nearly 50% of cases, without differences between inpatients and outpatients.

Post-cholecystectomy syndrome: spectrum of biliary findings at magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Post-cholecystectomy syndrome (PCS) is defined as a complex of heterogeneous symptoms, consisting of upper abdominal pain and dyspepsia, which recur and/or persist after cholecystectomy. Nevertheless, this term is inaccurate, as it encompasses biliary and non-biliary disorders, possibly unrelated to cholecystectomy. Biliary manifestations of PCS may occur early in the post-operative period, usually because of incomplete surgery (retained calculi in the cystic duct remnant or in the common bile duct) or operative complications, such as bile duct injury and/or bile leakage. A later onset is commonly caused by inflammatory scarring strictures involving the sphincter of Oddi or the common bile duct, recurrent calculi or biliary dyskinesia. The traditional imaging approach for PCS has involved ultrasound and/or CT followed by direct cholangiography, whereas manometry of the sphincter of Oddi and biliary scintigraphy have been reserved for cases of biliary dyskinesia. Because of its capability to provide non-invasive high-quality visualisation of the biliary tract, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) has been advocated as a reliable imaging tool for assessing patients with suspected PCS and for guiding management decisions. This paper illustrates the rationale for using MRCP, together with the main MRCP biliary findings and diagnostic pitfalls.

Impact of clinical data on chest radiography sensitivity in detecting pulmonary abnormalities in immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia.

PURPOSE: Chest radiography (CXR) of immunocompromised patients has low sensitivity in the early evaluation of pulmonary abnormalities suspected to be infectious. The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether the knowledge of clinical data improves the diagnostic sensitivity of CXR in the particular setting of immunocompromised patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four CXRs of immunocompromised patients with clinically suspected pneumonia were retrospectively and independently evaluated by two radiologists to assess the presence of radiological signs of pneumonia, before (first reading) and after (second reading) the knowledge of clinical data. A chest computed tomography (CT) performed within 3 days was assumed as the standard of reference. For each reading, sensitivity of both radiologists was calculated. RESULTS: Readers showed a sensitivity of 39% and 58.5% for the first reading, and 43.9% and 41.5% for the second reading, respectively. For both readers, these values were not significantly different from those obtained at first reading (McNemar's test, p>0.05). Interobserver agreement at second reading was fair (Cohen test, k=0.33). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of CXR is too low to consider it a stand-alone technique for the evaluation of immunocompromised patients after HSCT with suspected pneumonia, even if the radiologist knows detailed clinical data. For these patients, an early chest CT evaluation is therefore recommended.