Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses for age-related cataract patients: a system review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

We compare multifocal intraocular lenses (MFIOLs) to monofocal IOLs for visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity, and adverse events using data from 21 randomized controlled trials with 2951 subjects. There was no statistical difference between uncorrected distance VA and corrected distance VA. Compared with monofocal IOLs, MFIOLs showed a better performance on uncorrected intermediate VA measured at 60 cm and uncorrected near VA; the mean differences were -0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.10, -0.03) and -0.13 (95% CI: -0.20, -0.07). Distance-corrected intermediate VA and distance-corrected near VA were measured wearing distance correction. MFIOLs performed better than monofocal IOLs on distance-corrected intermediate VA at 60 cm and distance-corrected near VA; the mean differences were -0.09 (95% CI: -0.12, -0.06) and -0.31 (95% CI: -0.43, -0.19). The contrast sensitivity of the MFIOL group was lower than that of the monofocal IOL group; mean difference was -0.06 (95% CI: -0.11, -0.02). More patients were spectacle free in the MFIOL group; the risk ratio was 2.86 (95% CI: 1.73, 4.73). More patients were troubled by glare and halos in the MFIOL group; the risk ratios were 1.91 (95% CI: 1.24, 2.95) and 3.08 (95% CI: 2.11, 4.49). We conclude that, compared with monofocal IOLs, MFIOLs give patients better near vision and intermediate vision at 60 cm, both corrected and uncorrected. Patients undergoing MFIOLs implantation are more likely to be spectacle free but have a higher risk of glare, halos, and lower contrast sensitivity.

Efficacy and safety of vitrectomy for congenital cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized and controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To explore the effectiveness and safety of vitrectomy for congenital cataract surgery. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Science Direct, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and the Wanfang Database. Two researchers extracted data and assessed paper quality independently. Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) or visual axis opacification (VAO), reoperation rate, visual acuity, intraocular lenses (IOL) deposit, synechias, uveitis, secondary glaucoma, low-contrast sensitivity and IOL decentration were compared. RESULTS: We included 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 634 congenital cataract eyes. Cases of posterior capsule opacification in vitrectomy group were significantly less than that of control group, with risk ratio (RR) of 0.15 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09, 0.26], and there was no heterogeneity (I2  = 0%, p = 0.94). Reoperation rate in vitrectomy group was lower than that of control group either (RR = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.17, 0.94), and there was no heterogeneity (I2  = 0%, p = 0.85). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured in LogMAR unit of vitrectomy group was smaller, with a mean difference (MD) of -0.17 (95%CI: -0.28, -0.05), and I2 was only 22%, indicating of a small heterogeneity. No statistical difference was found between two groups on IOL deposit (RR = 1.23, 95%CI: 0.70, 2.17), and the heterogeneity was small (I2  = 16%, p = 0.31). No statistical difference was found between two groups on synechias (RR = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.60, 1.94), with a quite small heterogeneity (I2  = 3%, p = 0.38). No statistical difference was found between two groups on uveitis (RR = 0.55, 95%CI: 0.15, 2.01), and there was no heterogeneity (I2  = 0%, p = 0.94). There was no statistical difference on IOP either, with a MD of 0.25 (95%CI: -1.56, 2.07), and there was no heterogeneity (I2  = 0%). Egger's test showed that there was no publication bias for all assessed outcomes. Low-contrast sensitivity was better in the vitrectomy group. And no evidence indicated vitrectomy could lead to a higher risk on secondary glaucoma or IOL decentration. CONCLUSION: Vitrectomy helps lower the PCO risk and reoperation risk after congenital cataract surgery, and also, vitrectomy helps patients gain a better BCVA and achieve a better low-contrast sensitivity, with no trade-off on IOP control, IOL deposit, synechias, uveitis and secondary glaucoma. We recommend performing vitrectomy during congenital cataract surgery.

Early expression of tumor necrosis factor α and nuclear factor kappa B after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty in rabbits.

PURPOSE: To investigate immune rejection after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) compared with that after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in New Zealand rabbit eyes and to identify the relationship between tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) and evaluate their involvement in graft rejection. METHODS: Sixty-nine New Zealand rabbits were divided into 3 groups: group A comprised the control group, which did not undergo either of the procedures; group B underwent DSEK; and group C underwent PKP. Twenty-three Chinese rabbits (46 eyes) were used as donors. The corneal transparency, graft placement, and anterior chamber were observed for 28 days. Blood serum, aqueous humor, and corneal samples were obtained on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 after the procedures. TNF-α levels were measured weekly by double-antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. NFκB in the cornea was checked by immunofluorescence. RESULTS: There were no graft rejections in group B. Group C showed a 50% rejection frequency with an increase in both the TNF-α concentrations and NFκB expression observed at 7 days and peak levels observed at 28 days after PKP. TNF-α concentrations did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) between groups B and A. NFκB expression was slightly increased at 7 days and returned to normal levels by day 14 after DSEK. CONCLUSION: Rabbits with DSEK had a lower rejection rate than rabbits with PKP. NFκB and TNF-α may contribute to the early rejection of corneal allografts.

[Experimental research of small-incision Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the surgical procedure, clinical efficacy, complications, density of endothelial cells and histological changes after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) surgery. METHODS: It was a experimental study. Twenty four New Zealand rabbits were divided into 3 groups, 8 rabbits per group. Donor grafts were dissected from 16 New Zealand rabbit eyes. Group A was experimental group, a 5 mm limbal tunnel incision was made. Descemet's membrane was striped off at 10 mm diameter, then the same diameter donor cornea (including Descemet's membrane and endothelium with a little of posterior stroma) was inserted into the recipient's anterior chamber. Air was injected into the anterior chamber to press the graft up against the recipient cornea. Group B was the control group, only striped the Descemet's membrane at the recipient cornea. Group C was the experiment control group, the procedure was similar to the group A, but the donor graft was without endothelial cells. RESULTS: All corneas of group A were transparent, and the mean density of the endothelial cells was (2195 +/- 77)/mm2 (t = 12.455, P < 0.001). Endothelial grafts attached to the recipients well and no scar formation between them under histological observation. The corneas were severe edema in groups B and C one month after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: DSEK is a safe surgery, can be recovered rapidly with little damages, and without interface scar formation after surgery. DSEK may be the first choice for the treatment of bullous keratopathy.