The Hennepin Ketamine Study Investigators' Reply.

We read with interest the recent editorial, "The Hennepin Ketamine Study," by Dr. Samuel Stratton commenting on the research ethics, methodology, and the current public controversy surrounding this study.1 As researchers and investigators of this study, we strongly agree that prospective clinical research in the prehospital environment is necessary to advance the science of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and emergency medicine. We also agree that accomplishing this is challenging as the prehospital environment often encounters patient populations who cannot provide meaningful informed consent due to their emergent conditions. To ensure that fellow emergency medicine researchers understand the facts of our work so they may plan future studies, and to address some of the questions and concerns in Dr. Stratton's editorial, the lay press, and in social media,2 we would like to call attention to some inaccuracies in Dr. Stratton's editorial, and to the lay media stories on which it appears to be based.Ho JD, Cole JB, Klein LR, Olives TD, Driver BE, Moore JC, Nystrom PC, Arens AM, Simpson NS, Hick JL, Chavez RA, Lynch WL, Miner JR. The Hennepin Ketamine Study investigators' reply. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019;34(2):111-113.

Modelling the control of ovulation and polycystic ovary syndrome.

The control of ovulation in mammalian species appears to be a highly robust process. The primary mechanism is believed to be competition amongst a group of developing follicles, mediated by a hormonal feedback loop involving in the first instance the pituitary. Successful follicles reach maturity and ovulate, the remainder atrophy and die. A model of this control process has been derived by Lacker and his group. Based on simple qualitative assumptions about the hormonal feedback loop, this is able to reflect many of the basic physiological features of ovulation in mammals. However, a fundamental hypothesis of Lacker's work is that all follicles are identical and respond to hormonal signals in precisely the same way. Not only is this improbable, but it also leads to several aspects of the model which are qualitatively unrealistic, most notable of these is its inability to accurately model the condition known as Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. This common malfunction of the ovulatory control mechanism accounts for up to three-quarters of cases of anovulatory infertility in humans and its understanding is therefore of considerable medical significance. In this paper we extend the analysis of Lacker's model to the case of non-identical follicles; this allows us to obtain behaviour much closer to that observed in PCOS patients and to draw some tentative conclusions about the mechanisms underlying this condition.