Comparison of 2-wall versus 3-wall orbital decompression against dysthyroid optic neuropathy in visual function: A retrospective study in a Chinese population.

ABSTRACT: To compare visual function of 2-wall (medial and lateral) versus 3-wall (medial, lateral, and inferior) orbital decompression in patients with dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON).A total of 52 eyes of 37 patients underwent orbital decompression for DON between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Two- or 3-wall decompression was performed in 31 eyes of 23 patients and 21 eyes of 14 patients, respectively. We examined best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual field mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD), pattern-reversed visual evoked potential (PVEP) for P100 latency and amplitude at 60 and 15 arcmin stimulation checkerboard size, as well as proptosis using Hertel exophthalmometry.Whether 2-wall or 3-wall decompression, all parameters of visual function were improved after surgery (all P < .05). The improvement in BCVA, MD, and PSD was not statistically significant between groups (all P > .05). Proptosis reduction was higher after 3-wall decompression (P = .011). Mean increase in P100 amplitude after 3-wall decompression was statistically higher than that of after 2-wall decompression at 60 and 15 arcmin (P = .045 and .020, respectively), while the mean decrease in P100 latency was similar between the groups (P = .821 and .655, respectively). Six patients (66.67%) had persistent postoperative diplopia and 1 patient (20%) had new-onset diplopia in 3-wall decompression group, which were higher than in 2-wall decompression group (46.15% persistent postoperative diplopia and no new-onset diplopia).Both 2-wall and 3-wall decompression can effectively improve visual function of patients with DON. Three-wall decompression provides better improvement in P100 amplitude and proptosis, however new-onset diplopia is more common with this surgical technique.

Intense Pulsed Light Therapy for Patients with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Ocular Demodex Infestation.

To observe the clinical changes of meibomian gland dysfunctipn (MGD) and ocular Demodex infestation after intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment to further examine the mechanism of IPL treating patients with MGD and ocular Demodex infestation. The medical records of 25 patients (49 eyes) with MGD treated with IPL, were retrospectively examined to determine outcomes. Associated ocular-surface parameters (ocular surface disease index, OSDI; lipid layer thickness, LLT; noninvasive first breakup time, NIF-BUT; noninvasive average breakup time, NIAvg-BUT; tear film breakup area, TBUA; Schirmer I Test, SIT; corneal fluorescein staining, CFS), eyelid margin abnormalities, meibum quality and expressibility, MG morphological parameters (macrostructure and microstructure), and the number of Demodex infestation were examined before and after treatment. The MG microstructure and the Demodex infestation were examined via in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). The results showed that there were statistically significant differences in associated ocular-surface parameters (all P<0.05) before and after IPL treatment, except SIT (P=0.065). Eyelid margin abnormalities, meibum quality and expressibility obviously improved in upper and lower eyelid after IPL treatment (all P<0.0001). MG macrostructure (MG dropouts) decreased in upper (P=0.002) and lower eyelid (P=0.001) after IPL treatment. The nine parameters of MG microstructure in upper and lower eyelid all distinctly improved after IPL treatment (all P<0.0001). The mean number of Demodex mites on the upper lid margin (6.59±7.16 to 3.12±3.81/9 eyelashes) and lower lid margin (2.55±2.11 to 1.29±1.53/9 eyelashes) significantly reduced after IPL treatment (all P<0.0001). The Demodex eradication rate was 20% (8/40) in upper lid margin and 34.15% (14/41) in lower lid margin. These findings indicate that IPL shows great therapeutic potential for patients of MGD and ocular Demodex infestation.