Impact of Oral Fidaxomicin Administration on the Intestinal Microbiota and Susceptibility to Clostridium difficile Colonization in Mice.

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), a common cause of hospital-acquired infections, typically occurs after disruption of the normal gut microbiome by broad-spectrum antibiotics. Fidaxomicin is a narrow-spectrum antibiotic that demonstrates a reduced impact on the normal gut microbiota and is approved for the treatment of CDI. To further explore the benefits of this property, we used a murine model to examine the effects of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin on gut microbiota and susceptibility to C. difficile colonization while tracking microbiota recovery over time. Mice were exposed to fidaxomicin or vancomycin by oral gavage for 3 days and subsequently challenged with C. difficile spores at predetermined time points up to 21 days postexposure to antibiotics. Fecal samples were subsequently collected for analysis. Twenty-four hours postchallenge, mice were euthanized and the colon contents harvested. The microbiota was characterized using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. All fidaxomicin-exposed mice (except for one at day 8) were resistant to C. difficile colonization. However, 9 of 15 vancomycin-exposed mice were susceptible to C. difficile colonization until day 12. All vancomycin-exposed mice recovered colonization resistance by day 16. Bacterial diversity was similar prior to antibiotic exposure in both arms and decreased substantially after exposure. A shift in taxonomic structure and composition occurred after both exposures; however, the shift was greater in vancomycin-exposed than in fidaxomicin-exposed mice. In summary, compared with vancomycin, fidaxomicin exposure had less impact on microbiota composition, promoted faster microbial recovery, and had less impact on the loss of C. difficile colonization resistance.

Surotomycin versus vancomycin in adults with Clostridium difficile infection: primary clinical outcomes from the second pivotal, randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The available treatment options for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) are limited by high recurrence rates. Surotomycin was a novel bactericidal cyclic lipopeptide in development to treat CDI that demonstrated non-inferiority to vancomycin in a Phase 2 trial. OBJECTIVES: To assess surotomycin safety and clinical response (non-inferiority versus vancomycin) at the end of treatment (EOT) of CDI. Additionally, to assess surotomycin response over time and sustained response at 30-40 days post-EOT (superiority versus vancomycin). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with CDI were randomized (1:1) to receive twice-daily oral surotomycin 250 mg alternating with twice-daily placebo or four-times-daily oral vancomycin 125 mg for 10 days in this Phase 3, double-blind, multicentre, international trial. Clinical response over time and sustained clinical response were monitored until the end of the trial, through a follow-up period of 30-40 days. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01598311. RESULTS: A total of 285 and 292 patients with confirmed CDI were randomized to receive surotomycin and vancomycin, respectively. Surotomycin-associated clinical response at EOT was non-inferior to vancomycin (surotomycin/vancomycin: 83.4%/82.1%; difference 1.4%, 95% CI - 4.9, 7.6). Following treatment with surotomycin, both clinical response over time (stratified log-rank test, P = 0.277) and sustained clinical response (63.3%/59.0%; difference 4.3%, 95% CI - 3.6, 12.2) did not demonstrate superiority versus vancomycin at end of trial. Both treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Surotomycin demonstrated non-inferiority to vancomycin for CDI clinical response at EOT. Surotomycin did not demonstrate superiority to vancomycin for clinical response over time or sustained clinical response rate.

Efficacy of surotomycin in an in vitro gut model of Clostridium difficile infection.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the efficacy of the cyclic lipopeptide surotomycin in treating clindamycin-induced Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) using an in vitro gut model. METHODS: Two three-stage chemostat gut models were inoculated with human faeces, spiked with C. difficile spores (∼10(7) cfu/mL, PCR ribotype 027 or 001). Clindamycin (33.9 mg/L, four times daily for 7 days) was dosed to induce CDI. Following high-level toxin production, surotomycin (250 mg/L, twice daily for 7 days) was instilled. Microflora populations, C. difficile vegetative cells and spores, cytotoxin titres and antimicrobial levels (LC-MS/MS and bioassay) were determined. The emergence of C. difficile and enterococci with reduced susceptibility to surotomycin was monitored on breakpoint agar (4 × MIC). RESULTS: Counts of viable C. difficile were reduced to near the limit of detection on Days 1 and 3 of surotomycin instillation, and cytotoxin was undetectable on Days 3 and 4 of surotomycin instillation in the 027 and 001 models, respectively. Recurrence of vegetative growth and toxin production occurred 11 days (001 model) and 15 days (027 model) after surotomycin instillation had ceased, and remained for the duration of the experiment. Surotomycin instillation decreased populations of bifidobacteria, clostridia, enterococci and lactobacilli, but was sparing of Bacteroides fragilis group populations. All enumerated organisms had recovered to steady-state levels by 3 weeks post-surotomycin instillation. No evidence of the emergence of reduced susceptibility to surotomycin was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Surotomycin successfully reduced C. difficile vegetative cell counts and toxin levels in the gut model and was sparing of B. fragilis group populations. There was no evidence of decreased susceptibility to surotomycin during exposure or post-exposure.