RESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIM: Precision medicine aims to revolutionize healthcare by tailoring treatment regimens. This study aimed to integrate comprehensive tumor genomic profiling (CTGP) by targeted-gene panel sequencing and drug screening by circulating tumor cell-derived organoids (CTOs) into clinical practice for the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients with various GI cancers underwent CTGP and CTO drug sensitivity testing. CTGP results guided targeted therapy and immunotherapy, while CTO drug sensitivity predicted response to chemotherapy and targeted agents. The drug recommendations from two platforms were correlated with the treatment response to the suggested medications retrospectively. RESULTS: Five patients received therapies aligned with CTGP, including HER2-targeted treatment, immunotherapy, and BRAF/MEK dual inhibition, showing positive responses. CTO drug sensitivity predicted progression under regorafenib (low potential benefit) and good response to chemotherapy with high potential benefit. The combination of CTGP and CTO drug sensitivity may exhibit significant correlation with clinical outcomes during treatment with candidate drugs, demonstrating a sensitivity of 79% and an accuracy of 75%. This encompasses various treatment modalities, such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: The present investigation elucidated the integration of CTGP and CTO drug sensitivity screening into clinical practice in a complementary manner, showcasing a significant correlation between treatment response and testing outcomes. Additional prospective evaluation of these two testing modalities in a large cohort is warranted to confirm whether the inclusion of CTO drug sensitivity screening confers enhanced survival benefits compared to utilizing CTGP alone.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Gastrointestinais , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes , Organoides , Humanos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/genética , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/patologia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/sangue , Feminino , Masculino , Organoides/patologia , Organoides/efeitos dos fármacos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patologia , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/metabolismo , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/efeitos dos fármacos , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Genômica/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/métodos , Adulto , Ensaios de Seleção de Medicamentos Antitumorais/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend ivosidenib followed by modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX) for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations. Taiwan National Health Insurance covers only fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) chemotherapy for this ICC group, and there has been no prior economic evaluation of ivosidenib. Therefore, we aimed to assess ivosidenib's cost-effectiveness in previously treated, advanced ICC-presenting IDH1 mutations compared with mFOLFOX or 5-FU/LV. METHODS: A 3-state partitioned survival model was employed to assess ivosidenib's cost-effectiveness over a 10-year horizon with a 3% discount rate, setting the willingness-to-pay threshold at 3 times the 2022 GDP per capita. Efficacy data for Ivosidenib, mFOLFOX, and 5-FU/LV were sourced from the ClarIDHy, ABC06, and NIFTY trials, respectively. Ivosidenib's cost was assumed to be NT$10,402/500 mg. Primary outcomes included incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and net monetary benefit. Deterministic sensitivity analyses (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were employed to evaluate uncertainty and explore price reduction scenarios. RESULTS: Ivosidenib exhibited ICERs of NT$6,268,528 and NT$5,670,555 compared with mFOLFOX and 5-FU/LV, respectively, both exceeding the established threshold. PSA revealed that ivosidenib was unlikely to be cost-effective, except when it was reduced to NT$4,161 and NT$5,201/500 mg when compared with mFOLFOX and 5-FU/LV, respectively. DSA underscored the significant influence of ivosidenib's cost and utility values on estimate uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: At NT$10,402/500 mg, ivosidenib was not cost-effective for IDH1-mutant ICC patients compared with mFOLFOX or 5-FU/LV, indicating that a 50-60% price reduction is necessary for ivosidenib to be cost-effective in this patient group.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares , Colangiocarcinoma , Análise Custo-Benefício , Fluoruracila , Glicina , Isocitrato Desidrogenase , Leucovorina , Mutação , Piridinas , Humanos , Isocitrato Desidrogenase/genética , Colangiocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Colangiocarcinoma/genética , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/economia , Taiwan , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Fluoruracila/economia , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Glicina/uso terapêutico , Glicina/economia , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/genética , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/economia , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Leucovorina/economia , Masculino , Feminino , Compostos Organoplatínicos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Organoplatínicos/economia , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) provides survival benefits for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) refractory to gemcitabine-based treatment, mainly gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA), in current practice. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) is another commonly administered first-line regimen before nab-paclitaxel reimbursement; however, the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for mPDAC after failed GS treatment has not been reported and was therefore explored in this study. METHODS: In total, 177 patients with mPDAC received first-line GS or GA treatment, followed by second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treatment (identified from a multicenter retrospective cohort in Taiwan from 2018 to 2020); 85 and 92 patients were allocated to the GS and GA groups, respectively. Overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were generally similar; however, a higher median age (67 versus 62 years, p < 0.001) and fewer liver metastases (52% versus 78%, p < 0.001) were observed in the GS versus GA group. The median OS was 15.0 and 15.9 months in the GS and GA groups, respectively (p = 0.58). The TTF (3.1 versus 2.8 months, p = 0.36) and OS (7.6 versus 6.7 months, p = 0.83) after nal-IRI treatment were similar between the two groups. More patients in the GS group developed mucositis during nal-IRI treatment (15% versus 4%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of second-line nal-IRI +5-FU/LV treatment was unaffected by prior S-1 exposure. GS followed by nal-IRI treatment is an alternative treatment sequence for patients with mPDAC.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Combinação de Medicamentos , Fluoruracila , Irinotecano , Leucovorina , Ácido Oxônico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Tegafur , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Feminino , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Irinotecano/uso terapêutico , Irinotecano/administração & dosagem , Tegafur/administração & dosagem , Tegafur/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ácido Oxônico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Oxônico/uso terapêutico , Lipossomos , Resultado do Tratamento , Metástase Neoplásica , Adulto , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Paclitaxel/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cancer susceptibility germline mutations are associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the hereditary status of PDAC and its impact on survival is largely unknown in the Asian population. METHODS: Exome sequencing was performed on 527 blood samples from PDAC individuals and analyzed for mutations in 80 oncogenic genes. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline variants were diagnosed according to the ACMG variant classification categories. The association between germline homologous recombination gene mutations (gHRmut, including BAP1, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, BLM, BRIP1, CHEK2, NBN, MUTYH, FANCA and FANCC) and the treatment outcomes was explored in patients with stage III/IV diseases treated with first-line (1L) platinum-based versus platinum-free chemotherapy. RESULTS: Overall, 104 of 527 (19.7%) patients carried germline P/LP variants. The most common mutated genes were BRCA2 (3.60%), followed by ATR (2.66%) and ATM (1.9%). After a median follow-up duration of 38.3-months (95% confidence interval, 95% CI 35.0-43.7), the median overall survival (OS) was not significantly different among patients with gHRmut, non-HR germline mutations, or no mutation (P = 0.43). Among the 320 patients with stage III/IV disease who received 1L combination chemotherapy, 32 (10%) had gHRmut. Of them, patients receiving 1L platinum-based chemotherapy exhibited a significantly longer median OS compared to those with platinum-free chemotherapy, 26.1 months (95% CI 12.7-33.7) versus 9.6 months (95% CI 5.9-17.6), P = 0.001. However, the median OS of patients without gHRmut was 14.5 months (95% CI 13.2-16.9) and 12.6 months (95% CI 10.8-14.7) for patients receiving 1L platinum-based and platinum-free chemotherapy, respectively (P = 0.22). These results were consistent after adjusting for potential confounding factors including age, tumor stage, performance status, and baseline CA 19.9 in the multivariate Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that nearly 20% of Taiwanese PDAC patients carried germline P/LP variants. The longer survival observed in gHRmut patients treated with 1L platinum-based chemotherapy highlights the importance of germline testing for all patients with advanced PDAC at diagnosis.
Assuntos
Mutação em Linhagem Germinativa , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Taiwan , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Recombinação Homóloga , Genes BRCA2 , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genéticaRESUMO
Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Over the past decade, significant therapeutic advancements have improved the survival rates of patients with pancreatic cancer. One of the primary factors contributing to these positive outcomes is the evolution of chemotherapy, from monotherapy to doublet or triplet regimens, and the integration of multimodal approaches. Additionally, targeted agents tailored to patients with specific genetic alterations and the development of cell therapies show promise in benefiting certain subpopulations. This article focuses on examining pivotal studies that explore the role of chemotherapy in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, maintenance, and salvage settings; highlights interesting findings related to cell therapy; and provides an overview of ongoing trials concerning metastatic settings. This review primarily aimed to offer recommendations based on therapeutic evidence, recent advancements in new treatment combinations, and the most innovative approaches. A unique aspect of this review is the inclusion of published papers on clinical trials and real-world data in Taiwan, thus adding a valuable perspective to the overall analysis.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Taiwan , Sociedades MédicasRESUMO
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive cancer that originates from the epithelial cells lining the bile ducts. Due to its location deep within the body and nonspecific symptoms in the early stages, it is often diagnosed at the advanced stage, thus leading to worse prognosis. Circulating tumor cells within liquid biopsies (i.e. blood) have been considered as promising biomarkers for CCA diagnosis, though current methods for profiling them are not satisfactory in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Herein we developed a new cancer cell probing and immuno-tracking assay known as "CAPTURE", which was performed on an integrated microfluidic system (IMS) to automate CCA diagnosis from bile with a sample amount of only 1 mL. The assay utilized magnetic beads surface-coated with two affinity reagents, a nucleic acid aptamer (HN16) and a glycosaminoglycan (SCH 45-mix), for capturing cancer cells in bile; the "gold standard" anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule was used as a comparison. In a single-blind test of 54 CCA-positive (+) and 102 CCA-negative (-) clinical samples, sensitivities and specificities of 96 and 80%, respectively, were documented with the CAPTURE assay on-bench. An IMS composed of a centrifugal module for sample pretreatment and a CAPTURE module for cell capture and staining was integrated with a new "vertical integration module" for detecting cancer cells from bile without human intervention. Furthermore, a novel micro-tier structure within the centrifugal module was designed to block passage of gallbladder stones with diameters >1 mm, thereby preventing their interference during the subsequent CAPTURE assay. Improved sensitivity and specificity (100 & 83%, respectively) by using three affinity reagents were achieved on the IMS when using 26 clinical bile samples, confirming its clinical bio-applicability for CCA diagnosis. This approach could be therefore used for early-stage CCA diagnostics, ideally enabling effective treatment, as well as reducing potential for relapse.
Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares , Colangiocarcinoma , Humanos , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Bile/química , Bile/metabolismo , Microfluídica , Método Simples-Cego , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/metabolismo , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/patologia , Colangiocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Colangiocarcinoma/metabolismo , Colangiocarcinoma/patologia , Ductos Biliares Intra-Hepáticos/metabolismo , Ductos Biliares Intra-Hepáticos/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In December 2022, the Taiwan National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA) announced the reimbursement of three dosages of pemigatinib 4.5 mg, 9 mg, and 13.5 mg for treating advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusions/rearrangements and set the reimbursement price for pemigatinib 4.5 mg at NT$6600. This study aims to analyze the cost-effectiveness of pemigatinib 13.5 mg as a second-line treatment compared to mFOLFOX and 5-FU chemotherapy for advanced ICC patients with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements from the perspective of Taiwan's NHIA. METHODS: This study used a 3-state partitioned survival model to analyze the 5 year cost-effectiveness of pemigatinib as a second-line treatment for advanced ICC patients in whom first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy failed and to compare the results with those for the mFOLFOX and 5-FU chemotherapy regimens. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated from the FIGHT-202 trial (pemigatinib), ABC-06 trial (mFOLFOX), and NIFTY trial (5-FU). The price of pemigatinib 13.5 mg was set at the potentially highest listing price (NT$17,820). Other parameters of utility, disutility, and costs related to advanced ICC were obtained from the published literature. The willingness-to-pay threshold was three times the forecasted gross domestic product per capita in 2022 (NT$2,928,570). A 3% discount rate was applied to quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs. Several scenario analyses were performed, including a gradual price reduction for pemigatinib. Deterministic sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA), and value of information were performed to assess uncertainty. RESULTS: Pemigatinib was not cost-effective compared to mFOLFOX or 5-FU in the base-case analysis. When the price of pemigatinib was reduced by 50% or more, pemigatinib gained a positive net monetary benefit (mFOLFOX: NT$55,374; 5-FU: NT$92,437) and a 72% (mFOLFOX) and 77.1% (5-FU) probability of being cost-effective. Most of the uncertainty came from the medication cost of pemigatinib, health state utility, and the overall survival associated with pemigatinib. CONCLUSIONS: According to the NCCN guidelines, the daily use of pemigatinib 13.5 mg at the hypothesized NHIA price of NT$17,820/13.5 mg was not cost-effective compared to mFOLFOX or 5-FU. The price reduction scenario suggested a 50% price reduction, NT$8910 per 13.5 mg, for advanced ICC patients with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements.
This study performed a cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of targeted therapy pemigatinib 13.5 mg daily in second-line treatment for Taiwanese patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) harboring FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements. This regimen was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2020 and recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Taiwan's National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA) has announced the reimbursement of three pemigatinib dosages of 4.5 mg, 9 mg, and 13.5 mg to be listed in the NHI coverage in 2022. However, as of the middle of April 2023, only the listing price for pemigatinib 4.5 mg has been determined, while pricing for the other two dosages remains pending. Based on a hypothesized NHIA price of NT$17,820/13.5 mg, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pemigatinib 13.5 mg as a second-line treatment for advanced ICC with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements compared to mFOLFOX (a regimen recommended by NCCN) and 5-FU (a regimen fully covered by Taiwan NHIA) and recommended a listing price for NHIA as reference. Our study showed that the hypothesized price of NT$17,820/13.5 mg was not cost-effective compared to mFOLFOX or 5-FU. The price reduction scenario suggested a 50% reduction (NT$8910) in the hypothesized NHIA price for advanced ICC patients with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Upfront resection (UR) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer. There is increasing evidence suggesting favourable outcomes toward neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery. METHODS: All clinical staging with resectable pancreatic cancer patients treated at a tertiary medical centre from 2013 to 2020 were identified. The baseline characteristics, treatment course, surgery outcome and survival results of UR or NAC were compared. RESULTS: Finally, in 159 resectable patients, 46 patients (29%) underwent NAC and 113 patients (71%) received UR. In NAC, 11 patients (24%) did not receive resection, 4 (36.4%) for comorbidity, 2 (18.2%) for patient refusal and 2 (18.2%) for disease progression. In UR, 13 patients (12%) were unresectable intraoperatively; 6 (46.2%) for locally advanced and 5 (38.5%) for distant metastasis. Overall, 97% of patients in NAC and 58% of patients in UR completed adjuvant chemotherapy. As of data cut-off, 24 patients (69%) in NAC and 42 patients (29%) in UR were still tumour free. The median recurrence-free survival in NAC, UR with adjuvant chemotherapy and without adjuvant chemotherapy were 31.3 months (95% CI, 14.4-not estimable), 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.0-14.3) and 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.8-11.8), P =0.036; and the median overall survival in each group were not reached (95% CI, 29.7-not estimable), 25.9 months (95% CI, 21.1-40.5) and 21.7 months (12.0-32.8), P =0.0053. Based on initial clinical staging, the median overall survival of NAC was not significantly different from UR with a tumour less than or equal to 2 cm, P =0.29. NAC patients had a higher R0 resection rate (83% versus 53%), lower recurrence rate (31% versus 71%) and harvested median number lymph node (23 versus 15). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that NAC is superior to UR in resectable pancreatic cancer with better survival.
Assuntos
Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastric adenosquamous carcinoma (GASC) is a rare subtype of gastric cancer. Research on GASC treatment is limited, and its outcome is usually poor. We investigated the clinical features, immunoprofile of GASC, and determined the optimal treatment modality for these patients. METHODS: Patients with GASC from Taipei Veterans General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical features and treatment outcomes were evaluated. Adequate samples were examined for surrogate biomarkers for immunotherapy by IHC staining. RESULTS: Total 14 (0.35%) GASC patients were found among 4034 gastric cancer patients. The median tumor size was 6.8 cm in 10 patients with stage III GASC, and all these patients underwent radical gastrectomy followed by adjuvant therapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.0 and 11.5 months, respectively. Two patients with stage IV GASC received frontline immunotherapy. Their median PFS and OS were 9.0 and 12.5 months. In immunoprofiling, 25.0% (n = 3), 75.0% (n = 9), and 33.3% (n = 4) of the samples had deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) protein, combined positive score (CPS) of ≥1, and CPS of ≥10, respectively. The univariate analysis revealed that programmed death-ligand 1 ≥5% (HR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.01-0.97; p = 0.047) was significant associated with superior OS. One stage IV patient with CPS ≥10 and dMMR proteins received nivolumab monotherapy as frontline treatment that resulted 14-month PFS. CONCLUSION: Patients with GASC are more likely to yield positive results for CPS and dMMR. Biomarkers should be examined, and immunotherapy can be considered as frontline systemic treatment.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Adenoescamoso , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia CombinadaRESUMO
Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy is the current treatment of choice for frontline programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive gastric cancer. However, the best treatment strategy remains an unmet medical need for elderly or fragile patients with gastric cancer. Previous studies have revealed that PD-L1 expression, Epstein-Barr virus association, and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) are the potential predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy use in gastric cancer. In this study, we showed that PD-L1 expression, tumor mutation burden, and the proportion of MSI-H were significantly elevated in elderly patients with gastric cancer who were older than 70 years compared with patients younger than 70 years from analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas gastric adenocarcinoma cohort [≥70/<70: MSI-H: 26.8%/15.0%, P =0.003; tumor mutation burden: 6.7/5.1 Mut/Mb, P =0.0004; PD-L1 mRNA: 5.6/3.9 counts per million mapped reads, P =0.005]. In our real-world study, 416 gastric cancer patients were analyzed and showed similar results (≥70/<70: MSI-H: 12.5%/6.6%, P =0.041; combined positive score ≥1: 38.1%/21.5%, P <0.001). We also evaluated 16 elderly patients with gastric cancer treated with immunotherapy and revealed an objective response of 43.8%, a median overall survival of 14.8 months, and a median progression-free survival of 7.0 months. Our research showed that a durable clinical response could be expected when treating elderly patients with gastric cancer with immunotherapy, and this approach is worth further study.
Assuntos
Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Idoso , Antígeno B7-H1/genética , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Herpesvirus Humano 4 , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Instabilidade de Microssatélites , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The nomogram derived from the pivotal phase III NAPOLI-1 study demonstrated a significant ability to predict median overall survival (OS) in gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI+5-FU/LV). However, the NAPOLI-1 nomogram has not been validated in a real-world setting and therefore the applicability of the NAPOLI-1 nomogram in daily practice remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate the NAPOLI-1 nomogram in a multicenter real-world cohort. METHODS: The NAPOLI-1 nomogram was applied to a previously established cohort of metastatic PDAC patients treated with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV in nine participating centers in Taiwan. Patients were divided into three risk groups according to the NAPOLI-1 nomogram. The survival impact of relative dose intensity at 6 weeks (RDI at 6 weeks) in different risk groups was also investigated. RESULTS: Of the 473 included patients, the median OSs of patients classified as low (n = 156), medium (n = 186), and high (n = 131) risk were 10.9, 6.3, and 4.3 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). The survival impact of RDI at 6 weeks remained significant after stratification by risk groups, adjustment with Cox regression, inverse probability weighting, or propensity score matching. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the usefulness of the NAPOLI-1 nomogram for risk stratification in gemcitabine-refractory metastatic PDAC treated with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV in daily practice. We further showed that the RDI at 6 weeks is an independent prognostic factor beyond the NAPOLI-1 nomogram.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends a second-line treatment of pemigatinib for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusions/rearrangements and modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX) for those without FGFR2 alterations. However, these regimens are not yet covered by Taiwa's National Health Insurance. This cost-effectiveness analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the pemigatinib/mFOLFOX regimen as the second-line treatment for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on FGFR2 status in comparison with the regimen of fluorouracil chemotherapy and provided a cost-effectiveness analysis-based reference price for pemigatinib. METHODS: A three-state partitioned survival model with a 5-year time horizon was constructed for patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who did not respond to first-line therapy. Overall and progression-free survival functions of pemigatinib, mFOLFOX, and fluorouracil were estimated from the FIGHT-202, ABC-06, and NIFTY trials, respectively. The utility of health states and disutility of adverse events were obtained from the literature. The genetic testing fee and price of pemigatinib were set as the market price. Other costs related to advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were calculated using National Health Insurance claims data. The willingness-to-pay threshold was three times the gross domestic product per capita in 2021 (NT$2,889,684). A 3% discount rate was applied to quality-adjusted life-years and costs. Scenario analyses included a gradual price reduction of pemigatinib, alternative survival models, application of a National Health Insurance payment conversion factor to non-medication costs, and consideration of life-years as effectiveness. A deterministic sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and a value of information analysis were performed. RESULTS: The new regimen provided an incremental 0.13 quality-adjusted life-years, with incremental costs of NT$459,697, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of NT$3,411,098 per quality-adjusted life-year and an incremental net monetary benefit of - NT$70,268. The new regimen was found to be 53.2% cost effective in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. The expected value of uncertainty measured by the expected value of perfect information was NT$80,695/person. In scenario analyses, the incremental net monetary benefit was positive when the price of pemigatinib was reduced by 40% or more. When applying a conversion factor to non-medical costs, the probability of the new regimen being cost effective was slightly increased from 53.2 to 56.5% compared with the base-case analysis. The utility and the cost of the new regimen were the main drivers of uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Although the new second-line genetic-based and biomarker-driven regimen of pemigatinib/mFOLFOX appears not cost effective for patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the base-case analysis, our analysis suggests it is highly likely to be cost effective in the case of a 40% price reduction on pemigatinib.
Assuntos
Colangiocarcinoma , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Humanos , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Colangiocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Biomarcadores , Análise Custo-Benefício , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone or in combination with chemotherapy can improve the limited efficacy of colorectal cancer (CRC) immunotherapy. CX-5461 causes substantial DNA damage and genomic instability and can increase ICIs' therapeutic efficacies through tumor microenvironment alteration. RESULTS: We analyzed whether CX-5461 enhances ICIs' effects in CRC and discovered that CX-5461 causes severe DNA damage, including cytosolic dsDNA appearance, in various human and mouse CRC cells. Our bioinformatics analysis predicted CX-5461-based interferon (IFN) signaling pathway activation in these cells, which was verified by the finding that CX-5461 induces IFN-α and IFN-ß secretion in these cells. Next, cGAMP, phospho-IRF3, CCL5, and CXCL10 levels exhibited significant posttreatment increases in CRC cells, indicating that CX-5461 activates the cGAS-STING-IFN pathway. CX-5461 also enhanced PD-L1 expression through STAT1 activation. CX-5461 alone inhibited tumor growth and prolonged survival in mice. CX-5461+anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 alone exhibited synergistic growth-suppressive effects against CRC and breast cancer. CX-5461 alone or CX-5461+anti-PD-1 increased cytotoxic T-cell numbers and reduced myeloid-derived suppressor cell numbers in mouse spleens. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, clinically, CX-5461 combined with ICIs for CRC therapy warrants consideration because CX-5461 can turn cold tumors into hot ones.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Humanos , Camundongos , Animais , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/farmacologia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Naftiridinas , Benzotiazóis , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Microambiente TumoralRESUMO
Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) improves survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after progression to gemcitabine-based therapy. Few studies have examined whether the starting dose and dose escalation of nal-IRI in subsequent treatment cycles may influence patient outcomes and toxicity profiles. A total of 667 patients who received nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for PDAC treatment between August 2018 and November 2020 at nine medical centers in Taiwan were included and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were allocated to the standard starting dose (SD), reduced starting dose (RD) without escalation, and RD with escalation of nal-IRI groups for comparison of survival outcome and safety. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for possible confounding variables. Nal-IRI was prescribed at SD, RD without escalation, and RD with escalation in 465 (69.7%), 147 (22.0), and 55 (8.2%), respectively. RD with escalation patients had significantly longer treatment cycles (6, range 2-25) than SD (5, range 1-42, P<0.001) and RD without escalation patients (4, range 1-26, P<0.001). The median overall survival (OS) of the patients were as follows: SD, 6.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7-6.7); RD with escalation, 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.1-9.2); and RD without escalation, 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.6-4.5). After PSM to adjust for potential confounders, RD without escalation patients still had the poorest OS compared to the other two groups (P<0.001), while the OS difference between SD and RD with escalation patients was insignificant (P=0.10). SD patients had higher incidences of ≥ grade 3 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia than the other two groups. Administering nal-IRI at RD followed by dose escalation in subsequent treatment cycles is safe and does not compromise survival outcomes in selected patients with PDAC receiving nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV.
RESUMO
Significance: Revealing the dynamic associations between brain functions and behaviors is a significant challenge in neurotechnology, especially for awake subjects. Imaging cerebral hemodynamics in awake animal models is important because the collected data more realistically reflect human disease states. Aim: We previously reported a miniature head-mounted scanning photoacoustic imaging (hmPAI) system. In the present study, we utilized this system to investigate the effects of ketamine on the cerebral hemodynamics of normal rats and rats subjected to prolonged ketamine self-administration. Approach: The cortical superior sagittal sinus (SSS) was continuously monitored. The full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the photoacoustic (PA) A-line signal was used as an indicator of the SSS diameter, and the number of pixels in PA B-scan images was used to investigate changes in the cerebral blood volume (CBV). Results: We observed a significantly higher FWHM (blood vessel diameter) and CBV in normal rats injected with ketamine than in normal rats injected with saline. For rats subjected to prolonged ketamine self-administration, no significant changes in either the blood vessel diameter or CBV were observed. Conclusions: The lack of significant change in prolonged ketamine-exposed rats was potentially due to an increased ketamine tolerance. Our device can reliably detect changes in the dilation of cortical blood vessels and the CBV. This study validates the utility of the developed hmPAI system in an awake, freely moving rat model for behavioral, cognitive, and preclinical cerebral disease studies.
RESUMO
Liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) treatment has demonstrated survival benefits but noticeable side effects in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that is refractory to gemcitabine-based therapy. This study aimed to explore whether combining albumin with the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), herein known as the albumin and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio score (ANS), could be utilized as a simple tool to predict survival and safety profiles in such patient groups. We retrospectively enrolled 434 consecutive PDAC patients treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV between 2018 and 2020 at nine medical centers in Taiwan. Patients were divided into three groups: ANS 0 (high albumin and low NLR), ANS 1 (low albumin or high NLR), and ANS 2 (low albumin and high NLR), for comparison. The median overall survival times for the ANS 0, 1, and 2 groups were 8.7 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 7.0-10.3 months), 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.3-6.0 months), and 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.9-3.3 months), respectively. The ANS was found to be an independent variable for overall survival and time-to-treatment failure in multivariate analyses. Patients in the ANS 2 group had significantly higher incidences of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events than those in the other two groups. The present study showed that the ANS was an independent prognosticator in PDAC patients receiving nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV therapy. The ANS can be a simple predictor of survival outcome and safety profiles in PDAC patients treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APC) are conceived to be frailer and susceptible to treatment toxicity that has led to disparity in lower likelihood of receiving chemotherapy and survival. Optimal chemotherapy is an unmet medical need for elderly patients with APC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with chemo-naive APC, age ≥70 years, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score ≤2 were eligible. The treatment was consisted of biweekly gemcitabine 800 mg/m2, 10 mg/m2/min infusion on day 1 plus oral S-1 and leucovorin (40-60 and 30 mg, respectively) twice daily on days 1-7, the GSL regimen. The primary end-point was progression-free survival with an interested P1 of 5.0 months. RESULTS: Of the 49 enrolled patients, the median age was 76 years, ECOG performance score ≥1 in 59.2%, metastatic diseases in 65.3%, Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 score ≥3 in 71.4%, and Geriatric 8 score ≤14 in 93.9%. After a median 11 cycles of treatment, the overall response rate and disease control rate were 26.5% and 75.5%, respectively. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 6.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4-9.2) and 12.5 months (95% CI, 8.9-14.7), respectively. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related toxicities were anaemia (20.4%), neutropenia (18.4%), and mucositis (12.2%). Patients had improved emotional function and global health status scores during the GSL treatment. CONCLUSION: The study met its primary end-point, which supports further investigation on the merit of GSL in Asian elderly APC patients.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fluoruracila , Humanos , Leucovorina , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Taiwan , Gencitabina , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC), the most common cancer type, causes high morbidity and mortality. Patients who develop drug resistance to oxaliplatin-based regimens have short overall survival. Thus, identifying molecules involved in the development of oxaliplatin resistance is critical for designing therapeutic strategies. METHODS: A proteomic screen was performed to reveal altered protein kinase phosphorylation in oxaliplatin-resistant (OR) CRC tumour spheroids. The function of CHK2 was characterised using several biochemical techniques and evident using in vitro cell and in vivo tumour models. RESULTS: We revealed that the level of phospho-CHK2(Thr68) was elevated in OR CRC cells and in ~30% of tumour samples from patients with OR CRC. We demonstrated that oxaliplatin activated several phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinases (PIKKs) and CHK2 downstream effectors and enhanced CHK2/PARP1 interaction to facilitate DNA repair. A phosphorylation mimicking CHK2 mutant, CHK2T68D, but not a kinase-dead CHK2 mutant, CHK2D347A, promoted DNA repair, the CHK2/PARP1 interaction, and cell growth in the presence of oxaliplatin. Finally, we showed that a CHK2 inhibitor, BML-277, reduced protein poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation), FANCD2 monoubiquitination, homologous recombination and OR CRC cell growth in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that CHK2 activity is critical for modulating oxaliplatin response and that CHK2 is a potential therapeutic target for OR CRC.
Assuntos
Quinase do Ponto de Checagem 2 , Neoplasias Colorretais , Proteômica , Humanos , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Oxaliplatina/farmacologia , Oxaliplatina/uso terapêutico , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinases , Proteínas Quinases , Quinase do Ponto de Checagem 2/metabolismoRESUMO
Introduction: This multicenter, real-world cohort study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of early cumulative dose administration and dosing pattern of liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI+5-FU/LV) in patients with gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). Material and Methods: The electronic medical records of mPDAC patients treated with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV in nine participating centers were manually reviewed. To accommodate to the NAPOLI-1 study population, only patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score of 0-1 were included. The survival impact of the relative 6-week cumulative dose and dosing pattern (standard vs. reduced starting dose, with and without further dose modification) were investigated. Results: Of the 473 included patients, their median overall survival (mOS) was 6.8 [95% CI, 6.2-7.7] months. The mOS of patients who received a relative 6-week cumulative dose of >80%, 60%-80%, and <60% were 7.9, 8.2, and 4.3 months, respectively (p<0.0001). Their survival impact remained significant after covariate adjustment using Cox regression. The mOS was 8.0-8.2 months in patients with a standard starting dose with and without early dose modification, and 9.3 and 6.7 months in those who had a reduced starting dose with and without escalation in the subsequent treatment, respectively. The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia and diarrhea was 23.3% and 2.7%, respectively. Conclusion: Our results support the use of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV in gemcitabine-refractory mPDAC and suggest that a lower starting dose followed by a re-escalation strategy could achieve clinical outcomes comparable to those with standard starting doses in real-world practice.