RESUMO
Gastric carcinoma is highly prevalent throughout the world. Understanding the pathogenesis of this disease will benefit diagnosis and resolution. Studies show that miRNAs are involved in the tumorigenesis of gastric carcinoma. An initial screening followed by subsequent validation identified that miR-376c is up-regulated in gastric carcinoma tissue and the plasma of patients with the disease. In addition, the urinary level of miR-376c is also significantly increased in gastric carcinoma patients. The plasma miR-376c level was validated as a biomarker for gastric carcinoma, including early stage tumors. The induction of miR-376c was found to enrich the proliferation, migration and anchorage-independent growth of carcinoma cells and, furthermore, the repression of the expression of endogenous miR-376c was able to reduce such oncogenic phenotypes. ARID4A gene is a direct target of miR-376c. Knockdown of endogenous ARID4A increased the oncogenicity of carcinoma cells, while ARID4A was found to be drastically down-regulated in tumor tissue. Thus, expression levels of miR-376c and ARID4A mRNA tended to be opposing in tumor tissue. Our results demonstrate that miR-376c functions by suppressing ARID4A expression, which in turn enhances the oncogenicity of gastric carcinoma cells. It seems likely that the level of miR-376c in plasma and urine could act as invaluable markers for the detection of gastric carcinoma.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , MicroRNAs/sangue , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/urina , Carcinogênese , Proliferação de Células , Humanos , MicroRNAs/urina , Proteína 1 de Ligação ao Retinoblastoma/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/sangue , Neoplasias Gástricas/metabolismo , Regulação para CimaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: MicroRNAs (miRNAs, miRs) have shown diagnostic and prognostic potential for oral cancer but their role in oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD) has been less investigated. We aimed to assess whether miR-21 and miR-31, two of the most relevant miRNAs in oral cancer, are useful as prognostic factors for OPMD progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: miR-21 and miR-31 in 20 saliva samples and 46 tissue samples from patients with OPMD (mean follow-up of 820days) were analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription PCR and in situ hybridization, respectively. The log-rank test, receiver operating characteristic curve, and Kaplan-Meier disease free survival analysis were used to assess the correlation between miRNA levels and OPMD progression. RESULTS: Significantly increased salivary miR-21 and miR-31 expression (P=0.003 and P<0.001, respectively) was observed in patients with OPMD compared to control individuals. Patients with recurrent OPMD and/or malignant transformation exhibited a further augmented expression of miR-31, but not miR-21, in the epithelium. Furthermore, increased miR-31 expression as well as epithelial dysplasia is an independent risk factor for OPMD progression as demonstrated in Cox-proportional hazard model (HR: 8.43, P<0.05, 95%CI: 1.04 to 68.03). CONCLUSIONS: Salivary miR-21 and miR-31 are applicable as useful OPMD screening tools. Epithelial dysplasia and miR-31 up-regulation synergistically predict the increased incidence of recurrence and/or malignant transformation in patients with OPMD. Detection of miR-31 expression is an adjuvant method for screening of high-risk OPMD.