RESUMO
Current immune checkpoint blockade therapy (ICBT) predominantly targets T cells to harness the antitumor effects of adaptive immune system. However, the effectiveness of ICBT is reduced by immunosuppressive innate myeloid cells in tumor microenvironments (TMEs). Toll-like receptor 7/8 agonists (TLR7/8a) are often used to address this problem because they can reprogram myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and tumor-associated M2 macrophages, and boost dendritic cell (DC)-based T-cell generation; however, the systemic toxicity of TLR7/8a limits its clinical translation. Here, to address this limitation and utilize the effectiveness of TLR7/8a, this work suggests a programmed two-step activation strategy via Antibody-Trojan Immune Converter Conjugates (ATICC) that specifically targets myeloid cells by anti-SIRPα followed by reactivation of transiently inactivated Trojan TLR7/8a after antibody-mediated endocytosis. ATICC blocks the CD47-SIRPα ("don't eat me" signal), enhances phagocytosis, reprograms M2 macrophages and MDSCs, and increases cross-presentation by DCs, resulting in antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell generation in tumor-draining lymph nodes and TME while minimizing systemic toxicity. The local or systemic administration of ATICC improves ICBT responsiveness through reprogramming of the immunosuppressive TME, increased infiltration of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells, and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis. These results highlight the programmed and target immunomodulation via ATICC could enhance cancer immunotherapy with minimized systemic toxicities.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with kidney failure treated with maintenance hemodialysis (HD) are poor responders to clopidogrel. More beneficial platelet-inhibiting strategies in HD patients therefore are required. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center, prospective, randomized, crossover study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 25 HD patients in Seoul, Korea. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel (300mg loading, 75mg once daily for maintenance dose) or ticagrelor (180mg loading, 90mg twice daily for maintenance dose) for 14 days, and after a 14-day washout period, crossover treatment for another 14 days. All patients received aspirin (100mg/d). OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Platelet function was evaluated predosing and at 1, 5, and 48 hours and 14 days after the first loading dose. During the offset phase, platelet function was assessed at 1 hour and 2, 4, and 14 days after the last dose by light transmittance aggregometry and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, and patients were genotyped for the CYP2C19*2 allele. Maximal extent of aggregation, inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA), P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs), and percentage of inhibition were evaluated. We performed per-protocol analysis, excluding patients who did not complete the protocol. RESULTS: 9 patients did not complete the protocol (7 patients due to adverse events; 2, nonadherence). Higher IPA occurred with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel at 1, 5, and 48 hours and 14 days after loading. By 5 hours after loading, a greater proportion of patients in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group achieved IPA>50% (75% vs 12%, respectively; P<0.05) and IPA>70% (44% vs 0%, respectively; P<0.05). Rates (slope) of onset and offset of the antiplatelet effect were faster in patients receiving ticagrelor than for those receiving clopidogrel (P<0.05). Regardless of CYP2C19*2 allele, the ticagrelor group had significantly lower PRUs at all times than the clopidogrel group. LIMITATIONS: Single-center study with a small number of patients, not a double-blind study, and not intention-to-treat analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor may result in more rapid and greater platelet inhibition than clopidogrel in patients with kidney failure receiving HD.
