Imaging with [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 anti-DLL3 antibody in patients with high-grade neuroendocrine tumours of the lung and prostate: a phase 1/2, first-in-human trial.

BACKGROUND: Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) is aberrantly expressed on the surface of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and neuroendocrine prostate cancer cells. We assessed the safety and feasibility of the DLL3-targeted imaging tracer [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 (composed of the anti-DLL3 antibody SC16.56 conjugated to p-SCN-Bn-deferoxamine [DFO] serving as a chelator for zirconium-89) in patients with neuroendocrine-derived cancer. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, first-in-human study of immunoPET-CT imaging with [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56. The study was done at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Patients aged 18 years or older with a histologically verified neuroendocrine-derived malignancy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were eligible. An initial cohort of patients with SCLC (cohort 1) received 37-74 MBq [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 as a single intravenous infusion at a total mass dose of 2·5 mg and had serial PET-CT scans at 1 h, day 1, day 3, and day 7 post-injection. The primary outcomes of phase 1 of the study (cohort 1) were to estimate terminal clearance half-time, determine whole organ time-integrated activity coefficients, and assess the safety of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56. An expansion cohort of additional patients (with SCLC, neuroendocrine prostate cancer, atypical carcinoid tumours, and non-small-cell lung cancer; cohort 2) received a single infusion of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 at the same activity and mass dose as in the initial cohort followed by a single PET-CT scan 3-6 days later. Retrospectively collected tumour biopsy samples were assessed for DLL3 by immunohistochemistry. The primary outcome of phase 2 of the study in cohort 2 was to determine the potential association between tumour uptake of the tracer and intratumoural DLL3 protein expression, as determined by immunohistochemistry. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04199741. FINDINGS: Between Feb 11, 2020, and Jan 30, 2023, 12 (67%) men and six (33%) women were enrolled, with a median age of 64 years (range 23-81). Cohort 1 included three patients and cohort 2 included 15 additional patients. Imaging of the three patients with SCLC in cohort 1 showed strong tumour-specific uptake of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 at day 3 and day 7 post-injection. Serum clearance was biphasic with an estimated terminal clearance half-time of 119 h (SD 31). The highest mean absorbed dose was observed in the liver (1·83 mGy/MBq [SD 0·36]), and the mean effective dose was 0·49 mSv/MBq (SD 0·10). In cohort 2, a single immunoPET-CT scan on day 3-6 post-administration could delineate DLL3-avid tumours in 12 (80%) of 15 patients. Tumoural uptake varied between and within patients, and across anatomical sites, with a wide range in maximum standardised uptake value (from 3·3 to 66·7). Tumour uptake by [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 was congruent with DLL3 immunohistochemistry in 15 (94%) of 16 patients with evaluable tissue. Two patients with non-avid DLL3 SCLC and neuroendocrine prostate cancer by PET scan showed the lowest DLL3 expression by tumour immunohistochemistry. One (6%) of 18 patients had a grade 1 allergic reaction; no grade 2 or worse adverse events were noted in either cohort. INTERPRETATION: DLL3 PET-CT imaging of patients with neuroendocrine cancers is safe and feasible. These results show the potential utility of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 for non-invasive in-vivo detection of DLL3-expressing malignancies. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health, Prostate Cancer Foundation, and Scannell Foundation.

Serial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing in ROS1 Fusion-Positive Lung Cancers During Treatment With Entrectinib.

PURPOSE: Patients with metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are effectively treated with entrectinib, a multikinase inhibitor. Whether serial targeted gene panel sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) can identify response and progression along with mechanisms of acquired resistance to entrectinib is underexplored. METHODS: In patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC, coclinical trial plasma samples were collected before treatment, after two cycles, and after progression on entrectinib (global phase II clinical trial, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02568267). Samples underwent cfDNA analysis using MSK-ACCESS. Variant allele frequencies of detectable alterations were correlated with objective response per RECIST v1.1 criteria. RESULTS: Twelve patients were included, with best response as partial response (n = 9, 75%), stable disease (n = 2, 17%), and progressive disease (PD; n = 1, 8%). A ROS1 fusion was variably detected in cfDNA; however, patients without a ROS1 fusion in cfDNA had no other somatic alterations detected, indicative of possible low cfDNA shedding. Clearance of the enrolling ROS1 fusion or concurrent non-ROS1 alterations (TP53, CDH1, NF1, or ARID1A mutations) was observed in response to entrectinib therapy. Radiologic PD was accompanied by redemonstration of a ROS1 fusion or non-ROS1 alterations. On-target resistance was rare; only one patient acquired ROS1 G2032R at the time of progression. Several patients acquired new off-target likely oncogenic alterations, including a truncating alteration in NF1. CONCLUSION: Serial cfDNA monitoring may complement radiographic assessments as determinants of response and resistance to entrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive lung cancers in addition to detecting putative resistance mechanisms on progression.

A phase I/II study of valemetostat (DS-3201b), an EZH1/2 inhibitor, in combination with irinotecan in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has few effective treatments. The EZH2-SLFN11 pathway is a driver of acquired chemoresistance that may be targeted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase I/II trial investigated valemetostat, an EZH1/2 inhibitor, with fixed-dose irinotecan in patients with recurrent SCLC. Phase I primary objectives were to assess safety and a recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The phase II primary objective was to determine overall response rate (ORR), with secondary objectives of duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Immunohistochemistry of pre- and on-treatment tumor biopsies and pharmacokinetics analysis were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients enrolled (phase I, n=12; phase II n=10); one withdrew consent prior to treatment. Three dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in dose-escalation resulted in valemetostat 100 mg orally daily selected as RP2D. Among 21 toxicity-evaluable patients, the most frequent (≥20%) treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and rash; 3 patients discontinued treatment for toxicity. In phase II, 3/10 patients experienced DLTs triggering a stopping rule. The ORR was 4/19 (21%, 95% CI 6 to 46%). The median DoR, PFS and OS were 4.6 mo, 2.2 mo (95% CI 1.3 to 7.6 mo) and 6.6 mo (95% CI 4.3 to not reached). SLFN11, EZH2 and SCLC subtyping markers did not correlate with response. MHC-I protein expression increased in 4/4 patients with paired biopsies, including 3/3 responders; two responders demonstrated subtype switching on treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Valemetostat and irinotecan was not tolerated but demonstrated efficacy in recurrent SCLC. Valemetostat may warrant further investigation in SCLC.

First-in-human imaging with [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 anti-DLL3 antibody in patients with high-grade neuroendocrine tumors of the lung and prostate.

Background: Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) is aberrantly expressed on the cell surface in many neuroendocrine cancers including small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). Several therapeutic agents targeting DLL3 are in active clinical development. Molecular imaging of DLL3 would enable non-invasive diagnostic assessment to inform the use of DLL3-targeting therapeutics or to assess disease treatment response. Methods: We conducted a first-in-human immuno-positron emission tomography (immunoPET) imaging study of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56, composed of the anti-DLL3 antibody SC16.56 conjugated to desferrioxamine (DFO) and the positron-emitting radionuclide zirconium-89, in 18 patients with neuroendocrine cancers. An initial cohort of three patients received 1-2 mCi of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 at a total mass dose of 2·5 mg and underwent serial PET and computed tomography (CT) imaging over the course of one week. Radiotracer clearance, tumor uptake, and radiation dosimetry were estimated. An expansion cohort of 15 additional patients were imaged using the initial activity and mass dose. Retrospectively collected tumor biopsies were assessed for DLL3 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (n = 16). Findings: Imaging of the initial 3 SCLC patients demonstrated strong tumor-specific uptake of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56, with similar tumor: background ratios at days 3, 4, and 7 post-injection. Serum clearance was bi-phasic with an estimated terminal clearance half-time of 119 h. The sites of highest background tracer uptake were blood pool and liver. The normal tissue receiving the highest radiation dose was liver; 1·8 mGy/MBq, and the effective dose was 0.49 mSv/MBq. Tumoral uptake varied both between and within patients, and across anatomic sites, with a wide range in SUVmax (from 3·3 to 66·7). Tumor uptake by [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 was associated with protein expression in all cases. Two non-avid DLL3 NEPC cases by PET scanning demonstrated the lowest DLL3 expression by tumor immunohistochemistry. Only one patient had a grade 1 allergic reaction, while no grade ≥2 adverse events noted. Interpretation: DLL3 PET imaging of patients with neuroendocrine cancers is safe and feasible. These results demonstrate the potential utility of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 for non-invasive in vivo detection of DLL3-expressing malignancies. Funding: Supported by NIH R01CA213448 (JTP), R35 CA263816 (CMR), U24 CA213274 (CMR), R35 CA232130 (JSL), and a Prostate Cancer Foundation TACTICAL Award (JSL), Scannell foundation. The Radiochemistry and Molecular Imaging Probes Core Facility is supported by NIH P30 CA08748.

Lorlatinib Tolerability and Association With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Advanced ALK- or ROS1-Rearranged NSCLC: A Brief Report.

Introduction: Treatment with lorlatinib for patients with advanced ALK- and ROS1-rearranged NSCLC (ALK+ and ROS1+ NSCLC) is associated with a unique set of adverse events (AEs) often requiring dose reduction. However, the impact of dose reductions on outcomes remains unclear and is mainly limited to analyses from prospective studies of lorlatinib in the first-line setting. Methods: We reviewed the course of 144 patients with advanced ALK- or ROS1-rearranged NSCLC treated with lorlatinib in the second-line or later setting to assess the frequency of dose reductions resulting from treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) and the association between dose reductions and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 58 patients (40%) had TRAE-related dose reductions, most (59%) owing to neurocognitive AEs or neuropathy. Among all patients, the median PFS was 8.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.4-11.8); the median OS was 20.7 months (95% CI: 16.3-30.5). Among patients who were started on lorlatinib 100 mg/d (n = 122), a Cox regression model with the occurrence of a dose reduction as a time-dependent covariate indicated no association between dose reduction and PFS (hazard ratio = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.54-1.39) or OS (hazard ratio = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.47-1.30). Conclusions: Lorlatinib dose reductions were not associated with inferior clinical outcomes in this multicenter analysis. Prompt identification of lorlatinib TRAEs and implementation of dose reductions may help maximize tolerability without compromising outcomes.

The GENIE BPC NSCLC Cohort: A Real-World Repository Integrating Standardized Clinical and Genomic Data for 1,846 Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: We describe the clinical and genomic landscape of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohort of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) Biopharma Collaborative (BPC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 1,846 patients with NSCLC whose tumors were sequenced from 2014 to 2018 at four institutions participating in AACR GENIE were randomly chosen for curation using the PRISSMM data model. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated for patients treated with standard therapies. RESULTS: In this cohort, 44% of tumors harbored a targetable oncogenic alteration, with EGFR (20%), KRAS G12C (13%), and oncogenic fusions (ALK, RET, and ROS1; 5%) as the most frequent. Median OS (mOS) on first-line platinum-based therapy without immunotherapy was 17.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 14.9-19.5 months]. For second-line therapies, mOS was 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.5-11.3 months) for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and 6.4 months (95% CI, 5.1-8.1 months) for docetaxel ± ramucirumab. In a subset of patients treated with ICI in the second-line or later setting, median RECIST PFS (2.5 months; 95% CI, 2.2-2.8) and median real-world PFS based on imaging reports (2.2 months; 95% CI, 1.7-2.6) were similar. In exploratory analysis of the impact of tumor mutational burden (TMB) on survival on ICI treatment in the second-line or higher setting, TMB z-score harmonized across gene panels was associated with improved OS (univariable HR, 0.85; P = 0.03; n = 247 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The GENIE BPC cohort provides comprehensive clinicogenomic data for patients with NSCLC, which can improve understanding of real-world patient outcomes.

Clinical Benefit From Immunotherapy in Patients With SCLC Is Associated With Tumor Capacity for Antigen Presentation.

INTRODUCTION: A small percentage of patients with SCLC experience durable responses to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Defining determinants of immune response may nominate strategies to broaden the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with SCLC. Prior studies have been limited by small numbers or concomitant chemotherapy administration. METHODS: CheckMate 032, a multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 trial evaluating nivolumab alone or with ipilimumab was the largest study of ICB alone in patients with SCLC. We performed comprehensive RNA sequencing of 286 pretreatment SCLC tumor samples, assessing outcome on the basis of defined SCLC subtypes (SCLC-A, -N, -P, and -Y), and expression signatures associated with durable benefit, defined as progression-free survival more than or equal to 6 months. Potential biomarkers were further explored by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: None of the subtypes were associated with survival. Antigen presentation machinery signature (p = 0.000032) and presence of more than or equal to 1% infiltrating CD8+ T cells by immunohistochemistry (hazard ratio = 0.51, 95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.95) both correlated with survival in patients treated with nivolumab. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed the association between durable benefit from immunotherapy and antigen processing and presentation. Analysis of epigenetic determinants of antigen presentation identified LSD1 gene expression as a correlate of worse survival outcomes for patients treated with either nivolumab or the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor antigen processing and presentation is a key correlate of ICB efficacy in patients with SCLC. As antigen presentation machinery is frequently epigenetically suppressed in SCLC, this study defines a targetable mechanism by which we might improve clinical benefit of ICB for patients with SCLC.

Molecular Biomarkers of Disease Outcomes and Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to First-Line Osimertinib in Advanced EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancers.

INTRODUCTION: Preferred first-line treatment for patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung cancer is osimertinib, yet it is not known whether patient outcomes may be improved by identifying and intervening on molecular markers associated with therapeutic resistance. METHODS: All patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung cancer treated with first-line osimertinib at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (n = 327) were identified. Available pretreatment and postprogression tumor samples underwent targeted gene panel sequencing and mutational signature analysis using SigMA algorithm. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Using multivariate analysis, baseline atypical EGFR (median PFS = 5.8 mo, p < 0.001) and concurrent TP53/RB1 alterations (median PFS = 10.5 mo, p = 0.015) were associated with shorter PFS on first-line osimertinib. Of 95 patients with postprogression biopsies, acquired resistance mechanisms were identified in 52% (off-target, n = 24; histologic transformation, n = 14; on-target, n = 12), with MET amplification (n = 9), small cell lung transformation (n = 7), and acquired EGFR amplification (n = 7), the most frequently identified mechanisms. Although there was no difference in postprogression survival on the basis of identified resistance (p = 0.07), patients with subsequent second-line therapy tailored to postprogression biopsy results had improved postprogression survival (hazard ratio = 0.09, p = 0.006). The paired postprogression tumors had higher tumor mutational burden (p = 0.008) and further dominant APOBEC mutational signatures (p = 0.07) compared with the pretreatment samples. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer treated with first-line osimertinib have improved survival with treatment adaptation on the basis of identified mechanisms of resistance at time of progression using tissue-based genomic analysis. Further survival gains may be achieved using risk-based treatment adaptation of pretreatment genomic alterations.

Bioinformatically Expanded Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis Optimizes Identification of Therapeutically Relevant MET Copy Number Alterations in >50,000 Tumors.

PURPOSE: Clinical relevance thresholds and laboratory methods are poorly defined for MET amplification, a targetable biomarker across malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in assessing MET copy number alterations was determined in >50,000 solid tumors. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization as reference, we validated and optimized NGS analysis. RESULTS: Incorporating read-depth and focality analyses achieved 91% concordance, 97% sensitivity, and 89% specificity. Tumor heterogeneity, neoplastic cell proportions, and genomic focality affected MET amplification assessment. NGS methodology showed superiority in capturing overall amplification status in heterogeneous tumors and defining amplification focality among other genomic alterations. MET copy gains and amplifications were found in 408 samples across 23 malignancies. Total MET copy number inversely correlated with amplified segment size. High-level/focal amplification was enriched in certain genomic subgroups and associated with targeted therapy response. CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging our integrated bioinformatic approach, targeted therapy benefit was observed across diverse MET amplification contexts.

Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibition as Monotherapy or in Combination With Chemotherapy in Metastatic ROS1-Rearranged Lung Cancers.

INTRODUCTION: ROS1 fusions are oncogenic drivers in 1% to 3% of NSCLCs. The activity of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy (chemotherapy with ICI [chemo-ICI]) in these tumors and their immunophenotype have not been systematically described. METHODS: In this multi-institutional retrospective study, tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were evaluated in patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. Time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and objective response rate (ORR) (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1) were calculated for patients treated with ICI or chemo-ICI in the metastatic setting. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients were identified. Among 146 assessable cases, PD-L1 expression was less than 1% in 60 (41%), 1% to 49% in 35 (24%), and greater than or equal to 50% in 51 tumors (35%). Of 100 (92%) TMB-assessable tumors, 92 had less than 10 mutations per megabase. TMB was significantly lower for ROS1-rearranged tumors (n = 97) compared with tumors with EGFR (n = 1250) or KRAS alterations (n = 1653) and all other NSCLC tumors (n = 2753) evaluated with Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (median TMB = 2.6 versus 3.5, 7.0, and 6.1 mutations per megabase, p < 0.001). Among patients treated with ICI, median TTD was 2.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-4.2 mo; n = 28) and ORR 13% (2 of 16 RECIST-assessable; 95% CI: 2%-38%). Among patients treated with chemo-ICI, median TTD was 10 months (95% CI: 4.7-14.1 mo; n = 11) and ORR 83% (5 of 6 RECIST-assessable; 95% CI: 36%-100%). There was no difference in PD-L1 expression (p = 0.91) or TMB (p = 0.83) between responders and nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Most ROS1-rearranged NSCLCs have low PD-L1 expression and TMB. The activity of ICI in these tumors is modest. In contrast, chemo-ICI can achieve meaningful activity.

Pilot Study of Dacomitinib for Patients With Metastatic EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancers With Disease Progression After Initial Treatment With Osimertinib.

Patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer have no approved targeted therapies after disease progression on first-line osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Preclinical studies suggest that tumors with both EGFR-sensitizing alteration and acquired second-site EGFR resistance alterations after treatment with osimertinib retain sensitivity to second-generation EGFR TKIs. We hypothesized that dacomitinib, a pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor TKI, may be effective in this setting. METHODS: In this phase II study, patients who had progressed on first-line osimertinib were treated with dacomitinib 45 mg orally daily until disease progression or intolerability. The primary end point was objective response rate. RESULTS: We enrolled 12 patients. Two partial responses were documented (17% objective response rate; 95% CI, 5 to 45). The median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.6 to not reached). One patient with an original sensitizing EGFR G719A mutation and one patient without molecular testing available had partial responses, whereas 0 of the 3 patients with second-site acquired EGFR resistance mutations (two C797S and one G724S) met the response criteria. The patient with EGFR G719A has an ongoing response at 17 months, which exceeds prior time on osimertinib (11 months). CONCLUSION: In the first trial evaluating a second-generation EGFR TKI after first-line third-generation osimertinib, we found that dacomitinib after disease progression on osimertinib has limited benefit.

Response to Standard Therapies and Comprehensive Genomic Analysis for Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma with EGFR Exon 20 Insertions.

PURPOSE: EGFR exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) are an uncommon genotype in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for which targeted therapies are under development. We sought to describe treatment outcomes and genomic and immunophenotypic characteristics of these tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We identified sequential patients with NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins and compared their clinical outcomes and pathologic features with other patients with NSCLC. RESULTS: Among 6,290 patients with NSCLC, 106 (2%) had EGFR ex20ins. Patients with EGFR ex20ins were more likely to be Black (14% vs. 6%; P < 0.001) or Asian (22% vs. 10%; P < 0.001) compared with all other patients with NSCLC. Median tumor mutational burden (TMB; 3.5 vs. 5.9; P < 0.001) and proportion of tumors with PD-L1 expression ≥1% (22% vs. 60%; P < 0.001) were lower in EGFR ex20ins compared with other NSCLCs (TMB, n = 5,851 and PD-L1 expression, n = 282) and EGFR del 19/L858R (median TMB, 3.5; P = 0.001 and 39% PD-L1 ≥ 1%; P = 0.02). Compared with a 2:1 cohort of patients with metastatic NSCLC without targetable alterations (n = 192), EGFR ex20ins patients had longer overall survival (median 20 vs. 12 months; HR, 0.56; P = 0.007) and longer time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) for platinum chemotherapy (median, 7 vs. 4 months; HR, 0.6; P = 0.02) and no improvement in TTD for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI; HR, 1.75; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: With better outcomes on platinum chemotherapy, patients with EGFR ex20ins NSCLC have improved prognosis, lower PD-L1 expression and TMB, and derive less benefit from ICIs compared with patients with NSCLC without targetable oncogenes. Improving molecularly targeted therapies could provide greater benefit for patients with EGFR ex20ins.

Spectrum of Mechanisms of Resistance to Crizotinib and Lorlatinib in ROS1 Fusion-Positive Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Current standard initial therapy for advanced, ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase fusion (ROS1)-positive (ROS1+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crizotinib or entrectinib. Lorlatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase/ROS1 inhibitor, recently demonstrated efficacy in ROS1+ NSCLC, including in crizotinib-pretreated patients. However, mechanisms of lorlatinib resistance in ROS1+ disease remain poorly understood. Here, we assessed mechanisms of resistance to crizotinib and lorlatinib. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Biopsies from patients with ROS1 + NSCLC progressing on crizotinib or lorlatinib were profiled by genetic sequencing. RESULTS: From 55 patients, 47 post-crizotinib and 32 post-lorlatinib biopsies were assessed. Among 42 post-crizotinib and 28 post-lorlatinib biopsies analyzed at distinct timepoints, ROS1 mutations were identified in 38% and 46%, respectively. ROS1 G2032R was the most commonly occurring mutation in approximately one third of cases. Additional ROS1 mutations included D2033N (2.4%) and S1986F (2.4%) post-crizotinib and L2086F (3.6%), G2032R/L2086F (3.6%), G2032R/S1986F/L2086F (3.6%), and S1986F/L2000V (3.6%) post-lorlatinib. Structural modeling predicted ROS1L2086F causes steric interference to lorlatinib, crizotinib, and entrectinib, while it may accommodate cabozantinib. In Ba/F3 models, ROS1L2086F, ROS1G2032R/L2086F, and ROS1S1986F/G2032R/L2086F were refractory to lorlatinib but sensitive to cabozantinib. A patient with disease progression on crizotinib and lorlatinib and ROS1 L2086F received cabozantinib for nearly 11 months with disease control. Among lorlatinib-resistant biopsies, we also identified MET amplification (4%), KRAS G12C (4%), KRAS amplification (4%), NRAS mutation (4%), and MAP2K1 mutation (4%). CONCLUSIONS: ROS1 mutations mediate resistance to crizotinib and lorlatinib in more than one third of cases, underscoring the importance of developing next-generation ROS1 inhibitors with potency against these mutations, including G2032R and L2086F. Continued efforts are needed to elucidate ROS1-independent resistance mechanisms.

Decade in review: a new era for RET-rearranged lung cancers.

Targeted therapy has become the standard of care for non-small cell lung cancers with a range of targetable alterations, including ALK and ROS1 kinase fusions. RET fusions drive the oncogenesis of 1-2% of NSCLCs and represent a substantial global burden of disease. Although these fusions were first identified more than thirty years ago, targeted therapy for RET fusion-positive lung cancers was only explored in the last decade. Whereas repurposed multikinase inhibitors were initially tested, selective inhibitors RET inhibitors have dramatically improved outcomes for patients whose tumors harbor these alterations. In 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration approved selpercatinib, a selective RET inhibitor, for adults with lung and thyroid cancers with RET rearrangements or mutations, making it the first targeted therapy to be approved for RET-altered cancers. While resistance to selective RET inhibition has been described, next-generation RET inhibitors are already being explored for patients who progress on prior RET kinase inhibitors.

Fewer actionable mutations but higher tumor mutational burden characterizes NSCLC in black patients at an urban academic medical center.

Background: Black patients have been historically underrepresented in studies investigating molecular patterns in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to investigate differences in actionable mutations among patients at our urban, diverse medical center. Results: 146 patients were included (59 black, 76 white, 7 Asian, 3 Hispanic, 1 mixed). 35 patients had a targetable mutation. Seven black patients (11.8%) had a targetable mutation compared to 28 non-black patients (32.2%, p = 0.005). 15 black patients had PD-L1 expression ≥50% compared to 19 non-black (25.4% vs 21.8%, p = 0.69). Black patients had a higher TMB compared to non-black (15.3 mutations/Mb compared to 11.5 mutations/Mb, p = 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, TMB was driven by smoking (p < 0.01), without any additive interaction in black patients who smoke (p = 0.8). Conclusion: NSCLC tumors from black patients had a higher TMB and were less likely to carry a targetable mutation. The higher TMB seen was driven by a higher prevalence of smoking among black patients in our study, which may not reflect nationwide trends. Our results serve as a proof of concept that differences in molecular markers exist between black and non-black patients, and that these differences may impact the treatment options available to black patients. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients with a diagnosis of NSCLC who underwent both PD-L1 testing and massively parallel sequencing (UCM-OncoPlus) was conducted. We examined whether high PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and presence of targetable mutations (EGFR, BRAF, ERBB2, RET or ALK translocations, ROS1 rearrangements) occur at different frequencies in tumors from black patients compared to non-black patients.

Afatinib Activity in Platinum-Refractory Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients With ERBB Alterations.

PURPOSE: Somatic mutations and copy number variation in the ERBB family are frequent in urothelial carcinoma (UC) and may represent viable therapeutic targets. We studied whether afatinib (an oral, irreversible inhibitor of the ErbB family) has activity in UC and if specific ERBB molecular alterations are associated with clinical response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II trial, patients with metastatic platinum-refractory UC received afatinib 40 mg/day continuously until progression or intolerance. The primary end point was 3-month progression-free survival (PFS3). Prespecified tumor analysis for alterations in EGFR, HER2, ERBB3, and ERBB4 was conducted. RESULTS: The first-stage enrollment goal of 23 patients was met. Patient demographic data included: 78% male, median age 67 years (range, 36 to 82 years), hemoglobin < 10 g/dL in 17%, liver metastases in 30%, median time from prior chemotherapy of 3.6 months, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1 in 100%. No unexpected toxicities were observed; two patients required dose reduction for grade 3 fatigue and rash. Overall, five of 23 patients (21.7%) met PFS3 (two partial response, three stable disease). Notably, among the 21 tumors analyzed, five of six patients (83.3%) with HER2 and/or ERBB3 alterations achieved PFS3 (PFS = 10.3, 7.0, 6.9, 6.3, and 5.0 months, respectively) versus none of 15 patients without alterations (P < .001). Three of four patients with HER2 amplification and three of three patients with ERBB3 somatic mutations (G284R, V104M, and R103G) met PFS3. One patient with both HER2 amplification and ERBB3 mutation never progressed on therapy, but treatment was discontinued after 10.3 months as a result of depressed ejection fraction. The median time to progression/discontinuation was 6.6 months in patients with HER2/ERBB3 alterations versus 1.4 months in patients without alterations (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Afatinib demonstrated significant activity in patients with platinum-refractory UC with HER2 or ERBB3 alterations. The potential contribution of ERBB3 to afatinib sensitivity is novel. Afatinib deserves further investigation in molecularly selected UC.