RESUMO
The COVID-19 pandemic has devastated the global community and continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. The development of effective vaccines has represented a major step towards reducing transmission and illness severity but significant challenges remain, particularly in regions where vaccine access has been limited. COVID-19 is associated with hypercoagulability and increased risk of thrombosis, with greatest risk among the critically ill. Interestingly, early observational data suggested that anticoagulant therapy might improve clinical outcomes, aside from thrombotic events, in patients with COVID-19. In this review we summarise data generated from three published randomised clinical trials which have sought to determine the effect of therapeutic heparin anticoagulation on efficacy and safety outcomes in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: the multiplatform REMAP-CAP, ACTIV-4a and ATTACC randomised controlled trials and the RAPID trial. In the multiplatform REMAP-CAP, ACTIV-4a and ATTACC randomised controlled trials, therapeutic heparin was not associated with benefit in critically ill patients with COVID-19 compared with usual care (adjusted proportional odds ratio (OR) for increased organ-support free days up to day 21: 0.83; 95% credible interval, 0.67-1.03, posterior probability of futility 99.9%). Conversely, among hospitalised patients without critical illness, therapeutic heparin was associated with an increased probability of organ support-free days alive (adjusted OR, 1.27; 95% credible interval, 1.03-1.58). The RAPID trial also evaluated the effect of therapeutic heparin compared with prophylactic heparin in non-critically ill patients. In this study, therapeutic heparin did not significantly reduce the odds of the primary composite outcome (death, mechanical ventilation or intensive care unit admission) (OR 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 1.10; p = 0.12) but was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality [OR, 0.22 (95%-CI, 0.07 to 0.65)]. Collectively these studies suggest that therapeutic anticoagulation with heparin may reduce the severity of illness and potentially even confer a survival benefit in hospitalised, non-critically ill patients with COVID-19. No benefit for therapeutic anticoagulation with heparin was evident in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Therefore, while the results of additional studies in this evolving field are pending, it is important to approach decisions regarding therapeutic heparin in moderately ill hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in a measured and individualised manner.
RESUMO
Aim The aim of this study is to assess the impact of EBUS on the concordance of clinical and pathological NSCLC staging in our center. Methods Data was collected retrospectively from the hospital database regarding patients who underwent surgical resection for early stage NSCLC between 2012 and 2017. Results A total of 251 patients were included. The mean age was 67 (±9), 55% (n=137) were male and 83% (n=209) were current/former smokers. In group A (n=154, 61%) clinical nodal stage (cN) was established from a combination of CT, PET CT and mediastinoscopy. Group B underwent additional EBUS (n=97, 39%). cN and pathological nodal staging (pN) were concordant in 78% (n=120) in group A versus 62% (n=60) in group B (p=0.009). Conclusion This study demonstrated higher rates of nodal discordance in patients who underwent EBUS which contrasts existing data that demonstrates improved concordance with EBUS. We describe these findings and potential explanations further in this study.
