Cost-effectiveness of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Versus Open Surgical Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the lifetime cost-effectiveness of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) in the Netherlands, based on recently published literature. METHODS: A model was developed to simulate a cohort of individuals (age 72 years, 87% men) with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter of at least 5.5 cm and considered fit for both repairs. The model consisted of two sub-models that estimated the lifetime cost-effectiveness of EVAR versus OSR: (1) a decision tree for the first 30 post-operative days; and (2) a Markov model for the period thereafter (31 days-30 years). RESULTS: In the base case analysis, EVAR was slightly more effective (4.704 vs. 4.669 quality adjusted life years) and less expensive (€24,483 vs. €25,595) than OSR. Improved effectiveness occurs because EVAR can reduce 30 day mortality risk, as well as the risk of events following the procedure, while lower costs are primarily due to a reduction in length of hospital stay. The cost-effectiveness of EVAR is highly dependent on the price of the EVAR device and the reduction in hospital stay, complications, and 30 day mortality. CONCLUSION: EVAR and OSR can be considered equally effective, while EVAR can be cost saving compared with OSR. EVAR can therefore be considered as a cost-effective solution for patients with AAAs.

Beneficial Effects of Pre-operative Exercise Therapy in Patients with an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The impact of post-operative complications in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery is substantial, and increases with age and concomitant co-morbidities. This systematic review focuses on the possible effects of pre-operative exercise therapy (PET) in patients with AAA on post-operative complications,aerobic capacity, physical fitness, and recovery. METHODS: A systematic search on PET prior to AAA surgery was conducted. The methodological quality of the included studies was rated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. The agreement between the reviewers was assessed with Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Five studies were included, with a methodological quality ranging from moderate to good. Cohen's kappa was 0.79. Three studies focused on patients with an AAA (without indication for surgical repair) with physical fitness as the outcome measure. One study focused on PET in patients awaiting AAA surgery and one study focused on the effects of PET on post-operative complications, length of stay, and recovery. CONCLUSION: PET has beneficial effects on various physical fitness variables of patients with an AAA. Whether this leads to less complications or faster recovery remains unclear. In view of the large impact of post-operative complications, it is valuable to explore the possible benefits of a PET program in AAA surgery.

Editor's choice--Use of disposable radiation-absorbing surgical drapes results in significant dose reduction during EVAR procedures.

OBJECTIVES: Because of the increasing number of interventional endovascular procedures with fluoroscopy and the corresponding high annual dose for interventionalists, additional dose-protecting measures are desirable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of disposable radiation-absorbing surgical drapes in reducing scatter radiation exposure for interventionalists and supporting staff during an endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedure. MATERIALS: This was a randomized control trial in which 36 EVAR procedures were randomized between execution with and without disposable radiation-absorbing surgical drapes (Radpad: Worldwide Innovations & Technologies, Inc., Kansas City, US, type 5511A). Dosimetric measurements were performed on the interventionalist (hand and chest) and theatre nurse (chest) with and without the use of the drapes to obtain the dose reduction and effect on the annual dose caused by the drapes. RESULTS: Use of disposable radiation-absorbing surgical drapes resulted in dose reductions of 49%, 55%, and 48%, respectively, measured on the hand and chest of the interventionalist and the chest of the theatre nurse. CONCLUSIONS: The use of disposable radiation-absorbing surgical drapes significantly reduces scatter radiation exposure for both the interventionalist and the supporting staff during EVAR procedures.

No differences in perioperative outcome between symptomatic and asymptomatic AAAs after EVAR: an analysis from the ENGAGE Registry.

AIM: This study aimed to compare the differences in perioperative outcome after endovascular repair of symptomatic abdominal aneurysms (S-AAAs) and elective non-symptomatic AAAs (E-AAAs). Data from the ENGAGE Registry were used for the analysis. METHODS: Between March 2009 and December 2010, 1200 AAA patients were enrolled from 79 sites in 30 countries and treated with an Endurant Stent Graft. S-AAAs defined as AAAs accompanied by abdominal or back pain, without rupture, were present in 185 (15.4%) patients and E-AAAs in 1015 (84.6%) patients. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare results. RESULTS: At baseline, E-AAA patients had larger aneurysms on average (P = 0.006) and scored higher ASA classification more often (P = 0.001). Further analyses were corrected for baseline differences. Operation time and technical success were comparable, and S-AAAs were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) as often as E-AAAs (35.7% vs. 33.4%, P = 0.479). Post-operative hospitalisation was similar (4.83 ± 5.29 in E-AAAs and 4.37 ± 3.49 in S-AAAs, P = 0.360). No differences in the occurrence of major adverse events, including mortality, within the 30-day post-implantation were seen between S-AAA and E-AAA patients, respectively, 3.2% and 4.2% (P = 0.572). CONCLUSION: With contemporary devices and technical proficiency, there is no difference in outcome between symptomatic AAA and elective non-symptomatic AAA patients if treated with endovascular techniques.

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in women.

The objective of this review is to establish the role of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in women. A step by step approach is taken looking at sex and gender differences in epidemiology, pathogenesis and natural history. We then proceed to discuss the results from the three randomized controlled trials comparing EVAR to open repair. Finally, sex-specific secondary prevention, risk factor management and medication, is discussed. Women seem to have higher mortality and more complications after EVAR. Risk factors such as diabetes and hypertension are associated with worse outcome in women compared to men. The role of EVAR in women is poorly investigated and its definite role remains to be determined. Aggressive treatment of risk factors and the optimisation of medication in women are indicated and deserve more attention in clinical practice and future research.

[Peripheral artery disease: clinical and cost comparison between duplex ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography--a multicenter randomized trial]. / De kosten en de effecten van magnetischeresonantieangiografie en duplexechografie bij patiënten met perifeer arterieel vaatlijden: een multicentrische gerandomiseerde studie.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical and economic consequences of replacing duplex ultrasonography (DUS) by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) for the initial diagnostic work-up of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). DESIGN: Randomised multicentre study. METHOD: In the period from January 2002 to August 2003, consecutive patients with PAD were randomly assigned to CE-MRA or DUS. The primary outcome measure was the costs. Secondary outcome measures included the confidence with which the specialist could take a therapeutic decision on the basis of the imaging study, the change in disease severity, and the change in quality of life (QOL) assessed during 6 months of follow-up. In addition, all costs of imaging, therapeutic interventions and outpatient visits were calculated. RESULTS: After 6 months of follow-up the data on 352 patients were analysed. Use of CE-MRA reduced the number of additional vascular-imaging procedures by 42% ((69-40)/69) and the specialists felt more confident about their therapeutic decisions. The diagnostic costs of all imaging studies taken together were Euro 167,- higher, on average, in the CE-MRA group (p < 0.001). However, after 6 months of follow-up, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups with regard to the change in disease severity, the QOL, or the total costs (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, a specialist that replaces DUS by CE-MRA will feel more confident about taking a therapeutic decision and will feel less need for additional imaging. However, the diagnostic costs were higher with CE-MRA.

Does endovascular aortic aneurysm repair justify a reduced cardiology work-up?

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) has been introduced as an alternative to open surgery with the purpose of reducing operative risk and improving survival. Since cardiac co-morbidity is a major risk factor for both the operative procedure and long-term survival, it seems worthwhile to compare the cardiac implication of the 2 procedures. If EVAR would indeed afford a cardioprotective effect, this could have clinical consequences. Preoperative cardiology work-up could be reduced and more high-risk patients could be treated. A review of the literature has been made focusing on studies that examined cardiology work-up and cardiac risk profile of EVAR and open surgery. Most literature data suggest that cardiac risk is indeed reduced with EVAR, since hemodynamic alterations are less severe, episodes of anaemia are less frequent, plasma catecholamine levels are lower and general anaesthesia can be avoided. There is no level I or II evidence that immediate or late cardiac complications are indeed reduced with EVAR. At present, there are not enough literature data on the cardiac implications of EVAR to justify a reduced preoperative cardiology work-up. Even if conclusive evidence was available that EVAR reduces operative cardiac risk, the value of preoperative cardiac screening and myocardial revascularisation would remain unchanged: the purpose of cardiology work-up is not only to reduce operative risk but also to improve long-term survival.