Hazard Perception in Visually Impaired Drivers Who Use Bioptic Telescopes.

Purpose: Bioptic telescopic spectacles can allow individuals with central vision impairment to obtain or maintain driving privileges. The purpose of this study was to (1) compare hazard perception ability among bioptic drivers and traditionally licensed controls, (2) assess the impact of bioptic telescopic spectacles on hazard perception in drivers with vision impairment, and (3) analyze the relationships among vision and hazard detection in bioptic drivers. Methods: Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and visual field were measured for each participant. All drivers completed the Driving Habits Questionnaire. Hazard perception testing was conducted using commercially available first-person video driving clips. Subjects signaled when they could first identify a traffic hazard requiring a change of speed or direction. Bioptic drivers were tested with and without their bioptic telescopes in alternating blocks. Hazard detection times for each clip were converted to z-scores, converted back to seconds using the average response time across all videos, and then compared among conditions. Results: Twenty-one bioptic drivers and 21 normally sighted controls participated in the study. The hazard response time of bioptic drivers was improved when able to use the telescope (5.4 ± 1.4 seconds vs 6.3 ± 1.8 seconds without telescope); however, it remained significantly longer than for controls (4.0 ± 1.4 seconds). Poorer visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and superior visual field sensitivity loss were related to longer hazard response times. Conclusions: Drivers with central vision loss had improved hazard response times with the use of bioptic telescopic spectacles, although their responses were still slower than normally sighted control drivers. Translational Relevance: The use of a bioptic telescope by licensed, visually impaired drivers improves their hazard detection speed on a video-based task, lending support to their use on the road.

Insights Regarding Optometric Findings of CHARGE Syndrome in a Pediatric Low Vision Clinic.

SIGNIFICANCE: CHARGE, named for common findings-coloboma, heart defects, atresia of choanae, retardation of growth and development, genital hypoplasia, and ear anomalies-is a frequent etiology of deaf-blindness. A retrospective review in a pediatric low vision clinic presented the opportunity to investigate ocular findings in this syndrome with variable clinical presentations. PURPOSE: This retrospective study reviewed ocular findings and visual function measures from low vision evaluations of patients with CHARGE syndrome, which may influence their multidisciplinary management. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted by three examiners of 60 patients presenting with CHARGE syndrome at a pediatric low vision clinic. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were obtained using standard measures. Ocular alignment and cycloplegic refractive error measurements were recorded. Refractive findings were analyzed using vector analysis. Anterior and posterior segment findings were recorded. RESULTS: Patients ranged in age from 1 to 29 years and were followed up for a mean of 4.3 years. Best-corrected visual acuity ranged from no light perception to 20/20 Snellen equivalent. Characteristics of strabismus, occurring in 82% of patients, were reported. Contrast sensitivity was reduced in 52% of patients. Chorioretinal colobomas were reported in 88% of patients. The most common ocular findings included nystagmus (43%), microphthalmia (27%), iris coloboma (27%), and facial nerve palsy (23%). Refractive vector analysis revealed significant myopic progression of the spherical equivalent with age and a tendency for with-the-rule astigmatism and minimal obliquity. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective review of a relatively large sample size for this rare condition outlined the most common ocular manifestations of CHARGE syndrome. Decreased visual acuity, myopic refractive error, strabismus, and reduced contrast sensitivity were common. Thus, careful optometric evaluation in this population is required, as these findings must be considered in appropriate clinical and habilitative management.

Use and Perceptions of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems by Older Drivers With and Without Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Purpose: Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) have been reported to improve the safety of elderly and normally sighted drivers. The purpose of this study was to assess exposure to, perceived safety of, comfort level with, and interest in using ADAS among drivers with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: Current drivers aged 60+ years were recruited at four US sites to complete a survey about ADAS and driving habits. Frequency of use and/or perceptions of eight ADAS were investigated. An avoidance score was generated using questions about difficult driving situations. Results: The survey was completed by 166 participants (80 with AMD vs. 86 without). Participants with AMD had worse self-rated vision than those without (34% vs. 2% poor or fair rating), and drove fewer weekly miles (median [interquartile range [IQR] 30 [15 to 75] vs. 60 [30 to 121] miles, P = 0.002). Participants with AMD reported more avoidance of difficult driving situations (P < 0.001). There was no difference in the number of ADAS used by AMD status (median [IQR for AMD = 2.5 [1 to 5] vs. 3 [2 to 4] without, P = 0.87). Greater reported number of ADAS used was associated with less avoidance of difficult situations (P = 0.02). The majority perceived improved safety with most ADAS. Conclusions: Many drivers with AMD utilize common ADAS, which subjectively improve their road safety and may help to reduce self-imposed restrictions for difficult situations and mileage. Translational Relevance: Drivers with AMD are adopting readily available ADAS, for which they reported potential benefits, such as safety and less restrictive driving.