Melphalan in regional chemotherapy for locally recurrent metastatic melanoma.

In-transit metastases occur in approximately 3% of melanoma patients, can be very symptomatic and survival in this group may be prolonged. Regional chemotherapy with melphalan delivered by isolated limb perfusion (ILP) or isolated limb infusion (ILI) are effective treatment options which are generally well tolerated. ILI is a less invasive and simpler alternative to ILP. ILI is tolerated better than ILP, though is probably less effective. Complete response rates are 45- 69% for ILP and 23-44% for ILI. The limb is often warmed to lower temperatures in ILI compared to ILP and the limb becomes progressively more hypoxic and acidotic during ILI, each of these parameters potentially having an effect on outcome. ILP & ILI are used primarily as palliative options when excision of in-transit metastases is unfeasible but can be used as an adjunctive procedure to surgery, for other tumour types such as merkel cell carcinoma, and can be repeated if indicated. For ILI correction of melphalan dose for ideal body weight has been shown to substantially decrease the rates of severe local toxicity while maintaining complete response rates, but overall response rate is reduced. Combination treatment with tumour necrosis factor α has been used with variable outcomes and new combinations with buthionine sulfoximine and ADH-1 are being investigated.

Erectile dysfunction in patients with psoriasis: increased prevalence, an unmet need, and a chance to intervene.

BACKGROUND: Male erectile dysfunction (ED) is common, frequently caused by pelvic arterial atherosclerosis, and is a predictor of future cardiovascular disease. There is an emerging association between psoriasis, the metabolic syndrome and atherosclerotic disease. We hypothesized that ED occurs more commonly in patients with psoriasis, at least in part due to incipient atherosclerosis, which may offer an opportunity for early intervention. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of, and risk factors for, ED in patients with psoriasis in comparison with a heterogeneous dermatology outpatient control group. METHODS: We conducted a pilot study with a prospective observational cross-sectional design, recruiting consecutive adult male dermatology outpatients diagnosed with psoriasis or any other skin condition. Sexually active participants completed a questionnaire, a Dermatology Life Quality Index and the validated five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). RESULTS: Fifty-three of 92 (58%) patients with psoriasis recorded an IIEF-5 score indicative of ED, compared with 64 of 130 (49%) control patients, reflecting an age-adjusted odds ratio of 2·007 (95% confidence interval 1·088-3·701; P = 0·026). A multivariable logistic regression model indicated that increasing age and hypertension, but not a diagnosis of psoriasis, were independent risk factors for ED in our study population. CONCLUSIONS: We present the largest survey of ED in patients with skin disease, and the first to posit the potential link between psoriasis, ED and atherosclerosis. We suggest that an assessment of sexual function should be part of the routine holistic care provided for dermatology outpatients, and highlight the need to screen for cardiovascular risk factors in those with documented ED.