Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Canakinumab in Patients With Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Periodic Syndrome: Results From a Phase III Trial.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed at assessing efficacy, safety, and tolerability of canakinumab in patients with tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) during a 72-week long-term, open-label extension of the CLUSTER study. METHODS: Patients received open-label canakinumab 150 or 300 mg, either every 4 weeks (q4w) or every 8 weeks, with up-titration permitted after on-treatment flares (maximum dose: 300 mg q4w). Efficacy assessments included physician global assessment of disease activity, number of flares, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A protein (SAA) levels. Adverse events were also reported. Results are described for the overall population and according to the cumulative dose of canakinumab adjusted for body weight (<36 mg/kg or ≥36 mg/kg). RESULTS: Of 53 patients entering the final phase (epoch 4) of CLUSTER, 51 completed the treatment. At the end of epoch 4, >94% of patients achieved no or minimal disease activity. Most patients had either no (69.8%) or one flare (24.5%), whereas at baseline, the median number of flares was 9.0 per year. Median CRP levels remained at <10 mg/L. Median SAA concentrations were largely unchanged, with medians of 11.5 mg/L and 14.5 mg/L in the <36 mg/kg and ≥36 mg/kg groups, respectively, at the end of the study. No unexpected safety findings were identified. CONCLUSION: Control of disease activity, with low flare incidence, was maintained with long-term canakinumab treatment in patients with TRAPS during the 72-week final epoch of the CLUSTER study, with no new safety findings.

Long-term efficacy and safety of canakinumab in patients with mevalonate kinase deficiency: results from the randomised Phase 3 CLUSTER trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of canakinumab in patients with mevalonate kinase deficiency during the open label extension (weeks 41-113) of the randomized controlled CLUSTER trial. METHODS: During a 72-week period, patients received open-label canakinumab 150 or 300 mg, every 4 or 8 weeks. The disease activity was evaluated every 8 weeks using physician global assessment and counting the number of flares. Concentrations of CRP and serum amyloid A protein were measured. The safety was studied by determination and classification of observed adverse events. The safety and efficacy were analysed separately in three subgroups of patients receiving a cumulative dose of less than <35 mg/kg, ≥35 to <70 mg/kg or ≥70 mg/kg. RESULTS: Of the 74 patients who started the CLUSTER study, 66 entered Epoch 4 and 65 completed it. During the 72-week period, 42 (64%) patients experienced no flares, while 13 (20%) had one flare, as compared with a median of 12 flares per year reported at baseline. Low physician global assessment scores were seen at the end of the study for all groups with >90% reporting minimal disease activity or none at all. Median CRP concentrations were consistently equal or lower than 10 mg/l, while median serum amyloid A concentrations remained only slightly above the normal range of 10 mg/l. The study showed no new or unexpected adverse events. CONCLUSION: Canakinumab proved effective to control disease activity and prevent flares in mevalonate kinase deficiency during the 72-week study period. No new safety concerns were reported. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02059291. https://clinicaltrials.gov.

Burden of illness in hereditary periodic fevers: a multinational observational patient diary study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterise the burden of illness of patients with inadequately controlled hereditary periodic fevers (HPFs), during and outside of flares. It was focused on the burden to the patients and also considered the wider impact on their caregivers and families. METHODS: The target population was patients or caregivers of patients with clinically/genetically confirmed colchicine resistant FMF (crFMF), mevalonate kinase deficiency/hyperimmunoglobinaemia D with periodic fever syndrome (MKD/HIDS) or TRAPS, who were expected to flare at least once in a 6-month period based on patient history. Disease burden was captured during and between flares using an electronic diary (e-diary) with questions on patient functioning, emotional/social well-being and pain, using validated instruments. RESULTS: HPF-related symptoms such as fever, joint, muscle or bone pain and tiredness and fatigue were reported by patients both during and outside of a flare. The SF-10 Health Survey (SF-10v2) (paediatric patients) and SF-12 Health Survey (SF-12v2) (adult patients) showed that flares negatively impacted patients' psychosocial and physical health. Negative effect of on-flare status on health utility index score assessed by the Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) was significant only for crFMF patients. Furthermore, the Sheehan Disability Score (SDSv3) showing the on-flare status resulted in significant functional impairment in all 3 disease cohorts through assessment of impact on work/school, social and family life. CONCLUSIONS: crFMF, MKD/HIDS and TRAPS negatively affected the quality of life (QoL) of adult and paediatric patients, including their physical, mental, psychosocial health, and social functioning. There remains, however, a high number of unmet needs for these patients to reduce their disease burden.

Long-term efficacy and safety of canakinumab in patients with colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever: results from the randomised phase III CLUSTER trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of canakinumab to treat patients with colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever (crFMF) during Epoch 4 (weeks 41 to 113) of the CLUSTER study. METHODS: Patients received open-label canakinumab 150 or 300 mg, every 4 or 8 weeks during a 72-week period. We evaluated disease activity every 8 weeks using the physician global assessment (PGA) of disease activity, counting the number of flares, and measuring concentrations of C reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA). Safety was studied by determination and classification of observed adverse events (AEs). We analysed safety and efficacy separately in two subgroups of patients receiving a cumulative dose of less than 2700 mg, or equal or more than 2700 mg. RESULTS: Of the 61 patients that started the CLUSTER study, 60 entered Epoch 4 and 57 completed it. During the 72-week period, 35/60 (58.3%) patients experienced no flares, and 23/60 (38.3%) had one flare, as compared with a median of 17.5 flares per year reported at baseline. PGA scores indicated no disease activity for the majority of patients throughout the study. Median CRP concentrations were always lower than 10 mg/L, while median SAA concentrations remained over the limit of normal (10 mg/L) but under the 30 mg/L threshold. No new or unexpected AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: crFMF patients treated with canakinumab during 72 weeks experienced a minimal incidence of flares and good control of clinical disease activity, with no new safety concerns reported.

Clinical characteristics and management of chronic spontaneous urticaria in patients refractory to H1-Antihistamines in Asia, Middle-East and Africa: Results from the AWARE-AMAC study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic urticaria (CU) is a condition characterized by recurrent itchy hives and/or angioedema for ≥6 weeks. Most of the data about CU come from western countries with very little information available about CU in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. METHODS: AWARE-AMAC is a 24-month prospective, observational, real-world, non-interventional study in patients aged ≥18 years from Asia, the Middle East, and Africa (AMAC) with CU refractory to H1-antihistamines (H1-AH). The main objective was to describe the real-world experience with CU, including clinical characteristics, presence of angioedema, treatment patterns (shifts between treatment classes and changes within a treatment class), investigator-assessed disease control, and the impact on quality of life. Subgroups of interest were type of CU at Baseline and treatment class (based on 2013 urticaria guidelines). There were no mandatory visits and diagnostic/monitoring procedures additional to routine practice, except the patient diary (7-day Urticaria Activity Score) and patient reported outcome assessments. RESULTS: The focus of the current manuscript is on patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), who formed 98% of the sample. Patients were predominantly female (69.6% female, mean age ± SD 39.8 ± 13.29 years). Time since current diagnosis (Mean ± SD) was 28.6 ± 49.06 months. Amongst patients with CSU, 31.0% had comorbid chronic inducible urticaria (CINDU) and 46.4% had a history of angioedema. 91.9% received H1-AH therapy (±other treatments). The most frequently prescribed treatment classes at Baseline were any/combination of medications, not classified under the other 7 treatment classes, named "Others" (30.5%) followed by, omalizumab (OMA; 23.6%) and second-generation H1-AH monotherapy (sgAH; 15.1%). At Month 12, the most prescribed treatment classes (>15%) for patients were OMA (23.5%) and "Other" (21.3%); 19.7% received "No drug". At Month 24, OMA (22.5%), and "Other" (17.9%) were most frequently prescribed; 28.6% received "No drug". Overall, 79.5% of patients had some type of change in treatment. Over the study period, improvement in self-reported QoL increased, which was mirrored by better disease control. CONCLUSION: In AMAC countries, the non-recommended "Other" treatment class played a major role in the initial management of CU patients. High usage of H1-AH (±other treatments) and OMA was observed. Treatment changes were observed in a majority of patients. Treatment escalation from sgAH was mostly via OMA. Improvement of disease control and QoL was achieved during the study period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Observational study (NA).