MORE EARLY BLEEDS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH BASELINE DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANT LEVELS IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: THE MAS STUDY.

Treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is effective and safe. However, bleeding complications still occur. Whether the measurement of DOAC levels may further improve treatment efficacy and safety is still an open issue. In the "Measure and See" (MAS) Study (#NCT03803579) venous blood was collected 15-30 days after DOAC initiation in AF patients who were then followed for one year to record the occurrence of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. DOAC plasma levels were measured in one laboratory, and results were kept blind to patients and treating doctors. Trough DOAC levels were assessed in 1657 patients [957 (57.7%) and 700 treated with standard and low-dose, respectively]. Fifty bleeding events were recorded during 1606 years of follow-up (3.11% pt/yrs). Fifteen bleeding events (4.97% pt/yrs) occurred in patients with C-trough standardized values in the highest activity class (> 0.50); whereas 35 events (2.69% pt/yrs) occurred in those with values in the two lower classes ( 0.50, p= 0.0401). Increasing DOAC levels and low-dose DOAC use were associated with increased bleeding risk in the first three months of treatment. 19% of patients receiving low doses had standardized activity values in the highest class. More bleeding occurred in patients treated with low (4.3% pt/yrs) than standard (2.2% pt/yrs; p= 0.0160) dose DOAC. Early measurement of DOAC levels in AF patients identified many subjects with high activity levels despite the low doses use and had more bleeding risk during the first 3 months of treatment.

Thrombotic events associated with low baseline direct oral anticoagulant levels in atrial fibrillation: the MAS study.

ABSTRACT: Although effective and safe, treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is still associated with thrombotic complications. Whether the measurement of DOAC levels may improve treatment efficacy is an open issue. We carried out the observational, prospective, multicenter Measure and See (MAS) study. Blood was collected 15 to 30 days after starting DOAC treatment in patients with AF who were followed-up for 1 year. Plasma samples were centralized for DOAC level measurement. Patients' DOAC levels were converted into drug/dosage standardized values to allow a pooled analysis in a time-dependent, competitive-risk model. The measured values were transformed into standardized values (representing the distance of each value from the overall mean) by subtracting the DOAC-specific mean value from the original values and dividing by the standard deviation. Trough and peak DOAC levels were assessed in 1657 and 1303 patients, respectively. In total, 21 thrombotic complications were recorded during 1606 years of follow-up (incidence of 1.31% of patients per year). Of 21 thrombotic events, 17 occurred in patients whose standardized activity levels were below the mean of each DOAC (0); the incidence was the highest (4.82% of patients per year) in patients whose standardized values were in the lowest class (-1.00 or less). Early measurement of DOAC levels in patients with AF allowed us to identify most of the patients who, having low baseline DOAC levels, subsequently developed thrombotic complications. Further studies are warranted to assess whether thrombotic complications may be reduced by measuring baseline DOAC levels and modifying treatment when indicated. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03803579.

Differential effect of direct oral anticoagulants on thrombin generation and fibrinolysis in patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest that direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) may induce different anticoagulant and profibrinolytic responses. We performed a head-to-head comparison of the changes in thrombin generation (TG) parameters and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA)-induced clot lysis produced by different DOAC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We tested 137 plasma samples from patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=72) and venous thromboembolism (n=65) under treatment with apixaban (n=38), edoxaban (n=29), rivaroxaban (n=39), or dabigatran (n=31). TG was evaluated by a fluorometric assay and fibrinolysis by measuring the lysis time of clots exposed to 40 ng/mL t-PA. RESULTS: Trough-to-peak changes of TG parameters, along with correlation analysis, showed that all DOAC prolonged the lag-time in a concentration-dependent fashion. As for the other parameters, anti-factor Xa drugs markedly reduced the thrombin peak and velocity index but had little (rivaroxaban) or no effect on endogenous thrombin potential (ETP); dabigatran, instead, reduced ETP, weakly decreased thrombin peak and did not influence the velocity index, as also inferred from the changes in TG values after neutralisation of dabigatran with idarucizumab. Concerning the profibrinolytic effect of DOAC, intergroup comparison showed that the clot lysis time of dabigatran samples was significantly shorter than that of the apixaban and rivaroxaban samples, at both C-Trough and C-Peak. Moreover, a significant correlation between trough-to-peak changes in drug level and clot lysis time was only observed in the dabigatran group (rho=0.53). Finally, after DOAC removal by DOAC-stop, only dabigatran samples showed a significant increase in lysis time. DISCUSSION: Our data show that dabigatran inhibits TG in a different way than anti-Xa DOAC; moreover, under our conditions, only dabigatran displayed profibrinolytic activity, most likely because of its distinctive effect on the TG curve.

Impact of centrifugation on thrombin generation in healthy subjects and in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants.

INTRODUCTION: Double centrifugation before freezing is recommended before thrombin generation assays (TGA). However, this procedure is not mandatory for routine hemostasis tests, precluding the use of these samples for TGA. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of single and double centrifugation on TGA performed on frozen samples from healthy volunteers (HVs) and patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). METHODS: Forty HVs and 57 patients receiving a DOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) were included in this prospective double-center observational study. Blood was collected into 109 mmol/L citrated tubes and frozen at -70°C before TGA using ST Genesia with STG-DrugScreen reagent. Four pre-analytical conditions were studied: (A) single centrifugation (2000 g, 15 minutes) before freezing; (B) one centrifugation before freezing and another after thawing (2000 g, 15 minutes for both); (C) one centrifugation before freezing(2000 g, 15 minutes) and another after thawing (2000 g, 10 minutes); (D) double centrifugation (2000 g, 15 minutes) before freezing (reference). Centrifugation conditions (A), (B), and (C) were compared with the reference condition (D). Acceptable relative differences were defined at 6%, 8%, and 10% for normalized lag time, endogenous thrombin potential, and peak height, respectively. RESULTS: Centrifugation conditions had a small but acceptable impact on HVs samples, but single centrifugation always resulted in unacceptable reductions in normalized lag times for DOAC samples. A second centrifugation after thawing permitted the recovery of acceptable differences for the three TGA parameters for edoxaban but not for apixaban, rivaroxaban, nor dabigatran. CONCLUSION: Double centrifugation before freezing should remain the recommended pre-analytical condition before TGA.

Prevalence of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: a cross-sectional study.

The association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and venous thrombotic disorders is still unclear. We assessed the association between COVID-19 infection-related pneumonia and proximal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) in a cohort of patients admitted to our hospital during the European outbreak in the front line of Cremona, Lombardy. In a single-center cross-sectional study, all patients hospitalized for more than 5 days in Internal Medicine Department with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia received 2-point compressive ultrasound assessment (CUS) of the leg vein system during a single day. Ninety-four percent of patients received enoxaparin as standard pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. The presence of DVT was defined as incompressibility of popliteal or common femoral vein. Out of 121 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (mean age 71.8, 66.3% males) hospitalized on March 31st, 70 stayed in hospital for over 5 days and 66 of them underwent CUS of deep venous system of the legs. The presence of asymptomatic DVT was found in 9 patients (13.6%). No symptomatic DVT was found. Patients with DVT showed mean age = 75.7 years, mean D-dimer levels = 4.02 ng/ml and all of them received enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis, except one. Computed tomography pulmonary angiogram confirmed pulmonary embolism in five patients. One every seven patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia, hospitalized for more than 5 days, had asymptomatic proximal DVT and half of them had confirmed PE despite standard pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. This observational study suggests the need of an active surveillance through CUS in patients hospitalized with acute SARS-COV-2 and underline the need of a more intense thromboprophylaxis.

Direct oral anticoagulant plasma levels' striking increase in severe COVID-19 respiratory syndrome patients treated with antiviral agents: The Cremona experience.

BACKGROUND: Antiviral drugs are administered in patients with severe COVID-19 respiratory syndrome, including those treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Concomitant administration of antiviral agents has the potential to increase their plasma concentration. A series of patients managed in the Cremona Thrombosis Center were admitted at Cremona Hospital for SARS-CoV-2 and started antiviral drugs without stopping DOAC therapy. DOAC plasma levels were measured in hospital and results compared with those recorded before hospitalization. METHODS: All consecutive patients on DOACs were candidates for administration of antiviral agents (lopinavir, ritonavir, or darunavir). Plasma samples for DOAC measurement were collected 2to 4 days after starting antiviral treatment, at 12 hours from the last dose intake in patients on dabigatran and apixaban, and at 24 hours in those on rivaroxaban and edoxaban. For each patient, C-trough DOAC level, expressed as ng/mL, was compared with the one measured before hospitalization. RESULTS: Of the 1039 patients hospitalized between February 22 and March 15, 2020 with COVID-19 pneumonia and candidates for antiviral therapy, 32 were on treatment with a DOAC. DOAC was stopped in 20 and continued in the remaining 12. On average, C-trough levels were 6.14 times higher during hospitalization than in the pre-hospitalization period. CONCLUSION: DOAC patients treated with antiviral drugs show an alarming increase in DOAC plasma levels. In order to prevent bleeding complications, we believe that physicians should consider withholding DOACs from patients with SARS-CoV-2 and replacing them with alternative parenteral antithrombotic strategies for as long as antiviral agents are deemed necessary and until discharge.

DOAC plasma levels measured by chromogenic anti-Xa assays and HPLC-UV in apixaban- and rivaroxaban-treated patients from the START-Register.

INTRODUCTION: To measure direct factor Xa inhibitor (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) concentrations, dedicated chromogenic anti-Xa assays are recommended as suitable methods to provide rapid drug quantification. Moreover, the high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) is reported as a reliable quantitative technique. We investigated seven anti-Xa assays and an HPLC-UV method for measurement of apixaban and rivaroxaban levels in patients enrolled in the START-Register. METHODS: A total of 127 apixaban and 124 rivaroxaban samples were tested by HPLC-UV and the following anti-Xa assays: Biophen DiXaI and Heparin LRT (Hyphen BioMed), Berichrom and Innovance Heparin (Siemens), STA-Liquid Anti-Xa (Stago Diagnostics), Technochrom anti-Xa (Technoclone), and HemosIL Liquid Anti-Xa (Werfen). Each method was performed in one of the participating laboratories: Bologna, Cremona, Florence, and Padua. RESULTS: Our data confirmed the overestimation of apixaban and rivaroxaban levels by the antithrombin-supplemented anti-Xa method (Berichrom). Performances and reproducibility of the six anti-Xa assays not supplemented with antithrombin and the HPLC-UV method were good, with limits of quantification from 8-39 ng/mL (apixaban) and 15-33 ng/mL (rivaroxaban). The six chromogenic methods showed good concordances with the quantitative HPLC-UV [bias: -26.9-22.3 ng/mL (apixaban), -11.3-18.7 ng/mL (rivaroxaban)]. Higher bias and wider range between limits of agreement were observed at higher concentrations [<100 ng/mL: bias -21.3-4.1 ng/mL (apixaban) and -6.2-3.8 ng/mL (rivaroxaban); >200 ng/mL: bias -42.2-36.8 ng/mL (apixaban) and -20.1-68.9 ng/mL (rivaroxaban)]. CONCLUSION: Overall, the anti-Xa assays not supplemented with antithrombin and the HPLC-UV method proved to be suitable for apixaban and rivaroxaban quantification.

Drug levels and bleeding complications in atrial fibrillation patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants.

Essentials Currently, DOACs are given at fixed doses and do not require laboratory monitoring. Direct oral anticoagulant-specific measurements were performed at trough and peak. Patients who developed bleeding events showed higher DOAC plasma levels at peak. This study suggests the need of a more accurate DOAC dose assessment. BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are administered at fixed dose. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between DOAC C-trough or C-peak plasma levels and bleeding complications in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). METHODS: Five hundred sixty five consecutive naive NVAF patients were enrolled. The DOAC measurements at C-trough and at C-peak (available in 411 patients) were performed at steady state, within the first month of treatment. Major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), and minor bleeding (MinB), occurring during 1 year of follow-up after blood sampling, were recorded. For each DOAC, interval of C-trough and C-peak levels was subdivided into four equal classes and results were attributed to these classes; the median values of results were also calculated. RESULTS: Two hundred eight patients were on apixaban, 185 on dabigatran, and 172 on rivaroxaban. For 1-[qqqdeletezzz] year follow up for all patients, we observed: 19 MB (3.36%), 6 CRNMB (1.06%), and 47 MinB (8.31%). The prevalence of bleeding patients with anticoagulant levels in the upper classes of C-peak activity (II + III + IV) was higher than that in the lowest class. Normalized results of C-peak levels were higher in patients with bleeding than in those without bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding complications during DOAC treatment were more frequent among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with higher C-peak anticoagulant levels. In addition to a previous study that showed an increased risk of thrombotic complications in the patients with low C-trough levels, this study seems to indicate that patients with NVAF on DOACs would need a more accurate definition of their optimal therapeutic window.

Edoxaban plasma levels in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Inter and intra-individual variability, correlation with coagulation screening test and renal function.

BACKGROUND: High inter-individual variability of the anticoagulant plasma levels of the first three direct oral anticoagulants was previously reported. Aims of the present study were to evaluate edoxaban inter and intra-individual variability in patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation and to assess correlation between edoxaban plasma levels and coagulation screening test and renal function. METHODS: From January 31st 2017 to June 30th 2018, a total of 101 NVAF patients were enrolled: 48 patients were on edoxaban 60 mg and 53 on edoxaban 30 mg, once daily. Blood samples were taken at C-trough and at C-peak within the first month (15-25 days) of treatment and then at C-trough each three months. Prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), specific anti-FXa chromogenic test were performed. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. RESULTS: Mean inter-individual variability expressed as overall coefficient of variation (CV%) values was lower at C-peak (CV% = 49) than at C-trough (CV% = 68). Mean CV% intra-individual variability was 26.5. No significant correlation was found between edoxaban plasma levels and CrCl (C-trough r/r2 = -0.007/0.000; C-peak r/r2 = 0.129/0.017). Correlations (r/r2), at C-trough and C-peak, between edoxaban levels and PT and aPTT, were 0.386/0.149-0.922/0.851 and 0.283/0.080-0.567/0.321, respectively. Significant discrepancies between PT or aPTT and edoxaban levels were found. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms also for edoxaban a high inter-individual variability in NVAF patients. PT and aPTT are not useful to measure this drug. As for the other two anti-FXa drugs, the absence of a significant correlation between CrCl and edoxaban plasma levels was observed.

Dabigatran Plasma Measurement to Guide the Management of Acute Bleeding and Thrombotic Complications.

Oral anticoagulant therapy is recommended for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and to prevent stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Until a few years ago, vitamin K antagonists were the only drugs available, but direct oral anticoagulants have recently been introduced into clinical practice for the same clinical indications. Unlike the situation with VKAs, fixed-dose administration was proposed for DOACs, without the necessity for routine laboratory monitoring. However, in clinical practice a high inter-variability in DOAC plasma levels, independently of the type of drug and patient characteristics, was observed and the importance of measuring DOAC anticoagulant activity to support treatment decisions has therefore been recognized. We describe two clinical cases in order to highlight the role and importance of dabigatran-specific measurements to guide patient management in case of major complications. LEARNING POINT: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been used in clinical practice at fixed doses without laboratory monitoring.However, the importance of measuring DOAC anticoagulant activity to support treatment decisions, particularly in emergency conditions, has been recognized.The clinical value of DOAC measurement is highlighted in the two described cases where the anticoagulation level was taken into consideration when deciding on treatment.

Dabigatran but not rivaroxaban or apixaban treatment decreases fibrinolytic resistance in patients with atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Most anticoagulants stimulate fibrinolysis in vitro through mechanisms dependent on and independent of thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI). We evaluated the effect of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban treatment on plasma fibrinolysis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients treated with dabigatran etexilate (n=22), rivaroxaban (n=24) or apixaban (n=22) were studied. Plasma was obtained before (trough) and 2h after drug intake (peak). Fibrinolytic resistance of clots exposed to exogenous tissue plasminogen activator was significantly lower in peak than in trough samples and correlated with drug concentration only in dabigatran group. Moreover, fibrinolytic resistance at peak was lower in dabigatran than in rivaroxaban and apixaban groups. This difference disappeared if the TAFI pathway was inhibited. Thrombin generation and TAFI activation were markedly lower in peak than in trough samples in all three groups. However, TAFIa levels in trough and peak samples were significantly lower in dabigatran group than in rivaroxaban and apixaban groups. Circulating levels of prothrombin fragment F1+2 (reflecting in vivo thrombin generation) and plasmin-antiplasmin complex (reflecting plasmin generation) were not or barely influenced by drug levels in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that dabigatran, contrary to rivaroxaban and apixaban, reduces fibrinolytic resistance by virtue of its greater impact on TAFI activation. The profibrinolytic effect of dabigatran may play a role locally, at sites of fibrin formation, by making the nascent thrombus more susceptible to plasminogen-dependent degradation.

Plasma levels of direct oral anticoagulants in real life patients with atrial fibrillation: Results observed in four anticoagulation clinics.

INTRODUCTION: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) intra- and inter-individual variability was previously reported, but its magnitude is still considered negligible for patient management. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate inter- and intra-individual variability in real-world atrial fibrillation patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban in four Italian anticoagulation clinics and to assess the correlation between DOAC plasma concentration and creatinine-clearance (CrCl). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 330 consecutive patients were enrolled, of which 160 were on dabigatran (70 and 90 taking 150 mg or 110 mg twice-daily, respectively), 71 on rivaroxaban (37 and 34 taking 20mg or 15 mg once-daily) and 99 on apixaban (73 and 26 taking 5mg or 2.5mg twice-daily). Blood was taken at trough and peak within the first month (15-25 days) of treatment. Diluted-thrombin-time (dTT) calibrated for dabigatran and anti-FXa calibrated for rivaroxaban or apixaban was performed. RESULTS: Mean inter-individual variability expressed as overall CV values for all drugs was lower at peak (CV=46%) than at trough (CV=63%). Mean CV% intra-individual variability was 36.6% at trough and 34.0% at peak. Correlation with CrCl was poor for all drugs and only dabigatran at trough showed a significant correlation. CONCLUSION: This multicenter study confirms high DOAC inter-individual variability that cannot be explained by the rate of renal clearance to which the three DOAC were subjected since the correlation with CrCl was relatively poor. This poor correlation suggests caution in using CrCl as the sole laboratory parameter to indirectly evaluate residual circulating DOAC.