Anatomical Treatment Strategies for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation with Ethanol Infusion within the Vein of Marshall-Current Challenges and Future Directions.

Currently, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the gold standard in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, PVI alone may be insufficient in the management of persistent AF, and complementary methods are being explored. One such method takes an anatomical approach-improving both its success rate and lesion durability may lead to improved treatment outcomes. An additional approach complementary to the anatomical one is also attracting attention, one that focuses on epicardial conduction. This involves ethanol ablation of the vein of Marshall (VOM) and can be very effective in blocking epicardial conduction related to Marshall structure; it is becoming incorporated into standard treatment. However, the pitfall of this "Marshall-PLAN", a method that combines an anatomical approach with ethanol infusion within the VOM (Et-VOM), is that Et-VOM and other line creations are not always successfully completed. This has led to cases of AF and/or atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence even after completing this lesion set. Investigating effective adjunctive methods will enable us to complete the lesion set with the aim to lower the rates of recurrence of AF and/or AT in the future.

Characterization and Clinical Significance of Hemolysis After Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Results of a Multicenter Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is increasingly used in clinical practice for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. While the susceptibility of erythrocytes to electroporation is well established, the effect of cardiac PFA technologies on hemolysis has remained underreported. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, severity, and clinical impact of PFA-induced hemolysis. METHODS: We included n=145 patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation with a pentaspline PFA catheter (biphasic, bipolar pulses of 2 kV) and n=70 patients receiving radiofrequency ablation (40-90 W) at 4 high-volume European centers. The lesion set comprised pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and pulmonary vein isolation±additional lesions for persistent atrial fibrillation. Hemolysis and renal function biomarkers were analyzed in blood samples at baseline, at the end of ablation, and 24 hours after the procedure. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups (overall mean 65.7±9.4 years; 69.3% men). The ablation procedures comprised a mean of 61.6±27.4 PFA deliveries and 26.3±15.0 minutes RF duration. Hemolysis was detected in 94.3% versus 6.8% of patients after PFA versus radiofrequency ablation (P<0.001): PFA was associated with significantly lower haptoglobin levels (0.5±0.4 versus 1.0±0.4 g/L), while free plasma hemoglobin (592.8±330.6 versus 147.8±183.0 mg/L), bilirubin (21.3±11.3 versus 14.8±8.8 µmol/L), and LDH (lactate dehydrogenase, 352.7±115.7 versus 253.2±56.5 U/L) were significantly higher after PFA compared with radiofrequency ablation (all P<0.001). Hemolysis correlated with the number of PFA deliveries (r=0.62 [95% CI, 0.33-0.80]; P<0.001), with the highest severity occurring ≥54 PFA deliveries. After PFA, hemoglobinuria occurred in 36.4%, while creatinine increase was higher in patients with baseline glomerular filtration rate <50 mL/min than with baseline glomerular filtration rate >50 mL/min (Δcrea, 27.0±103.1 versus -0.2±12.1 µmol/L; P=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular hemolysis is a frequent finding after PFA and increases with the number of PFA deliveries. Until the clinical impact of PFA-associated hemolysis is fully elucidated, a careful titration of PFA deliveries during the ablation procedure is warranted.

Safety and Effectiveness of Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Heart Failure: A MANIFEST-PF Sub-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) coexist, increasing morbidity and mortality. Studies have demonstrated improved outcomes following AF ablation in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF). OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of pulsed-field ablation (PFA) in HF. METHODS: MANIFEST-PF is a multicenter patient-level registry of consecutive patients undergoing PFA for paroxysmal (PAF) or persistent AF (PerAF). In this sub-study, patients were stratified as: no history of HF (no-HF), HF with preserved EF (HFPEF; LVEF≥50%) or HF with reduced/mildly-reduced EF (HFMR/REF; LVEF<50%). The primary effectiveness and safety endpoints were freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias lasting ≥30s and major adverse events (MAEs), respectively. RESULTS: Of the 1,381 patients, 85% (n=1,174) were no-HF, 6.2% (n=87) were HFPEF, and 8.6% (n=120) were HFMR/REF. No-HF patients had less PerAF than patients with HF (p<0.001), with no difference between HF subtypes (p=1.00). The 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia was significantly higher in no-HF than with HFPEF or HFMR/REF (79.9%, 71.3%, 67.5%, p<0.001), but similar between HFMR/REF and HFPEF (p=0.26). However, there was no significant difference in freedom from atrial arrhythmia among patients with no-HF vs HFPEF vs HFMR/REF for those with PAF (82.8%/82.4%/71.7%, p=0.09) and PerAF (73.3%, 64.2%, and 64.9%, p=0.14.MAE rates were similar between the no-HF, HFPEF and HFMR/REF groups (1.9%, 0%, and 2.5%, respectively). CONCLUSION: PFA appears to be potentially safe and effective in AF patients with HF. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia post-PFA was higher in patients without a history of HF, with no significant difference between HF subtypes.

Safety and Effectiveness of Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) coexist, increasing morbidity and mortality. Studies have demonstrated improved outcomes following AF ablation in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF). OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the outcomes of pulsed field ablation (PFA) in HF. METHODS: MANIFEST-PF (Multi-National Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Post-Approval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation) is a multicenter, patient-level registry of consecutive patients undergoing PFA for paroxysmal AF or persistent AF (PerAF). In this substudy, patients were stratified as no history of HF (no-HF), HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) (left ventricular EF of ≥50%) or HF with reduced/mildly reduced EF (HFmr/rEF) (left ventricular EF of <50%). The primary effectiveness and safety endpoints were freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias lasting ≥30 seconds and major adverse events, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 1,381 patients, 85% (n = 1,174) were no-HF, 6.2% (n = 87) were HFpEF, and 8.6% (n = 120) were HFmr/rEF. No-HF patients had less PerAF than patients with HF (P < 0.001), with no difference between HF subtypes (P = >0.99). The 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia was significantly higher in no-HF patients than in those with HFpEF or HFmr/rEF (79.9%, 71.3%, and 67.5%, respectively; P < 0.001) but similar between patients with HFmr/rEF and HFpEF (P = 0.26). However, there was no significant difference in freedom from atrial arrhythmia among patients with no-HF vs HFpEF vs HFmr/rEF for those with paroxysmal AF (82.8%, 82.4%, and 71.7%, respectively; P = 0.09) and PerAF (73.3%, 64.2%, and 64.9%, respectively; P = 0.14). Major adverse event rates were similar between the no-HF, HFpEF, and HFmr/rEF groups (1.9%, 0%, and 2.5%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PFA appears to be potentially safe and effective in AF patients with HF. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia post-PFA was higher in patients without a history of HF, with no significant difference between HF subtypes.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Impact of Left Atrial Posterior Wall Ablation During Pulsed-Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is insufficient to treat many patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). Adjunctive left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) ablation with thermal technologies has revealed lack of efficacy, perhaps limited by the difficulty in achieving lesion durability amid concerns of esophageal injury. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of PVI + LAPW ablation vs PVI in patients with PersAF using pulsed-field ablation (PFA). METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of the MANIFEST-PF (Multi-National Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Post-approval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation) registry, we studied consecutive PersAF patients undergoing post-approval treatment with a pentaspline PFA catheter. The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia of ≥30 seconds. Safety outcomes included the composite of acute and chronic major adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 547 patients with PersAF who underwent PFA, 131 (24%) received adjunctive LAPW ablation. Compared to PVI-alone, patients receiving adjunctive LAPW ablation were younger (65 vs 67 years of age, P = 0.08), had a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score (2.3 ± 1.6 vs 2.6 ± 1.6, P = 0.08), and were more likely to receive electroanatomical mapping (48.1% vs 39.0%, P = 0.07) and intracardiac echocardiography imaging (46.1% vs 17.1%, P < 0.001). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmias was not statistically different between groups in the full (PVI + LAPW: 66.4%; 95% CI: 57.6%-74.4% vs PVI: 73.1%; 95% CI: 68.5%-77.2%; P = 0.68) and propensity-matched cohorts (PVI + LAPW: 71.7% vs PVI: 68.5%; P = 0.34). There was also no significant difference in major adverse events between the groups (2.2% vs 1.4%, respectively, P = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PersAF undergoing PFA, as compared to PVI-alone, adjunctive LAPW ablation did not improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months.

Local VA index for the differential diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Differentiating between atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia utilizing a septal accessory pathway is a complex challenge. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the "local VA index," a straightforward method based on signals from the coronary sinus catheter, to distinguish between these arrhythmias during tachycardia and entrainment. The ventriculoatrial (VA) interval on the coronary sinus catheter is measured during tachycardia and entrainment, at the site of earliest atrial activity. The difference between these 2 situations defines the "local VA index." We also propose a mechanism to clarify the limitations of historical pacing maneuvers, such as postpacing interval minus tachycardia cycle length (PPI-TCL) and stimulus-atrial interval minus ventriculoatrial interval (SA-VA), by examining nodal decrement and intraventricular conduction delay. METHODS: In a retrospective study of 75 patients referred for supraventricular tachycardia evaluation, 37 were diagnosed with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) with orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia, and 38 with AVNRT (27 typical, 11 atypical). RESULTS: In comparison to AVRT patients, AVNRT patients exhibited longer PPI-TCL (176 ± 47 ms vs 113 ± 42 ms; P <.01) and SA-VA (138 ± 47 ms vs 64 ± 28 ms; P <.01). The AVRT group had mean local VA index of -1 ± 13 ms, whereas the AVNRT group had a significantly longer index of 91 ± 46 ms (P <.01). An optimal threshold for differentiation was a local VA index of 40 ms. Importantly, there was no significant correlation between pacing cycle length and nodal decrement as well as intraventricular delay related to pathway location. This interindividual variability might explain misleading interpretations of PPI-TCL and SA-VA. CONCLUSION: This novel approach is advantageous because of its simplicity and effectiveness, requiring only 2 diagnostic catheters. A local VA interval difference <40 ms provides a clear distinction for AVRT.

Clinical Outcomes by Sex After Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

Importance: Previous studies evaluating the association of patient sex with clinical outcomes using conventional thermal ablative modalities for atrial fibrillation (AF) such as radiofrequency or cryoablation are controversial due to mixed results. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel AF ablation energy modality that has demonstrated preferential myocardial tissue ablation with a unique safety profile. Objective: To compare sex differences in patients undergoing PFA for AF in the Multinational Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Postapproval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation (MANIFEST-PF) registry. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cohort study of MANIFEST-PF registry data, which included consecutive patients undergoing postregulatory approval treatment with PFA to treat AF between March 2021 and May 2022 with a median follow-up of 1 year. MANIFEST-PF is a multinational, retrospectively analyzed, prospectively enrolled patient-level registry including 24 European centers. The study included all consecutive registry patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent first-ever PFA for paroxysmal or persistent AF. Exposure: PFA was performed on patients with AF. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation and additional ablation, which was performed at the discretion of the operator. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from clinically documented atrial arrhythmia for 30 seconds or longer after a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety outcome was the composite of acute (<7 days postprocedure) and chronic (>7 days) major adverse events (MAEs). Results: Of 1568 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.5] years; 1015 male [64.7%]) with AF who underwent PFA, female patients, as compared with male patients, were older (mean [SD] age, 68 [10] years vs 62 [12] years; P < .001), had more paroxysmal AF (70.2% [388 of 553] vs 62.4% [633 of 1015]; P = .002) but had fewer comorbidities such as coronary disease (9% [38 of 553] vs 15.9% [129 of 1015]; P < .001), heart failure (10.5% [58 of 553] vs 16.6% [168 of 1015]; P = .001), and sleep apnea (4.7% [18 of 553] vs 11.7% [84 of 1015]; P < .001). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 99.8% of female (552 of 553) and 98.9% of male (1004 of 1015; P = .90) patients. Additional ablation was performed in 22.4% of female (124 of 553) and 23.1% of male (235 of 1015; P = .79) patients. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmia was similar in male and female patients (79.0%; 95% CI, 76.3%-81.5% vs 76.3%; 95% CI, 72.5%-79.8%; P = .28). There was also no significant difference in acute major AEs between groups (male, 1.5% [16 of 1015] vs female, 2.5% [14 of 553]; P = .19). Conclusion and Relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that after PFA for AF, there were no significant sex differences in clinical effectiveness or safety events.

Abnormal Atrial Potentials Recorded During Sinus Rhythm or Pacing Represent Substrates for Reentrant Atrial Tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal atrial potentials (AAPs) recorded during sinus rhythm/atrial pacing may indicate areas of slow conduction capable of supporting reentrant atrial tachycardia (AT). Therefore, we sought to examine the relationship between AAPs and AT circuits. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three reentrant ATs in 104 patients were analyzed. AAPs, consisting of fragmented potentials and split potentials, were assessed using the Rhythmia LUMIPOINT algorithm. RESULTS: There was 93±13% overlap between areas with AAPs during sinus rhythm/atrial pacing and areas of slow conduction along the reentry circuit during AT. The cumulative area of AAPs was smaller in patients with localized-reentrant ATs compared with anatomic macro-reentrant ATs (20.0 [14.6-30.5] versus 28.9 [21.8-35.6] cm2; P=0.021). Patients with perimitral ATs had larger areas of AAPs on the lateral wall whereas patients with roof-dependent ATs had larger areas of AAPs on the roof and posterior wall (P≤0.018 for all comparisons). The patchy scar that was associated with localized-reentrant AT exhibited a larger area of AAPs at its periphery than the scar that did not participate in localized-reentrant AT (3.1 [2.4-4.5] versus 1.0 [0.7-1.6] cm2; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AAPs recorded during sinus rhythm/atrial pacing are associated with areas of slow conduction during reentrant AT. The burden and distribution of AAPs may provide actionable insights into AT circuit features, including in cases in which ATs are difficult to map.

Electrophysiologic Determinants of Isoelectric Intervals on Surface Electrocardiograms During Atrial Tachycardia: Insights From High-Density Mapping.

BACKGROUND: Substrate abnormalities can alter atrial activation during atrial tachycardias (ATs) thereby influencing AT-wave morphology on the surface electrocardiogram. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify determinants of isoelectric intervals during ATs with complex atrial activation patterns. METHODS: High-density activation maps of 126 ATs were studied. To assess the impact of the activated atrial surface on the presence of isoelectric intervals, this study measured the minimum activated area throughout the AT cycle, defined as the smallest activated area within a 50-millisecond period, by using signal processing algorithms (LUMIPOINT). RESULTS: ATs with isoelectric intervals (P-wave ATs) included 23 macro-re-entrant ATs (40%), 26 localized-re-entrant ATs (46%), and 8 focal ATs (14%), whereas those without included 46 macro-re-entrant ATs (67%), 21 localized-re-entrant ATs (30%), and 2 focal ATs (3%). Multivariable regression identified smaller minimum activated area and larger very low voltage area as independent predictors of P-wave ATs (OR: 0.732; 95% CI: 0.644-0.831; P < 0.001; and OR: 1.042; 95% CI: 1.006-1.080; P = 0.023, respectively). The minimum activated area with the cutoff value of 10 cm2 provided the highest predictive accuracy for P-wave ATs with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 96%, 97%, 97%, and 95%, respectively. In re-entrant ATs, smaller minimum activated area was associated with lower minimum conduction velocity within the circuit and fewer areas of delayed conduction outside of the circuit (standardized ß: 0.524; 95% CI: 0.373-0.675; P < 0.001; and standardized ß: 0.353; 95% CI: 0.198-0.508; P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced atrial activation area and voltage were associated with isoelectric intervals during ATs.

Impact of filter configurations on bipolar EGMs: An optimal filter setting for identifying VT substrates.

BACKGROUND: The impact of filtering on bipolar electrograms (EGMs) has not been systematically examined. We tried to clarify the optimal filter configuration for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. METHODS: Fifteen patients with VT were included. Eight different filter configurations were prospectively created for the distal bipoles of the ablation catheter: 1.0-250, 10-250, 100-250, 30-50, 30-100, 30-250, 30-500, and 30-1000 Hz. Pre-ablation stable EGMs with good contact (contact force > 10 g) were analyzed. Baseline fluctuation, baseline noise, bipolar peak-to-peak voltage, and presence of local abnormal ventricular activity (LAVA) were compared between different filter configurations. RESULTS: In total, 2276 EGMs with multiple bipolar configurations in 246 sites in scar and border areas were analyzed. Baseline fluctuation was only observed in the high-pass filter of (HPF) ≤ 10 Hz (p < .001). Noise level was lowest at 30-50 Hz (0.018 [0.012-0.029] mV), increased as the low-pass filter (LPF) extended, and was highest at 30-1000 Hz (0.047 [0.041-0.061] mV) (p < .001). Conversely, the HPF did not affect the noise level at ≤30 Hz. As the HPF extended to 100 Hz, bipolar voltages significantly decreased (p < .001), but were not affected when the LPF was extended to ≥100 Hz. LAVAs were most frequently detected at 30-250 Hz (207/246; 84.2%) and 30-500 Hz (208/246; 84.6%), followed by 30-1000 Hz (205/246; 83.3%), but frequently missed at LPF ≤ 100 Hz or HPF ≤ 10 Hz (p < .001). A 50-Hz notch-filter reduced the bipolar voltage by 43.9% and LAVA-detection by 34.5% (p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Bipolar EGMs are strongly affected by filter settings in scar/border areas. In all, 30-250 or 30-500 Hz may be the best configuration, minimizing the baseline fluctuation, baseline noise, and detecting LAVAs. Not applying the 50-Hz notch filter may be beneficial to avoid missing VT substrate.

Detailed analysis of tachycardia cycle length aids diagnosis of the mechanism and location of atrial tachycardias.

AIMS: Although the mechanism of an atrial tachycardia (AT) can usually be elucidated using modern high-resolution mapping systems, it would be helpful if the AT mechanism and circuit could be predicted before initiating mapping. OBJECTIVE: We examined if the information gathered from the cycle length (CL) of the tachycardia can help predict the AT-mechanism and its localization. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-eight activation maps of ATs including eight focal-ATs, 94 macroreentrant-ATs, and 36 localized-ATs in 95 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Maximal CL (MCL) and minimal CL (mCL) over a minute period were measured via a decapolar catheter in the coronary sinus. CL-variation and beat-by-beat CL-alternation were examined. Additionally, the CL-respiration correlation was analysed by the RhythmiaTM system. : Both MCL and mCL were significantly shorter in macroreentrant-ATs [MCL = 288 (253-348) ms, P = 0.0001; mCL = 283 (243-341) ms, P = 0.0012], and also shorter in localized-ATs [MCL = 314 (261-349) ms, P = 0.0016; mCL = 295 (248-340) ms, P = 0.0047] compared to focal-ATs [MCL = 506 (421-555) ms, mCL = 427 (347-508) ms]. An absolute CL-variation (MCL-mCL) < 24 ms significantly differentiated re-entrant ATs from focal-ATs with a sensitivity = 96.9%, specificity = 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) = 100%, and negative predictive value (NPV) = 66.7%. The beat-by-beat CL-alternation was observed in 10/138 (7.2%), all of which showed the re-entrant mechanism, meaning that beat-by-beat CL-alternation was the strong sign of re-entrant mechanism (PPV = 100%). Although the CL-respiration correlation was observed in 28/138 (20.3%) of ATs, this was predominantly in right-atrium (RA)-ATs (24/41, 85.7%), rather than left atrium (LA)-ATs (4/97, 4.1%). A positive CL-respiration correlation highly predicted RA-ATs (PPV = 85.7%), and negative CL-respiration correlation probably suggested LA-ATs (NPV = 84.5%). CONCLUSION: Detailed analysis of the tachycardia CL helps predict the AT-mechanism and the active AT chamber before an initial mapping.