Real-world effectiveness for 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for genotype 1 hepatitis C: the Trio Health study.

Early data regarding the "real-world" experience with novel therapies for hepatitis C (HCV) are encouraging. Data are still limited, however, regarding real-world rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) for ledipasvir-sofosbuvir (LDV-SOF), particularly for patients with prior treatment failure. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1597 patients with chronic genotype 1 HCV who were treated using 12 weeks of the following regimens LDV-SOF±ribavirin (RBV) (n=1521 without RBV, n=76 with RBV). The primary outcome was SVR-determined at 12 weeks in an intention-to-treat design. Prescription according to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved labelling (adding RBV for patients with cirrhosis and treatment failure) was assessed in multivariate models. The study population was aged 60 years on average (range 19-89), 60% male, 50% Caucasian, 43% cared for at an academic centre and 30% cirrhotic. Overall, LDV-SOF resulted in a 94% SVR rate. Only 44 (2.9%) patients relapsed. LDV-SOF+RBV yielded SVR in 97% with 0 viral relapses. While cirrhosis and thrombocytopenia were associated with lower odds of SVR, in a multivariable regression model, only treatment at an academic centre and prescriptions contrary to FDA labelling were significantly associated with lower SVR-odds ratios, 0.56 95% CI (0.35-0.87) and 0.29 95% CI(0.12-0.68), respectively. The real-world experience with LDV-SOF mirrors the SVR rates observed in clinical trials. Efforts to promote prescription within FDA recommendations are warranted.

High baseline bilirubin and low albumin predict liver decompensation and serious adverse events in HCV-infected patients treated with sofosbuvir-containing regimens.

To conduct surveillance and determine the safety profile of new hepatitis C virus treatments in real-world clinical practice. Hepatic decompensation and other serious adverse events were investigated in an observational cohort study of 511 patients treated with regimens containing sofosbuvir, December 2013-June 2014. Among 499 previously stable patients (no history of hepatic decompensation during the previous 12 months), a nested case-control study was performed to identify predictors of decompensation/serious adverse event. Cases and controls were matched 1:5 based on treatment regimen and duration. Matched conditional logistic regression was used for analysis. Providers scored the likelihood that events were treatment-related (scale = 0-4). The cumulative incidence of decompensation/events was 6.4% for the total cohort. Among 499 previously stable patients, the incidence of decompensation/events was 4.5%; the mortality rate was 0.6%. Sixteen of the 499 experienced one or more serious complications considered to be at least potentially treatment-related, and the sustained virological response rate was 7/16 (44%). Two cases, both on sofosbuvir/simeprevir (without interferon or ribavirin), had complications consistent with autoimmune events (score 3, 'likely treatment-related'), and one experienced a flare of autoimmune hepatitis. Compared to controls, cases had higher baseline median model for end-stage liver disease scores (14 vs 8, P < 0.01). Decompensation/events was independently associated with lower baseline albumin (OR = 0.12/g/dL, P = 0.01) and higher total bilirubin (OR = 4.31/mg/dL, P = 0.01). Reduced hepatic function at baseline increased the risk of liver decompensation/events.

Disparate access to treatment regimens in chronic hepatitis C patients: data from the TRIO network.

Despite the clinical success in the real-world of all oral hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy with response rates approaching that seen in the clinical trials, access has been limited by many payers with discussion of prioritization of treatment based upon AASLD guidelines. We evaluated patients in the TRIO network who were prescribed sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens to determine reasons for not starting treatment. Trio Health is a disease management company that works in partnership with academic medical centres, community physicians and specialty pharmacies in the United States to optimize care for HCV. Data for 3841 patients prescribed a sofosbuvir-containing regimen between December 2013 and September 2014 were obtained through this programme. Of the entire group, 315 (8%) patients did not start the prescribed sofosbuvir-containing therapy. A total of 141 (45%) of the nonstart patients had a commercial plan as their primary insurance, 137 (44%) were primarily covered by Medicaid, 17 (5%) were primarily covered by Medicare, and 20 (6%) were either without coverage or coverage was not specified. Reasons for nonstarts were varied and overlapping. Only 15 patients (5% of nonstarts) did not start because they were unreachable or failed to complete required testing. Another 39 patients who did not start (12%) were following their physicians' direction to either wait for new treatment options or to hold treatment for an unspecified reason. Insurance-related processes and financial reasons accounted for 254 (81%) of the 315 nonstarts. The remaining 7 (2%) patients did not have a specified reason for not starting treatment. Nonstart rates were highest in the Medicaid-covered population at 35%. Medicare and Commercial nonstart rates were 2% and 6%, respectively. In a matched comparison, patients with commercial coverage were 6.5 times as likely to start SOF-based therapy compared to patients with Medicaid. Despite high SVR rates of SOF-based regimens in clinical practice, there are still barriers to access to care. In fact, almost half of the nonstart patients had advanced fibrosis scores (F3 or F4) and should have been prioritized to start treatment. As better treatment for HCV with high efficacy and low side effect rates become available, the disparity in access to treatment, as evidenced by the high nonstart rate in the Medicaid-covered group, must be resolved.

Effect of fibrosis on adverse events in patients with hepatitis C treated with telaprevir.

BACKGROUND: Data about adverse events are needed to optimise telaprevir-based therapy in a broad spectrum of patients. AIM: To investigate adverse events of telaprevir-based therapy in patients with and without advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis in a real-world setting. METHODS: Data on 174 hepatitis C-infected patients initiating telaprevir-based therapy at Mount Sinai and Montefiore medical centres were collected. Biopsy data and FIB-4 scores identified patients with advanced fibrosis. Multivariable fully adjusted models were built to assess the effect of advanced fibrosis on specific adverse events and discontinuation of treatment due to an adverse event. RESULTS: Patients with (n = 71) and without (n = 103) advanced fibrosis were similar in BMI, ribavirin exposure, gender, prior treatment history, haemoglobin and creatinine, but differed in race. Overall, 47% of patients completed treatment and 40% of patients achieved SVR. Treated patients with and without advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis had similar rates of adverse events; advanced fibrosis, however, was independently associated with ano-rectal discomfort (P = 0.03). Three patients decompensated and had advanced fibrosis. The discontinuation of all treatment medications due to an adverse event was significantly associated with older age (P = 0.01), female gender (P = 0.01) and lower platelets (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events were common, but were not significantly related to the presence of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. More critical monitoring in older and female patients with low platelets throughout treatment may reduce adverse event-related discontinuations.

Degree of viral decline early in treatment predicts sustained virological response in HCV-HIV coinfected patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin.

BACKGROUND: In hepatitis C virus (HCV) monoinfection, the on-treatment virological response at Weeks 4 and 12 is a strong predictor of treatment outcomes. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we examined these responses in 289 HIV-HCV coinfected patients treated with Peg-IFN alfa-2a /ribavirin for 48 weeks in a large randomized, multinational trial (APRICOT). RESULTS: Overall, 21% of patients achieved a rapid virological response at Week 4 and, of these, 88% achieved a sustained virological response. An early virological response at Week 12 was achieved in 71% of patients, and 56% of these patients achieved a sustained virological response. These results are similar to the sustained virological response rates obtained in monoinfected patients who achieve a rapid or early virological response. Patients who did not achieve a rapid virological response but who had unquantifiable HCV RNA or > 3 log10 drop over baseline also had high sustained virological response rates. A total of 46% of patients achieved undetectable HCV RNA (<50 IU/mL) at Week 12. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that infection with HCV genotype 2/3, low baseline HCV RNA level, and lower age predicted rapid virological response. Infection with HCV genotype 2/3 and low baseline HCV RNA level predicted early virological response. CONCLUSION: A rapid virological response is the best predictor of a sustained virological response, and lack of an early virological response is the best predictor of no sustained virological response. Such results are consistent with findings in HCV monoinfected patients.

Management of chronic hepatitis C patients who have relapsed or not responded to pegylated interferon alfa plus ribavirin.

Development of therapeutic strategies for patients with chronic hepatitis C who experience virological breakthrough, relapse or nonresponse lag behind those for treatment-naïve patients. The probability of a previously treated patient responding to re-treatment depends on the nature of the previous regimen, the magnitude of the response to previous treatment and the patient's characteristics. Relapsers have higher sustained virological response rates than nonresponders when re-treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. Re-treatment of nonresponders to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin with the standard 48-week regimen resulted in an approximate 6% sustained response rate in the EPIC-3 program. In the REPEAT trial, the sustained response rate was significantly higher in nonresponders to pegylated interferon alfa-2b (12 kD) plus ribavirin randomized to 72 weeks of peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kD) plus ribavirin, compared with a 48-week regimen (16%vs 8%, P = 0.0006). Based on available data, extended treatment is the best option for these individuals. Undetectable viral RNA at week 12 is an important criterion for re-treatment in the REPEAT and EPIC studies. Maintenance therapy with pegylated interferon is generally ineffective in nonresponders and cannot be recommended. Directly acting antivirals may increase response rates and the burden of adverse events when combined with the standard of care, but will not be available for some years. In conclusion, after careful evaluation of an individual's benefit-risk ratio, a 72-week regimen is the preferred strategy for optimizing sustained response rates in patients who have not responded to the standard of care, provided that viral RNA is undetectable at week 12 of re-treatment.

Hepatitis C patients' self-reported adherence to treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin.

BACKGROUND: Prior research on adherence to hepatitis C treatment has documented rates of dose reductions and early treatment discontinuation, but little is known about patients' dose-taking adherence. AIMS: To assess the prevalence of missed doses of pegylated interferon and ribavirin and examine the correlates of dose-taking adherence in clinic settings. METHODS: One hundred and eighty patients on treatment for hepatitis C (23% coinfected with HIV) completed a cross-sectional survey at the site of their hepatitis C care. RESULTS: Seven per cent of patients reported missing at least one injection of pegylated interferon in the last 4 weeks and 21% reported missing at least one dose of ribavirin in the last 7 days. Dose-taking adherence was not associated with HCV viral load. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported dose non-adherence to hepatitis C treatment occurs frequently. Further studies of dose non-adherence (assessed by method other than self-report) and its relationship to HCV virological outcome are warranted.

Treatment of dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C using pegylated interferon and low-dose ribavirin.

BACKGROUND: No safe and effective therapy exists for chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients. Available data on the antiviral treatment of hepatitis C in dialysis population is mostly based on standard interferon monotherapy. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a prospective, cohort trial with combined therapy (pegylated-interferonalpha-2a (135 mcg/week) plus low dose ribavirin (200 mg/day)) for chronic hepatitis C in 15 patients undergoing long-term dialysis. Twelve patients had HCV genotype 1a/1b, three were co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and two had compensated cirrhosis. End-points were sustained viral response and adverse effects. RESULTS: Sustained virological response was obtained in four patients (including two with HCV genotype 1); the SVR rate was 28.6% (4/14), on an intention-to-treat analysis. One subject with SVR had compensated cirrhosis. All HIV co-infected patients had well controlled HIV and one of them (33%) reached SVR. Seven (50%) of the 14 patients were non-responders, two of which relapsed after discontinuation of therapy. Drop-out rate was 71.4% (10/14). The most frequent side-effect was anemia, which required ribavirin discontinuation in three patients; seven (47%) patients received blood transfusions. Two patients died (week 4 and 14) of causes related to cardiovascular disease, which was frequent in our cohort. Two subjects were hospitalized and discontinued therapy (week 1, and 27). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study showed that about one-third of HD patients achieved sustained virological response with pegylated-interferon-alpha-2a plus low-dose ribavirin; however, tolerance to antiviral treatment was unsatisfactory. Well- controlled HIV infection should not be a contraindication to HCV therapy in dialysis patients. Prospective, controlled clinical trials of combined antiviral therapy targeted at HCV in chronic kidney disease population are indicated.

Zidovudine use but not weight-based ribavirin dosing impacts anaemia during HCV treatment in HIV-infected persons.

Anaemia during peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy is common in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus (HIV/HCV)-coinfected patients despite the use of lower doses of RBV than are recommended for HIV-seronegative persons. In addition, concurrent zidovudine (ZDV) may exacerbate the anaemia caused by PEG-IFN and RBV. We retrospectively analysed the incidence of anaemia, RBV dose reduction and epoetin-alpha (EPO) use among coinfected patients treated with PEG-IFN and weight-based RBV (800-1400 mg/day) who enrolled in two clinical trials and had haemoglobin (Hb) levels assessed at baseline and after 4 and/or 12 weeks of HCV treatment. Overall, 217 patients were included; pre-treatment Hb levels (mean 14.7 g/dL) were similar in all patients, including ZDV users (29% of patients). After 4 weeks of therapy, the mean Hb decline was greater among ZDV recipients (3.13 g/dL) compared with those on other anti-retroviral treatment (ART) (2.13 g/dL) or on no ART (1.47 g/dL) (P < 0.0001). RBV dose reduction and EPO use were more common in patients taking ZDV compared with those not taking ZDV (P < 0.0001). RBV dose was not associated with Hb reduction, RBV dose reduction or EPO use. Virologic response after 12 weeks of therapy and the treatment discontinuation rate did not differ by ZDV use. The use of ZDV but not weight-based RBV dosing was associated with an increased risk of anaemia, RBV dose reduction or EPO use in coinfected patients treated with PEG-IFN/RBV. However, ZDV use was not associated with higher rates of treatment discontinuation or lower early virologic response rates. HIV and hepatitis C care providers should be cognizant of these data.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus and HIV coinfection: the road less traveled.

The use of HAART for HIV infection has significantly reduced morbidity and mortality secondary to AIDS-related opportunistic infections. In hepatitis C virus (HCV)-HIV-coinfected patients, progression to AIDS, cirrhosis, and liver failure from HCV infection has become an important issue. Liver disease caused by chronic HCV infection has become the second leading cause of death in some HIV-infected populations. HIV infection is not a contraindication to HCV infection therapy. Several clinical studies have borne out that HCV infection can be safely and successfully treated in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients. These patients should be evaluated and offered anti-HCV treatment as clinically indicated.

The histopathology of 103 consecutive colonoscopy biopsies from 82 symptomatic patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: original and look-back diagnoses.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the primary diagnoses assigned by general surgical pathologists on a series of 103 consecutive colon biopsies from individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) with diagnoses rendered by a pathologist with extensive experience in gastrointestinal pathology in HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. DESIGN: New sections were cut from paraffin blocks of 103 consecutive colon biopsies taken during colonoscopies of 82 different HIV-infected patients; all new sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. These individuals either had negative stool studies or had failed to respond to therapy and had chronic large bowel symptoms, such as frequent small volume-type diarrhea, tenesmus, and/or bright red blood per rectum. Immunohistochemistry for cytomegalovirus (CMV) was performed on 18 of 22 specimens originally diagnosed with CMV colitis. RESULTS: The initial study yielded 70 (68%) negative or nonspecific diagnoses, 22 (21%) cases of CMV colitis, 5 (5%) Cryptosporidium diagnoses, 2 cases each of adenomatous polyps and Kaposi sarcoma, and 1 case each of spirochetosis and squamous cell carcinoma of the anorectum. Review of the recuts yielded 64 (62%) negative or nonspecific diagnoses, 12 (12%) new adenovirus infections (3 combined with CMV), and 11 (11%) lone CMV infections. Three attaching and effacing bacterial infections were diagnosed, 1 with adenovirus coinfection. A total of 4 spirochetosis cases were found on review. Seven (7%) of the biopsies showed at least 1 coinfection. Nine biopsies had features suggestive of inflammatory bowel disease. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy with biopsy after negative stool studies or failure to respond to therapy yielded a high proportion of negative or nonspecific diagnoses. Adenovirus and enteropathogenic bacterial infections had been totally overlooked on initial examination. It takes particular experience to evaluate gastrointestinal biopsies from HIV-infected patients.

Effect of HIV-1 infection on lymphocyte proliferation in gut-associated lymphoid tissue.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the change in the percentage of proliferative and activated lymphocytes in gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) in HIV-1-infected subjects compared with that in uninfected controls. METHODS: We measured the percentage of proliferative (Ki-67+) and activated (CD-69+, HLA-DR+, CD45RO+) lymphocytes from GALT and peripheral blood in chronically HIV-1-infected (12) and uninfected (9) individuals. RESULTS: The percentage of proliferative GALT CD4+ T cells was increased in HIV-1-infected control subjects compared with that in uninfected controls (p <.007). Based on immunohistochemical staining, proliferative T cells were principally located in the parafollicular area surrounding lymphoid aggregates. The percentage of activated GALT lymphocytes, however, was not significantly different in HIV-1-infected individuals, whereas it was significantly increased in the peripheral blood of HIV-1-infected individuals. The percentage of peripheral blood lymphocytes trafficking to the intestine was also not significantly different in HIV-1-infected individuals compared with that in uninfected controls. CONCLUSIONS: CD4+ T cell proliferation in GALT is increased in HIV-1 infection without a significant alteration in the percentage of peripheral blood T cells trafficking to the gastrointestinal mucosa.

Infections of the liver in HIV-infected patients.

The liver is a common site of pathology in HIV-infected patients. In patients with controlled HIV and minimal immunosuppression, infection with hepatitis viruses is common owing to the risk factors of sexual transmission or parenteral drug use. In patients with AIDS, the liver is a common site of lymphohematogenous dissemination of several infectious pathogens. A thorough diagnostic approach leads to a diagnosis of most hepatobiliary processes. The therapeutic nihilism that has surrounded hepatic disease, including viral hepatitis, is unwarranted, because treatment of the underlying HIV and the hepatic process may improve the quality of life and longevity of these patients.

Hepatitis C virus/human immunodeficiency virus coinfection: clinical management issues.

The use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has extended the healthy lifespan of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); deaths among people with AIDS declined for the first time in 1996, after the institution of this therapeutic approach. As the life expectancy of HIV-infected patients increases, greater attention will need to be focused on the recognition and management of potentially severe concurrent illnesses that may increase their mid- to long-range morbidity and mortality. The incidence of infection by hepatitis C virus (HCV) is increased among patients with HIV disease, reflecting shared epidemiological risks. HCV not only may have an impact on the health status of HIV-infected patients but also may decrease their quality of life and increase their health care costs. Although clinicians have been reluctant to treat viral hepatitis C in the HIV-infected population, this therapeutic nihilism is unwarranted. The majority of studies have concluded that treatment of hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients results in an initial efficacy and long-term response similar to those in the HIV-seronegative population. Furthermore, treatment of HCV infection in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients may improve tolerance for antiretroviral medications. Physicians caring for patients with HIV infection require up-to-date information to make rational decisions regarding HCV coinfection to ensure that morbidity and mortality are minimized and that quality of life and medical care costs are optimized.

Activity of combination therapy with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients co-infected with HIV.

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) often co-infect the same individuals because they share comparable routes of transmission. Co-infection with HIV in those patients infected with HCV influences the accuracy of HCV diagnostic testing, levels of HCV viremia, severity of liver histopathology, and rate of progression to cirrhosis. By contrast, the effect of HCV co-infection on HIV disease is unclear. Nevertheless, the combination therapy containing recombinant interferon alfa-2b (rIFN-alpha 2b) plus ribavirin has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, whereas alpha interferon monotherapy has been shown to be efficacious in patients co-infected with HCV and HIV. It is therefore logical to propose and test the hypothesis that combination rIFN-alpha 2b/ribavirin therapy will also benefit patients who are co-infected with HCV and HIV. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study is presently under way to investigate this hypothesis.

Hepatitis B and C in the context of HIV disease: implications for incarcerated populations.

HIV-infected inmates are often co-infected with hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C virus. To describe the burden of HIV in the incarcerated population today, one must consider the impact of co-infection. HIV may dramatically modify the course of viral hepatitis infection, especially chronic hepatitis C. The converse is uncertain: chronic hepatitis does not seem to accelerate HIV disease progression. In this article, we offer guidelines for selecting appropriate candidates for treatment among co-infected inmates.

Hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus: clinical issues in coinfection.

The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection ranges from nearly 30% to over 50%, depending on the population. Shared modes of transmission and the success of current antiretroviral regimens have contributed to the emergence of HCV as a significant pathogen in the HIV-positive population. HIV coinfection appears to worsen HCV infection, with studies showing more severe fibrosis, a higher frequency of cirrhosis, and increased deaths from liver disease. HIV coinfection may also increase the rate of maternal-fetal transmission of HCV. Similarly, studies suggest a more rapid progression to AIDS or death for HCV genotypes 1a and 1b than for other genotypes in HIV-infected patients with hemophilia. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), such as HIV protease inhibitors, has no effect on HCV infection and may transiently increase ALT, AST, and hepatitis C viral load. Hepatotoxicity associated with HAART may or may not be related to the presence of HCV and may depend on the specific agents used. Data suggest that treating chronic hepatitis C in HIV-co-infected patients can decrease fibrosis, increase T-cell responsiveness to HCV antigens, and decrease the rate of fatal hepatomas. Interferon alpha may provide sustained biochemical or virologic responses in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. The combination of interferon-alpha and ribavirin may also be a treatment option but is more complex, and additional research is needed. Treating HCV infection in HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals may help lower the hepatitis C viral load and permit treatment with protease inhibitors.