Role of potential biomarkers in aortic aneurysms: Does it hold promise for clinical decision making?

Aortic aneurysms (AA) are a life-threatening disease with a mortality rate of up to 80% when they rupture. AA has a multifactorial etiology, including smoking, advanced age, and family history, and has multifaceted pathophysiological mechanisms underlying its formation, mainly including inflammation of the aortic wall, reduction of medial smooth muscle cells (SMC), and degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM). It is also a progressive disease. Their treatments are limited to open surgical repair and endovascular aneurysm repair. There is no effective drug treatment. The diagnosis of AA is usually made as a result of a scan performed for another reason. There is no specific diagnostic and prognostic biomarker available, and great efforts are being made on this subject. These studies reveal that in the future, the causal pathophysiological mechanisms for the occurrence and progression of AA will be elucidated and some potential biomarkers will be adopted to facilitate clinical decision-making. This commentary provides a brief contribution to Teng et al.'s analysis of the causal influence between aortic aneurysm (AA) and immune-metabolic interactions, and eventually identification of biomarkers.

Role of multilayer flow modulator stents in the treatment of arterial aneurysms.

Arterial aneurysms remain a significant public health problem because they often result in death when ruptured; therefore, they require immediate medical treatment. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has recently become the primary treatment option, owing to the fewer side effects compared to those with open surgery. However, stents used for conventional EVAR often cause side-branch occlusion, which alters the perfusion of vital organs. Recently, multilayer flow modulator (MFM) stents have been used as a new treatment for arterial aneurysms. These stents appear to be feasible owing to their unique design consisting of an uncoated three-dimensionally braided multilayered structure. MFM stents generally remodulate laminar flow and reduce the flow velocity in the aneurysmal sac, leading to thrombosis, which causes the aneurysm to shrink over time. Thus, they reduce the risk of mortality. Moreover, they reduce morbidity by preserving the side-branch blood flow. They can be easily applied to complex aneurysms and are ready to use without customization, which shortens the waiting time for interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the role of MFM stents in the treatment of arterial aneurysms based on available data.

Atlas Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents Inhibit Neointimal Hyperplasia in Sheep Modeling.

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Many patients with CAD require mechanical revascularization. However, restenosis after minimally invasive interventions is a major problem for these patients. Fortunately, the controlled drug delivery properties of drug-eluting stents seem to be able to overcome this problem. In this study, the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of Atlas Drug-eluting Coronary Stents coated with poly (lactic acid-coglycolic acid) (PLGA) were evaluated. Materials and Methods: This study included 20 non-atherosclerotic female sheep divided into 4 groups that included 4 study and 1 control animal randomly assigned to each group. Animals in the study groups were stented with Atlas Drug-eluting Coronary Stents, and the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties were evaluated. Results: Sirolimus was shown to have a statistically important effect on the vascular endothelium. With time, the decrease in sirolimus in blood samples was statistically significant. Two animals died after implantation; however no clinically significant side effects were observed in the others. Conclusions: The results in this study showed a significant reduction in neointimal hyperplasia after experimental implantation of Atlas Drug-eluting Coronary Stents coated with PLGA polymer. Pharmacokinetic studies also showed that the stent did not release a significant amount of sirolimus after 28 days.

Comparative analysis of VenaBlock and VenaSeal Systems for catheter-guided endovenous cyanoacrylate closure in treating chronic venous insufficiency of the lower extremity: effectiveness and feasibility.

Cyanoacrylate adhesive closure (CAC) systems are widely used to treat varicose veins. In terms of efficacy and safety, these nonthermal, non-tumescent methods are noninferior to endovenous thermal ablation techniques. However, no published studies have compared products that use CAC systems. VenaSeal® (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) and VenaBlock® (Invamed) are the most commonly used CAC-based products worldwide. This study aimed to focus on the efficacy of these two commonly used products, with little emphasis on safety. Published full-text articles on the VenaBlock® and VenaSeal® systems were searched. Data for each product were evaluated by comparing them with each other in terms of effectiveness. In total, 1882 extremities from 11 studies using VenaBlock® and 524 extremities from eight studies using VenaSeal® were included and compared. Both devices were effective, and their cumulative recanalization-free survival rates were similar (P=0.188) at the 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, and 60-month follow-ups. Both products improved the venous clinical severity score (VCSS) and quality of life (QoL) scores. VenaBlock® and VenaSeal® are effective in terms of cumulative recanalization-free survival rates, and no significant difference was found between the two groups (P=0.188). Both significantly improve the VCSS and QoL scores. CAC is feasible for the treatment of varicose veins.

Featured minimally invasive therapeutic approach for chronic subdural hematoma: Embolization of middle meningeal artery - A narrative review.

Chronic subdural hematoma (c-SDH) is a frequent and serious neurological disease. It develops due to hemorrhage to the subdural space, mainly caused by head trauma. The middle meningeal artery (MMA) plays a critical role in the supply of blood to c-SDH. The decision on the type of treatment for c-SDH depends mainly on clinical and imaging evaluation. In cases in which patients are critically ill, the hematoma must be evacuated immediately. For this purpose, surgery is generally accepted as the mainstay of treatment. Among surgical techniques, twist-drill craniotomy, burr-hole craniotomy, and craniotomy are the three most used. The recurrence rate of c-SDH after surgery is an important problem with a rate of up to 30%. The technical success classification embolization of MMA (EMMA) has emerged as an effective and safe option for the treatment of c-SDH, especially those that recur. EMMA is commonly used as an adjunct to surgery or less frequently alone. The technical success of EMMA has been a promising minimal invasive strategy as an alternative or adjunctive therapy to surgical methods. Polyvinyl alcohol is the most widely used among various embolizing agents, including n-butyl cyanoacrylate, coil, and gelatin sponge. EMMA has been shown to prevent the formation or recurrence of c-SDH by eliminating blood flow to the subdural space. Complication rates are low. The large-scale comparative prospective will ensure efficacy and safety. This article aims to highlight the current information about EMMA in patients with c-SDH.

The Role of Immune Mechanisms in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Could It be a Promising Therapeutic Strategy?

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an enlargement of the aorta greater than 50% in diameter. Although up to 80% of cases result in mortality if the aneurysm ruptures, patients are often diagnosed too late, as most cases are asymptomatic. The current treatment for AAA is still surgery as there are currently no effective drug treatments. Knowledge of the pathophysiological mechanisms is essential for the development of new preventive and therapeutic approaches. However, the molecular mechanisms are complex and remain unclear. Apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells, the major cellular component of the aorta, and degeneration of the extracellular matrix, the skeleton of the aortic wall, are hallmarks of AAA pathology. Inflammation, mainly through macrophage cells, has been recognized as a central factor in the development of AAA. Macrophage cells also orchestrate other pathways and immune cells involved in this process. Macrophages do not exist as pure populations at aneurysm sites. M1 macrophages are pro-inflammatory and weaken the aortic wall during AAA development. M2 macrophages, in contrast, are involved in anti-inflammatory reactions and aorta tissue repair. The balancing effect on AAA progression makes M1/M2 macrophages therapeutic targets to control inflammation and destruction of the aortic wall. An early diagnosis is also important to allow for early interventions. This review article, based on the available data, aims to evaluate the role of an immunotherapeutic approach in controlling AAA development by briefly discussing the immunological mechanisms.

A review of the current state in neointimal hyperplasia development following endovascular intervention and minor emphasis on new horizons in immunotherapy.

Endovascular strategies play a vital role in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). However, luminal loss or restenosis after endovascular intervention remains a significant challenge. The main underlying mechanisms are negative vascular remodeling and elastic recoil in balloon angioplasty. During stenting, the main reason for this complex is neointimal proliferation. Endothelial cell injury due to endovascular intervention initiates a series of molecular events, such as overexpression of growth factors, cytokine secretion, and adhesion molecules. These induce platelet activation and inflammatory processes, which trigger the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells into the intima, resulting in neointimal hyperplasia. During this process, PAD progression is mainly caused by chronic inflammation, in which macrophages play a central role. Of the current strategies, drug release interventions aim to suppress restenosis using antiproliferative drugs, such as sirolimus and paclitaxel, during drug release. These drugs inhibit vascular reendothelialization and reduce late in-stent restenosis. For this reason, immunotherapy can be considered an important alternative. Interventions that polarize macrophages to the M2 subtype are particularly important, as they shape the immune response in an anti-inflammatory direction and contribute to tissue repair. However, there are several challenges to overcome, such as localizing antiproliferative or polarizing agents only to areas of vascular injury. This review discusses, based on the early study observations, immunotherapeutic approaches to prevent restenosis after endovascular intervention for the treatment of PAD.

Leishmania Vaccines: the Current Situation with Its Promising Aspect for the Future.

Leishmaniasis is a serious parasitic disease caused by Leishmania spp. transmitted through sandfly bites. This disease is a major public health concern worldwide. It can occur in 3 different clinical forms: cutaneous, mucocutaneous, and visceral Leishmaniasis (CL, MCL, and VL, respectively), caused by different Leishmania spp. Currently, licensed vaccines are unavailable for the treatment of human Leishmaniasis. The treatment and prevention of this disease rely mainly on chemotherapeutics, which are highly toxic and have an increasing resistance problem. The development of a safe, effective, and affordable vaccine for all forms of vector-borne disease is urgently needed to block transmission of the parasite between the host and vector. Immunological mechanisms in the pathogenesis of Leishmaniasis are complex. IL-12-driven Th1-type immune response plays a crucial role in host protection. The essential purpose of vaccination is to establish a protective immune response. To date, numerous vaccine studies have been conducted using live/attenuated/killed parasites, fractionated parasites, subunits, recombinant or DNA technology, delivery systems, and chimeric peptides. Most of these studies were limited to animals. In addition, standardization has not been achieved in these studies due to the differences in the virulence dynamics of the Leishmania spp. and the feasibility of the adjuvants. More studies are needed to develop a safe and effective vaccine, which is the most promising approach against Leishmania infection.