[Anaphylactic cardiocirculatory failure after intraoperative application of dipyrone]. / Anaphylaktisches Herz-Kreislauf-Versagen nach intraoperativer Metamizolapplikation.

CASE REPORT: In our case, a 48-year-old healthy woman undergoing elective tympanoplasty under general anesthesia received an infusion of 2 g dipyrone in 100 ml 0.9% sodium chloride solution for pain prophylaxis. After receiving 1 g dipyrone within 5 min, the patient exhibited a cardiocirculatory failure and cyanosis and had to be resuscitated. After 20 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and administration of 3mg epinephrine and 2 mg norepinephrine, a stable circulation was reestablished. After exclusion of a fulminant pulmonary embolism and a primary cardiac event by computer tomography, electrocardiogram and enzyme diagnostics, the patient was transferred to an intensive care unit where she was mechanically ventilated for a period of 6 h. After 2 days of intensive monitoring, she was transferred to a peripheral ward,where she exhibited a normal neurological status and stable cardiocirculatory condition. A postoperatively performed allergy testing revealed a type I sensitization to dipyrone, which was responsible for the intraoperative cardiocirculatory failure due to a massive anaphylactic reaction. However, in this case, the typical symptoms of allergic reactions such as erythema, edema or bronchospasm were missing, which did not allow for an immediate diagnosis. CONCLUSION. Regarding the frequent perioperative use of dipyrone and the severity of anaphylaxis observed in this case, it should be considered that this analgesic should be applied intravenously only if adequate safety measures such as emergency therapy option and patient monitoring are guaranteed as recommended by the German drug regulation authority since 1982.

Better late than never? Experience with intravenous pamidronate treatment in patients with low bone mass or fractures following cardiac or liver transplantation.

Organ transplantation is associated with a high turnover of bone metabolism, and an increased loss of bone mass and incidence of osteoporotic fractures. Established therapies for osteoporosis after organ transplantation are still lacking, however. We report on an intravenous bisphosphonate therapy initiated in transplant patients because of a high rate of bone loss or incident osteoporotic fractures. Twenty-one patients after liver transplantation and 13 patients after heart transplantation received 30 mg pamidronate intravenously every 3 months, combined with 1000 mg calcium and 1000 IU vitamin D per day. The median time interval between transplantation and start of pamidronate treatment was 1.9 years in cardiac patients and 2.3 years in liver patients. Lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS BMD) and femoral neck BMD (FN BMD) were measured before and every 6 months after pamidronate therapy was initiated. Spinal radiographs were performed annually. Biochemical markers of bone metabolism were determined every 3 months, immediately before pamidronate administration. From a previous observational study, 58 patients treated only with calcium and vitamin D were matched for age, sex, pretransplantation LS BMD and time interval between transplantation and the first pamidronate treatment. In the pamidronate-treated patients, the mean increase in LS BMD adjusted for baseline values amounted to 0.080 +/- 0.038 g/cm(2) (8.6 +/- 4.0 %) after 1 year and 0.091 +/- 0.058 g/cm(2) (10.4 +/- 6.1%) after 2 years compared with 0.001 +/- 0.037 g/cm(2) (0.26 +/- 4.0%) after 1 year and 0.015 +/- 0.057 g/cm(2) (1.8 +/- 6.0%) after 2 years in the historical control group (absolute LS BMD changes pamidronate group vs historical group p < 0.0001 after 1 and 2 years). The changes of FN BMD were 0.024 +/- 0.043 g/cm(2) (3.2 +/- 6.1%) after 1 year and 0.046 +/- 0.052 g/cm(2) (7.0 +/- 6.1%) after 2 years in the pamidronate group compared with -0.012 +/- 0.043 g/cm(2) (-1.6 +/- 6.1%) after 1 year and -0.013 +/- 0.052 g/cm(2) (-1.1 +/- 6.1%) after 2 years in the historical control group (absolute FN BMD changes pamidronate group vs historical group p = 0.003 after 1 year and p = 0.001 after 2 years). From a total of 287 application cycles of pamidronate treatment, no severe side effects were observed and non-severe side effects were seen in only 39 cycles (13.6%). We conclude that cyclic intravenous pamidronate treatment is beneficial to patients with low bone mass or osteoporotic fractures following transplant, even when not immediately initiated.

Frequency and predictors of osteoporotic fractures after cardiac or liver transplantation: a follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis and related fractures are a major complication after organ transplantation. The aim of this study was to find out the frequency and predictors of osteoporotic fractures after cardiac or liver transplantation. METHODS: 235 consecutive patients who had a cardiac transplant (n=105; 88 men, 17 women) or a liver transplant (130; 75 men, 55 women) were followed. Vertebral fractures were assessed by a standardised analysis of spinal radiographs before and annually after transplantation. Clinical and non-vertebral fracture data were noted from hospital records. FINDINGS: In the first and second years after transplantation, the proportion of patients (Kaplan-Meier estimates) who had at least one vertebral fracture was slightly higher in the cardiac group (first year 21%, second year 27%) than in the liver group (first year 14%, second year 21%). In the third and fourth years, one third of patients from both groups had had one or more vertebral fractures. Non-vertebral fractures occurred in nine patients (7%) after liver transplantation and avascular necrosis of the hip head in three patients (3%) after cardiac transplantation. In both groups, no dose-dependent effect of immunosuppressive therapy on fracture development could be identified. Independent predictors assessed by multivariate analysis were age (hazard ratio [95% CI] increase of 5 years, 1.71 [1.1-2.7]) and lumbar bone-mineral density (decrease of 1 SD t score, 1.97 [1.2-3.2]) in cardiac transplantation patients, and vertebral fractures before transplantation (6.07 [1.7-21.7]) in the liver group. INTERPRETATION: The high frequency of osteoporotic fractures in the 2 years after transplantation and the limitations of reliable fracture-risk predictions, show the need to investigate preventive therapies.