Treatment of lymphangiomas by means of sclerotherapy with OK-432 (Picibanil®) is safe and effective - A retrospective case series.

Introduction: Congenital cystic lymphangiomas (CCL) or lymphatic malformations (LMs) are benign malformations due to a developmental disorder of lymphatic vessels. Besides surgical excision, sclerosant therapy of these lesions by intracavitary injection of OK-432 (Picibanil®), a lyophilized mixture of group A Streptococcus pyogenes, is a common therapeutical option. Methods: In a single center retrospective study we analyzed 37 consecutive patients (30 children, 3 adolescents and 4 adults) who were diagnosed with lymphangioma and subsequently treated with OK-432 (Picibanil®) in a general hospital between October 2000 and November 2021. Results: The median follow-up period was 2.5 months (range 0.7-56.7 months). The lymphangiomas were localized in the head and neck region (n = 25), the thorax/abdomen (n = 6) and extremities (n = 6). The majority of patients had 1 injection with OK-432 (n = 28), five patients had 2 injections, three patients had 3 injections and one patient had more than 3 injections. The most common complications were swelling (89%), fever (81%), redness at the injection site (81%) and pain (73%). The response to therapy was excellent or good in 32 patients (86.4%), 2 patients had a medium response and 3 patients did not show any response. The clinical reaction after the instillation of OK-432 is not predictive for the quality of outcome. Conclusion: The application of Picibanil is safe and without serious side effects. Parents and patients prefer local sclerotherapy versus surgery as it has less complications. We therefore suggest that Picibanil sclerotherapy should be the first-line treatment for macrocystic and mixed type lymphangiomas.

[Merging different biobanks under one roof : Benefits and constraints on the way to a centralized biobank using the example of the BMBH]. / Alle unter einem Dach : Erfolge und Herausforderungen auf dem Weg zu einer zentralisierten Biobank am Beispiel der BMBH.

Founded in 1386, Heidelberg University is Germany's oldest and one of Europe's most reputable universities. As a scientific hub in Germany, Heidelberg is home to several internationally renowned medical research facilities that have an enormous demand for biomaterial samples and data-especially in the field of translational and cancer research.The main objective of the BMBF-funded project "BioMaterialBank Heidelberg" (BMBH) was the harmonization of local biobanking under the same administrative roof through the implementation of common and standardized project, data, and quality management procedures.In the very beginning, existing structures and processes of the participating biobanks in Heidelberg were identified and a common administrative structure with central representatives for IT and quality management (QM) was established to coordinate all BMBH activities.Over time, implementation of consented structures and processes took place, also revealing organizational challenges that had to be solved concerning, for example, differences in sample handling and the definition of consistent access regulations.We will discuss below these challenges as well as the opportunities of building a centralized biobank and show how issues can be resolved using the example of the BMBH.

[Requirements for a cross-location biobank IT infrastructure : Survey of stakeholder input on the establishment of a biobank network of the German Biobank Alliance (GBA)]. / Anforderungen an eine standortübergreifende Biobanken-IT-Infrastruktur : Erhebung des Stakeholderinputs zum Aufbau eines Biobankennetzwerks der German Biobank Alliance (GBA).

BACKGROUND: The large number of biobanks within Germany results in a high degree of heterogeneity with regard to the IT components used at the respective locations. Within the German Biobank Alliance (GBA), 13 biobanks implement harmonized processes for the provision of biomaterial and accompanying data. OBJECTIVES: The networking of the individual biobanks and the associated harmonisation of the IT infrastructure should facilitate access to biomaterial and related clinical data. METHODS: For this purpose, the relevant target groups were first identified in order to determine their requirements for IT solutions to be developed in a workshop. RESULTS: Of the seven identified interest groups, three were initially invited to a first round of discussions. The stakeholder input expressed resulted in a catalogue of requirements with regard to IT support for (i) a sample and data request, (ii) the handling of patient consent and inclusion, and (iii) the subsequent evaluation of the sample and data request. CONCLUSIONS: The next step is to design the IT solutions as prototypes based on these requirements. In parallel, further user groups are being surveyed in order to be able to further concretise the specifications for development.

Improvement of islet graft function using liraglutide is correlated with its anti-inflammatory properties.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Liraglutide improves the metabolic control of diabetic animals after islet transplantation. However, the mechanisms underlying this effect remain unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative properties of liraglutide on rat pancreatic islets in vitro and in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In vitro, rat islets were incubated with 10 µmol·L-1 liraglutide for 12 and 24 h. Islet viability functionality was assessed. The anti-inflammatory properties of liraglutide were evaluated by measuring CCL2, IL-6 and IL-10 secretion and macrophage chemotaxis. The anti-oxidative effect of liraglutide was evaluated by measuring intracellular ROS and the total anti-oxidative capacity. In vivo, 1000 islets were cultured for 24 h with or without liraglutide and then transplanted into the liver of streptozotocin-induced diabetic Lewis rats with or without injections of liraglutide. Effects of liraglutide on metabolic control were evaluated for 1 month. KEY RESULTS: Islet viability and function were preserved and enhanced with liraglutide treatment. Liraglutide decreased CCL2 and IL-6 secretion and macrophage activation after 12 h of culture, while IL-10 secretion was unchanged. However, intracellular levels of ROS were increased with liraglutide treatment at 12 h. This result was correlated with an increase of anti-oxidative capacity. In vivo, liraglutide decreased macrophage infiltration and reduced fasting blood glucose in transplanted rats. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The beneficial effects of liraglutide on pancreatic islets appear to be linked to its anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative properties. These findings indicated that analogues of glucagon-like peptide-1 could be used to improve graft survival.

Role of islet culture on angiogenic and inflammatory mechanisms.

Early events hampering islet engraftment may relate to instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR) and to insufficient islet revascularization inducing ß-cell death. We evaluated the influence of time of culture on angiogenic and inflammatory cellular mechanisms in islet loss in vitro. Rat pancreatic islets cultured for 0, 12, 24, and 48 hours were assessed for functionality using glucose stimulation tests and identification of signaling pathways using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) arrays. Islet functionality decreased significantly immediately. Index of stimulation (IS) was decreased to 2.29 ± 1.05 after 48 hours of culture versus 18.47 ± 4.84 at 0 hours (P < .001). Gene expression studies at 12 hours of culture showed significant overexpression of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines--interleukin (IL)-6 884.22 ± 282.58 (P < .001) and Cxcl-1 448.09 ± 196.05-fold change (P < .01). Moreover, islets exhibited significant under-expression after 48 hours of genes encoding angiogenic growth factors, such as epidermal growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1, a major protein involved in angiogenesis: 0.07 ± 0.02, 0.11 ± 0.08 (P < .001), and 0.17 ± 0.15-fold change (P < .01) respectively. Moreover, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1, an inhibitor of metallopeptidase, was significantly more over-expressed, namely 54.58 ± 18.08 at 12 hours of culture versus 0.93 ± 0.15/fold change at 0 hours. This study revealed current culture conditions to be deleterious for islet engraftment, possibly due to expression of angiogenic genes and proinflamatory genes during culture.